What is so great about the type S?
What is so great about the type S?
So when I was shopping for a car, I definetly wanted something that will not need much upgrades, so I picked type s after reading that is has sport suspension, sport oriented tires, big engine and also a nice audio system, among other things. However, here is what I am hearing from all of you guys and please correct me if I am wrong:
The suspension sucks, the brakes suck, the Bose Blows and the engine looses too much power to the wheels because of the shitty auto-tranny. The 17 wheels need to be replaced and tires are not grippy enough. Yes these are very terminal statements, but I am trying to make a point.
So here is the question? Did Acura just not put enough sport emphasis into this car? Is this just an accord with a bigger engine and stiffer suspension and better interior? Is it because Acura did not expect this car to gain such popularity with a younger crowd which wants stiffer suspension, big tires, better brakes? Or is just simply to each his own and economies of scale, meaning Acura could not keep the price low enough and put the "good" stuff into it. And what is the wrong with the Blows system anyway. I think its very nice and crispy clear even at the max, only needs base.
I am just trying to decide whether this car really needs upgrades to suspension, tires, etc. or is it mostly car guys needing something to do to their cars to be diffirent while keeping busy.
------------------
---------------------
'01 Satin Silver w/Black, Navi_less, spoiler, mud guards, wind deflector.
Tint 15%, Polarqs M6s, Things to come: sub, air kit (if exists), maybe headers, CAI, and spring/sway combo.
The suspension sucks, the brakes suck, the Bose Blows and the engine looses too much power to the wheels because of the shitty auto-tranny. The 17 wheels need to be replaced and tires are not grippy enough. Yes these are very terminal statements, but I am trying to make a point.
So here is the question? Did Acura just not put enough sport emphasis into this car? Is this just an accord with a bigger engine and stiffer suspension and better interior? Is it because Acura did not expect this car to gain such popularity with a younger crowd which wants stiffer suspension, big tires, better brakes? Or is just simply to each his own and economies of scale, meaning Acura could not keep the price low enough and put the "good" stuff into it. And what is the wrong with the Blows system anyway. I think its very nice and crispy clear even at the max, only needs base.
I am just trying to decide whether this car really needs upgrades to suspension, tires, etc. or is it mostly car guys needing something to do to their cars to be diffirent while keeping busy.
------------------
---------------------
'01 Satin Silver w/Black, Navi_less, spoiler, mud guards, wind deflector.
Tint 15%, Polarqs M6s, Things to come: sub, air kit (if exists), maybe headers, CAI, and spring/sway combo.
o
\|/
|
/ \
*****
*----**
*------**
*--------**
*************
there's you're soapbox ... now climb the f*ck down ...
) ... and everybody, enjoy your damn car 
------------------
Black 2001 Type S
*Eibach Pro-Kit (Waiting to be installed)
*Xephyr Cold Air Intake
*PIAA 19169 Road Lamps
*Acura Winter Mats
*Mudguards
*Mobile 1 Synthetic
*Rockford 500a2 [FOR SALE]
*Pioneer 12" @ 400w (x2) [FOR SALE]
*77237-SOK-A02 (Holder Assembly)
---Still 2 rims not scratched---
\|/
|
/ \
*****
*----**
*------**
*--------**
*************
there's you're soapbox ... now climb the f*ck down ...
) ... and everybody, enjoy your damn car 
------------------
Black 2001 Type S
*Eibach Pro-Kit (Waiting to be installed)
*Xephyr Cold Air Intake
*PIAA 19169 Road Lamps
*Acura Winter Mats
*Mudguards
*Mobile 1 Synthetic
*Rockford 500a2 [FOR SALE]
*Pioneer 12" @ 400w (x2) [FOR SALE]
*77237-SOK-A02 (Holder Assembly)
---Still 2 rims not scratched---
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by fbazakos:
o
\|/
|
/ \
*****
*----**
*------**
*--------**
*************
there's you're soapbox ... now climb the f*ck down ...
) ... and everybody, enjoy your damn car 
</font>
o
\|/
|
/ \
*****
*----**
*------**
*--------**
*************
there's you're soapbox ... now climb the f*ck down ...
) ... and everybody, enjoy your damn car 
</font>

------------------
---------------------
'01 Satin Silver w/Black, Navi_less, spoiler, mud guards, wind deflector.
Tint 15%, Polarqs M6s, Things to come: sub, air kit (if exists), maybe headers, CAI, and spring/sway combo.
[This message has been edited by Big_Pimp's_Type_S (edited 03-22-2001).]
it doesnt need to many upgrades if u like driving around and doin nothing. but myself likes to hall even more ass, so i need the upgrades. I havent gotten suspension b/c i dont race on the track, but it would be nice to have. It is a great car stock, i dont know about the Bose, i like it. the speakers are good. maybe the deck sux but thats ok. thats about all i have to say. 
------------------
Nick
01' Cl-S Silver/ Black W/ Navi and Spoiler
V-1 Radar Hard Wired, Limo Tint all around
Comptech Headers, Sways, and AEM CAI
I've got one of the CLS's from the fast batch.
Lead Foot!

------------------
Nick
01' Cl-S Silver/ Black W/ Navi and Spoiler
V-1 Radar Hard Wired, Limo Tint all around
Comptech Headers, Sways, and AEM CAI
I've got one of the CLS's from the fast batch.
Lead Foot!
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Big_Pimp's_Type_S:
So when I was shopping for a car, I definetly wanted something that will not need much upgrades, so I picked type s after reading that is has sport suspension, sport oriented tires, big engine and also a nice audio system, among other things. However, here is what I am hearing from all of you guys and please correct me if I am wrong:
The suspension sucks, the brakes suck, the Bose Blows and the engine looses too much power to the wheels because of the shitty auto-tranny. The 17 wheels need to be replaced and tires are not grippy enough. Yes these are very terminal statements, but I am trying to make a point.
So here is the question? Did Acura just not put enough sport emphasis into this car? Is this just an accord with a bigger engine and stiffer suspension and better interior? Is it because Acura did not expect this car to gain such popularity with a younger crowd which wants stiffer suspension, big tires, better brakes? Or is just simply to each his own and economies of scale, meaning Acura could not keep the price low enough and put the "good" stuff into it. And what is the wrong with the Blows system anyway. I think its very nice and crispy clear even at the max, only needs base.
I am just trying to decide whether this car really needs upgrades to suspension, tires, etc. or is it mostly car guys needing something to do to their cars to be diffirent while keeping busy.
</font>
So when I was shopping for a car, I definetly wanted something that will not need much upgrades, so I picked type s after reading that is has sport suspension, sport oriented tires, big engine and also a nice audio system, among other things. However, here is what I am hearing from all of you guys and please correct me if I am wrong:
The suspension sucks, the brakes suck, the Bose Blows and the engine looses too much power to the wheels because of the shitty auto-tranny. The 17 wheels need to be replaced and tires are not grippy enough. Yes these are very terminal statements, but I am trying to make a point.
So here is the question? Did Acura just not put enough sport emphasis into this car? Is this just an accord with a bigger engine and stiffer suspension and better interior? Is it because Acura did not expect this car to gain such popularity with a younger crowd which wants stiffer suspension, big tires, better brakes? Or is just simply to each his own and economies of scale, meaning Acura could not keep the price low enough and put the "good" stuff into it. And what is the wrong with the Blows system anyway. I think its very nice and crispy clear even at the max, only needs base.
I am just trying to decide whether this car really needs upgrades to suspension, tires, etc. or is it mostly car guys needing something to do to their cars to be diffirent while keeping busy.
</font>
------------------
The #1 Corolla errr I mean IS300 Killer.
MODS: Acura Stickers, Mentally Unstable Driver. Total Points count is 8 only 3 to go before I am back in court
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by eclipse23:
I love this car as a daily driver and I don't agree with 90% of what you have said. If I wanted a racer I would have bought an ITR not even a 330xi or an IS300.
</font>
I love this car as a daily driver and I don't agree with 90% of what you have said. If I wanted a racer I would have bought an ITR not even a 330xi or an IS300.
</font>
------------------
---------------------
'01 Satin Silver w/Black, Navi_less, spoiler, mud guards, wind deflector.
Tint 15%, Polarqs M6s, Things to come: sub, air kit (if exists), maybe headers, CAI, and spring/sway combo.
Trending Topics
I love my Accord Coupe TypeS ;-)
------------------
2001 Acura 3.2 CL Type-S
Comptech Springs
Apexi V-AFC
AEM CAI
------------------
2001 Acura 3.2 CL Type-S
Comptech Springs
Apexi V-AFC
AEM CAI
You also have to consider the source. 9/10 of the people who frequent this board would be classified as ehthusiasts. By nature enthusiasts are never satisifed and desire to make the breed better. Overall the CL(S) exceeds most of its owners expectations, but the enthusiasts modify the car to elevate it to their expectations. So, when you read these posts just consider the source!
I agree that what you have at this group is a bunch of guys who would upgrade anything they bought. There's no way a company like Acura is going to produce a car that's as low & as stiff as *most* of the guys who contribute to this forum want it. They're making a car that has to appeal to as wide an audience as possible, so there obviously have to be some compromises for comfort, driveability, economy, reliability, etc.
The *only* thing I think Acura should have done is offer the car with a manual trans (6 speed ideally), apart from that I think the performance, handling, comfort, & luxury features are more than adequate for a car at it's price. If you want to sacrifice ride comfort by installing shorter, stiffer springs & lower profile tires that option's available to you, and that's great, but don't think that because a lot of the folks at this forum lean toward customization & performance that there's anything inherently wrong with the CL-S.
My 2 cents (CDN) worth,
SK
PS. I also agree that the Audio system sounds just fine :-).
------------------
2001 Sundance Gold Type S
The *only* thing I think Acura should have done is offer the car with a manual trans (6 speed ideally), apart from that I think the performance, handling, comfort, & luxury features are more than adequate for a car at it's price. If you want to sacrifice ride comfort by installing shorter, stiffer springs & lower profile tires that option's available to you, and that's great, but don't think that because a lot of the folks at this forum lean toward customization & performance that there's anything inherently wrong with the CL-S.
My 2 cents (CDN) worth,
SK
PS. I also agree that the Audio system sounds just fine :-).
------------------
2001 Sundance Gold Type S
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
I am just looking for an explanation of why we as a collective believe that certain upgrades need to be done. However, the S is the best car on the market for the money, bar none.
[/B]</font>
I am just looking for an explanation of why we as a collective believe that certain upgrades need to be done. However, the S is the best car on the market for the money, bar none.
[/B]</font>
[This message has been edited by Stravis (edited 03-22-2001).]
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
Did Acura just not put enough sport emphasis into this car? </font>
Did Acura just not put enough sport emphasis into this car? </font>
In a word, No. Not at least for a lot of people.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
Is this just an accord with a bigger engine and stiffer suspension and better interior?
</font>
Is this just an accord with a bigger engine and stiffer suspension and better interior?
</font>
In a word, Yes. With more luxury features too.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
Is it because Acura did not expect this car to gain such popularity with a younger crowd which wants stiffer suspension, big tires, better brakes?
</font>
Is it because Acura did not expect this car to gain such popularity with a younger crowd which wants stiffer suspension, big tires, better brakes?
</font>
No, they just didn't design this car for the younger crowd and I don't think this car has much popularity with the younger crowd. This forum is definitely not representative of most '01 CL buyers. Every time I see a CL, there is a baby-boomer driving it - right where the target market is!
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
Or is just simply to each his own and economies of scale, meaning Acura could not keep the price low enough and put the "good" stuff into it.
</font>
Or is just simply to each his own and economies of scale, meaning Acura could not keep the price low enough and put the "good" stuff into it.
</font>
Economies of scale has a lot to do with the price. Acura cheaped out in some ways, but the car is still very good and a very good value. No way in hell is a 330Ci worth $10K more similary equipped.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
And what is the wrong with the Blows system anyway. I think its very nice and crispy clear even at the max, only needs base.
</font>
And what is the wrong with the Blows system anyway. I think its very nice and crispy clear even at the max, only needs base.
</font>
It's all in what you're used to. If you've ever heard a great car stereo, you'd think this one sucked too. The Blowz is okay for my tastes too, but I recognize that it could be MUCH higher quality.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
I am just trying to decide whether this car really needs upgrades to suspension, tires, etc. or is it mostly car guys needing something to do to their cars to be diffirent while keeping busy.
</font>
I am just trying to decide whether this car really needs upgrades to suspension, tires, etc. or is it mostly car guys needing something to do to their cars to be diffirent while keeping busy.
</font>
It all depends upon the person. I chose to make my car a little more sporty than the way Acura designed it. I don't want a BMW or an IS300. The value is just not there for me. Plus I don't particularly care for the styling on either car. I have no problems with trying to make this car something it wasn't designed to be. I don't have to be an engineer to make my car suit my needs a little better.
just my .02
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by bone_stock:
You also have to consider the source. 9/10 of the people who frequent this board would be classified as ehthusiasts. By nature enthusiasts are never satisifed and desire to make the breed better. Overall the CL(S) exceeds most of its owners expectations, but the enthusiasts modify the car to elevate it to their expectations. So, when you read these posts just consider the source!</font>
You also have to consider the source. 9/10 of the people who frequent this board would be classified as ehthusiasts. By nature enthusiasts are never satisifed and desire to make the breed better. Overall the CL(S) exceeds most of its owners expectations, but the enthusiasts modify the car to elevate it to their expectations. So, when you read these posts just consider the source!</font>
------------------
CL-S
White/Parchment
Gold Emblems
Mud Guards / Wheel Locks
Spoiler
Winter Floor Mats
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Stravis:
And it's perfectly fine to be upset that if you think you didn't get your money's worth. But I doubt many people will say that didn't get a lot of bang for their buck with te CL-S</font>
And it's perfectly fine to be upset that if you think you didn't get your money's worth. But I doubt many people will say that didn't get a lot of bang for their buck with te CL-S</font>
However, when I bought this car, I was really under impression that nothing needs to be done to it, but of course I was an acura-cl.com virgin back then
. I am extatic that this board opened my eyes to various possibilities. No pun intended.------------------
---------------------
'01 Satin Silver w/Black, Navi_less, spoiler, mud guards, wind deflector.
Tint 15%, Polarqs M6s, Things to come: sub, air kit (if exists), maybe headers, CAI, and spring/sway combo.
did you even test drive the car before you bought it?? yes? well then why the hell did you buy the car?? you should have gotten yourself a SPORTS car.
------------------
Black/Parch '01 CL-S no-navi, Spoiler, Visor (currently removed for winter), 35% tint, locks, PIAA19170
------------------
Black/Parch '01 CL-S no-navi, Spoiler, Visor (currently removed for winter), 35% tint, locks, PIAA19170
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by P-Man:
did you even test drive the car before you bought it?? yes? well then why the hell did you buy the car?? you should have gotten yourself a SPORTS car.
</font>
did you even test drive the car before you bought it?? yes? well then why the hell did you buy the car?? you should have gotten yourself a SPORTS car.
</font>
------------------
---------------------
'01 Satin Silver w/Black, Navi_less, spoiler, mud guards, wind deflector.
Tint 15%, Polarqs M6s, Things to come: sub, air kit (if exists), maybe headers, CAI, and spring/sway combo.
reading this board(bored) daily makes me hyper. i am perfectly happy with my stock cl-s. but i feel slow and left out after reading all the mod crap all day. i fit the demographics perfectly of the "ACURA" buyer.
the people on this board are not what acura/honda expected. this car is by far the best one for the money. if you want more,go for it. if you are happy like me, read less of this and you will remain happy.
all im saying is that there is nothing wrong with modding your car, just dont do it because you read it here.
also, most cars you will encoumter on the street are stock and you will still kick the shit out of them if you desire.
my .02
sorry its so long
------------------
01 BLK/BLK CL-S SPOILER
98 INFINITI I30T
99 MAXIMA SE
the people on this board are not what acura/honda expected. this car is by far the best one for the money. if you want more,go for it. if you are happy like me, read less of this and you will remain happy.
all im saying is that there is nothing wrong with modding your car, just dont do it because you read it here.
also, most cars you will encoumter on the street are stock and you will still kick the shit out of them if you desire.
my .02
sorry its so long
------------------
01 BLK/BLK CL-S SPOILER
98 INFINITI I30T
99 MAXIMA SE
B A N N E D
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,657
Likes: 3
From: The grande.. Riverdale NJ.. Hopefully moving to skyline village in Lincoln park NJ..yes dirty jersey
I bought the car cuz it got CLASS...
but not too much if u know what i mean?
When people see a 21 year old ( I LOOK 15)
driving a benze or bimmer, they say look at thet rich Fu^k with the silver spoon sticking outta his A$$. When they see tha ACURA they just think overpriced accord, and thats the way I like it. Dont want all the prestige and i dont wanna be summtin I aint if ya know what i mean. The car is quick enough and brakes good enough for me, wouldnt mind upgrading the suspention though!
but not too much if u know what i mean?
When people see a 21 year old ( I LOOK 15)
driving a benze or bimmer, they say look at thet rich Fu^k with the silver spoon sticking outta his A$$. When they see tha ACURA they just think overpriced accord, and thats the way I like it. Dont want all the prestige and i dont wanna be summtin I aint if ya know what i mean. The car is quick enough and brakes good enough for me, wouldnt mind upgrading the suspention though!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tman570
2G RL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
11
Jun 11, 2019 07:56 AM
sockr1
Car Parts for Sale
22
Oct 1, 2015 01:31 AM
brandnewcolony
3G TL (2004-2008)
53
Sep 12, 2015 10:39 AM






