Mazda admits power deficiency in the RX-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:12 AM
  #1  
Scrib's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,326
Likes: 131
From: Northwest IN
Mazda admits power deficiency in the RX-8



http://www.rx8forum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=9347

RX-8 6MT is re-rated at 238HP by Mazda.
RX-8 4AT is re-rated at 197HP by Mazda.

Anyone who has bought the car (up to August 26th, or waiting on delivery) is offered the following:
1. Repurchase of vehicle - all costs included
2. $500 debit card and free maintenance for the warranty period (4 years and 50k miles).
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:19 AM
  #2  
Scrib's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,326
Likes: 131
From: Northwest IN
Here's the dyno if anyone cares...

Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:22 AM
  #3  
AtlCl's Avatar
Not AtlCl98 or Atl-CL
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
that sucks. its got the same torque as my 2.3 CL
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:55 AM
  #4  
rondog's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 129
From: yonkers, NY
fuckin mazda, remember when they pulled the same shit with the most recent miata, over rating it by 20 hp or something. At least the RX8 looks sweet.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:57 AM
  #5  
zamo's Avatar
Houses Won't Depreciate?
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,238
Likes: 0
From: Weston, FL
...the same deal that they offered after the 2001 Miata was found to be down on power too.

what is Mazda thinking? They can fool customers and take a chance?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:58 AM
  #6  
hemants's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
From: toronto
Hehe, it sure sounds sweet to when Wolfman drives it in X2. too bad there's no way in hell that they used the RX8 engine note in that movie.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:28 AM
  #7  
CLUofI's Avatar
337
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 0
From: Iowa City/Des Moines
less power than a hond accord, what a sports car
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:35 AM
  #8  
mt6forlife's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally posted by CLUofI
less power than a hond accord, what a sports car

Ohhhhhhh but its a rotary so it's a magic engine that makes more power than a dyno shows.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:37 AM
  #9  
mantis23's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,856
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton, Texas
scrib, I assume that is a 6 spd manual dyno?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:38 AM
  #10  
Scrib's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,326
Likes: 131
From: Northwest IN
I don't know actually... Let me find out. It probably is... Unless the auto tranny provides less than 10% loss to the wheels.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #11  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
That sucks...I hope they don't do that to the RX-7
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:53 AM
  #12  
DISRUPTV's Avatar
Full-Time IDIoT---DoH!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,654
Likes: 16
From: DUMB ISLAND
this definetely raises quite a few eyebrows for mazda in a bad way

Did they think that no one was actually goingto dyno a sports car?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:57 AM
  #13  
Zapata's Avatar
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
Originally posted by Scrib
I don't know actually... Let me find out. It probably is... Unless the auto tranny provides less than 10% loss to the wheels.

that's the auto tranny.....
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 09:11 AM
  #14  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
no that above dyno is for a 6-speed. RX-8 engine is making 200-210 HP instead of 250 HP.

It is a messed up situatian for Mazda.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 09:21 AM
  #15  
amir was here's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,296
Likes: 0
what did mazda first claim this car had? hp/tq?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 09:43 AM
  #16  
Shawn S's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
From: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Look at the “bright” side for the consumer.
After the SHIT hits the fan there will be plenty of these cars available WELL below cost in the foreseeable future.
They’re not just gonna take those traded cars to the crusher, they’re gonna discount them heavily and put them back on the used market.

It’s still a hot car and I’m sure those missing HP can be made up with minimal modifications.

Shawn S
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 09:46 AM
  #17  
CLS2001_97124's Avatar
Revving at 9K...
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 1
From: Portland Oregon
Twin Turbo...

I might look into one... That way I have a 2 door and 4 door S2000.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 10:16 AM
  #18  
Silverbulit40's Avatar
Enjoy the Ride
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Cali
This is from a friend who owned a 3rd gen rx-7 :
first, a twin turbo kit isn't available because of the placement of the exhaust manifold. Second, they can thank a combination of emissions standards and shitty American gas for the loss of power. Third, no matter what power it shows the fact is that it can out corner an RX-7 3rd gen which pretty much means it's one of the best turning cars ever to come out of Japan.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 10:45 AM
  #19  
sonor kid's Avatar
One who Laps
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
There's no way that dyno is for a 6 speed.
It must be for the auto tranny.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #20  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
Originally posted by sonor kid
There's no way that dyno is for a 6 speed.
It must be for the auto tranny.
It is a 6-speed!

Mazda claimed 247 HP and 159 lbft of torque. Last week it was lowered to 238 HP instead of 247.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 10:57 AM
  #21  
Zapata's Avatar
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
It is a 6-speed!

Mazda claimed 247 HP and 159 lbft of torque. Last week it was lowered to 238 HP instead of 247.
i'm pretty sure that's the automatic in the dyno.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #22  
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 5
From: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Damn a RSX-S dynos that
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 11:12 AM
  #23  
heyitsme's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
From: philly
the 6-speeds are dynoing ~175-185hp. if the car is still running low 14's it was a big mistake to not just lower the ratings to begin with and advertise about the acceleration numbers instead.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #24  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
So the dynographs at the beginning of this thread show 170 hp at the wheels.

The closest car mechanically to the RX-8 is the Miata. The current Miatas have the same gearbox as the RX-8. Probably a bit different (gear ratios, etc.) but it is the same unit. RX-8 has driveshaft probably lighter than the metal one in the Miata. The rear ends are probably comparable too.

Miatas dynoing 170 hp at the wheels make about 196 hp at the crank. It is about 26 hp drivetrain loss at these power levels. Miata builders have pulled out engines for engine dyno sessions and compared them to the wheel hp to come to this 26 hp number for this power levels - so is not a guess.

You probably can assume that the two 6sp MT RX8 whose dyno charts were posted in this thread are making 196 hp at the crank neighbourhood which is far away from the 238 hp announced.

I hope with the miles when engines get broken in, they will gain the missing ~ 40hp to 238 hp, but who knows ...

Last edited by jmanolov on 08-26-2003 at 03:07 PM
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #25  
Scrib's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,326
Likes: 131
From: Northwest IN
Mazda is blaming the loss of horsepower on US gas? Is our gas really THAT bad??? 93 octane won't cut it???
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 02:38 PM
  #26  
cusdaddy's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
That dyno is from a 6-speed. Check it out here:

Both cars had around 1500 miles. Both were 6MT's.
http://www.rx8forum.com/showthread.php?threadid=9553

BTW, the only RX-8's running low 14's are the mag versions. Only 1 RX-8 on the messageboard broke 14's (14.9 to be exact), and the rest are running low to mid 15's. A guy on with a 6-speed on their board lost to a new Solara!! HAHAHA!!!

The worst part is that many are experiencing 13 mpg with their car!!! Many are only getting 200 miles to a tank! Insane. Mazda royally screwed up this time!!

http://www.rx8forum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=8919
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 02:40 PM
  #27  
cusdaddy's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Here are a few times of the 6-speed RX-8 at the track:

reac. .516
60ft. 2.407
330ft. 6.525
1/8th et 9.914
1/8th mph 72.80
1/4 et 15.277
mph. 90.38

reac. .536.
60ft. 2.305.
330ft 6.495.
1/8 et 9.920.
1/8mph 72.10.
1/4 et 15.333.
1/4mph 89.65


reac .560
60ft 2.253
330ft 6.406
1/8et 9.878
1/8mph 70.98
1/4et 15.404
1/4mph 88.06
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 02:47 PM
  #28  
cusdaddy's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Last post, but I found this pretty funny.. This is from a RX-8 owner:

Bad RX-8 Moments:

1) When I dynoed the car 5 weeks ago and first discovered it's little secret.

2) When I realized I have no chance of passing a Toyota Solara if he/she decides to accelerate.

3) When Mazda is F^+$(ing lying about a 9hp correction that does not affect performance.

4) When I realized that the RX-8 will be laughed at by other enthusiasts unless I drop $$$$ on mods so that I can hang with Boxters, and S2000's.

I am at a loss. I waited many years to own a fresh, brand new, rotary car. Huge improvements from previous NA rotarys, but not keeping up with the 280+hp [real hp] V6's.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 02:48 PM
  #29  
Six Shifter's Avatar
an adult perspective
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 26
From: York, Pa
Originally posted by cusdaddy
The worst part is that many are experiencing 13 mpg with their car!!! Many are only getting 200 miles to a tank! Insane. Mazda royally screwed up this time!!
sad The bad seals of the early 70's - along with the gas crisis of '73 - nearly finalized the demise of the rotary engine - as witnessed by the reduction of the rotary line from a total of 5 vehicles (RX-2, RX-3, RX-4, COSMO, and the Rotary Pick-up) to the RX-7 which fell to high costs. If this doesn't get sorted out SOON there will never, ever again be an RX-7 in the stable.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 04:02 PM
  #30  
CLSter's Avatar
Under the radar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: WA
Mazda seems to have the market cornered on gutless but great handling cars. Miata and now the RX-8. Didn't Nissan also overstate their HP/Torque ratings awhile ago?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 04:23 PM
  #31  
Python2121's Avatar
The hair says it all
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,566
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, NYC
i would be pretty embarassed if i paid over sticker for it.

still, you have to admit that it (and im mag racing here, i haven't driven it) out handles a lot of stuff and has a sweet interior
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 05:15 PM
  #32  
Six Shifter's Avatar
an adult perspective
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 26
From: York, Pa
Originally posted by Python2121
i would be pretty embarassed if i paid over sticker for it.
why? according to what they're saying on the RX8 forum, Mazda has agreed to buy back the car from anybody who purchased (and took delivery of) one before today. If I had paid over sticker, I'd get my money back in a heartbeat and then ... if I still wanted it ... go out and re-purchase it used or by a new one at under MSRP!
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 06:43 PM
  #33  
mt6forlife's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
From: CA
So what's RX stand for anyway? Rotary eXperiment?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 06:54 PM
  #34  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Originally posted by CLSter
Mazda seems to have the market cornered on gutless but great handling cars. Miata and now the RX-8. Didn't Nissan also overstate their HP/Torque ratings awhile ago?
Nissan MIGHT HAVE overrated the 2k2 Max by like 5 horsepower but they underrated the Altima (now it has 245). I'm thinking the VQ in those 2 have around 245-250. But nobody has really confirmed this (just a guess on most parties). There was also a question as to whether the Q45 had lower than advertised hp ratings but I think they found out that the gearing really sucked for the car and made it slower than first anticipated. Nissan's been pretty accurate for the most part on their horsepower ratings, unlike Mazda err.. Ford.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:04 PM
  #35  
cor's Avatar
cor
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
sucks-- i always thought the rx-8 would be a tight car to own.. now that i see its 15 second 1/4 mile-- no thanks... i could do that by adding mods to my first gen
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:55 PM
  #36  
joedokes28's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, Az
Does everyone remember the DOHC Cobra Mustang fiasco? Ford owns a great stake in Mazda and it shows.

I have a close friend that owns an RX-8. If I bring this up, I probably get punched
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #37  
sonor kid's Avatar
One who Laps
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
I'm in shock with those being the dyno numbers. I've always been a Madza rotary fanatic and still own my 84' RX-7 GSL 12A Rotary and to this day it has only 16,000 miles, a sweet ride. It's showroom mint with many mods and I smile every time I star it up. It turns heads everywhere I drive it. I have digital pics but not sure how to post them here. For those of you not familiar with the rotary engine, hold your criticisms because it's an awesome engine design, very powerful for it's size. Because of it's size, it's light and allows for a design with incredible handling characteristics.
Mazda will fix it's error here and I believe you'll see other designs of this Rotary before long. Can you say boost?
Anyway, 3 to 4 years down the road my CL will be replaced a Rotary powered sports car from Mazda, maybe an RX-7.
That's unless Acura replaces the CL with something better and so far I don't like what I see.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 09:00 PM
  #38  
mt6forlife's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
From: CA
How do car makers determine engine power? Do they have dynos that connect directly to the crankshaft or something? Or is it calculated from WHP and adding back their best estimate of driveline loss?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2003 | 12:49 AM
  #39  
bullaculla's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,992
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Originally posted by Moog-Type-S
That sucks...I hope they don't do that to the RX-7
Huh?:sqnteek:
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2003 | 03:29 AM
  #40  
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Nissan's been pretty accurate for the most part on their horsepower ratings, unlike Mazda err.. Ford
Nissan errr Renault
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.