Supercharge concerns................
#1
Supercharge concerns................
I was recently reading the latest Motor Trend issue where they were comparing the MB C32 and Audi S4. They mentioned that on the MB AMG, which is a 3.2 V6 supercharge, had to have replace camshaft, springs, hydraulic lifters and valves and other internal in the angine to be able to handle the increase in horse power/torque (349/332) and also to increase reliability/longevity. Is this something that should concern us in the Acura CL world? Or Are the internal in our engine up to the task of handling that extra HP and TQ once we consider to supercharge our 3.2CL-S?
#2
Re: Supercharge concerns................
Originally posted by dfv3.2CL-S
I was recently reading the latest Motor Trend issue where they were comparing the MB C32 and Audi S4. They mentioned that on the MB AMG, which is a 3.2 V6 supercharge, had to have replace camshaft, springs, hydraulic lifters and valves and other internal in the angine to be able to handle the increase in horse power/torque (349/332) and also to increase reliability/longevity. Is this something that should concern us in the Acura CL world? Or Are the internal in our engine up to the task of handling that extra HP and TQ once we consider to supercharge our 3.2CL-S?
I was recently reading the latest Motor Trend issue where they were comparing the MB C32 and Audi S4. They mentioned that on the MB AMG, which is a 3.2 V6 supercharge, had to have replace camshaft, springs, hydraulic lifters and valves and other internal in the angine to be able to handle the increase in horse power/torque (349/332) and also to increase reliability/longevity. Is this something that should concern us in the Acura CL world? Or Are the internal in our engine up to the task of handling that extra HP and TQ once we consider to supercharge our 3.2CL-S?
The CT SC for the CL has about 3.5 lbs of boost which is very conservative. And yes, the CT SC will cause more wear than a non-forced induction motor. The problem is the temptation you will have to deal with if you have a SC'd car. You will more likely want to use that extra power it has and drive your car harder. So in the end, your car would get less life out of the engine.
The question is how badly do you want the extra power and are you willing to pay the extra cost in terms of money and wear and tear on your car?
Purely speculating ... if your fully stock CL went 150-200k before needing an engine rebuild, the same CL with a SC and driven roughly the same as your stock CL (including the temptation to see what this baby will do) , this SC'd beast might see 100-150k before needing an engine rebuild. Please note: engine wear will vary greatly with different driving styles/habits.
#3
Re: Re: Supercharge concerns................
Originally posted by cls6sp03
I would think that the engine's crank, main bearings, rods, rod bearings and pistons would be much more affected by increased power and torque than the camshaft, value springs, hydraulic lifters and valves.
The CT SC for the CL has about 3.5 lbs of boost which is very conservative. And yes, the CT SC will cause more wear than a non-forced induction motor. The problem is the temptation you will have to deal with if you have a SC'd car. You will more likely want to use that extra power it has and drive your car harder. So in the end, your car would get less life out of the engine.
The question is how badly do you want the extra power and are you willing to pay the extra cost in terms of money and wear and tear on your car?
Purely speculating ... if your fully stock CL went 150-200k before needing an engine rebuild, the same CL with a SC and driven roughly the same as your stock CL (including the temptation to see what this baby will do) , this SC'd beast might see 100-150k before needing an engine rebuild. Please note: engine wear will vary greatly with different driving styles/habits.
I would think that the engine's crank, main bearings, rods, rod bearings and pistons would be much more affected by increased power and torque than the camshaft, value springs, hydraulic lifters and valves.
The CT SC for the CL has about 3.5 lbs of boost which is very conservative. And yes, the CT SC will cause more wear than a non-forced induction motor. The problem is the temptation you will have to deal with if you have a SC'd car. You will more likely want to use that extra power it has and drive your car harder. So in the end, your car would get less life out of the engine.
The question is how badly do you want the extra power and are you willing to pay the extra cost in terms of money and wear and tear on your car?
Purely speculating ... if your fully stock CL went 150-200k before needing an engine rebuild, the same CL with a SC and driven roughly the same as your stock CL (including the temptation to see what this baby will do) , this SC'd beast might see 100-150k before needing an engine rebuild. Please note: engine wear will vary greatly with different driving styles/habits.
#4
Re: Re: Re: Supercharge concerns................
Originally posted by 03TL_PlaTinUM
I thought the CT SC pumped out 5lbs of boost? If its bad for the engine, why then does it not void your engine warranty?
I thought the CT SC pumped out 5lbs of boost? If its bad for the engine, why then does it not void your engine warranty?
#5
Re: Re: Re: Re: Supercharge concerns................
Originally posted by cls6sp03
According to CT, the SC pumps out 3 1/2 lbs of boost. IMO anytime you increase the output of an engine and use that extra power, you will increase the wear on that engine. Not sure about the warranty issue, except, I was told by my Acura dealership that if they installed the SC and I brought my car in for regularly scheduled maintenance, the warranty would be good even with the SC installed. This assumes I didn't do unsafe NOS or ECU mods that could vastly shorten an engine's life.
According to CT, the SC pumps out 3 1/2 lbs of boost. IMO anytime you increase the output of an engine and use that extra power, you will increase the wear on that engine. Not sure about the warranty issue, except, I was told by my Acura dealership that if they installed the SC and I brought my car in for regularly scheduled maintenance, the warranty would be good even with the SC installed. This assumes I didn't do unsafe NOS or ECU mods that could vastly shorten an engine's life.
#7
Could be,.....Change the cams to maximize output. Change the springs, valves and lifters so you don't float the valves when you raise the red line to maximize the output with the new cams. Or could be the have weak shlt to begin with.
Bottom end upgrade is usually needed for excessive HP gains. Top end upgrade is usually needed for a higher RPM red line.
My CT 5AT SC with stock exhaust is 4 1/2 - 5 psi. The dynos I've seen show the HP still going up at the red line so if the red line could be raised, the HP would go up w/o changing anything else. At some point the valves begin to float so the top end needs to be upgraded.
Bottom end upgrade is usually needed for excessive HP gains. Top end upgrade is usually needed for a higher RPM red line.
My CT 5AT SC with stock exhaust is 4 1/2 - 5 psi. The dynos I've seen show the HP still going up at the red line so if the red line could be raised, the HP would go up w/o changing anything else. At some point the valves begin to float so the top end needs to be upgraded.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by ModAddict
Could be,.....Change the cams to maximize output. Change the springs, valves and lifters so you don't float the valves when you raise the red line to maximize the output with the new cams. Or could be the have weak shlt to begin with.
Bottom end upgrade is usually needed for excessive HP gains. Top end upgrade is usually needed for a higher RPM red line.
My CT 5AT SC with stock exhaust is 4 1/2 - 5 psi. The dynos I've seen show the HP still going up at the red line so if the red line could be raised, the HP would go up w/o changing anything else. At some point the valves begin to float so the top end needs to be upgraded.
Could be,.....Change the cams to maximize output. Change the springs, valves and lifters so you don't float the valves when you raise the red line to maximize the output with the new cams. Or could be the have weak shlt to begin with.
Bottom end upgrade is usually needed for excessive HP gains. Top end upgrade is usually needed for a higher RPM red line.
My CT 5AT SC with stock exhaust is 4 1/2 - 5 psi. The dynos I've seen show the HP still going up at the red line so if the red line could be raised, the HP would go up w/o changing anything else. At some point the valves begin to float so the top end needs to be upgraded.
BTW - I got to ride in the CT proto CLS 6sp WITH ALL THE GOODIES... wow what a ride... threw me back into the seat.
#9
Lemme put it to you this way---
If Acura had designed a factory supercharged version of the CL-S, I can absolutely guarantee you that they would have made changes to the basic 3.2L type-S motor before adding the blower.
I don't think a major manufacturer EVER just slapped a supercharger on an already existing engine without changing anything. Just food for thought.
If Acura had designed a factory supercharged version of the CL-S, I can absolutely guarantee you that they would have made changes to the basic 3.2L type-S motor before adding the blower.
I don't think a major manufacturer EVER just slapped a supercharger on an already existing engine without changing anything. Just food for thought.
#10
Originally posted by cls6sp03
How did you get the 4 1/2 - 5 psi boost? Is this how the SC comes out of the box? The reason I ask is because I visited CT in Sacramento several weeks ago and they said the SC produces only 3 1/2 lbs boost for the CL because they wanted it to be highly reliable. I've also talked with several other people at CT and they all said the same thing.
BTW - I got to ride in the CT proto CLS 6sp WITH ALL THE GOODIES... wow what a ride... threw me back into the seat.
How did you get the 4 1/2 - 5 psi boost? Is this how the SC comes out of the box? The reason I ask is because I visited CT in Sacramento several weeks ago and they said the SC produces only 3 1/2 lbs boost for the CL because they wanted it to be highly reliable. I've also talked with several other people at CT and they all said the same thing.
BTW - I got to ride in the CT proto CLS 6sp WITH ALL THE GOODIES... wow what a ride... threw me back into the seat.
#11
Originally posted by ModAddict
Out of the box, 4.5-5 psi. I've got Scalbert's boost upgrade pulley on now and it's at 6 psi, strong and smooth, without a hint of spark knock, and still pig rich . I'm still waiting for the Stone headers and once they're on, it might lean up a bit, and the psi could drop a smidge.
Out of the box, 4.5-5 psi. I've got Scalbert's boost upgrade pulley on now and it's at 6 psi, strong and smooth, without a hint of spark knock, and still pig rich . I'm still waiting for the Stone headers and once they're on, it might lean up a bit, and the psi could drop a smidge.
#12
Originally posted by cls6sp03
Interesting... just called CT again and they said absolutely, out of the box, it's only 3.5 lbs boost. What's special about your SC? How are you measuring the boost?
Interesting... just called CT again and they said absolutely, out of the box, it's only 3.5 lbs boost. What's special about your SC? How are you measuring the boost?
The gauge ia an electronic full sweep Autometer, 30 in.Hg.-15 psi. It recalibrates it self each time the car is started, and has peak boost memory, and an adjustable peak boost alarm.
I thought some of the others here reported 4.5 psi also.
#13
Just lets not get out of hand here regarding the boost. My main questions is, If MB did all these changes to there engine to create a more reliable engine, why wouldn't we have to make similar changes for our CL engine. Will Acura cover under warranty the engine components, if you have a SC or will the extended warranty cover the engine part, if the SC is on the car.
#14
Originally posted by dfv3.2CL-S
Just lets not get out of hand here regarding the boost. My main questions is, If MB did all these changes to there engine to create a more reliable engine, why wouldn't we have to make similar changes for our CL engine. Will Acura cover under warranty the engine components, if you have a SC or will the extended warranty cover the engine part, if the SC is on the car.
Just lets not get out of hand here regarding the boost. My main questions is, If MB did all these changes to there engine to create a more reliable engine, why wouldn't we have to make similar changes for our CL engine. Will Acura cover under warranty the engine components, if you have a SC or will the extended warranty cover the engine part, if the SC is on the car.
I installed my own, and will push the limit with upgrades. I don't expect the dealer to cover engine problems caused with the SC, but I do expect them cover everything else non-related.
#15
Originally posted by cls6sp03
Interesting... just called CT again and they said absolutely, out of the box, it's only 3.5 lbs boost. What's special about your SC? How are you measuring the boost?
Interesting... just called CT again and they said absolutely, out of the box, it's only 3.5 lbs boost. What's special about your SC? How are you measuring the boost?
When headers are added I expect a drop in boost but an increase in power.
#16
Originally posted by ModAddict
I installed my own, and will push the limit with upgrades. I don't expect the dealer to cover engine problems caused with the SC, but I do expect them cover everything else non-related.
I installed my own, and will push the limit with upgrades. I don't expect the dealer to cover engine problems caused with the SC, but I do expect them cover everything else non-related.
If you want more power with the same amenities you pay for a higher end car. Or you mod your own at you own risk.
The chances of something occurring are minimal so enjoy what your have.
#17
Originally posted by scalbert
Amen to that and I am so glad to hear someone else say it. You mod a car at your own risk so doing the work your self helps to alleviate blame…
If you want more power with the same amenities you pay for a higher end car. Or you mod your own at you own risk.
The chances of something occurring are minimal so enjoy what your have.
Amen to that and I am so glad to hear someone else say it. You mod a car at your own risk so doing the work your self helps to alleviate blame…
If you want more power with the same amenities you pay for a higher end car. Or you mod your own at you own risk.
The chances of something occurring are minimal so enjoy what your have.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BoricuaTL
Car Parts for Sale
138
04-08-2016 01:08 PM
Joe Avesyan
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
09-29-2015 03:57 PM