Dyno'd my car today!!!
Thread Starter
new cl, type-s and shxt
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Sugarland, TX
Dyno'd my car today!!!
completely stock 01 Type-S with 5 spd auto with 56300 on the odometer, runnin Mobil 1 10w-30, approx. ambient 50-55 degrees
run 1 - HP: 199.5 TQ: 178.1
run 2 - HP: 202.1 TQ: 184.8
run 3 - HP: 205.5 TQ: 186.5
run 4 - HP: 207.5 TQ: 185.9
I think these numbers are pretty strong for bein a stock car, when taking into account drivetrain loss and such. What numbers are others seen'?
I think my first mod will prob be a header most likely the OBX unit mostly because of price, has there been any comparison reports between the OBX and Comptech header? whether one or the other has better flow characteristics?
run 1 - HP: 199.5 TQ: 178.1
run 2 - HP: 202.1 TQ: 184.8
run 3 - HP: 205.5 TQ: 186.5
run 4 - HP: 207.5 TQ: 185.9
I think these numbers are pretty strong for bein a stock car, when taking into account drivetrain loss and such. What numbers are others seen'?
I think my first mod will prob be a header most likely the OBX unit mostly because of price, has there been any comparison reports between the OBX and Comptech header? whether one or the other has better flow characteristics?
Trending Topics
:sqnteek:
boosted is best
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 4
From: .
Re: Dyno'd my car today!!!
Originally posted by BlackCL_Type-S
completely stock 01 Type-S with 5 spd auto with 56300 on the odometer, runnin Mobil 1 10w-30, approx. ambient 50-55 degrees
run 1 - HP: 199.5 TQ: 178.1
run 2 - HP: 202.1 TQ: 184.8
run 3 - HP: 205.5 TQ: 186.5
run 4 - HP: 207.5 TQ: 185.9
I think these numbers are pretty strong for bein a stock car, when taking into account drivetrain loss and such. What numbers are others seen'?
I think my first mod will prob be a header most likely the OBX unit mostly because of price, has there been any comparison reports between the OBX and Comptech header? whether one or the other has better flow characteristics?
completely stock 01 Type-S with 5 spd auto with 56300 on the odometer, runnin Mobil 1 10w-30, approx. ambient 50-55 degrees
run 1 - HP: 199.5 TQ: 178.1
run 2 - HP: 202.1 TQ: 184.8
run 3 - HP: 205.5 TQ: 186.5
run 4 - HP: 207.5 TQ: 185.9
I think these numbers are pretty strong for bein a stock car, when taking into account drivetrain loss and such. What numbers are others seen'?
I think my first mod will prob be a header most likely the OBX unit mostly because of price, has there been any comparison reports between the OBX and Comptech header? whether one or the other has better flow characteristics?
My modded '03 CLS 6sp (with CT intake/headers/b-pipe/exhaust) dyno'd at CompTech with 236 WHP and 201 lbs. Tq. running Pilot Sport A/S 225/50ZR17s on stock rims. Ambient temp was between 55-60 degrees. CompTech said that the crank HP was probably between 300 to 307.
Do the mods... I'd do the intake and headers together first. You'll see a lot more gains with both since they compliment each other.
TQ > MPG
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 8
From: Metro Detroit
There's no way you have 300hp at the crank. A 70hp loss would be a slipping automatic, not a fwd manual transmssion. To find out what the engine is making all you have to do it take your dyno numbers and divide them by .85 (6 speed) or .77 (auto).
Senior Moderator
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally posted by jtkz13
There's no way you have 300hp at the crank. A 70hp loss would be a slipping automatic, not a fwd manual transmssion. To find out what the engine is making all you have to do it take your dyno numbers and divide them by .85 (6 speed) or .77 (auto).
There's no way you have 300hp at the crank. A 70hp loss would be a slipping automatic, not a fwd manual transmssion. To find out what the engine is making all you have to do it take your dyno numbers and divide them by .85 (6 speed) or .77 (auto).
Team Owner
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
From: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Originally posted by jtkz13
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
Senior Moderator
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally posted by jtkz13
TypeR read the thread again.
Hookid on Foniks is ur frend.
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
TypeR read the thread again.
Hookid on Foniks is ur frend.
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
TQ > MPG
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 8
From: Metro Detroit
I have always been told 15% for manual transmissions, and also consider that fwd's are a little more efficient than rwd so it's going to be a little less the standard for rwd.
A stock 6 speed shold in theory put down 221hp/197tq, which is pretty inline with what most people pull.
A stock 6 speed shold in theory put down 221hp/197tq, which is pretty inline with what most people pull.
very nice......
