Why get underdrive pulleys instead of non-underdrive.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2005, 08:02 AM
  #1  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why get underdrive pulleys instead of non-underdrive.

So i was curious, when replacing your crank pulley, i assume the power gains come from the differance in weight between the stock crank pulley and the lighter crank pulley. If the power gains come from less weight, why get the smaller, underdrive pulley if it has possible negative affects. Why not just get the same size pulley, but lighter and reap the benefits of the weight loss?

I have read tons of posts, i already know some people say the underdrive pulley doesnt negativley affect your car and some people say it does, so i am not asking that, just the reasoning behind getting the smaller underdrive pulley over just the lighter same size pulley.
Old 08-18-2005, 08:59 AM
  #2  
I need FI
 
berny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'd like to know too!
Old 08-18-2005, 10:50 AM
  #3  
Old&CnL
 
us000011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Carolina
Age: 78
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UR says you gain 15% hp more above and beyond the weight change, by driving your AC, power steering, and alternator at a lower speed- makes sense, because you exert greater leverage on the accessories, ie less power drain.

Love my pulley!!
Old 08-18-2005, 11:24 AM
  #4  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if you gain maybe 10 hp at the most from the standard lighter crank pulley, you might get 11hp by using the underdrive pulley. I think its a much more wise idea to not gain 1 hp and have absolutley no risk of messing up anything electrical or air conditioning related by underdriving your accessories, nor will you have that restriction on running additional electrical items in your car with the underdrive pulley.

I guess its up to the user, are you willing to increase your output by 1 measly horsepower for changing something like speed at which your accessories run, which could or could not have a problematic long term effect on your accessories. The possible risk definatly out weighs the 1hp benefit.
Old 08-18-2005, 12:24 PM
  #5  
Not Asian
 
phipark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: St. Louis
Age: 45
Posts: 13,409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by zoltanh
So if you gain maybe 10 hp at the most from the standard lighter crank pulley, you might get 11hp by using the underdrive pulley. I think its a much more wise idea to not gain 1 hp and have absolutley no risk of messing up anything electrical or air conditioning related by underdriving your accessories, nor will you have that restriction on running additional electrical items in your car with the underdrive pulley.

I guess its up to the user, are you willing to increase your output by 1 measly horsepower for changing something like speed at which your accessories run, which could or could not have a problematic long term effect on your accessories. The possible risk definatly out weighs the 1hp benefit.
which is why I went with the stock diameter UR pulley.

Just to note, the whp/tq numbers for the UR pulley are from the underdrive crank pulley.
Old 08-18-2005, 12:45 PM
  #6  
I need FI
 
berny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phipark
which is why I went with the stock diameter UR pulley.

Just to note, the whp/tq numbers for the UR pulley are from the underdrive crank pulley.
yeah okay, but is it similar numbers for the stock diameter one as well?
Old 08-18-2005, 12:58 PM
  #7  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by berny
yeah okay, but is it similar numbers for the stock diameter one as well?
read post #3 and #4
Old 08-18-2005, 01:04 PM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok.ummm . you answered your own question..

your avatar reminds me of Mikey Tuttel from Orange County Choppers..
Old 08-18-2005, 01:14 PM
  #9  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smitty
your avatar reminds me of Mikey Tuttel from Orange County Choppers..
Its some guy that was selling a mind reading machine on ebay...
I thought it was halarious.
Old 08-18-2005, 01:15 PM
  #10  
Suzuka Master
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well you must of bid, won and used it, because it read your mind....
Old 08-18-2005, 01:21 PM
  #11  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smitty
well you must of bid, won and used it, because it read your mind....
I guess i just didnt understand the logic in reducing the speed of your accessories from stock to gain 1hp. Plus i am not an eleet mechanic so i didnt know if there is some alterior motive to underdrive your accessories besides the 1 hp gain. Maybe most people dont know that underdriving only gives you 1 hp. This might sway people to get the standard size pulley instead of underdrive, cause thats what i am going to do.
Old 08-18-2005, 01:22 PM
  #12  
I need FI
 
berny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i still dont understand how you can gain hp with the stock diameter size crank pulley...............
Old 08-18-2005, 01:24 PM
  #13  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by berny
i still dont understand how you can gain hp with the stock diameter size crank pulley...............
because the unorthodox pulley is like 6 pounds lighter then the stock pulley
Old 08-18-2005, 01:25 PM
  #14  
Suzuka Master
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by berny
i still dont understand how you can gain hp with the stock diameter size crank pulley...............



inertia..... mass// weight

example... why do people buy light weight rims???.. think about it...

This is why I find it SO funny when these idiots buy 24 inch rims and put them on their SUV and DO NOT upgrade the brake calipers/pads & rotors.. total disaster waiting to happen....
Old 08-18-2005, 01:31 PM
  #15  
Pro
 
robeaneee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 909 foo
Age: 39
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would think smaller radius would have a greater effect..seeing as how moment of inertia for any object involves mass x radius squared. but that's purely from a physical standpoint..i dunno much about pulleys on the car
Old 08-18-2005, 01:36 PM
  #16  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correction, our stock pulley is 8.9 pounds, unorthodox is 2.0 pounds so you lose 6.9 pounds of weight on the crank. Unorthodox claims 2.7hp per pound lost from the crank, so theoreticly you should gain 18.63 hp from the lighter crank pulley.

If unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs includes underdriving then you would gain 15.8hp with the stock size unorthodox crank pulley and you would gain 18.63 on the underdrive unorthodox crank pulley. I am sure their 2.7hp/lbs is over exagerated, but you get the idea.
Old 08-18-2005, 01:39 PM
  #17  
I need FI
 
berny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoltanh
Correction, our stock pulley is 8.9 pounds, unorthodox is 2.0 pounds so you lose 6.9 pounds of weight on the crank. Unorthodox claims 2.7hp per pound lost from the crank, so theoreticly you should gain 18.63 hp from the lighter crank pulley.

If unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs includes underdriving then you would gain 15.8hp with the stock size unorthodox crank pulley and you would gain 18.63 on the underdrive unorthodox crank pulley. I am sure their 2.7hp/lbs is over exagerated, but you get the idea.
is it your helmet that helped you figure that one out?
Old 08-18-2005, 01:59 PM
  #18  
Suzuka Master
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by berny
is it your helmet that helped you figure that one out?

i thought it was pretty good info to have....

thanks Mikey Tuttel.
Old 08-18-2005, 02:05 PM
  #19  
I need FI
 
berny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smitty
i thought it was pretty good info to have....

thanks Mikey Tuttel.
I agree
Old 08-18-2005, 02:56 PM
  #20  
Never had a clean run
 
rtatsutani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Honolulu
Age: 46
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoltanh
Correction, our stock pulley is 8.9 pounds, unorthodox is 2.0 pounds so you lose 6.9 pounds of weight on the crank. Unorthodox claims 2.7hp per pound lost from the crank, so theoreticly you should gain 18.63 hp from the lighter crank pulley.

If unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs includes underdriving then you would gain 15.8hp with the stock size unorthodox crank pulley and you would gain 18.63 on the underdrive unorthodox crank pulley. I am sure their 2.7hp/lbs is over exagerated, but you get the idea.
Unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs does not include underdriving but rather from just the weight loss alone which account for only 85% of the gains. You have to add the additional 15% that you get from underdriving which would bring the total HP to 21.91 when underdriving giving you a whopping 3.28 hp difference. GIVEN THEIR INFLATED NUMBERS...
Old 08-18-2005, 03:10 PM
  #21  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rtatsutani
Unorthodox's 2.7 hp/lbs does not include underdriving but rather from just the weight loss alone which account for only 85% of the gains. You have to add the additional 15% that you get from underdriving which would bring the total HP to 21.91 when underdriving giving you a whopping 3.28 hp difference. GIVEN THEIR INFLATED NUMBERS...
Actually, 18.63hp * 1.15 ~ 21.42hp and 21.42hp - 18.63hp = 2.79hp so theoreticly, you only get 2.79 hp by underdriving, and im sure they get the 2.7hp/lbs with the a/c off and only thing running is the engine. So realisticlly your probably only looking at 1hp or less gained with underdriving.
Old 08-18-2005, 03:40 PM
  #22  
Intermediate
 
ATownTXType-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 42
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aftermarket pulleys are a smaller for crank and larger for accesories diameter across. Think of a moutain bike and the different size teeth. The larger the sprocket, the easier to turn.

The con of pulleies is spinning your accessories slower, less amperage from alt.
Old 08-18-2005, 03:41 PM
  #23  
Intermediate
 
ATownTXType-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 42
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
Old 08-18-2005, 03:44 PM
  #24  
Suzuka Master
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...

u sure about that?
Old 08-18-2005, 03:58 PM
  #25  
I need FI
 
berny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats what I thought...

Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
Old 08-18-2005, 04:28 PM
  #26  
Relax!
 
6MTpromises's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frederick/Baltimore, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
huh?
Old 08-18-2005, 04:29 PM
  #27  
Relax!
 
6MTpromises's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frederick/Baltimore, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
Old 08-18-2005, 04:39 PM
  #28  
o1s
Drifting
 
o1s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tallahassee Fl.
Age: 43
Posts: 3,186
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
uh...i'm all confused. math never was my strong point. what next theories of universe expansion?
Old 08-18-2005, 04:43 PM
  #29  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATownTXType-S
That is where the horsepower gains are, not in weight...
Not to be a dick, but can you NOT give people TOTALY INCORRECT information!?
Everyone please ignore his post and continue reading.
Old 08-18-2005, 06:22 PM
  #30  
Never had a clean run
 
rtatsutani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Honolulu
Age: 46
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoltanh
Actually, 18.63hp * 1.15 ~ 21.42hp and 21.42hp - 18.63hp = 2.79hp so theoreticly, you only get 2.79 hp by underdriving, and im sure they get the 2.7hp/lbs with the a/c off and only thing running is the engine. So realisticlly your probably only looking at 1hp or less gained with underdriving.
Huh, you got the equation wrong? I used this equation. 85/100 = 18.63/x
18.63 being 85% of the gains and X being the 100% equivalent of 18.63.

Let's not get too technical over 10ths of a hp, but seriously, all in all, if you're worried, don't underdrive, not worth the extra ~1-3 hp. If you're not worried and have tons of friends who've had no problem, underdrive the sucker!

Installing mine next week (underdrive that is) I'll definitely let you guys know if I run into problems!
Old 08-19-2005, 07:23 PM
  #31  
Intermediate
 
ATownTXType-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 42
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lighter rotating mass mey give you some tourque, but not horsepower. It would be the equivalent of lighter flywheel weight.

Thinking about it, the flywheel may be bigger on underdrive pulleys...with smaller accessory pulleys
Old 08-22-2005, 07:17 AM
  #32  
Old&CnL
 
us000011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Carolina
Age: 78
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am running the UR underdrive pulley with no problems and improved performance. For various dynamometer graphs showing HP and torque gains, check their website(unorthodox racing). You may debate their accuracy, but in every case you apparently gain both with the underdrive pulley. Also, I have found their people to to helpful and responsive.
Old 08-22-2005, 08:42 AM
  #33  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
here's the real answer...the stock size UR is new....they only developed it for the super charger guys...but another benefit of the under drive s smaller diameter is moving the rotational mass inward also increase it's weight loss effect...
Old 08-22-2005, 09:57 AM
  #34  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Excelerate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Age: 43
Posts: 9,877
Received 624 Likes on 478 Posts
UR makes it underdrives to make power by not only lightening their weight but also by underdriving the accessories so that there is less parasitic drag. Therefore the lighter weight and the reduced drag created from running the accessories at peak creates more hp. Now the UR Ultra S Underdrive crank pulley will not affect anything adversely if you do not have a supercharger or a stereo system over 600 watts RMS.

- If you run the Ultra S underdrive pulley and your car is supercharged you could be suffering from a loss of boost (less psi) b/c the accessories are underdriven and a S/C runs off the belts.

- With a car with a large stereo system (over 600 watts RMS) there is a large draw on the alternator and electrical system. So your lights could dim somewhat b/c there is such a large amount of electrical current needed to run the stereo system and all the other accessories.

You do not need the Ultra Sc 12 Volt pulley designed for the stereo guys and the S/Ced guys. However if you want it is your choice.
Old 08-22-2005, 10:34 AM
  #35  
says "hello to my TLX".
 
Sun Diego CL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 5,788
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
so to get the gains mentioned above, you have to buy only the Ultra S underdrive crank pulley, the underdrive pulley set, or all of these together?
Old 08-22-2005, 10:48 AM
  #36  
Intermediate
 
ATownTXType-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 42
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Horsepower is created through allowing air/gas mixture into the motor and exhausting that mixture.

Tourque is the ability/quickness of creating that horsepower. (i.e. the ease of the motor creating creating hosrepower)
Old 08-22-2005, 10:52 AM
  #37  
says "hello to my TLX".
 
Sun Diego CL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 5,788
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
yes, that is true. but it is also true that horsepower is unleashed by allowing more flow or decreasing resistance in many parts of the engine where otherwise you can't allow to happen cos of stock parts.
Old 08-22-2005, 11:41 AM
  #38  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
there is no such thing as hp...it is a calculation derived from torque
Old 08-22-2005, 11:55 AM
  #39  
I need a Hybrid CL-S
Thread Starter
 
zoltanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 43
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The bottom line is this:
The unorthodox underdrive pullies will give you 15% more horsepower then the unorthodox same size pullies, which as mentioned before equals 1-2 more horsepower.
Old 08-22-2005, 12:54 PM
  #40  
Suzuka Master
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


u guys R pissing off Mikey Tuttel.....

I know you knew the answer, so I do not know why you put yourself through 2 pages of torture..


Quick Reply: Why get underdrive pulleys instead of non-underdrive.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.