Personal Review: 6 days with a 2004 Toyota Camry
#41
gto2050, jeez, my bad, nothing personal here....
Okay, Ferrari's have soul for a machine. They also cost $200,000. They BETTER have soul. Or let me feel like they do.
Okay, Ferrari's have soul for a machine. They also cost $200,000. They BETTER have soul. Or let me feel like they do.
#45
GEEZER
Dash looks like a truck...even with the fake wood.
Nice write up Gav!
Nice write up Gav!
#46
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Paul
I had a camry v6 before my cl and I do agree totally with this review. The camry felt like a much solid car than the cl.
I had a camry v6 before my cl and I do agree totally with this review. The camry felt like a much solid car than the cl.
#49
Originally posted by gavriil
Relax boys. I think we all know what one means when they refer to "soul" in a car. Yes, Ferraris have it, M cars have it, even a Miata has it. It does not have to be expensive to have soul. But as I said, most people dont care about soul in a car. Reliability and idiot-proof driving characteristics are way more important to them. Safety and price are way more important also.
The Camry belongs to that market. It's made for that market. The market that does not care about soul. And it does a great job at that. Possibly better than everyone else in the category and the sales figures back that argument. And for that, it deserves a round of applause and respect from all of us.
I always said, a true auto enthusiast, finds "greatness" (something to like) in every car, in every category. In my opinion, belonging to schools of thought, take brand sides, etc. is not apporpriate from a true car enthusiast.
I love all cars for different reasons, but if you ask me what I believe in, my answer would be: "value". When Acura comes out with this new TL with all these features and benefits packed into it and prices it at $33K, I just cannot NOT say "my hat's off to them" and recognize the great job they did. Same with the Camry, the Accord, the G35/C, etc., etc.
Relax boys. I think we all know what one means when they refer to "soul" in a car. Yes, Ferraris have it, M cars have it, even a Miata has it. It does not have to be expensive to have soul. But as I said, most people dont care about soul in a car. Reliability and idiot-proof driving characteristics are way more important to them. Safety and price are way more important also.
The Camry belongs to that market. It's made for that market. The market that does not care about soul. And it does a great job at that. Possibly better than everyone else in the category and the sales figures back that argument. And for that, it deserves a round of applause and respect from all of us.
I always said, a true auto enthusiast, finds "greatness" (something to like) in every car, in every category. In my opinion, belonging to schools of thought, take brand sides, etc. is not apporpriate from a true car enthusiast.
I love all cars for different reasons, but if you ask me what I believe in, my answer would be: "value". When Acura comes out with this new TL with all these features and benefits packed into it and prices it at $33K, I just cannot NOT say "my hat's off to them" and recognize the great job they did. Same with the Camry, the Accord, the G35/C, etc., etc.
Things like the overdirve button where available in the 1989 maxima and locking doors when put in drive are in the 1996 windstar, very basic features let alone lexus range. The camry does not represent the same value as a tl imo in their respective price ranges.
I think its an abosolut bullshit excuse that a family sedan is exempt from a nice inside n out design for the sake of mass market production and if a car ever had a terrible inside design it was the camry, ergonomics or not.
The car is flawless, the best built car family car in the world.
#50
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by heyitsme
I don't see that at all, the taurus used to be a sales leader in the segment and I had no love for that car other than the sho, just because toyota has a better reputation doesn't mean the camry deserves respect for sales #'s.
I don't see that at all, the taurus used to be a sales leader in the segment and I had no love for that car other than the sho, just because toyota has a better reputation doesn't mean the camry deserves respect for sales #'s.
So, we're again back to "if your car is the sales leader, it must be a great car for the category". Now, if the difference between the number one and number two is small, both are great. The first might have won due to rebates, incentives, etc. And that's probably the case with the Accord here, though I have not driven one ever.
Originally posted by heyitsme
Things like the overdirve button where available in the 1989 maxima and locking doors when put in drive are in the 1996 windstar, very basic features let alone lexus range.
Things like the overdirve button where available in the 1989 maxima and locking doors when put in drive are in the 1996 windstar, very basic features let alone lexus range.
The locking doors feature...OK. My 2001 RX300 does not have it! Bad for Lexus then. Why take away from the Camry?
Originally posted by heyitsme
The camry does not represent the same value as a tl imo in their respective price ranges.
The camry does not represent the same value as a tl imo in their respective price ranges.
Though, how big of a value a vehicle is, is more relevant within its own category rather than outside of it. And hence my positive comments about the Camry.
Originally posted by heyitsme
I think its an abosolut bullshit excuse that a family sedan is exempt from a nice inside n out design for the sake of mass market production and if a car ever had a terrible inside design it was the camry, ergonomics or not.
I think its an abosolut bullshit excuse that a family sedan is exempt from a nice inside n out design for the sake of mass market production and if a car ever had a terrible inside design it was the camry, ergonomics or not.
#51
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by heyitsme
A lexus being built off this car doesn't mean shit other than the lexus is going to have cheap ass camry components, the nav screen comes to mind. This is exactly why bmws are built on their on platforms, luxury shares nothing with non luxury cars.
A lexus being built off this car doesn't mean shit other than the lexus is going to have cheap ass camry components, the nav screen comes to mind. This is exactly why bmws are built on their on platforms, luxury shares nothing with non luxury cars.
Does that make the ex-SLK a cheap ass car because 1/3rd of parts were used by a Chrysler?
Does that make our CL a cheap ass car beacuse the Accord uses parts? Same for so many cars...
Again, the Camry is a better car because Toyota knows that a Lexus will be based on it.
#53
Gac, heyitsme is cool but clearly I swear to Thor he posts drunk.
A cheap 14k Camry is better built than any 35k TL. Where is the value in having a car that has the build quality of a wet paper towel? I see none. The TL would be almost the perfect car, if they could actually build a solid one.
A cheap 14k Camry is better built than any 35k TL. Where is the value in having a car that has the build quality of a wet paper towel? I see none. The TL would be almost the perfect car, if they could actually build a solid one.
#54
Senior Moderator
you're on crack SICKLEX. typical.
#55
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
Gac, heyitsme is cool but clearly I swear to Thor he posts drunk.
A cheap 14k Camry is better built than any 35k TL.
Gac, heyitsme is cool but clearly I swear to Thor he posts drunk.
A cheap 14k Camry is better built than any 35k TL.
#56
Originally posted by mattg
you're on crack SICKLEX. typical.
you're on crack SICKLEX. typical.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Sensative cunts.
#57
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXAS
Age: 43
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i also got a 03 as a loaner for a few days
smooth ride
felt solid
nice interior
just hate 2 things about it
interior
the seats are not comfortable at all!!!!!
sidemarker
smooth ride
felt solid
nice interior
just hate 2 things about it
interior
the seats are not comfortable at all!!!!!
sidemarker
#58
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
Gac, heyitsme is cool but clearly I swear to Thor he posts drunk.
A cheap 14k Camry is better built than any 35k TL. Where is the value in having a car that has the build quality of a wet paper towel? I see none. The TL would be almost the perfect car, if they could actually build a solid one.
Gac, heyitsme is cool but clearly I swear to Thor he posts drunk.
A cheap 14k Camry is better built than any 35k TL. Where is the value in having a car that has the build quality of a wet paper towel? I see none. The TL would be almost the perfect car, if they could actually build a solid one.
#60
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
Sensative cunts.
Sensative cunts.
#61
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
Gac, heyitsme is cool but clearly I swear to Thor he posts drunk.
A cheap 14k Camry is better built than any 35k TL. Where is the value in having a car that has the build quality of a wet paper towel? I see none. The TL would be almost the perfect car, if they could actually build a solid one.
Gac, heyitsme is cool but clearly I swear to Thor he posts drunk.
A cheap 14k Camry is better built than any 35k TL. Where is the value in having a car that has the build quality of a wet paper towel? I see none. The TL would be almost the perfect car, if they could actually build a solid one.
#62
The Camry belongs to that market. It's made for that market. The market that does not care about soul. And it does a great job at that. Possibly better than everyone else in the category and the sales figures back that argument. And for that, it deserves a round of applause and respect from all of us.
Does that make the ex-SLK a cheap ass car because 1/3rd of parts were used by a Chrysler?
Does that make our CL a cheap ass car beacuse the Accord uses parts? Same for so many cars...
Again, the Camry is a better car because Toyota knows that a Lexus will be based on it.
Does that make our CL a cheap ass car beacuse the Accord uses parts? Same for so many cars...
Again, the Camry is a better car because Toyota knows that a Lexus will be based on it.
Yes the cl is cheaper for using accord parts.
I don't agree that the camry is automatically a better car just because lexus has a version. Is the taurus automatically a better car because jag made an x-type using that platform, no. Is the 350z better because its on a similiar platform as the new m45, no. There was an article comparing the g35 platform to the new m45 platform( both same related platform) and there was a definate difference with the improvements in stiffness they added to the m, around 1400% increase.
#63
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by heyitsme
How can sales figures back something up when you're not taking into account fleet sales, you found this camry on a rental lot=fleet sales. Honda does very little fleet.
How can sales figures back something up when you're not taking into account fleet sales, you found this camry on a rental lot=fleet sales. Honda does very little fleet.
A car's success includes the ability of the sales and marketing departments and overall effort, not just that of the engineering department of an auto maker.
#64
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by heyitsme
If the slk was based off a chylser yes that would make it cheaper, but the parts are taken from the more expensive car making the chrysler better.
If the slk was based off a chylser yes that would make it cheaper, but the parts are taken from the more expensive car making the chrysler better.
So I will assume we agree that the platform was designed with all of these cars in mind. So some Lexus recipe went into the platform.
Now, granted, the SLK's platform was not designed with the Crossfire in mind when made (and that will change going forward for DCX).
My point does not change though. If Toyota had Lexus cars in mind when designing a platform, in addition to Toyota cars, then the Toyota cars benefit from that. And that is confirmed by me (to myself at least), every time I got into a Camry, etc.
Originally posted by heyitsme
Yes the cl is cheaper for using accord parts.
Yes the cl is cheaper for using accord parts.
Originally posted by heyitsme
I don't agree that the camry is automatically a better car just because lexus has a version. Is the taurus automatically a better car because jag made an x-type using that platform, no.
I don't agree that the camry is automatically a better car just because lexus has a version. Is the taurus automatically a better car because jag made an x-type using that platform, no.
Originally posted by heyitsme
Is the 350z better because its on a similiar platform as the new m45, no.
Is the 350z better because its on a similiar platform as the new m45, no.
But if you brought the example of the G35C, then the answer is absolutely yes. Nissan was developing that platform with both Nissan and Infiniti cars in mind, so how can it not be better as opposed to the possibility of the Nissan and Infiniti cars NOT sharing the same platforms?
Originally posted by heyitsme
There was an article comparing the g35 platform to the new m45 platform( both same related platform) and there was a definate difference with the improvements in stiffness they added to the m, around 1400% increase.
There was an article comparing the g35 platform to the new m45 platform( both same related platform) and there was a definate difference with the improvements in stiffness they added to the m, around 1400% increase.
But that's not my point exactly. As long as major parts of the luxo division of a given manufacturer are shared with the mama brand, then the mama brand benefits.
#65
Originally posted by gavriil
True, but it's still sales. You say the Accord does little fleet sales like it does not want to be sold, or something. Fleet sale= sale for people to drive the car. Does that mean there is something wrong with the car? Maybe? Maybe it's the sales department.
A car's success includes the ability of the sales and marketing departments and overall effort, not just that of the engineering department of an auto maker.
True, but it's still sales. You say the Accord does little fleet sales like it does not want to be sold, or something. Fleet sale= sale for people to drive the car. Does that mean there is something wrong with the car? Maybe? Maybe it's the sales department.
A car's success includes the ability of the sales and marketing departments and overall effort, not just that of the engineering department of an auto maker.
#66
Originally posted by gavriil
[B]Chicken and the egg. You're assuming that when this (Toyota) platform was designed, it was designed for the Camry and the ES, RX, Highlander, etc. offerings were an afterthought. You cant possibly believe that right? Toyota is smarter than that, I am sure you'll agree.
So I will assume we agree that the platform was designed with all of these cars in mind. So some Lexus recipe went into the platform.
[B]Chicken and the egg. You're assuming that when this (Toyota) platform was designed, it was designed for the Camry and the ES, RX, Highlander, etc. offerings were an afterthought. You cant possibly believe that right? Toyota is smarter than that, I am sure you'll agree.
So I will assume we agree that the platform was designed with all of these cars in mind. So some Lexus recipe went into the platform.
Putting a camry next to a es platform, I'd bet there is little difference, with both being built based on saving costs. Same as the current tl using an accord platform, all cost based, not luxury based - not making the accord a better car, instead making the tl a cheaper car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mugen TSX
Eastern Canada
0
09-16-2015 09:52 PM
Mugen TSX
Eastern Canada
0
09-01-2015 11:05 PM