Speedzone's 2004 Detector Test Results
#1
At least it's not Jersey
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: CT
Age: 50
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
At least it's not Jersey
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: CT
Age: 50
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aside from the arrows (which I'll never give up) the V1 no longer has the advantage. We need an upgrade, especially now that POP is being used.
#4
Adventurist.
POP is inadmissable in court, they legally cannot give you a ticket based on a POP reading, it can only be used for the probable cause of pulling someone over; meaning the police officer must turn his conventional radar or laser gun and clock you.
I'll stick to my V1.
EDIT:
I'll stick to my V1.
EDIT:
POP mode doesn't meet the requirements of radar case law, legal guidelines established over several decades that define how radar must perform and how it must be used.
#5
At least it's not Jersey
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: CT
Age: 50
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the cop is using POP for the cars in front of you and those cars aren't going fast enough for the cop to switch to normal radar, the V1 picks up nothing
Then you're the next target traveling above the speed limit, get POP at that speed - then nailed with Ka to confirm and make legal, wouldn't you say having POP detection would have been nice?
Then you're the next target traveling above the speed limit, get POP at that speed - then nailed with Ka to confirm and make legal, wouldn't you say having POP detection would have been nice?
#7
At least it's not Jersey
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: CT
Age: 50
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NiteQwill
No, again because of its legality; because if the cop was adamant enough, he would be using laser, not POP.
Trending Topics
#8
At least it's not Jersey
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: CT
Age: 50
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, I think I understand what you mean. If the cop was dead set on catching speeders and had a choice between laser or using a radar gun w/ POP, he would go w/ laser.
For arguement sake, let's just stick to radar w/ POP being his only choice. Again, it would be nice, with the example I gave above, to be able to detect it.
For arguement sake, let's just stick to radar w/ POP being his only choice. Again, it would be nice, with the example I gave above, to be able to detect it.
#11
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Good read. Still like the V1 arrows. By those tests There isn't really that much of a performance difference between the V1 & Escort. Exactly what my experiences with the 2 of them are. Also keep in mind at the bottem of that site they cleary stated eveything was tested in ideal conditions, in a controlled enviroment. Real world performance will be different.
#13
Blown LS6!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After running around with the guys this wknd in Portland (at legal speeds of course) I decided I needed a radar detector. I just went out and got the X50 since Best Buy is right here next to me. $299...a little cheaper than the V1 and hopefully just as sensitive. The POP isn't activated on the X50 in default mode. I guess since it isn't legally enough to give you a ticket they figure you'll pick up another band when they hit another car in front of you. I'll activate it since I paid for it though...
#16
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,017
Received 6,987 Likes
on
3,548 Posts
Is speedzone the company BEL hired before to do this so called "test?"
#17
My Member is Registered
Interesting:
"A laser gun’s ability to target is greatly based on the color of the vehicle. The lighter the vehicle, the easier the targeting. A white colored vehicle is the easiest target for a laser gun as the color white reflects all colors including laser’s infrared light. The darker the vehicle the more difficult it is to target. A black car with no chrome, no front plate, and pop down headlights is virtually impossible to target with laser."
"A laser gun’s ability to target is greatly based on the color of the vehicle. The lighter the vehicle, the easier the targeting. A white colored vehicle is the easiest target for a laser gun as the color white reflects all colors including laser’s infrared light. The darker the vehicle the more difficult it is to target. A black car with no chrome, no front plate, and pop down headlights is virtually impossible to target with laser."
#18
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
the words of Mike V himself about a discussion we had about these tests last year.
Hi everybody! You managed to bait me really well this time!
Well, I have to admit that I have never heard of "POP3".
Our web site has a whole section on the POP feature used in the MPH BEE III Ka-band radar gun, which you seem to have read. Perhaps the "III" from the radar name and "POP" have become "urban legend-ized" into "POP3".
While there have been claims from speedzones.com that many detectors (including V1) pick up K-band POP signals, we have not been able to independantly replicate the same results. We have in our possession an MPH Industries Enforcer Moving Radar that was obtained in the K-band version. In our testing, detectors mentioned by speedzones as able to find K-band POP, can't detect the Enforcer when it's operated in the POP mode. This is very strange. We've evaluated a number of samples of new BEL/Escort detectors (RX65, 995, 8500x50) that claim to detect POP that don't respond to the Enforcer's K-band POP signal either.
It has been mentioned before that Carl Fors, the speedzones owner, has had various dealings with my competitors as well as police radar makers, and I can't help wondering what was going on in the Summer 2003 detector test he performed -- especially with his POP testing and results (same data as used in Motor Trend "test").
We, of course, have long been working on a V1 upgrade for POP. This would include Ka-band POP from the BEE III as well as K-band POP from the Enforcer. The main riddle to be solved is how to separate POP signals (only .067 seconds duration) from junk-signals that are radiated from hundreds of thousands of BEL and Cobra radar detectors. These detector-generated junk-signals have frequency and duration characteristcs that are nearly identical to real POP signals.
It's quite a challenge to give useful warning of POP radars without beating users' ears deaf with false alarms from all the offending BEL and Cobra detectors in circulation. If one were to merely tone down the sensitivity to short duration signals, to mask or lessen the presence of the BEL/Cobra junk, then only strict line-of-sight detection of real POP radar signals would be possible. Forget over-the-hill or around-the-corner warnings.
Of course, with the way speedzones.com and radartest.com compare detectors, line-of-sight detection is all that is likely to be tested. Over-the-hill and around-the-corner warning performance would be left up to the imagination of their readers (thereby glossing over deficiencies of products that are too weak to detect POP beyond mere line-of-sight).
In sum:
A) The new BEL/Escort detectors we bought DO NOT pick up K-band POP from the MPH Enforcer (even after re-programming POP mode to "On"). Read the fine print in their ads or instruction books.
B) The problem to be overcome to gain useful POP detection capability is the grotesque on-the-road interference radiating from BEL and Cobra radar detectors in other poeples' vehicles. Even BEL/Escort knows this since their Ka-band-only POP feature is defaulted to "Off" when leaving the factory (one has to manually program POP reception to "On'). One may assume this is to prevent product returns -- "too much false signal beeping" -- from the unwary.
Oh well, I'm sure we'll figure out a good solution for V1.
Cheers,
Mike
Hi everybody! You managed to bait me really well this time!
Well, I have to admit that I have never heard of "POP3".
Our web site has a whole section on the POP feature used in the MPH BEE III Ka-band radar gun, which you seem to have read. Perhaps the "III" from the radar name and "POP" have become "urban legend-ized" into "POP3".
While there have been claims from speedzones.com that many detectors (including V1) pick up K-band POP signals, we have not been able to independantly replicate the same results. We have in our possession an MPH Industries Enforcer Moving Radar that was obtained in the K-band version. In our testing, detectors mentioned by speedzones as able to find K-band POP, can't detect the Enforcer when it's operated in the POP mode. This is very strange. We've evaluated a number of samples of new BEL/Escort detectors (RX65, 995, 8500x50) that claim to detect POP that don't respond to the Enforcer's K-band POP signal either.
It has been mentioned before that Carl Fors, the speedzones owner, has had various dealings with my competitors as well as police radar makers, and I can't help wondering what was going on in the Summer 2003 detector test he performed -- especially with his POP testing and results (same data as used in Motor Trend "test").
We, of course, have long been working on a V1 upgrade for POP. This would include Ka-band POP from the BEE III as well as K-band POP from the Enforcer. The main riddle to be solved is how to separate POP signals (only .067 seconds duration) from junk-signals that are radiated from hundreds of thousands of BEL and Cobra radar detectors. These detector-generated junk-signals have frequency and duration characteristcs that are nearly identical to real POP signals.
It's quite a challenge to give useful warning of POP radars without beating users' ears deaf with false alarms from all the offending BEL and Cobra detectors in circulation. If one were to merely tone down the sensitivity to short duration signals, to mask or lessen the presence of the BEL/Cobra junk, then only strict line-of-sight detection of real POP radar signals would be possible. Forget over-the-hill or around-the-corner warnings.
Of course, with the way speedzones.com and radartest.com compare detectors, line-of-sight detection is all that is likely to be tested. Over-the-hill and around-the-corner warning performance would be left up to the imagination of their readers (thereby glossing over deficiencies of products that are too weak to detect POP beyond mere line-of-sight).
In sum:
A) The new BEL/Escort detectors we bought DO NOT pick up K-band POP from the MPH Enforcer (even after re-programming POP mode to "On"). Read the fine print in their ads or instruction books.
B) The problem to be overcome to gain useful POP detection capability is the grotesque on-the-road interference radiating from BEL and Cobra radar detectors in other poeples' vehicles. Even BEL/Escort knows this since their Ka-band-only POP feature is defaulted to "Off" when leaving the factory (one has to manually program POP reception to "On'). One may assume this is to prevent product returns -- "too much false signal beeping" -- from the unwary.
Oh well, I'm sure we'll figure out a good solution for V1.
Cheers,
Mike
#19
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by Cruz_msl
Interesting:
"A laser gun’s ability to target is greatly based on the color of the vehicle. The lighter the vehicle, the easier the targeting. A white colored vehicle is the easiest target for a laser gun as the color white reflects all colors including laser’s infrared light. The darker the vehicle the more difficult it is to target. A black car with no chrome, no front plate, and pop down headlights is virtually impossible to target with laser."
"A laser gun’s ability to target is greatly based on the color of the vehicle. The lighter the vehicle, the easier the targeting. A white colored vehicle is the easiest target for a laser gun as the color white reflects all colors including laser’s infrared light. The darker the vehicle the more difficult it is to target. A black car with no chrome, no front plate, and pop down headlights is virtually impossible to target with laser."
they say black corvettes are hard to tag
#20
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by darrinb
i need to invest in a v1 but i always rather invest the $$ in go fast mods
save your ass mods are more important
#22
Senior Moderator
Are the Valentines due for a new update soon? What's the latest version number out..? I can't decide which radar detector to get.. It seems all three are pretty much equal..
#24
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
What Mike V says doesn't make sense. They used a K band POP gun. Speedzons used a KA band one. Mike V claims Speedzones only tests line of site. Speedzones stated they tested one "slightly over a hill"
Mike V sounds very disgruntled refering to bell/cobra as "junk" so many times.
Mike V sounds very disgruntled refering to bell/cobra as "junk" so many times.
#25
Drifting
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 46
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cruz_msl
Interesting:
"A laser gun’s ability to target is greatly based on the color of the vehicle. The lighter the vehicle, the easier the targeting. A white colored vehicle is the easiest target for a laser gun as the color white reflects all colors including laser’s infrared light. The darker the vehicle the more difficult it is to target. A black car with no chrome, no front plate, and pop down headlights is virtually impossible to target with laser."
"A laser gun’s ability to target is greatly based on the color of the vehicle. The lighter the vehicle, the easier the targeting. A white colored vehicle is the easiest target for a laser gun as the color white reflects all colors including laser’s infrared light. The darker the vehicle the more difficult it is to target. A black car with no chrome, no front plate, and pop down headlights is virtually impossible to target with laser."
#26
teh Senior Instigator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes
on
328 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
What Mike V says doesn't make sense. They used a K band POP gun. Speedzons used a KA band one. Mike V claims Speedzones only tests line of site. Speedzones stated they tested one "slightly over a hill"
Mike V sounds very disgruntled refering to bell/cobra as "junk" so many times.
Mike V sounds very disgruntled refering to bell/cobra as "junk" so many times.
This was after last years test. They may of changed their protocols for this years.
#27
At least it's not Jersey
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: CT
Age: 50
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The slighly over the hill is at the 2 1/2 mile mark which is proceed by a long, flat straight (line of sight). Mike is stating this is not a normal, real world situation where as most cops set traps around corners, below the crest of a hills, etc and always at closer range.
And Cobra detectors are junk my fuzzy friend! Bel and the V1 are the only choices.
And Cobra detectors are junk my fuzzy friend! Bel and the V1 are the only choices.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ITSJESTER
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
17
12-06-2018 02:29 AM
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM