Hbp ?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Hbp ?
I just bought the last HBP from CT Engineering , an it should be here next week. They told me that the only thing I have to do its get the car on the dyno to set the FPR, that I wont need no fuel management system, or bigger injectors that the ESM would work just fine. Its anyone out here running the HBP on the esm an havent gotten any issues ? Any help would be gladly appreciated.
#2
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
people who run it/have run it up their fuel pressure. Streetka and Rondog were running the HBP for a while with no tune. I think they'll both suggest you don't run it without engine management since they both ended up replacing their engines. But there are a few people who run it with no problems so
The following 2 users liked this post by gnuts:
civicdrivr (05-22-2012),
StreetKA (05-22-2012)
#3
Instructor
Thread Starter
people who run it/have run it up their fuel pressure. Streetka and Rondog were running the HBP for a while with no tune. I think they'll both suggest you don't run it without engine management since they both ended up replacing their engines. But there are a few people who run it with no problems so
#4
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
i think the only one that works with the 6speed is the emanage blue and the 6speed boomslang harness. Not sure if you keep the ESM once you have the emanage though. No one has really posted about the success of the emanage yet so its seems kind of grey.
#5
Instructor
Thread Starter
oh damn i dont wanna blow up, where can i get the boomslang from, an can i used a unviersal emanage ?
#6
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
The ESM needs to be removed when using a piggy back IIRC.
#7
Instructor
iTrader: (5)
Yeah that's what Paul told me when I talked to him about it. Take out the esm, f it works let me know! Also I remember reading somewhere on here about doing something f you're running HBP. I can't remember exactly but someone posted about avoiding engine damage. I'll try to find it.
Trending Topics
#8
6mt swapped..smart
Mike this gonna be your biggest problem...management. It all sucks with these cars. I wouldn't put the hbp on till you figure stuff out. If your insistent though, i'd get a wideband first along with a walbro 255, better afpr and start playing with your fuel pressure
#9
Instructor
Thread Starter
Mike this gonna be your biggest problem...management. It all sucks with these cars. I wouldn't put the hbp on till you figure stuff out. If your insistent though, i'd get a wideband first along with a walbro 255, better afpr and start playing with your fuel pressure
#10
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Jesus, "tuning" with an FPR is from the early 90s. To this day, Im still shocked a company like CT would recommend that on a $5k supercharger kit.
The following users liked this post:
bigdaddyKA8 (06-20-2012)
#12
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (8)
even with low boost pulley you have to go to the dyno and try your best to adjust fpr to run too rich or lean... i ran too rich on lbp and too lean on hbp couldnt do anything about it... my point is i do not regret anything... its was worth it... forget about running it without wideband
fpr must be adjusted right... mine could be faulty or something
fpr must be adjusted right... mine could be faulty or something
#13
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
The emanage blue is universal made by Greddy.
http://www.boomslang.us/e-manage-blu...5&trans=Manual
http://www.boomslang.us/e-manage-blu...5&trans=Manual
#14
Boosted...
iTrader: (2)
i'm running the CT HBP now, and would not even think about putting it on without any management system. But if you really want to try and only adjust fuel pressure, you need to ditch the CT fuel regulator and go with a 1.1 regulator. The rising rate one CT use's isn't consistent enough for the HBP. I played with it for a while and thought i had it set with just fuel pressure, but on a few pulls the thing would go way lean. I'm now running the AEM FIC6 and running strong and consistent numbers for A/F.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (05-23-2012)
#15
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
i'm running the CT HBP now, and would not even think about putting it on without any management system. But if you really want to try and only adjust fuel pressure, you need to ditch the CT fuel regulator and go with a 1.1 regulator. The rising rate one CT use's isn't consistent enough for the HBP. I played with it for a while and thought i had it set with just fuel pressure, but on a few pulls the thing would go way lean. I'm now running the AEM FIC6 and running strong and consistent numbers for A/F.
The following users liked this post:
StreetKA (05-23-2012)
#19
Boosted...
iTrader: (2)
I have a 2G TL-P (auto), But about 1/2 of the way done with my 3.6 build.
it depends on management and how it's setup. If he leaves the imrc controlled by the factory ecu it will have problems as the ecu takes multiple factors into opening the valve ( coolant temp, rpm, eld, & calculated load). so you could try tuning for it to be opened and the factory ecu decides to keep it shut. The best way around it is to intercept the signal with the piggyback and set it up to open with a map signal or straight rpm based cutoff.
it depends on management and how it's setup. If he leaves the imrc controlled by the factory ecu it will have problems as the ecu takes multiple factors into opening the valve ( coolant temp, rpm, eld, & calculated load). so you could try tuning for it to be opened and the factory ecu decides to keep it shut. The best way around it is to intercept the signal with the piggyback and set it up to open with a map signal or straight rpm based cutoff.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (05-23-2012)
#22
3.7L Nitrous Breathing CL
iTrader: (7)
i'm running the CT HBP now, and would not even think about putting it on without any management system. But if you really want to try and only adjust fuel pressure, you need to ditch the CT fuel regulator and go with a 1.1 regulator. The rising rate one CT use's isn't consistent enough for the HBP. I played with it for a while and thought i had it set with just fuel pressure, but on a few pulls the thing would go way lean. I'm now running the AEM FIC6 and running strong and consistent numbers for A/F.
aem,booms,is it stock or did you have to re-pin any wires ?
#24
Boosted...
iTrader: (2)
Short anwser, yes. I will start with just the 3.6 swap, then add the SC back on then finally upgrade to the M90. I know everyone will jump all over me that the M62 is to small for the 3.6, but i still don't see how it could hurt the numbers since i all ready own it. So i will try it first to see what kind of numbers i can get out of it.
I really isn't that much different, the main difference is the crank signal. The 6 speeds have a hall sensor vs the AT's mag sensor. So you just have to make sure you use the correct input to the FIC.
I got the AEM extension harness, and wired it myself. I didn't re-pin any wires, the stock harness is untouched, but i am running a type s ecu as well. I had an mdx ecu trying to get more fuel, but that was before setting up FIC.
I got the AEM extension harness, and wired it myself. I didn't re-pin any wires, the stock harness is untouched, but i am running a type s ecu as well. I had an mdx ecu trying to get more fuel, but that was before setting up FIC.
#25
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
The M62 on the 3.6l will struggle to make 3psi if you're running the HBP. The power gained will just offset the weight added.
/obligatory stroker+CT s/c'er wont work comment
/obligatory stroker+CT s/c'er wont work comment
#27
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
IIRC I heard that they were waiting for AEM to get back to them with a configuration update. Dont quote me though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
k6biv
Member Cars for Sale
1
09-10-2015 06:37 PM