new SL500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 05:23 PM
  #1  
Akim711's Avatar
Thread Starter
dynamic Duo!
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia, CA
new SL500

i saw a few on the road the other day... pretty much one of the sickest looking stock rides i've ever seen. or is it just me?

sorry, i just had to mention this. guess the CL500 ain't my dream car no more.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 05:31 PM
  #2  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
i still rather have the cl600 with some DUBs
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 05:32 PM
  #3  
Nicky Pass's Avatar
Fuct in the hed!
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,057
Likes: 4
From: Chicagoland-ish
CL 600 is to big and slow.........SL 500 is way better!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 05:34 PM
  #4  
cob3683's Avatar
Burn some dust here
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
CL600 is faster than the Sl500
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 06:33 PM
  #5  
ItalianStallion's Avatar
I Feel Too Old Here
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,100
Likes: 0
i'd say there isnt much difference between the CL and SL anymore, just the SL is faster of course because it is the flagship sportscar and it doesnt have the back seat. as long as the CL 600 and SL 500 are compared its almost even IMO leaning toward the CL cause of the V12. But SL600 ownz everybody.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 06:36 PM
  #6  
Red Nj-s's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 0
From: central jerzey
The SL is is better lookin, i think. I'd still opt for the Cl because of rapper credentials.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 07:10 PM
  #7  
cob3683's Avatar
Burn some dust here
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
Originally posted by ItalianStallion
i'd say there isnt much difference between the CL and SL anymore, just the SL is faster of course because it is the flagship sportscar and it doesnt have the back seat. as long as the CL 600 and SL 500 are compared its almost even IMO leaning toward the CL cause of the V12. But SL600 ownz everybody.
SL600 isnt made anymore. MB is gonna put on hold the 600's for awhile with the 55's going to 47-hp+
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 08:00 PM
  #8  
CLUofI's Avatar
337
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 0
From: Iowa City/Des Moines
what no pics?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 09:08 PM
  #9  
Zoot's Avatar
__
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: Pa
Originally posted by cob3683

SL600 isnt made anymore. MB is gonna put on hold the 600's for awhile with the 55's going to 47-hp+
The V12 will be back. They first introduce the 500, then 600 and 55. Look at the S and CL (mercedes CL that is).
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 11:41 PM
  #10  
QwiQ cLs's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: EARTH you dumb fuck....!!
SL55 0-60 4.6 seconds
smoke the cl55 n e day
and comes with a retractable hardtop!!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:30 AM
  #11  
VeiLsTyleZ's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: so cali
yeah...ill take the sl500
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 08:38 AM
  #12  
cob3683's Avatar
Burn some dust here
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
Originally posted by Acura3.0CLP
The V12 will be back. They first introduce the 500, then 600 and 55. Look at the S and CL (mercedes CL that is).
Very true. But with all the 55's going to 470+hp, who in the hell would buy the 600?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 08:55 AM
  #13  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I'll take a Porsche over any MB :o

cheaper too
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 10:09 AM
  #14  
Silver_Lana's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, NJ
Correction for you guys....

The New SL 55 //AMG is going to have 500Hp.... the reason?
The New E 55 AMG turned out to be faster then the SL because of weight differences so they bumped up the SL 55 to 500Hp... oh baby!!!!
Cant wait to see the revised numbers on that bad boy...

I will post a link to the revised info as soon as i can find it again...
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 10:23 AM
  #15  
bigman's Avatar
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,016
Likes: 4
From: Yonkers NY
Mercedes is superchargine all of there new engines coming out. Imagine the possibilities of putting a smaller pulley on one of them bad boys. The new v 12 in the s class will be a twin turbo v 12 to compete wit the 6.0 litre bimmer and the new S8. Mercedes will have the best engines in the world soon. The E55 will have 4 hundred and change horses out of a blown 5.5 litre 8 and will blow the doors off the M3 and the M5. The SL will be by itself as the ultimate luxo sports car. But, from what i am hearing from a friend at the bimmer dealer is that BMW is going to be making the next m3 a v8 while the rest of the line up will be 6's. And, the M5 will be either a v 10 that bmw has been working on for years or use a modified version of the companies flagship 12 cylinder beast from the 760il.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 11:16 AM
  #16  
proactive's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: NY
More pics stolen and resized from various sites:


AMG




Barbus






Lorinser




Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 11:30 AM
  #17  
NYKEEROCKA's Avatar
phuck your CL race my F4
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
From: strong island
my boss just bought the new sl500 a couple of weeks ago, sick ass car.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 01:12 PM
  #18  
cob3683's Avatar
Burn some dust here
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
That Lorinser is GHEY looking. The Brabus and normal SL55 are the shit, but that damn Lorinser looks like a big pile of poo.
Lorinser
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 01:15 PM
  #19  
jdtypeS's Avatar
Lucky Kid Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
DUB:
lol
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:02 PM
  #20  
Akim711's Avatar
Thread Starter
dynamic Duo!
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia, CA
drool!
man, haha, i just had to voice my opinion after i saw the car... didn't know i'd get so many replies. haha

anyway, with all this talk about fighting back and retaliations among BMW, Audi, and Benz... poppin in BIG 8 cylinders in M3's and huge 12's in tiny coupes and shit...

... meanwhile Honda's jacking off trying to figure out a way to pump out an extra 15 horses out of the 2.0liter to differentiate it between a baseline and Type-R.

i kno Honda's more technology oriented, but man, I think its time that the RL deserves an 8.... NSX is cool with the high-revving 6cyls and all, but the RL is supposed to be the apex in luxury among Honda's production line...
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:13 PM
  #21  
SiGGy's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 2
From: Lenexa, KS
Originally posted by someguy
I'll take a Porsche over any MB :o

cheaper too
Which porsche?

They are pretty close base vs. base models. And pretty close on the high end too. Unless you want a boxster.

i.e.

SL500 vs 911 porsche.

SL55 vs 911 turbo.

Do they still make the SL320? I only hear about the SL500 since the redesign?

----

I'm with ya though, I'd take a 911 turbo for sure
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:17 PM
  #22  
Chaptorial's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 18,552
Likes: 4
From: Long Island, NY
Definately an awesome car. My friends uncle has the last generation SL600. Drving down the LIE you wouldn't belive how much attention it gets. A trucker offered to trade his rig straight up for it.

This new gen looks 10x better however.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:20 PM
  #23  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by SiGGy


Which porsche?

They are pretty close base vs. base models. And pretty close on the high end too. Unless you want a boxster.

i.e.

SL500 vs 911 porsche.

SL55 vs 911 turbo.

Do they still make the SL320? I only hear about the SL500 since the redesign?

----

I'm with ya though, I'd take a 911 turbo for sure
The base 911 is faster than the SL500 and quite a bit cheaper. The Turbo is much faster than the SL55. And I don't mean just straight line. And the Posches aren't fat pigs with automatic only. Much more fun to drive.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:27 PM
  #24  
cob3683's Avatar
Burn some dust here
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
Originally posted by someguy
The base 911 is faster than the SL500 and quite a bit cheaper. The Turbo is much faster than the SL55. And I don't mean just straight line. And the Posches aren't fat pigs with automatic only. Much more fun to drive.
Very true for both on performance standpoints. Porsche has 4 seats and MB has 2. But, if you equip the normal 911 to the level an SL500 is, it will be more. Trust me, $700 for lights in the car and another $1600 for power seats.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:32 PM
  #25  
SiGGy's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 2
From: Lenexa, KS
Originally posted by someguy


The base 911 is faster than the SL500 and quite a bit cheaper. The Turbo is much faster than the SL55. And I don't mean just straight line. And the Posches aren't fat pigs with automatic only. Much more fun to drive.
Whats quite a bit?

I thought the base 911 was still $70K? (msrp)

WOW!

I just went and looked at Mercedes site

ya! no kidding. They raised the price a bit on the new SL.
$86,665 closer to 90+k realistically...

You could buy a SL500 2 years ago in the 70's of course you could buy a SL320 then too.... UGH

geeze. How much is the AMG SL55 now?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:41 PM
  #26  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by cob3683

Very true for both on performance standpoints. Porsche has 4 seats and MB has 2. But, if you equip the normal 911 to the level an SL500 is, it will be more. Trust me, $700 for lights in the car and another $1600 for power seats.
I know Porsche rapes you on options. I can honestly say that I would rather have a 911 C2 with no options than the SL500.

I priced out a 911 w/ 10k in options. I could easily do without the Leather interior and save another $3700...

Porsche Stability Management System
Not Listed $1230

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sport Exhaust System
Not Listed $2400

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AM/FM Radio With CD Player
Not Listed $350

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special Leather Interior
Not Listed $3690

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Graphite Grey Floor Mat
Not Listed $115

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sport Seats
$0 $0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sport Chassis
Not Listed $690

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carrera Light Alloy Wheels, 18-In.
Not Listed $1325

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rear Wiper
Not Listed $340

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total of Selected Options
$0 $10140

For a total of $78,805, including the base price of $67,900

Whereas the SL500 with only the Sports Package is $93,055.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 03:43 PM
  #27  
SiGGy's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 2
From: Lenexa, KS
LoL, I loaded one up for a whopping $114,934.

:GULP:


Mabye I'll get $70K off the sticker so I can afford it!

LMAO
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 04:37 PM
  #28  
cob3683's Avatar
Burn some dust here
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
Originally posted by someguy
I know Porsche rapes you on options. I can honestly say that I would rather have a 911 C2 with no options than the SL500.
I priced out a 911 w/ 10k in options. I could easily do without the Leather interior and save another $3700...
For a total of $78,805, including the base price of $67,900
Whereas the SL500 with only the Sports Package is $93,055.
You are not building the Convert though. Compare a Cl500 if you do that. Base price on the Convert is $77, Now we are getting closer when you add in those options.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 04:51 PM
  #29  
Zoot's Avatar
__
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: Pa
Originally posted by SiGGy



Do they still make the SL320? I only hear about the SL500 since the redesign?
No 320. M-B dropped the 6 when they slightly re-freshened the SL a few years ago (98 i believe).

yes, I love the look of the new SL, but I will really miss the previous gen. SL's. They had classy style that still looks great after 10 years. It will take some time for me to accept this new car as an "SL." My neighbor has a 2002 SL500 Silver Arrow collectors edition. WOW is that a beautiful car. For those of you who don't know what the silver arrow is; it's M-B's way of saying farewell to this classic car. The Silver arrow is a spruced up previous gen. SL. Too bad they are all sold out, but i guess I can just stare at my neighbors.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #30  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by cob3683

You are not building the Convert though. Compare a Cl500 if you do that. Base price on the Convert is $77, Now we are getting closer when you add in those options.
It would still be a no brainer for the Porsche. The Cabrio with those options would still be more than $7K cheaper and have a manual transmission. It would be faster, handle better and be much more fun to drive.

I would rather have the coupe though. A Targa would be a good compromise with it's retractable Glass roof....cheaper than the cabrio...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dabeast51
3G TL (2004-2008)
0
Jul 13, 2015 08:56 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Mar 31, 2012 09:01 AM
TSC17
Wash & Wax
35
Apr 1, 2009 07:48 PM
gavriil
Automotive News
5
Sep 28, 2003 08:03 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
8
Jun 5, 2003 05:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.