Ford GT v. Mercedes SLR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2004, 02:11 PM
  #1  
lover and fighter
Thread Starter
 
r10apple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: St Augustine, Florida
Age: 53
Posts: 2,417
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts
Ford GT v. Mercedes SLR

Perhaps one of the most grotesquely biased articles I've ever read (even if it is stupid to compare the two)...

http://autos.msn.com/advice/article....022336&src=msn
Old 01-29-2004, 02:24 PM
  #2  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
poorly written as well :thumbsdn:
Old 01-29-2004, 02:46 PM
  #3  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
^^^I agree. I'll take a SLR over a GT anyday.
Old 01-29-2004, 02:49 PM
  #4  
Audi S4 driver
 
blader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Forked River NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
^^^I agree. I'll take a SLR over a GT anyday.
slr looks 1000 times better too IMO
Old 01-29-2004, 04:25 PM
  #5  
THE SILVER BULLET
 
pimpscls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: socal
Age: 36
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
omg totally different cars
Old 01-29-2004, 05:53 PM
  #6  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,662
Received 10,731 Likes on 5,438 Posts
The all-aluminum understructure is stunningly stiff and lissomely light, and clad in unstressed aluminum body panels. Ford hasn't released official weight figures, but the GT is expected to place only about a 3,400 lb. burden on the earth's crust.
only 3400 lbs? ok someone obviously doesn't know much about race cars....... 3400 lbs is rather hefty, for a "purpose-built" race car.

the SLR is 3800 lbs, which is a lot, but nobody said it was a race car...

I also don't appreciate this comment:

The SLR engine, built by AMG, Mercedes' in-house racing skunkworks, has surprisingly similar specs to the Ford—a 5.4-liter V8 (Mercedes calls it 5.5, but at precisely 5,439 cc, either their PR department is cheating or their engineers can't do math—you guess which...)
For how many years has the the Ford Mustang "5.0" thrived, when it is only 4942 cc's??? i.e. it is actually a 4.9, not a 5.0. Anyways.
Old 01-29-2004, 06:09 PM
  #7  
Three Wheelin'
 
AcuraFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I missing something here? Why are they even comparing cars that are in such grossly different price classes? The SLR costs almost three times as much as the GT. To me, that's like comparing a Civic to a LS430...there's just no point.
Old 01-29-2004, 06:13 PM
  #8  
///M POWER
 
darrinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
slr>gt any day

it would be crazy to see one on the road
Old 01-29-2004, 06:15 PM
  #9  
I Feel Too Old Here
 
ItalianStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Age: 44
Posts: 5,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by AcuraFan
Am I missing something here? Why are they even comparing cars that are in such grossly different price classes? The SLR costs almost three times as much as the GT. To me, that's like comparing a Civic to a LS430...there's just no point.


that was the first thing i thought of when i saw this on my home page.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F-C
Motorsports News
33
08-22-2018 09:53 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
09-17-2015 10:16 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
3
09-14-2015 10:48 AM



Quick Reply: Ford GT v. Mercedes SLR



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.