Turbo or Supercharge?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2006, 01:29 PM
  #1  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
ryanfleming76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 39
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo or Supercharge?

What are y'alls opinions on this? I have a 2001 Acura CL Type-S!! Automatic
Old 02-12-2006, 01:39 PM
  #2  
i use the search button
 
bens cl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: san fernando valley,cali
Age: 47
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you search there are TONS of threads on this already, i have been searching for this same info and what you will get from thoes threads is well beyond what your going to hear on this thread.

Old 02-12-2006, 01:51 PM
  #3  
says "hello to my TLX".
 
Sun Diego CL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 5,788
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
do some work and do a search.

start off by thinking how much you are willing to spend (or have got for that matter)?
Old 02-12-2006, 02:43 PM
  #4  
I NEED MONEY!
 
VeeralS05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta
Age: 37
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Supercharger, your tranny can't handle the turbo... unless u trade it in for a 6speed
Old 02-12-2006, 04:32 PM
  #5  
ex 6 Speed owner :(
 
BlueCLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are a couple of turbo automatics already. You'll have a lot more options with a turbo and much higher power possibilities, but the supercharger will be SMOG legal and under warranty (possibly). Depends on your budget...
Old 02-12-2006, 04:40 PM
  #6  
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
 
MarbleGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 6,234
Received 1,192 Likes on 485 Posts
eh...i think, either way, thats too much money to spend on a car that old
Old 02-12-2006, 07:16 PM
  #7  
318whp/289wtq @ 6psi
 
blk2001tlon19s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Accokeek, Maryland
Age: 44
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VeeralS05
Supercharger, your tranny can't handle the turbo... unless u trade it in for a 6speed


Holding up on my car just fine, but then again, I don't drive the car everyday either.
Old 02-12-2006, 07:31 PM
  #8  
Posts: 1,100,980
 
Chemmech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lake Arrowhead
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having all the torque down low is nice with the S/C'er.
Old 02-13-2006, 12:37 AM
  #9  
ex 6 Speed owner :(
 
BlueCLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<--- 300wTQ @ 3,ooo RPM... I don't think torque down low is a problem with a Turbo.
Old 02-13-2006, 09:29 AM
  #10  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by VeeralS05
Supercharger, your tranny can't handle the turbo... unless u trade it in for a 6speed

Oh come on. The 3rd gear clutch pack issue has nothing to do with power. I can't say I've heard of any more SC'd or turbo'd cars going through trannys quicker. Do you research before you throw out opinions.
Old 02-13-2006, 03:34 PM
  #11  
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
CL6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Get a manual transmission because your tranny will blow harder than Old Faithful.
Old 02-13-2006, 05:00 PM
  #12  
i use the search button
 
bens cl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: san fernando valley,cali
Age: 47
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
Oh come on. The 3rd gear clutch pack issue has nothing to do with power. I can't say I've heard of any more SC'd or turbo'd cars going through trannys quicker. Do you research before you throw out opinions.

+1
Old 02-13-2006, 06:28 PM
  #13  
RN are my initials...
 
psychoRN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Age: 44
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ryanfleming76
What are y'alls opinions on this? I have a 2001 Acura CL Type-S!! Automatic
is there a budget?
Old 02-13-2006, 06:32 PM
  #14  
uu
Burning Brakes
 
uu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo is more efficient than supercharger, but cost more and take more work to install, while supercharger most likely can be a snap-on. Do a search you will find quite a few useful threads on the how-it-works on turbo and supercharger.

I would not recommend put any kind of forced induction on our CLS 5AT, the transmission is fragile as it is already.
Old 02-13-2006, 11:06 PM
  #15  
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
 
MarbleGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 6,234
Received 1,192 Likes on 485 Posts
Originally Posted by o2cls
eh...i think, either way, thats too much money to spend on a car that old
i retract my statement...if i had the money i would do one or the other
Old 02-14-2006, 09:04 AM
  #16  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by uu
I would not recommend put any kind of forced induction on our CLS 5AT, the transmission is fragile as it is already.

More fiction from the uninformed.

Let's try it again. See if you can keep up.


The 3rd gear clutch pack issue has nothing to do with power. I can't say I've heard of any more SC'd or turbo'd cars going through trannys quicker. Do you research before you throw out opinions.
Old 02-14-2006, 10:19 AM
  #17  
Three Wheelin'
 
MikeCLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA-Northern Va.
Age: 43
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont think i would ever slap a turbo or supercharger on the the auto trannies, unless i never went WOT
Old 02-14-2006, 10:59 AM
  #18  
Missing my Acura's
 
REDLINEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boston,MA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,485
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
More fiction from the uninformed.

Let's try it again. See if you can keep up.
Old 02-14-2006, 01:07 PM
  #19  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 37,115
Received 602 Likes on 419 Posts
I say supercharger unless you have a lot of cash available.
Old 02-14-2006, 02:27 PM
  #20  
uu
Burning Brakes
 
uu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
More fiction from the uninformed.

Let's try it again. See if you can keep up.
Well, I sure didn't know that. I always thought the transmission was from the Accord which was meant to handle 200 horses and more importantly 195 torque, Acura team didn't do quite a good job when picking from their parts bin.

Anyway, regardless of that, I would never turbo or supercharge my CLS 5AT. Why? Transmission is easy to fail, and when it does, the dealer is going look under the hood and going . Even if you can prove 100% that transmission failure has nothing to do with that extra 50 horse and torque, either way you are going to have loads of trouble.

Just my opinions.
Old 02-14-2006, 03:08 PM
  #21  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by uu
Well, I sure didn't know that. I always thought the transmission was from the Accord which was meant to handle 200 horses and more importantly 195 torque, Acura team didn't do quite a good job when picking from their parts bin.

Anyway, regardless of that, I would never turbo or supercharge my CLS 5AT. Why? Transmission is easy to fail, and when it does, the dealer is going look under the hood and going . Even if you can prove 100% that transmission failure has nothing to do with that extra 50 horse and torque, either way you are going to have loads of trouble.

Just my opinions.

I've know several people with the Comptech blower that have had their trannys replaced no questions asked. The dealers aren't stupid. They know why the trannys fail.
Old 02-14-2006, 07:10 PM
  #22  
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
CL6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
To suggest that increasing the horsepower of one's engine will not increase the stress that is placed on a transmission seems naive, at best. The TL transmissions, as far as I know, fail because of improper lubrication of certain gears, thus reducing the cooling. However the increased power of the engine will be turning the tranny faster. This will result in increased friction and heat which should lead to premature transmission failure.

As far as I know Comptech designs all of their products to work within Acura's warranty so I do not believe an honest Acura dealer would ever try and pin a failure on a Comptech modification.

If I am wrong about the transmission I'd sure like to see some data to support the other point.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Slow98teg
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
30
01-02-2017 09:01 AM
mvidal6
ILX
12
11-14-2015 07:43 AM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM
Joe Avesyan
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
09-29-2015 03:57 PM
81brettkeith
3G TL (2004-2008)
34
09-15-2015 06:04 PM



Quick Reply: Turbo or Supercharge?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.