Top speed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 01:35 AM
  #1  
Speedy3.2CL-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Top speed?

Car has been broken in for a while now, and I had some fun with a friend in a Maxima, well after 130 he let off, but I kept on it because the car was accelerating hard. I actually hit 150, and it was still pulling, but I got a bit scared and let off. How fast can these cars go!? I was just amazed!

It was a long 2-3 mile strech of road you could see for miles ahead of you, no traffic. 4 lanes.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 01:40 AM
  #2  
jimcol711's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,227
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
supposedly there is a fuel cut-off or something at 147 MPH...thats what acura says...
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
sidemarker's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Speedy3.2CL-S

I too live in San Antonio and last week i was headed up towards dallas and i wanted to see the cl-s top speed. my cl-s is stock and i had 2 passengers. I could only get up to 124 mph

in my old 00 accord coupe i could easily get up to that speed but the cl-s felt like it struggled pass 105 mph. Maybe its time for me to get an intake...

sidemarker
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 09:04 AM
  #4  
louisn's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Jonesboro, Arkansas
Sidemarker, you don't need an intake, you need to get your CL-S fixed. It does 140 w/o a sweat--TAKE IT IN FOR SERVICE!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 09:10 AM
  #5  
Scrib's Avatar
Administrator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,326
Likes: 131
From: Northwest IN
Originally posted by louisn
Sidemarker, you don't need an intake, you need to get your CL-S fixed. It does 140 w/o a sweat--TAKE IT IN FOR SERVICE!

Ha... that'd be funny.

"Um... Mr. Service Man. I tried to get my CL-S up to 150mph yesterday and I couldn't get it past 124mph. WTF!!!??? Can you fix it?"

I think I'd have a hard tiume taking my car in because I couldn't get it over 124mph.

I can't imagine why it had a hard time getting past that speed, though...
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 09:14 AM
  #6  
sidemarker's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
so what could be the problem? extra weight (2 passengers and a full trunk)?

i think ill go attempt for my top speed again.

sidemarker
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 10:53 AM
  #7  
NateBoozer's Avatar
Slower traffic keep right
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
My car is still pulling very hard after 105mph. I haven't taken it to the limit yet but first through third is very strong. Fourth isn't near as strong but still pulls.

Is there a way to make 4th any stronger? Probably not

Oh well, I love this car!!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 11:54 AM
  #8  
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 5
From: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
I did a late night high speed test about two weeks ago. The fourth gear problem isn't really that bad. Once I got to about 125 VTEC kicked back in and I flew to 135 before shutting her down, although she wanted more. Gotta love the scream of CAI @ 135.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 12:29 PM
  #9  
BLK CLS's Avatar
Stealth Bomber
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Go in either sport shift or manually shift the gears to bring third right to the red line, so that when you shift into 4th you are almost in vtec. I have hit the speed limiter time and time again ang it is there. Sometimes when you go down hill and hit it, it feels like your hitting a wall, but you can definately do it.

The worst way is to let it shift into 4th early, make sure you really really really rev out 3rd, mine goes a little past the redline before hitting the rev limiter.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 01:53 PM
  #10  
BlackShadow's Avatar
O.G.
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 1
From: East Hanover, NJ
147 mph in my 99 TL!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 02:31 PM
  #11  
Pull_T's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,746
Likes: 0
From: मुंबई, भारत
Originally posted by sidemarker
so what could be the problem? extra weight (2 passengers and a full trunk)?

i think ill go attempt for my top speed again.

sidemarker
The extra weight will surely cost a bit of top speed, but nowhere near the difference between 124 and 150.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 04:49 PM
  #12  
God's Avatar
God
GOD Of ACURA-CL.COM
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, S.C.
Originally posted by NateBoozer


Is there a way to make 4th any stronger? Probably not

Oh well, I love this car!!
Comptech Headers
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 04:58 PM
  #13  
Nicky Pass's Avatar
Fuct in the hed!
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,057
Likes: 4
From: Chicagoland-ish
I've hit 135 in this car so far....I kinda got caught up in the moment.....damn the CAI
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 07:31 PM
  #14  
aciurczak's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by Pull_T


The extra weight will surely cost a bit of top speed, but nowhere near the difference between 124 and 150.
Actually, weight has pretty much nothing to do with top speed. It has everything to do with acceleration. Your car should reach the same top speed with or without passengers or a full trunk, you just need to find a longer road to get there.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 07:48 PM
  #15  
Pull_T's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,746
Likes: 0
From: मुंबई, भारत
Originally posted by aciurczak


Actually, weight has pretty much nothing to do with top speed. It has everything to do with acceleration. Your car should reach the same top speed with or without passengers or a full trunk, you just need to find a longer road to get there.
untrue.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 08:21 PM
  #16  
aciurczak's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by Pull_T


untrue.
While you seem like a good guy, I gotta go with Isaac Newton on this one.

F=MA. The heavier an object is, the more force you need for the same acceleration. Or, the slower acceleration you get with the same force. A 2000 pound car with 200 horsepower will accelerate 1/2 as fast as a 4000 pound car with 200 horsepower.

But top speed is a direct relationship of power to drag. Once you get over a certain speed, virtually all of the drag is aerodynamic drag. (rolling resistance of wheels, friction in other parts of the drivetrain, all of this becomes completely meaningless compared to the air resistance).

The only way that weight has anything to do with top speed is if it upsets the aerodynamic balance of the car; such as putting 1000 pound weight in the trunk that lifts the front of the car up higher, or something equally silly.

A 2000 pound car with 20 square feet of frontal area, a CD of .30, and 200 horsepower, will hit a certain top speed. A 4000 pound car with the same specs, will hit that same exact top speed.

EDIT: (this model makes some assumptions, for example that the motor is making 200 hp right around the top speed; this would depend somewhat on gearing. But weight would still have no effect)
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 08:37 PM
  #17  
NateBoozer's Avatar
Slower traffic keep right
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
While you seem like a good guy, I gotta go with Isaac Newton on this one.
I think he's got you there.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 08:37 PM
  #18  
OUTRAGEOUS CL TYPE S's Avatar
1 Phat CL !
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: CITY
i drive 130 everyday. fastest was i think speedometer said 150+
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 10:11 PM
  #19  
Pull_T's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,746
Likes: 0
From: मुंबई, भारत
Originally posted by aciurczak


While you seem like a good guy, I gotta go with Isaac Newton on this one.

F=MA. The heavier an object is, the more force you need for the same acceleration. Or, the slower acceleration you get with the same force. A 2000 pound car with 200 horsepower will accelerate 1/2 as fast as a 4000 pound car with 200 horsepower.

But top speed is a direct relationship of power to drag. Once you get over a certain speed, virtually all of the drag is aerodynamic drag. (rolling resistance of wheels, friction in other parts of the drivetrain, all of this becomes completely meaningless compared to the air resistance).

The only way that weight has anything to do with top speed is if it upsets the aerodynamic balance of the car; such as putting 1000 pound weight in the trunk that lifts the front of the car up higher, or something equally silly.

A 2000 pound car with 20 square feet of frontal area, a CD of .30, and 200 horsepower, will hit a certain top speed. A 4000 pound car with the same specs, will hit that same exact top speed.

EDIT: (this model makes some assumptions, for example that the motor is making 200 hp right around the top speed; this would depend somewhat on gearing. But weight would still have no effect)
The differences in rolling resistence will come into play, though small. That's all I was getting at. It'll be small, but there.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 11:51 PM
  #20  
xplicit TL-S's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
i have a tl-s i topped it out one night on highway us 27.... i was really amazed that i hit 150 thats when the governor kicked in. it actually kicked in so hard that when i hit it it propelled me forward. it was actually a scaryy experience even though the rush was amazing
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 02:10 AM
  #21  
XkRaZiX's Avatar
got kUsToM?
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: san gabriel s.cali
i only tried up to 135mph..... but i swear she was beggin for more
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2002 | 08:22 AM
  #22  
louisn's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Jonesboro, Arkansas
Could his actuator be defective?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
70
Dec 7, 2020 05:39 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Aug 15, 2019 12:58 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
Sep 17, 2015 09:01 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 08:57 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 10:16 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.