Here are my GTech Pro Times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
juice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: Boutte, LA 70070
Here are my GTech Pro Times

I took my car out today for a few runs. Let me know what you think.

Conditions:

Mod - An AEM CAI that I cut to be a SRI
77 was the temp/typical New Orleans humidity
VSA & A/C off
Torque braked @ 1800 RPM in D5
The only thing that varied was me trying to feather the trottle and control wheelspin.


I did 6 0-60 runs:
6.35
6.28
6.31
6.50 - mad wheel spin, I still have the stocks
6.39
6.36
Average: 6.365

As you can see, all times seemed to be consistent.

I did 3 1/4 miles which where pretty close

14.83 @ 100.4
14.69 @ 100.8
14.90 @ 99.7
Average: 14.806 @ 100.3
I know the speeds are pretty high.

What do you think? All comments accepted.

juice
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 08:41 PM
  #2  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
Good slap the OBX headers and repeat... make sure to run on the same road and in similar weather conditions and let us know.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 08:51 PM
  #3  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Looks about right with the GTech. As Nashua mentioned, try the runs at about the same conditions at the same location for comparison.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 08:55 PM
  #4  
2001CL's Avatar
Ricky: Drugs > Football
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,147
Likes: 0
From: S. FLA / Nashville
get some toyo t1's to help with the wheelspin.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 09:18 PM
  #5  
Rescuer's Avatar
Evil Bob Knieval
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 7
yeah, but what did you set your weight too? because setting the weight is the ONLY way to get a truly accurate reading on that thing.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 09:37 PM
  #6  
Mike's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,925
Likes: 12
From: location location
Good runs! Did you make runs in both directions?

Dragoon, you don't need to set the weight for 0-60 runs.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 09:40 PM
  #7  
Rescuer's Avatar
Evil Bob Knieval
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 7
Originally posted by Mike
Dragoon, you don't need to set the weight for 0-60 runs.
but you do for 1/4 mile times
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 09:45 PM
  #8  
mattg's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
it seems to be consistant and i would guess pretty accurate too, except for the trap speed which should be low to mid 90's.

it will be cool to see the after headers run.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 09:45 PM
  #9  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
weight is only needed to estimate WHP!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 09:49 PM
  #10  
Rescuer's Avatar
Evil Bob Knieval
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 7
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
weight is only needed to estimate WHP!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 10:03 PM
  #11  
juice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: Boutte, LA 70070
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
weight is only needed to estimate WHP!
What he said.

I did runs both ways. I will do my after runs on the same road. I will start a new post then. I am working a lot now and should be off a few days this weekend, if not next weekend.

juice
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 10:15 PM
  #12  
Rescuer's Avatar
Evil Bob Knieval
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 7
i never really messed with my Gtech after i bought it because i wasn't sure of the exact weight of my car plus me in it.

i just found a new respect for the thing
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 07:50 AM
  #13  
Nicky Pass's Avatar
Fuct in the hed!
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,057
Likes: 4
From: Chicagoland-ish
That thing is pretty accurate!!!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 08:56 AM
  #14  
dustbuster4's Avatar
A-CL Post Whore w/N2O
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,070
Likes: 1
From: D.C. Suburbs
I sold mine after comparing it to actual trap times at the track. Not only were the ETs and speeds consistently wrong, there was no consistency to how wrong they were.

Here's the thread: http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=65254
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 09:45 AM
  #15  
johntypes's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
take it to the track and lets see what you do it will be 1/3 of a secound slower let us no
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 12:48 PM
  #16  
hughesne's Avatar
Sick Spd Owner
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
The trap times are off, because they arent trap times (which average your speed over the last 60' of the run), GTech gives you the speed you are running when you cross the 1/4 mile line.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 03:37 PM
  #17  
Ming 2.7T's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
whenever we have used the Gtech the 1/4 mile times were always within .05 and the mph was usually higher by 2mph.
Its all in the correct alignment of the unit, has to be pointed straight ahead and level. Set it up, get out of the car, go to fron tof car and check to see if its pointing forward, better if you have 2 people.
it works better with automatics because the manual cars have alot of up and down motion which can skew the readings.
make 1 run one way, then make another in the opposite direction. then average the 2 runs.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 03:38 PM
  #18  
EricL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 1
From: Ninth Gate & So Cal
Originally posted by hughesne
The trap times are off, because they arent trap times (which average your speed over the last 60' of the run), GTech gives you the speed you are running when you cross the 1/4 mile line.
Actually, the average (trap speed) vs. end-of-run difference (GTECH) only accounts for 2-3 MPH. The additional 2-3 MPH (in addition to the error from not averaging) is due to the "pitch" of the car at the end of the run. (It can get even higher depending on the amount of pitch, relative front-to-rear lift due to a car’s velocity, and front-to-rear spring rate and static weight distribution.)

The "lift" on a surface is related to the car's velocity squared (V^2). The lift on the front is greater that the lift on the back of the car. The accelerometer on the GTech Pro does not correct for "pitch" (TILT) and as such, the force of gravity (1G) gets summed in to create a large and consistent MPH error (for a given car).

The 2-3 MPH difference is relatively constant and will occur for "most" cars.

The overly high reading (beyond the 2-3 MPH as explained on the GTECH site) depends on the individual car's aerodynamics...
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 04:22 PM
  #19  
BSK181's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: LONG ISLAND NY
those are good consistent runs
i do the same thing, go 2 ways and compare/average
always the exact same spot too

when i did runs when temp was in low 40's i got 2 way average of 6.0 and 14.6 quarter with and without stock tires and only k/n dropin
remember, not the track but great way to practice technique
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TLDude876
Car Talk
134
Dec 28, 2016 03:18 PM
Onyxthecat
Car Parts for Sale
7
Oct 18, 2016 02:05 PM
forrie
2G RDX (2013-2018)
12
Sep 15, 2015 09:57 AM
gnuts
2G CL (2001-2003)
0
Sep 11, 2015 10:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.