MotorTrend long term test with CL-S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2003, 08:05 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Jayhawk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Downingtown, PA,USA
Age: 75
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MotorTrend long term test with CL-S

New March Motor Trend has an article on their one year with the 01 CLS; about 9500 miles spent with a black one. Very complimentary article and balanced set of what's hot and what's not. The love the engine, mixed reviews on the tranny shift pattern; too short on head room. Check it out on p. 128.
Old 01-30-2003, 08:06 PM
  #2  
The Creator
 
soopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Age: 42
Posts: 37,950
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
scan it up
Old 01-30-2003, 09:01 PM
  #3  
Changin bulbs since '73
iTrader: (1)
 
Loseit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chi-town burbs
Age: 51
Posts: 8,111
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by Soopa™
scan it up
Old 01-30-2003, 09:13 PM
  #4  
Team Owner
 
Shawn S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Soopa™
scan it up
I would, but I didn’t get mine in the mail yet.

Shawn S
Old 01-30-2003, 09:49 PM
  #5  
6 Forward 1 Back
 
Speed_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 2,400
Received 312 Likes on 155 Posts
Here you go. . .





Old 01-30-2003, 09:58 PM
  #6  
Administrator Alumnus
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Honest, decent review.
Old 01-30-2003, 10:00 PM
  #7  
Team Owner
 
Shawn S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems like a relatively positive review.
They scraped the SHIT out of the wheels, but at least they didn’t blow the Tranny.

Shawn S
Old 01-30-2003, 10:11 PM
  #8  
trying to get a lil V-I
 
chikai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Left Coast
Age: 45
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
good article. I'll say most of what they wrote can reflect on many of our experiences here. It's unfortunate they have a false sense of reliability with their auto CL. Imagine if their tranny had blown like some of ours have in the middle of a busy LA highway. I bet their tone of voice would be slightly different.

thanks speed_racer for scanning the article.
Old 01-30-2003, 10:13 PM
  #9  
trying to get a lil V-I
 
chikai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Left Coast
Age: 45
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Also...they mentioned that the airbags are now dual staged, dual threshold device. When did they include that? 2002 or 2003?
Old 01-30-2003, 10:13 PM
  #10  
Pro
 
6spdmanual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't understand why use Eclispe and Camry as alternatives. Sucks!!
Old 01-30-2003, 10:30 PM
  #11  
Suzuka Master
 
danny25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Age: 43
Posts: 8,869
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I've never noticed a lack of head room in my CL, and I'm almost 6'3". Maybe they didn't notice that the seat height could be adjusted.
Old 01-30-2003, 10:31 PM
  #12  
Instructor
 
oghondaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: bay area ca.
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5 passenger? Fifth passenger must have a sore ass!!
Old 01-30-2003, 10:58 PM
  #13  
Fell off my Rocking-Chair
 
shaHn78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In a different State of Mind
Posts: 1,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
where are the guys who are always quick to label certain magazines (i.e motor trend) sold-out or bought-out by other car companies?

Guess they wont be coming out on this one huh
Old 01-30-2003, 11:29 PM
  #14  
2nd Gear
 
Dave 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have to agree also with two or three considerations - I am 6' 3" and have plenty of room, but I ride like a low rider! And better tires make a huge difference (Sumitomo HTR+ 235 45 17).

Plus get the 6 speed manual - at all costs!!!
Old 01-30-2003, 11:30 PM
  #15  
2nd Gear
 
Dave 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I am not really a newbie, just Dave in disguise!
Old 01-31-2003, 12:02 AM
  #16  
ALi G in the House!
 
AkuraCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NA
Posts: 5,034
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
last i checked, our car was ment to only fit 4 people...they have 5 people listed...no wonder they complained..
Old 01-31-2003, 12:18 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
pianoman41's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Western MA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I almost didn't get my TL-S because of the lack of headroom. Almost. I'm 6'4" so I now definitely sit more reclined than I did in my Maxima (ordered sans sunroof). My kingdom for another inch of headroom! I would have loved to have the option to lose the sunroof in favor of the headroom. I wonder if the '03 TLs have the additional headroom like the '03 CLs do?
Old 01-31-2003, 01:49 AM
  #18  
Fuct in the hed!
 
Nicky Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicagoland-ish
Age: 45
Posts: 14,057
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
They like it....they really like it
Old 01-31-2003, 05:46 AM
  #19  
Instructor
 
tktommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago's western burbs
Age: 64
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just have a problem with the comment that one editor wrote about not choosing the CL-S over the G35 coupe. It would make sense if the G35 coupe were available at the time of the test. I was taken by the G35 when I first saw it (except for the interior, ugh.), but let's see how the G35 stands the same type of test. My brother has a G35 sedan and has already had the A/C go out twice and other misc. irritants with the car. I know-the CL-S has a tranny issue, but I still think bang for the buck, the CL-S and TL-S are the best.
Old 01-31-2003, 01:59 PM
  #20  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Great review. Don't know where they are getting the lack of headroom from. I'm 6'2" and have no problems.
Old 01-31-2003, 08:17 PM
  #21  
Back to Four Doors
 
lead_sled_dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Rafael, CA USA
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
Great review. Don't know where they are getting the lack of headroom from. I'm 6'2" and have no problems.
Editor must have been 7' 3" ... At 6'1", I find no problem with the headroom. I do agree that the A/C controls on the NAVI are a pain in the ass. And what's up with the seats having a "mind of their own?" WTF?
Old 02-01-2003, 04:46 AM
  #22  
Under the radar
 
CLSter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think the editors even knew how to use the seat adjustments. I am 6' 3" and the headroom isn't all that good but I am comfortable. Too bad they never found out about the easy sunroof fix. I will agree with the assessment of the wind noise around the mirrors, it's still there on the 2003s. All in all it seems like a good review. Though it does sound like the 2003 is the best year to own.
Old 02-01-2003, 05:54 AM
  #23  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
They said the seat had a mind of its own...uh...maybe they missed the MEMORY FUnCTION...duh
Old 02-01-2003, 12:29 PM
  #24  
Safety Car
 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Age: 43
Posts: 4,954
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Why are M/T's long term tests for 10k somtimes, every car tha I know of that C/D has taken has gone like 40k before they give it back (I think) I still subscribe to MT, cause they get different news and all that, but CD and Road and Track are far better mags IMHO.
Old 02-01-2003, 12:43 PM
  #25  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally posted by tktommy
I know-the CL-S has a tranny issue, but I still think bang for the buck, the CL-S and TL-S are the best.
unless the CLS/TLS sticker for under $27G, the WRX is still the best bang for the buck.

As for the A/C glitch in your bros G, it is in its first year of production so bugs are a given.
Old 02-01-2003, 02:55 PM
  #26  
Fell off my Rocking-Chair
 
shaHn78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In a different State of Mind
Posts: 1,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by F23A4
unless the CLS/TLS sticker for under $27G, the WRX is still the best bang for the buck.

Umm not really. WRX is an econo-car with performance of a m3. WRX offers speed with absolutely NO luxury while CLS/TLS offers a bit of performance (tho no where comperable to the wrx) with very nice luxury.

But its about personal... if u want cheap speed then wrx is right for u but if u care more about luxury with performance being 2nd then CLS is still up there.

So who are U to say no-no to someone who find cls and tls as the cars for the best bang for bucks?
Old 02-01-2003, 03:06 PM
  #27  
Senior Moderator
 
mattg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OR
Age: 48
Posts: 22,909
Received 388 Likes on 196 Posts
i'm over 6'3", and i've never concidered headroom a problem
Old 02-01-2003, 03:13 PM
  #28  
Changin bulbs since '73
iTrader: (1)
 
Loseit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chi-town burbs
Age: 51
Posts: 8,111
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by shaHn78
Umm not really. WRX is an econo-car with performance of a m3. WRX offers speed with absolutely NO luxury while CLS/TLS offers a bit of performance (tho no where comperable to the wrx) with very nice luxury.

But its about personal... if u want cheap speed then wrx is right for u but if u care more about luxury with performance being 2nd then CLS is still up there.

So who are U to say no-no to someone who find cls and tls as the cars for the best bang for bucks?
when i was 18 i would have wanted a WRX. Back in the day it was Camaro's and 5.0's. But now that i am an old fat bastard i would never want to sit in a car that wasnt comfortable and nice inside. Now the attributes of the CL appeal to me more. Luxury with a mix of performance.
Old 02-01-2003, 07:59 PM
  #29  
Safety Car
 
nate'sCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SAC, CA
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by lead_sled_dog
Editor must have been 7' 3" ...
It was Shaq.
Old 02-01-2003, 08:00 PM
  #30  
Safety Car
 
nate'sCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SAC, CA
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by mattg
i'm over 6'3", and i've never concidered headroom a problem
same.
Old 02-01-2003, 08:38 PM
  #31  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Best bang for the buck = Most performance for the least money

Originally posted by shaHn78
Umm not really. WRX is an econo-car with performance of a m3. WRX offers speed with absolutely NO luxury while CLS/TLS offers a bit of performance (tho no where comperable to the wrx) with very nice luxury.

But its about personal... if u want cheap speed then wrx is right for u but if u care more about luxury with performance being 2nd then CLS is still up there.

So who are U to say no-no to someone who find cls and tls as the cars for the best bang for bucks?
Did he not state "best bang for the buck" I didnt think the qualifier for this designation was luxury. My mistake.
Old 02-01-2003, 08:38 PM
  #32  
The hair says it all
 
Python2121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Age: 38
Posts: 7,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the g35 has 280 hp, not 260. THEY LIE!!!

hehe, theres also some other problem they they said about it but i dont remember
Old 02-01-2003, 09:24 PM
  #33  
Shogun Assassin
 
fahoumh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Age: 43
Posts: 3,395
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Re: Best bang for the buck = Most performance for the least money

Originally posted by F23A4
Did he not state "best bang for the buck" I didnt think the qualifier for this designation was luxury. My mistake.
that term isn't just for performance, kid
Old 02-01-2003, 09:42 PM
  #34  
BC
nearsighted visionary
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Gresham, Oregon
Age: 74
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine too. Every 3rd or 4th time I scoot the seats forward, they fail to return all the way back. I will talk to lame dealer at 15K in May or so. Good thing they didn't mention all the TSB's.
Old 02-02-2003, 12:31 AM
  #35  
Safety Car
 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Age: 43
Posts: 4,954
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Python the G35 Sedan has 260, 280 for the coupe.
Old 02-02-2003, 01:08 AM
  #36  
Under the radar
 
CLSter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't the best "bang for the buck" award go to the Dodge Neon SRT?

I wouldn't trade in my CL-S for any Nissan Product, long-term I really believe the Nissan's won't be very nice to own

BTW, BMW has a ton of TSBs too. Believe me I know.
Old 02-02-2003, 11:28 AM
  #37  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
That's what I'm talking 'bout.

Originally posted by CLSter
Wouldn't the best "bang for the buck" award go to the Dodge Neon SRT?
You got me there, CLSter. For $20G there's nothing faster.
Old 02-02-2003, 12:55 PM
  #38  
Three Wheelin'
 
randomwalk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: houston,tx
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought TLS/CLS's engine is DOHC and the TL/CL is SOHC ???
Old 02-02-2003, 01:11 PM
  #39  
Three Wheelin'
 
mt6forlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both the premium and Type S motors are SOHC.

AC Controls-I don't see what's so hard. You push the AC button on the NAVI and there's all the controls. Not that I have any reason to go off auto control most of the time.

Headroom-It depends on where your height is. ie. legs vs. torso. I'm not quite 5'10" and I fit OK, but its still too easy for me to hit the headliner if I move just right, like turning around to back up.
Old 02-02-2003, 01:27 PM
  #40  
Suzuka Master
 
russianDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,367
Received 703 Likes on 545 Posts
Would be funny if the transmission would crap out on them....


Quick Reply: MotorTrend long term test with CL-S



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.