saab 9-5 aero (02)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 12:48 PM
  #1  
I am RobG's Avatar
Thread Starter
im back
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
From: New York
saab 9-5 aero (02)

i'm racing my friends 9-5 aero after work, and seriousyl dont underestimate those. i drove it yesterday and that fucker is quick. He's gonna give me a run for my money but i dont think he'll come out on top, what do you guys think?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #2  
Sdog2012's Avatar
We dont love these hoes
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,737
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
my dad used to have a 99, 9-5 aero and theyre damn fast, mad top end. Should be a good race.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 04:50 PM
  #3  
BSK181's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: LONG ISLAND NY
?

let us know

g/l
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 07:58 PM
  #4  
I am RobG's Avatar
Thread Starter
im back
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
From: New York
no dice man those fuckers are fast! i didn't have traction either but i wasn't gaining until about 90 then i started passing
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 08:08 PM
  #5  
Seattle Cl-S's Avatar
Blown LS6!!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
How could it be so close? I thought those things were doing 0-60 in 6.7 and 1/4 at about 15.1??? That's about an Auto CL-S's times, but a 6-spd???
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2003 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
I am RobG's Avatar
Thread Starter
im back
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
From: New York
i repeat i didn't have traction which means spinning the tires through 2nd gear
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #7  
prelude9925's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Naples, Fl
My dad has a 2001 9-5 aero and itll do the 6.7-6.8 and 15.1 that you are talking about. One small factor is that its automatic...the five speed is a bit quicker. Also, it depends on what year the aero is. the 2002 went from 230 hp to 250. The torque went up as well..not sure what the 2002 has but the 01 had 258 lb/ft. Also in 2002 the auto aero got a five speed automatic instead of the old 4-speed...find out what year it is, either way the 5 speed mauals are pretty fast when the garrett turbo hits its peak boost of 19.6lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 06:43 AM
  #8  
I am RobG's Avatar
Thread Starter
im back
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
From: New York
it says (02) on the topic. its a quick fucker, i just had a bad launch, but we're going again soon cuz now he's on an ego trip and i have to stop that
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #9  
quikcls's Avatar
WHO'S NEXT!!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally posted by Seattle Cl-S
How could it be so close? I thought those things were doing 0-60 in 6.7 and 1/4 at about 15.1??? That's about an Auto CL-S's times, but a 6-spd???
uh, who is running in the 15's here? i think its been established, stock cl auto's run 14.7-.8.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 09:34 AM
  #10  
BSK181's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: LONG ISLAND NY
Originally posted by quikcls
uh, who is running in the 15's here? i think its been established, stock cl auto's run 14.7-.8.
nothing is "established"

some cars run mid 14's, some into the 15's, each car is different

the 6 speed is faster, if it can hook up

when i drove titand's 6, i could not keep the wheels from spinning and got terrible times with a g tech. i have been driving a stick for more then 30 years, this car is a FUCK to launch.

my .02
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uzzmaan
Automotive News
336
Aug 4, 2025 08:29 AM
jspangan
ILX
5
Aug 18, 2020 11:05 AM
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
Jul 16, 2017 07:33 AM
lovic87
3G TL (2004-2008)
8
Sep 9, 2015 10:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.