gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2001 | 03:01 AM
  #1  
miles_RENAMED's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: marysville wa
gas

is there a big difference in 87 and 92 octain and how long does it take the computer to catch up if i change gas
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2001 | 03:04 AM
  #2  
30CL's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: IL, USA
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by miles:
is there a big difference in 87 and 92 octain and how long does it take the computer to catch up if i change gas</font>
Yep, big difference. You'll notice. I would think car would pick it up 2nd fill up.

I use Mobil 93.

Correct me guys if I am wrong.



------------------
Black '97 Acura 3.0CL Premium (Leather,WoodTrim,SunRoof Visor,Spoiler,Gold,Fogs)
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2001 | 03:15 AM
  #3  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
anythhing below 91 ocatane is very bad for your engine. It simply will detonate. the ECU will detect that and tries to prevent the detonations by de-tuning!! your engine.

To prevent damage the perforamce will hurt big time!.. get cheap try to save $1.5 on a fill a risk damaging your engine.

If you are worried about gas mileage I would recommend you a buy a second geo metro, or honda insight, if you can afford it!

------------------
Black, Eboney, 3.2 CL Type-S.
- Acura NAV.
- 3M clear bra (full front bumper, and side mirros)
- Wheels locks.
- Mooonroof visor
- Splash guards,
- Winter mats,
- Trunk liner,
- Acura Spoiler.
- Valentine V1 Radar Locator.
- PIAA 19169 road lamps.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2002 | 10:25 PM
  #4  
nandowong's Avatar
Work safe avatar bish :D
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,056
Likes: 0
From: Avon Park/Gainesville FL
i think you mean is bad for your 3.2 cl since it has a higher compresion ration than his 3.0. on the 3.2 91 is the recomended minimum and i believe is 87 for the 3.0.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 08:34 AM
  #5  
TypeSAddict's Avatar
is Pretty Much a Moron
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, NY
I would use 93. The reason is simple, the octane measurement is actually a percent. The percentage is the amount of Carbon atoms in Gasoline that are NOT in a straight chain. So in 93 octane, 7% of the carbon atoms are in a straight line. In 87, 13%. It is MUCH easier for an engine to break up gasoline if its molecules are not in a straight line.

Ex. Lets say that this was a molecule of gasoline C-C-C-C-C

It would be substantially easier for an engine to break up this:


C
l
C - C - C
l
C

Same thing, different layout.
Using premium fuel WILL make your engine run smoother and stay healthier.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 08:55 AM
  #6  
dustbuster4's Avatar
A-CL Post Whore w/N2O
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,070
Likes: 1
From: D.C. Suburbs
I have a 1st gen, and have always run 87 octane (recommended by Honda). I've run 92/93 octane over the past 2+ weeks (I am awaiting a nitrous nozzle from Zex [which could arrive any day--right ], and Zex recommends running 92/93 octane with nitrous). During these past 2+ weeks, my car has performed poorly, seems a bit slower, and my mileage has dropped 2-3 miles per gallon!

I can't wait to get 87 octane back in her!
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 12:03 PM
  #7  
momentum3.2's Avatar
War Eagle!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally posted by dustbuster4
I have a 1st gen, and have always run 87 octane (recommended by Honda). I've run 92/93 octane over the past 2+ weeks (I am awaiting a nitrous nozzle from Zex [which could arrive any day--right ], and Zex recommends running 92/93 octane with nitrous). During these past 2+ weeks, my car has performed poorly, seems a bit slower, and my mileage has dropped 2-3 miles per gallon!

I can't wait to get 87 octane back in her!

Dustbuster, that really sounds backwards...what brand are you using? I've always used 93 in the CL however I had a 4runner in college that I would flip back and forth with, 87 one week 93 the other and it always seemed to run better if not quieter on the 93...it was a 3.0 V6...ironically, the fuel pump died in it...
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 12:08 PM
  #8  
Slimey's Avatar
Where is my super sauce?
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 1
From: Tick-Tock Tech
While we're on the topic of fuel octane:

In the NorthEast there are Sunoco stations that have super-premium gas with 94 octane. Is there any benefit in using this (for the CL-S)?

I currently use the premium 93 from reputable gas stations like Mobil/Exxon, Sunoco, or Amoco. I try to vary the gas as little as possible and usually go with Mobil/Exxon (out of habit, plus I have the key chain charge-it thingy).
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 12:13 PM
  #9  
TypeSAddict's Avatar
is Pretty Much a Moron
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, NY
Originally posted by Slimey
While we're on the topic of fuel octane:

In the NorthEast there are Sunoco stations that have super-premium gas with 94 octane. Is there any benefit in using this (for the CL-S)?

I currently use the premium 93 from reputable gas stations like Mobil/Exxon, Sunoco, or Amoco. I try to vary the gas as little as possible and usually go with Mobil/Exxon (out of habit, plus I have the key chain charge-it thingy).
The differences between 94 and 93 are negligible and insignificant. I say in this situation go with Mobil, because not only is the speedpass convieniant, but the car is used to it.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 01:14 PM
  #10  
Water-S's Avatar
go like hell
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,154
Likes: 1
From: Anna,OH(home of the honda/acura motors)
I don't know I'm kinda of unsure about this too cause my friend has a 350 s-10 (it's his racing pickup) he runs nothing but whatever the highest octane at the pump(weither it's 92 or 93 whatever) anyhow he swears by it. but i read a study at about my car they did a test with and it showed no difference between 87 and 92. so I run 87(or the cheap crap)
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 01:36 PM
  #11  
KCPreki11's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,773
Likes: 0
From: PA
For your car yes, but for a higher performance engine it will differ performance.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 03:15 PM
  #12  
FTM-1's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC.
Originally posted by KCPreki11
For your car yes, but for a higher performance engine it will differ performance.
I agree the TL & CL models are design to burn 91 or higher octane as stated in the owners manual. I use 93 because thats the highest otane rating for premium fuel at the stations I go to.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2002 | 04:11 PM
  #13  
momentum3.2's Avatar
War Eagle!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
(quote from "analyze this" when Jelly steps out to greet Dr. Sobiel after he rear-ends Jelly's town car with a thug in the trunk)

"Cheap Gas! Pings & Knocks! Whatcha gonna do?"

Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 05:15 PM
  #14  
nandowong's Avatar
Work safe avatar bish :D
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,056
Likes: 0
From: Avon Park/Gainesville FL
Hey what did you do?
Watch "analyze this" a million times
Nice quote nonetheless

Ps: they are coming out with analyze this 2. It is called "analyze that"
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 05:57 PM
  #15  
Scrib's Avatar
Administrator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,326
Likes: 131
From: Northwest IN
Originally posted by TypeSAddict


The differences between 94 and 93 are negligible and insignificant. I say in this situation go with Mobil, because not only is the speedpass convieniant, but the car is used to it.
I love Speedpass... Makes it easy to get McDonalds too.

http://www.speedpass.com/news/article.jsp?id=50
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 06:25 PM
  #16  
ktgumbo's Avatar
Balla on a Budget
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Cali
Where do you guys have a 93' Octane rating? Here in Cali, the highest that we can put in our cars in 91!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2003 | 02:26 AM
  #17  
Dantethelnferno's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
it has been proven that 87 octane is better than 91 octane for J30A1 engines (3.0 liter). With 91, you will actually LOSE about 4 HP!!!

The reason for the lost power on the J30A1 when running higher octane fuel is because of ignition timing issues. The J30A1 is tuned and optimized for 87 octane fuel, and it does not adjust itself for other octane levels, so the amount of ignition advance is pretty much fixed on the J30A1!!!

If you really want to get the performance results of using a higher octane, you could advance your timing so that the spark fires sooner. If you don't advance the timing when running a higher octane than an engine was designed for will cause the peak of the combustion cycle to occur after the optimal torque point and this, ladies and gentlemen, is how you lose power.

Keep in mind that most cars (like the 3.2 liter) will benefit from running higher octane, but I think that the J30A1 is one of the exceptions to the rule.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
Oct 5, 2015 11:00 AM
MilanoRedDashR
3G TL Problems & Fixes
2
Oct 2, 2015 10:49 AM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
Oct 1, 2015 12:59 PM
San Yasin
2G RDX (2013-2018)
21
Sep 29, 2015 10:52 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.