raced a 99 M3... story continues inside
#1
You underdig?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
raced a 99 M3... story continues inside
My friend just got a 99 M3 (E36) and we ran a little Friday night. Surprisingly, I hung with him. Those things have such a consistent power line that I only caught up when he shifted. Luckily its a new tranny feel to him so he hasn't quite got the quickness down. As far as I know, our car and the E36 M3 are pretty similar. They both have about the same WHP and Torque. The major difference I think is weight (about 3-400lbs) and the bimmer's magnificent tranny. Anyway, thought I'd share that one with yall cause I expected to get spanked. GO CL-S!
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#2
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Re: raced a 99 M3... story continues inside
Originally posted by nitelyfe
The major difference I think...D
The major difference I think...D
The major difference is an M3 would spank us in the twisties all day long. We are pretty even on the straight line though. Nice run.
#4
Lead Footed
Re: Re: raced a 99 M3... story continues inside
Originally posted by mrsteve
The major difference is an M3 would spank us in the twisties all day long. We are pretty even on the straight line though. Nice run.
The major difference is an M3 would spank us in the twisties all day long. We are pretty even on the straight line though. Nice run.
![Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
No twisties in North Central Texas so we pretty much own them here.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Ruf
Trending Topics
#8
'Big Daddy Diggler'
Yeah, the key is catching them down low rolling or off the line. If you get a maual vs manual, It would be on the driver up until about 100, then the Bimmers gearing should win the race. If you get him from a 50 roll, i think stock for stock the bimmer would still pull slightly. If the 6 speed is modded, than it should take the bimmer till a little over 100 once again. But if the bimmer is modded, then expect it to hand you your ass.
#9
Senior Moderator
Quick poll: How many people buy that "240hp" rating on the E36 M3? Hint: not me!!
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#12
You underdig?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rondog
yeah, but he's an auto vs a manual, try a 6speed cl-s and he'd def hang better and or beat him. with I/H/E, he will do the same also. I friggin love the power my car has gained lately, all on it's own too. but the Beemer will own on the twisties as stated.
yeah, but he's an auto vs a manual, try a 6speed cl-s and he'd def hang better and or beat him. with I/H/E, he will do the same also. I friggin love the power my car has gained lately, all on it's own too. but the Beemer will own on the twisties as stated.
What kind of exhaust do you have?
#14
You underdig?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by brianlin87
so if the 99 M3 were a manual and the CL were the 5spd-auto, we'd still hang with or beat it?
so if the 99 M3 were a manual and the CL were the 5spd-auto, we'd still hang with or beat it?
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#15
You underdig?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by F23A4
Quick poll: How many people buy that "240hp" rating on the E36 M3? Hint: not me!!
Quick poll: How many people buy that "240hp" rating on the E36 M3? Hint: not me!!
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#17
You underdig?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chinisimo
How much would you have paid? My friend paid 3k more for his than I paid for my CL-S and its 3 years older (mine is an 01). If you ask me they're overpriced. I heard the E46s are being marked up by at least 10k... makes me
!
How much would you have paid? My friend paid 3k more for his than I paid for my CL-S and its 3 years older (mine is an 01). If you ask me they're overpriced. I heard the E46s are being marked up by at least 10k... makes me
![Big Eek](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/bigeek.gif)
#19
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Eh...
I admire their performance. But EVERYONE has them and they look way too much like the regular 3 series. The new M3 is leaps and bounds beyond the previous model. I'm not all that impressed by the E36.
I admire their performance. But EVERYONE has them and they look way too much like the regular 3 series. The new M3 is leaps and bounds beyond the previous model. I'm not all that impressed by the E36.
#21
no comparison
between the boat CL-S and the M3... even the e-36. It handles like it's on rails. I hate to say this, but I'd ditch my car in a second for a E-46, even though it's slower....
#22
You underdig?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: no comparison
Originally posted by numbaonestunna
between the boat CL-S and the M3... even the e-36. It handles like it's on rails. I hate to say this, but I'd ditch my car in a second for a E-46, even though it's slower....
between the boat CL-S and the M3... even the e-36. It handles like it's on rails. I hate to say this, but I'd ditch my car in a second for a E-46, even though it's slower....
And what kind of car are you driving thats faster than the e46? Or do you not realize they have 333hp?
#23
Ok, I'm gonna stick my 2 cents in (being the owner of the e36 m3 in question). I believe the engines are exactly on par (accept some additional torque in the cl-s engine). The weight is the only thing that makes the m3 slightly faster. I also know I havent perfected my clutch drop yet, so time will tell if this holds true.
Also the e36 and e46 m3's are cars in totally different leagues. The e36 m3 does 0-60 in 5.8s. The e46 m3 does the 0-60 in 4.8s. The e36 m3 puts 205-210hp to the ground, while the e46 m3 puts 275-280hp to the ground.
-Chris
Also the e36 and e46 m3's are cars in totally different leagues. The e36 m3 does 0-60 in 5.8s. The e46 m3 does the 0-60 in 4.8s. The e36 m3 puts 205-210hp to the ground, while the e46 m3 puts 275-280hp to the ground.
-Chris
#24
Re: Re: no comparison
Originally posted by nitelyfe
No comparison?? The E-36 and the CL-S are almost identical in power. In fact, I think we have more torque. Your correct about the handling but, I'm correct in saying our interior is MUCH nicer.
And what kind of car are you driving thats faster than the e46? Or do you not realize they have 333hp?
No comparison?? The E-36 and the CL-S are almost identical in power. In fact, I think we have more torque. Your correct about the handling but, I'm correct in saying our interior is MUCH nicer.
And what kind of car are you driving thats faster than the e46? Or do you not realize they have 333hp?
#26
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally posted by pimpscls
like i said that m3 is a masterpeice and one day ill buy one and track it even in 20 years, its my dream car
like i said that m3 is a masterpeice and one day ill buy one and track it even in 20 years, its my dream car
Not exactly what i'd call a "dream car" considering they are old and not really exotic.
#28
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Rockville, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 5,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by cyberhide
I also know I havent perfected my clutch drop yet, so time will tell if this holds true.
-Chris
I also know I havent perfected my clutch drop yet, so time will tell if this holds true.
-Chris
#29
You underdig?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by haiduc
noooooo! please tell me you dont plan on dumping the clutch on a launch. BMW's do not like to be launchced at all. You will get better results by slipping the clutch slightly. Sub-frame bolts and diff bolts tend to get expensive to repair.
noooooo! please tell me you dont plan on dumping the clutch on a launch. BMW's do not like to be launchced at all. You will get better results by slipping the clutch slightly. Sub-frame bolts and diff bolts tend to get expensive to repair.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Right Chris?
#30
Instructor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Newark, DE
Age: 49
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been around for a while, but not a big poster. I've had my cls for 2 years. I can't comment on the e36 car, but I can comment on the s52 (3.2 240 HP motor) which is in my 00 M roadster that I just bought.
I've been into fast cars for a long time, a few mustangs, camaro, firebirds, etc. My last car was a 99 SS auto, running 12.9@109 very fast and solid, but nothing like the little roadster.
This cars turn in is fantastic, and the braking is great, and the gears are very close together and it pulls very well through all the gears.
This is clearly a fair bit quicker than the cls, which unfortunately is an auto, but with headers and cold air. Handling is not even comparable so forget about the back roads, and straight line, top of 3rd in the cls it kind of hangs, but is still falling back a bit.
The switchgear is better in the acura, interior better but this car is about driving, not riding. That's the impression i've gotten from the 3 series and 5 series cars i've driven...but owning one it's true....Drivers car, much moreso than the luxury sport coupe of the CL type S and even as much as the hulking camaro SS...recently departed.
Joe
I've been into fast cars for a long time, a few mustangs, camaro, firebirds, etc. My last car was a 99 SS auto, running 12.9@109 very fast and solid, but nothing like the little roadster.
This cars turn in is fantastic, and the braking is great, and the gears are very close together and it pulls very well through all the gears.
This is clearly a fair bit quicker than the cls, which unfortunately is an auto, but with headers and cold air. Handling is not even comparable so forget about the back roads, and straight line, top of 3rd in the cls it kind of hangs, but is still falling back a bit.
The switchgear is better in the acura, interior better but this car is about driving, not riding. That's the impression i've gotten from the 3 series and 5 series cars i've driven...but owning one it's true....Drivers car, much moreso than the luxury sport coupe of the CL type S and even as much as the hulking camaro SS...recently departed.
Joe
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM