One of you guys
#42
Re: grow up
Originally posted by silverm3
I think the 330ci is a great car and stock for stock a better overall performer than a cl type s if you want to pay more money. I know for a fact though you can't blow the doors off 3.2 cl type s especially a 6-speed it will be a close race.
Show some more class, and act accordingly, your giving us BMW owners a bad image. You can post a kill in a more discrete manner and get your kill accepted.
02 silver m3
93 mr2 turbo
02 3.2 tl nav
I think the 330ci is a great car and stock for stock a better overall performer than a cl type s if you want to pay more money. I know for a fact though you can't blow the doors off 3.2 cl type s especially a 6-speed it will be a close race.
Show some more class, and act accordingly, your giving us BMW owners a bad image. You can post a kill in a more discrete manner and get your kill accepted.
02 silver m3
93 mr2 turbo
02 3.2 tl nav
#43
Originally posted by eclipse23
Note I say I did NOT consider the 330 because it's performance was too close to the CLS and TLS so let that be an indication of how I feel about your trash talking. Your car is barely faster in stick form.
Note I say I did NOT consider the 330 because it's performance was too close to the CLS and TLS so let that be an indication of how I feel about your trash talking. Your car is barely faster in stick form.
BTW why did u buy a SMG M3?? Manual is the only way to go in a high performance vehicle.
#44
Originally posted by Maximized
Look at the handling and braking aspects of the CL-S and 330i and a clear difference is easily seen.
Look at the handling and braking aspects of the CL-S and 330i and a clear difference is easily seen.
The test track revealed numbers that can only be related to a simple lack of rubber. The Acura's 215/50VR-17 Michelin Pilots are substantially skinnier than the Bimmer's Continentals (225/ 45ZR-17 in front and 245/40ZR-17 rear). Although the Acura's skidpad performance was minimally better (0.86 versus 0.85), the CL was off the mark in the emergency-lane-change maneuver (60.5 mph versus 63.9 mph) and worse by 11 feet (178 feet versus 167 feet) in the 70-to-0-mph braking test.
This problem can easily be fix by increasing the size of the tires of the CL. In fact, I will challenge any BMW in a test of handling and braking, and I promise you, I will not lose!! I added a few mods to help in this area, and my car still cost less then yours.
#45
Originally posted by Maximized
Why does everyone say this? You Acura guys are becoming more and more like F-body/Mustang owners and only are comparing acceleration stats. Look at the handling and braking aspects of the CL-S and 330i and a clear difference is easily seen.
BTW why did u buy a SMG M3?? Manual is the only way to go in a high performance vehicle.
Why does everyone say this? You Acura guys are becoming more and more like F-body/Mustang owners and only are comparing acceleration stats. Look at the handling and braking aspects of the CL-S and 330i and a clear difference is easily seen.
BTW why did u buy a SMG M3?? Manual is the only way to go in a high performance vehicle.
Really? Is that right? Don't tell F1 that or the fact that the M3 CSL (lightweight version of the car) will only come in SMG because according to BMW and BMWCAR magazine SMG is the future of high performance racing. So, on that rationale considering some of the most exotic cars ever built are starting to offer SMG and the fact that SMG is going to be the next standard in upgrades for most cars (z4) this was the natural way to go. Manual's are great but if you drive in traffic like me I want to have the option of having the car do it for me. Since the SMG system is what.. .008 shift points or something like that and no loss of power it's a great option and I recommend you go test drive one. The shifting is sick it's definitely faster than the human hand could ever do it. Lastly, to say the manual is faster, that's due to launching and how SMG launches. I don't plan on beating the shit out of a 58K car so you manual guys can keep your .001 second difference
#46
Originally posted by Maximized
Why does everyone say this? You Acura guys are becoming more and more like F-body/Mustang owners and only are comparing acceleration stats. Look at the handling and braking aspects of the CL-S and 330i and a clear difference is easily seen.
Why does everyone say this? You Acura guys are becoming more and more like F-body/Mustang owners and only are comparing acceleration stats. Look at the handling and braking aspects of the CL-S and 330i and a clear difference is easily seen.
#47
Re: One of you Dorks
Originally posted by BMW330Ci
I toasted one of you dorks on Rt 4 East bound in NJ this past saturday night..you guys cant hang
I toasted one of you dorks on Rt 4 East bound in NJ this past saturday night..you guys cant hang
I have also ran one on the highway a while back and left it.
They just do not have hte power.
#49
Originally posted by eclipse23
Really? Is that right? Don't tell F1 that or the fact that the M3 CSL (lightweight version of the car) will only come in SMG because according to BMW and BMWCAR magazine SMG is the future of high performance racing. So, on that rationale considering some of the most exotic cars ever built are starting to offer SMG and the fact that SMG is going to be the next standard in upgrades for most cars (z4) this was the natural way to go. Manual's are great but if you drive in traffic like me I want to have the option of having the car do it for me. Since the SMG system is what.. .008 shift points or something like that and no loss of power it's a great option and I recommend you go test drive one. The shifting is sick it's definitely faster than the human hand could ever do it. Lastly, to say the manual is faster, that's due to launching and how SMG launches. I don't plan on beating the shit out of a 58K car so you manual guys can keep your .001 second difference
Really? Is that right? Don't tell F1 that or the fact that the M3 CSL (lightweight version of the car) will only come in SMG because according to BMW and BMWCAR magazine SMG is the future of high performance racing. So, on that rationale considering some of the most exotic cars ever built are starting to offer SMG and the fact that SMG is going to be the next standard in upgrades for most cars (z4) this was the natural way to go. Manual's are great but if you drive in traffic like me I want to have the option of having the car do it for me. Since the SMG system is what.. .008 shift points or something like that and no loss of power it's a great option and I recommend you go test drive one. The shifting is sick it's definitely faster than the human hand could ever do it. Lastly, to say the manual is faster, that's due to launching and how SMG launches. I don't plan on beating the shit out of a 58K car so you manual guys can keep your .001 second difference
#53
Re: One of you Dorks
Originally posted by BMW330Ci
I toasted one of you dorks on Rt 4 East bound in NJ this past saturday night..you guys cant hang
I toasted one of you dorks on Rt 4 East bound in NJ this past saturday night..you guys cant hang
Dorks?? Grow the fuck up boy.
#54
Originally posted by Maximized
SMG stands for Sequentila Manual Gearbox, which is a fancy auto basically.
SMG stands for Sequentila Manual Gearbox, which is a fancy auto basically.
#55
Originally posted by corey415
An SMG transmission is just as fast as a manual (for the M3 and Ferraris), and it is a great option to get on the M3.
An SMG transmission is just as fast as a manual (for the M3 and Ferraris), and it is a great option to get on the M3.
"The SMG gearbox is the best of its ilk, but a buyer would want to be sure they really need it because in auto mode it isn't as forgiving as a conventional automatic, and in manual mode it offers virtually no advantages over one with a clutch pedal apart from giving the driver's left leg a rest. Fun for the tech-heads, but ultimately a bit complex for its own good."
Take it for what its worth....
#56
Originally posted by corey415
Dude your kidding rite? Sportshift, autostick, stuff like that is a fancy auto, as they still have torque converters and are not necessarily faster than a regular automatic. An SMG transmission is just as fast as a manual (for the M3 and Ferraris), and it is a great option to get on the M3.
Dude your kidding rite? Sportshift, autostick, stuff like that is a fancy auto, as they still have torque converters and are not necessarily faster than a regular automatic. An SMG transmission is just as fast as a manual (for the M3 and Ferraris), and it is a great option to get on the M3.
#57
Originally posted by Rips CL
Here is what they said about the SMG transmission in an auto mag I was reading:
"The SMG gearbox is the best of its ilk, but a buyer would want to be sure they really need it because in auto mode it isn't as forgiving as a conventional automatic, and in manual mode it offers virtually no advantages over one with a clutch pedal apart from giving the driver's left leg a rest. Fun for the tech-heads, but ultimately a bit complex for its own good."
Take it for what its worth....
Here is what they said about the SMG transmission in an auto mag I was reading:
"The SMG gearbox is the best of its ilk, but a buyer would want to be sure they really need it because in auto mode it isn't as forgiving as a conventional automatic, and in manual mode it offers virtually no advantages over one with a clutch pedal apart from giving the driver's left leg a rest. Fun for the tech-heads, but ultimately a bit complex for its own good."
Take it for what its worth....
#58
My friend has a 02 M3 manual and tells me that the SMG is a waste. It is a big hype that BMW is trying to market for people who cant shift very well themselves. A manual M3 is faster in all aspects, so why get the SMG in a sports car like the M3? I cant see an adavantage to this technology except the "auto" function mode.
#59
Originally posted by Maximized
My friend has a 02 M3 manual and tells me that the SMG is a waste. It is a big hype that BMW is trying to market for people who cant shift very well themselves. A manual M3 is faster in all aspects, so why get the SMG in a sports car like the M3? I cant see an adavantage to this technology except the "auto" function mode.
My friend has a 02 M3 manual and tells me that the SMG is a waste. It is a big hype that BMW is trying to market for people who cant shift very well themselves. A manual M3 is faster in all aspects, so why get the SMG in a sports car like the M3? I cant see an adavantage to this technology except the "auto" function mode.
to sum it all up if i didnt have to drive in crazy traffic i would get the manual and if i did have to drive in crazy traffic smg is the way to go and still have a sporty shifting experience when not in traffic
#60
Originally posted by Maximized
My friend has a 02 M3 manual and tells me that the SMG is a waste. It is a big hype that BMW is trying to market for people who cant shift very well themselves. A manual M3 is faster in all aspects, so why get the SMG in a sports car like the M3? I cant see an adavantage to this technology except the "auto" function mode.
My friend has a 02 M3 manual and tells me that the SMG is a waste. It is a big hype that BMW is trying to market for people who cant shift very well themselves. A manual M3 is faster in all aspects, so why get the SMG in a sports car like the M3? I cant see an adavantage to this technology except the "auto" function mode.
Really? Is that right? Don't tell F1 that or the fact that the M3 CSL (lightweight version of the car) will only come in SMG because according to BMW and BMWCAR magazine SMG is the future of high performance racing. So, on that rationale considering some of the most exotic cars ever built are starting to offer SMG and the fact that SMG is going to be the next standard in upgrades for most cars (z4) this was the natural way to go.
Yeah, It's a gimmick alright! BMW is fooling 1million plus dollar racing machines all the way to the bank If your only getting manual to feel like your in a sports car, go right ahead....
As for it being faster, show me the numbers that's highly debated right now based on launch style. PLUS the numeric diff. if any is negligable.
#61
Originally posted by eclipse23
No offense but they are morons if they think it's that simple. Go test drive one and read up it yourself. In auto mode it's simply a non-parasitic auto. It is faster than a human can do it that's been proven and it's not complex unless your IQ is lacking.
No offense but they are morons if they think it's that simple. Go test drive one and read up it yourself. In auto mode it's simply a non-parasitic auto. It is faster than a human can do it that's been proven and it's not complex unless your IQ is lacking.
"This technique can't beat an expert's foot on a clutch, however. Our most recent three-pedal M3 outran the SMG by 0.3 second, with the entire advantage gained in first gear. The SMG hit 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and ran the quarter in 13.4, 0.3 second slower than our long-term M3 at both points, and each crossed the quarter-mile at 107 mph, suggesting they were equally powerful. Running in the A5 mode slowed the SMG by another 0.2 second.
BMW claims that performance, not convenience, is SMG's raison d'être. Our numbers don't prove that out, but we do think there's $2472 worth of convenience here."
#62
Originally posted by Rips CL
Here is another article out of Car & Driver. Take it for what it is worth...
"This technique can't beat an expert's foot on a clutch, however. Our most recent three-pedal M3 outran the SMG by 0.3 second, with the entire advantage gained in first gear. The SMG hit 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and ran the quarter in 13.4, 0.3 second slower than our long-term M3 at both points, and each crossed the quarter-mile at 107 mph, suggesting they were equally powerful. Running in the A5 mode slowed the SMG by another 0.2 second.
BMW claims that performance, not convenience, is SMG's raison d'être. Our numbers don't prove that out, but we do think there's $2472 worth of convenience here."
Here is another article out of Car & Driver. Take it for what it is worth...
"This technique can't beat an expert's foot on a clutch, however. Our most recent three-pedal M3 outran the SMG by 0.3 second, with the entire advantage gained in first gear. The SMG hit 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and ran the quarter in 13.4, 0.3 second slower than our long-term M3 at both points, and each crossed the quarter-mile at 107 mph, suggesting they were equally powerful. Running in the A5 mode slowed the SMG by another 0.2 second.
BMW claims that performance, not convenience, is SMG's raison d'être. Our numbers don't prove that out, but we do think there's $2472 worth of convenience here."
#63
since the average Vette (NON Z06) runs around the same time, i'd bet money 8 out of 10 times, the SMG will win...i highly doubt the driver's gonna shift nearly as perfectly as the SMG, AND i hardly think the driver can shift at the optimal RPM's as the SMG
#64
Originally posted by eclipse23
Ok so I can own a manual and get a better launch and gain a total of .03 in the 1/4 or I can get an SMG have the option of the car doing the shifting for me and lose .03? Ummm ok guys .03 is not that much considering I'm not gonna be draggin my car and .03 aint gonna stop my car from being in front of alot of cars
Ok so I can own a manual and get a better launch and gain a total of .03 in the 1/4 or I can get an SMG have the option of the car doing the shifting for me and lose .03? Ummm ok guys .03 is not that much considering I'm not gonna be draggin my car and .03 aint gonna stop my car from being in front of alot of cars
#65
Originally posted by eclipse23
Ok so I can own a manual and get a better launch and gain a total of .03 in the 1/4 or I can get an SMG have the option of the car doing the shifting for me and lose .03? Ummm ok guys .03 is not that much considering I'm not gonna be draggin my car and .03 aint gonna stop my car from being in front of alot of cars
Ok so I can own a manual and get a better launch and gain a total of .03 in the 1/4 or I can get an SMG have the option of the car doing the shifting for me and lose .03? Ummm ok guys .03 is not that much considering I'm not gonna be draggin my car and .03 aint gonna stop my car from being in front of alot of cars
i want a M3 too!!!!!
#66
Who gives a phuck!? It's a phucking m3. It's not a 911tt or ferrari or lambo. It's a nicely priced bimmer that would blow the doors off most cars and still have the invite of interior amenities to take your girl out and feel comfy. Yeah get a z06, and all you got is american muscle with so-so interior. I would rather get style, luxary and go fast all together. You guys kill me. Real sports car! SMG all the way unless you live in a freaking non populated area where you can everyday spit quarter mile times out and take twisties afterwork for a couple of hours. I am in the market for a m3 and I'll take what ever model. .03 don't mean shit if you can't shift or you are chirping the hell out of 1st and 2nd gear in the manual.
#68
its funny how these 330 guys think that their 225horses can hang with 260hp. i guess if you really try hard you can make yourself believe anything, even if if is fantasy world. suck it up you paid almost 10g's more for less of a vehicle in all aspects sucka. go brag to your bile movement buddy's about this supposed win you had bitch and leave the ACURA forum, cause nobody here takes your statements with any truth. by the way i smoked a 330 with a is300 and thats 10hp's less than you, thats much more of a closer match, but a cls keep on wettin yourself with those dreams..lol
#70
on the topic of reputations mr.330ci . i wouldn't even go there! bmw does not have the best when it comes to vehicle maintainance especially compared to a acura, which on the other hand has a great rep for maintenance. do you really even know what your talkin about or are you just so happy with your 330 that you start thinkin its an invincible entity of some sort? i bet you can blow up a 03 vette too huh. on second thought could it be anger and jealousy from gettin smoked by so many cls' that you came here to make up shit and make yourself feel better
#71
Originally posted by quikcls
its funny how these 330 guys think that their 225horses can hang with 260hp. i guess if you really try hard you can make yourself believe anything, even if if is fantasy world. suck it up you paid almost 10g's more for less of a vehicle in all aspects sucka. go brag to your bile movement buddy's about this supposed win you had bitch and leave the ACURA forum, cause nobody here takes your statements with any truth. by the way i smoked a 330 with a is300 and thats 10hp's less than you, thats much more of a closer match, but a cls keep on wettin yourself with those dreams..lol
its funny how these 330 guys think that their 225horses can hang with 260hp. i guess if you really try hard you can make yourself believe anything, even if if is fantasy world. suck it up you paid almost 10g's more for less of a vehicle in all aspects sucka. go brag to your bile movement buddy's about this supposed win you had bitch and leave the ACURA forum, cause nobody here takes your statements with any truth. by the way i smoked a 330 with a is300 and thats 10hp's less than you, thats much more of a closer match, but a cls keep on wettin yourself with those dreams..lol
#73
its funny how these 330 guys think that their 225horses can hang with 260hp. i guess if you really try hard you can make yourself believe anything, even if if is fantasy world. suck it up you paid almost 10g's more for less of a vehicle in all aspects sucka. go brag to your bile movement buddy's about this supposed win you had bitch and leave the ACURA forum, cause nobody here takes your statements with any truth. by the way i smoked a 330 with a is300 and thats 10hp's less than you, thats much more of a closer match, but a cls keep on wettin yourself with those dreams..lol
BMW's did the 0-60 sprint in under 6 seconds with the OLD 189hp I-6. Only 189hp. HP is not everything, let's talk TORQUE
BMW's underated their engines to me. Or they are accurate. I guess any car without 260hp is just plain stupid to own huh?
#74
Originally posted by Scooter
since the average Vette (NON Z06) runs around the same time, i'd bet money 8 out of 10 times, the SMG will win...i highly doubt the driver's gonna shift nearly as perfectly as the SMG, AND i hardly think the driver can shift at the optimal RPM's as the SMG
since the average Vette (NON Z06) runs around the same time, i'd bet money 8 out of 10 times, the SMG will win...i highly doubt the driver's gonna shift nearly as perfectly as the SMG, AND i hardly think the driver can shift at the optimal RPM's as the SMG
#75
My German car list in order....
1. Benz
2. Porsche
3. Tie
BMW
Audi
5. VW
I love German cars, but some of there up-keep is expensive compared to Japanese cars. But if I was going to buy one, it would be just like my dads.....CL55 AMG!! AWESOME!!!
1. Benz
2. Porsche
3. Tie
BMW
Audi
5. VW
I love German cars, but some of there up-keep is expensive compared to Japanese cars. But if I was going to buy one, it would be just like my dads.....CL55 AMG!! AWESOME!!!
#76
Originally posted by Maximized
An average Vette and 6 speed E46 M3 run around the same time, but the SMG is about .5 slower in reality at the track. SMG is for people who havent learned how to properly drive a high powered RWD car or for people who do like to shift.
An average Vette and 6 speed E46 M3 run around the same time, but the SMG is about .5 slower in reality at the track. SMG is for people who havent learned how to properly drive a high powered RWD car or for people who do like to shift.
cough cough M3 CSL cough cough F1 cough cough
#77
Originally posted by eclipse23
I agree that's why some of the fastest cars are using it
cough cough M3 CSL cough cough F1 cough cough
I agree that's why some of the fastest cars are using it
cough cough M3 CSL cough cough F1 cough cough
#78
Originally posted by eclipse23
I agree that's why some of the fastest cars are using it
cough cough M3 CSL cough cough F1 cough cough
I agree that's why some of the fastest cars are using it
cough cough M3 CSL cough cough F1 cough cough
You can argue all day because you bought a SMG, but on a M3 IT IS FASTER, End of story.
FYI: The Sequential gearbox in a F1 shares very little in common with the SMGs in production cars.
#79
Originally posted by BMW330Ci
Crusing along in 4th gear @50 mph, Blue CL-Stype pulls up next to me, looking at me passing me, slowing down, continuously for a half mile. I dropped it into 3rd and saw the Honda nowhere to be found
Crusing along in 4th gear @50 mph, Blue CL-Stype pulls up next to me, looking at me passing me, slowing down, continuously for a half mile. I dropped it into 3rd and saw the Honda nowhere to be found
#80
this guy is tripping me out. I know damn well my CLS can beat the piss out of a 330ci. I have a buddy who just bought a 325ci, paid $36k, way too much, and I blew the doors off him too. I know the 330ci has what, 30 more HP, but somehow I dont believe you killed him. If you did, im sure the CL you raced wasnt ready. From all the different threads that have been posted about the 330 vs CLS, this is just another attempt to talk shit. No one really cares anymore, but anyways, if you beat him I guess I have to say good job but next time, race a manual and see what happens