So why didnt acura give us dohc motors?
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orlando (UCF) and Ft. Lauderdale
Age: 39
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So why didnt acura give us dohc motors?
Yea I was just thinking .. its cool being sohc and all but dohc seem to be where its at?
Hehe someone should make a conversion (if that was at all possible)
Hehe someone should make a conversion (if that was at all possible)
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#3
Meat stick
Originally Posted by NiteQwill
Because it would be an NSX....
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
You can do that engine swap in Forza motorsports.......I had a CL-s with ~670HP and over 500 ft-lbs torque.....it was fucking useless to drive, though
![Doh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/doh.gif)
#4
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXAS
Age: 43
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i believe its due to cost purposes and SOHCs are probably easier to engineer and design then DOHCs...
for the most part i dont think it really matters for a 6 cylinder.
sidemarker
for the most part i dont think it really matters for a 6 cylinder.
sidemarker
#5
GEEZER
Originally Posted by JaredGMS
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
You can do that engine swap in Forza motorsports.......I had a CL-s with ~670HP and over 500 ft-lbs torque.....it was fucking useless to drive, though
![Doh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/doh.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
Trending Topics
#14
plus they were probably trying to keep to the 276hp pact that japan manufacturers had.
and also they figured the weak tranny they used probably wouldn't be able to take all that power.
and also they figured the weak tranny they used probably wouldn't be able to take all that power.
#19
My Work is Done Here
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Still too far from the beach
Posts: 11,134
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by JaredGMS
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
You can do that engine swap in Forza motorsports.......I had a CL-s with ~670HP and over 500 ft-lbs torque.....it was fucking useless to drive, though
![Doh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/doh.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#22
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by Hurleysurf24
anyways to do a conversion .. that would be pretty cool ![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![No](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/no.gif)
You want DOHC so bad, buy your little del-slo and do a DOHC swap on that. The CL seems to be doing fine with SOHC. All-motor is a testament to that.
#23
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by umcp
plus they were probably trying to keep to the 276hp pact that japan manufacturers had.
and also they figured the weak tranny they used probably wouldn't be able to take all that power.
and also they figured the weak tranny they used probably wouldn't be able to take all that power.
![pofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pofl.gif)
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
THe CL was strictly for the U.S. so their little 276hp pact would not have made a difference. Hell, most of the supercars built by the Japanese dyno way too high to only be 276 hp, so its nothing new that they don't really care to push the limits.
#24
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by mclarenf3387
![pofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pofl.gif)
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
THe CL was strictly for the U.S. so their little 276hp pact would not have made a difference. Hell, most of the supercars built by the Japanese dyno way too high to only be 276 hp, so its nothing new that they don't really care to push the limits.
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
#25
Safety Car
I don't really see the benefit of DOHC when you are FI... air + fuel + spark = Power. On an NA car, you can fine-tune a DOHC much more to extract power. Obviously on a race-car even if it is FI, you want tunability!
#27
Way Fast Whitey
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hurleysurf24
lol driveability ? theres people with well over 300hp in a fwd car
Yes, but if you notice the 60ft times are horrible on these cars with 260HP or 300HP+. I looked at track times and decided that boost was a waste of money on FWD unless you race from a roll everytime.
#28
Senior Moderator
really?
i've pulled 2.0's on 18" street tires in my 300whp cl-s auto.
i've pulled 2.0's on 18" street tires in my 300whp cl-s auto.
#30
Originally Posted by Hurleysurf24
Yea I was just thinking .. its cool being sohc and all but dohc seem to be where its at?
Hehe someone should make a conversion (if that was at all possible)
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
Hehe someone should make a conversion (if that was at all possible)
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
What are you talking about --->
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#32
Originally Posted by CBR1100XX
Yes, but if you notice the 60ft times are horrible on these cars with 260HP or 300HP+. I looked at track times and decided that boost was a waste of money on FWD unless you race from a roll everytime.
Even 3400lb RWD 300whp cars such as LS1 Transmarobirds have traction issues.
Put a sticky tire on any car and you can cut sub-2.0 60' times, period.
#33
Safety Car
Originally Posted by 03 CL TypeS
It's all about traction (and therefore good tires).
Even 3400lb RWD 300whp cars such as LS1 Transmarobirds have traction issues.
Put a sticky tire on any car and you can cut sub-2.0 60' times, period.
Even 3400lb RWD 300whp cars such as LS1 Transmarobirds have traction issues.
Put a sticky tire on any car and you can cut sub-2.0 60' times, period.
#36
Cajun Gumbo Man
![Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon6.gif)
Gasoline consumption !
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post