CT SC dyno for AV6 has been posted!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2002, 01:01 PM
  #1  
Happy CL-S Pilot
Thread Starter
 
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CT SC dyno for AV6 has been posted!

Staright from CT:
http://www.comptechusa.com/images/dyno/av6scfinal.pdf
<pre>
Comptech Supercharger Wheel HP 1998 Accord 3.0L V6:
RPM Stock H, E S/C, H, E
5600 161 172 200 ( max Stock, H, E )
6400 131 144 221 ( max SC. H, E)
</pre>



<pre>
Comptech Supercharger Torque 1998 Accord 3.0L V6:
RPM H, E S/C, H, E
5400 163.4 187.2 ( max H, E )
5800 154.1 190.3 ( max SC. H, E)
</pre>

Cost: 4,495 plus installation
Old 05-07-2002, 01:06 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
moomaster_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: CT SC dyno for AV6 has been posted!

Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
Staright from CT:
http://www.comptechusa.com/images/dyno/av6scfinal.pdf
<pre>
Comptech Supercharger Wheel HP 1998 Accord 3.0L V6:
RPM Stock H, E S/C, H, E
5600 161 172 200 ( max Stock, H, E )
6400 131 144 221 ( max SC. H, E)
</pre>



<pre>
Comptech Supercharger Torque 1998 Accord 3.0L V6:
RPM H, E S/C, H, E
5400 163.4 187.2 ( max H, E )
5800 154.1 190.3 ( max SC. H, E)
</pre>

Cost: 4,495 plus installation
Looks even better now....maybe $3500-4500 isnt all bad....
Old 05-07-2002, 01:15 PM
  #3  
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
 
ruvz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
very impressive numbers... wow!!

I assume headers are not included in the SC package?
Old 05-07-2002, 01:22 PM
  #4  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Jeezus ...

Those curves make me wonder sometimes ... 100whp at 3500RPM?

Who drives at 6000RPM? I sure don't for prolonged periods of time ...
Old 05-07-2002, 01:26 PM
  #5  
Smack My B*tch Up
 
Samer007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: W. Bloomfield, MI
Age: 45
Posts: 6,213
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how much higher would those numbers be for the Type S
Old 05-07-2002, 01:39 PM
  #6  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Sweet the Accord should run low to mid 14's. When is the supercharger comming out for the CL-S?
Old 05-07-2002, 01:43 PM
  #7  
Happy CL-S Pilot
Thread Starter
 
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
50-WHP is very impressive... yeah.... that's cool... @ $90/WHP
that makes the Headers a real bargain at $52/WHP!

Enjoy your ride.
Old 05-07-2002, 02:40 PM
  #8  
I LOVE MY CAR
 
Dom418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
Age: 45
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
49 HP is the best gain from the SC.... I'm not all that impressed by that.. not for $4,500.

I would be curious to see what the SC can do with smaller pullies, then it MAY ALMOST be worth looking into...

can't wait to see a Type S dyno
Old 05-07-2002, 03:45 PM
  #9  
Pro
 
e1828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
50-WHP is very impressive... yeah.... that's cool... @ $90/WHP
that makes the Headers a real bargain at $52/WHP!

Enjoy your ride.
yea do not forget to factor in installation costs that will run your $/WHP even higher than $90/whp.. try over $100 per +1 gain in WHP.

Also, there is a typo for the torque section where it shows the difference at 5800 rpm to be 62.6 when in reality if you do the math correctly should be 36.2 (190.3-154.1).
Old 05-07-2002, 04:43 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
moomaster_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Dom418
49 HP is the best gain from the SC.... I'm not all that impressed by that.. not for $4,500.

I would be curious to see what the SC can do with smaller pullies, then it MAY ALMOST be worth looking into...

can't wait to see a Type S dyno
Dude!! WTF!! Are you talking about...the peak WHP gain is 70 whp gain over just headers and exhaust.....the 39whp is the peak gain at the stock peak power....the power is spread out over the entire powerband...in effect, if you are racing your car...it has moved your entire powerband....meaning you are making a lot of usable power at the top before shifting....the peak torque gain is 63.4 lbs.!!! As for city driving...you are making an additional 18-30 lbs. of torque and 10-30 whp from 3-4K....which is your passing band....this is over headers and exhaust...I wasn't too impressed at first, but if you bother to look at that dyno it makes more torque at 3000 rpms than it does with headers and exhaust at peak torque.
Old 05-07-2002, 05:01 PM
  #11  
Old timer
 
JRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: .
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by charliemike
Jeezus ...

Those curves make me wonder sometimes ... 100whp at 3500RPM?

Who drives at 6000RPM? I sure don't for prolonged periods of time ...
Don't say that around here, the comptech headers support group will come after you and claim you shouldn't be driving a Type S!!!!
Old 05-07-2002, 05:10 PM
  #12  
Old timer
 
JRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: .
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Dude!! WTF!! Are you talking about...the peak WHP gain is 70 whp gain over just headers and exhaust.....the 39whp is the peak gain at the stock peak power....the power is spread out over the entire powerband...in effect, if you are racing your car...it has moved your entire powerband....meaning you are making a lot of usable power at the top before shifting....the peak torque gain is 63.4 lbs.!!! As for city driving...you are making an additional 18-30 lbs. of torque and 10-30 whp from 3-4K....which is your passing band....this is over headers and exhaust...I wasn't too impressed at first, but if you bother to look at that dyno it makes more torque at 3000 rpms than it does with headers and exhaust at peak torque.
Hey instead of all this arguing how about someone compares the area under the SC dyno line to the area under the headers/intake/exhaust line with the area between the H/I/E and stock lines and come up with a ratio of the two.

Then compare the ratio of the prices of each (SC package vs headers/intake/exhaust) and you'll probably realize the overall costs are fairly on target with the amount of power you're getting.
Old 05-07-2002, 05:15 PM
  #13  
Old timer
 
JRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: .
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dude!! WTF!! Are you talking about...the peak WHP gain is 70 whp gain over just headers and exhaust.....the 39whp is the peak gain at the stock peak power....
No, the pdf clearly states the increase in peak HP (at their different rpms) is only 49 whp. However, the max gain isn't at the peak. Actually I think that's what you're trying to say but you shouldn't use the word "peak" in your sentence using "70 whp".
Old 05-07-2002, 08:31 PM
  #14  
Subie Dubie
 
Red Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: PDX
Age: 70
Posts: 5,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by JRock


Don't say that around here, the comptech headers support group will come after you and claim you shouldn't be driving a Type S!!!!
1. You don't have headers
2. You don't want headers
3. You don't need headers
4. Get over it.

Thank you Red Rider
Charter Member
Comptech Headers Support Group Inc.
Old 05-07-2002, 09:56 PM
  #15  
My other car is a 350Z
 
H@mmerm@n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SacTown
Age: 63
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Red Rider


1. You don't have headers
2. You don't want headers
3. You don't need headers
4. Get over it.

Thank you Red Rider
Charter Member
Comptech Headers Support Group Inc.
Old 05-07-2002, 09:58 PM
  #16  
Fuct in the hed!
 
Nicky Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicagoland-ish
Age: 45
Posts: 14,057
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't think 40 hp is worth $5000
Old 05-07-2002, 10:26 PM
  #17  
Senior Moderator
 
mattg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OR
Age: 48
Posts: 22,909
Received 388 Likes on 196 Posts
msrp = $4495


you will be able to buy it off the net for less than 4k though.
Old 05-08-2002, 08:04 AM
  #18  
I LOVE MY CAR
 
Dom418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
Age: 45
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Dude!! WTF!! Are you talking about...the peak WHP gain is 70 whp gain over just headers and exhaust.....the 39whp is the peak gain at the stock peak power....the power is spread out over the entire powerband...in effect, if you are racing your car...it has moved your entire powerband....meaning you are making a lot of usable power at the top before shifting....the peak torque gain is 63.4 lbs.!!! As for city driving...you are making an additional 18-30 lbs. of torque and 10-30 whp from 3-4K....which is your passing band....this is over headers and exhaust...I wasn't too impressed at first, but if you bother to look at that dyno it makes more torque at 3000 rpms than it does with headers and exhaust at peak torque.
MOO,

I'm not trying to argue here, but it CLEARLY states on the Dyno chart the Peak HP before S/C is 172, peak HP after S/C is 221, = an increase of 49 HP.... I think you're including the gain from the headers and exhaust into you calc..., that's all...

I do agree that it produces pretty nice gains across the full RPM Band

DOM
Old 05-08-2002, 08:25 AM
  #19  
Old timer
 
JRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: .
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Nicky Pass
I don't think 40 hp is worth $5000
Look at the amount of new area under the horsepower line. It's about three times what just intake,headers,exhaust will get you. So figure three times that price is what it should cost (although actually more because an SC involves a lot more R&D than non-moving-part mods.)

I'd say it's pretty fairly priced for what you get, although still a little steep. But if you bought Comptech headers, you can't complain - those things are at least as overpriced for what you get as this SC is. :P
Old 05-08-2002, 09:13 AM
  #20  
Moderator Alumnus
 
haiduc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Rockville, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 5,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for all you people that are complainig about the price of the supercharger..... dont!

just think what a simple pulley mod will do for your powerband.
Old 05-08-2002, 09:17 AM
  #21  
I LOVE MY CAR
 
Dom418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
Age: 45
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1genCL
for all you people that are complainig about the price of the supercharger..... dont!

just think what a simple pulley mod will do for your powerband.
This is wwhat I am dying to Know??? any clue what we could raise the Boost to with a pulley swap???

I know on a GTP it raises it to like 11 psi:P

Do the 1st Gen's have a S/C available??

DOM
Old 05-08-2002, 09:28 AM
  #22  
S/C'd Accord Coming Soon!
 
BNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Lafayette, LA | Houston, TX (Weekends)
Age: 47
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is already one Company which is an authorized CompTech dealer that is taking pre-orders for $3,900. CompTech suggests a 6 install time which means you are looking at somewhere b/w 6 x $60 ($360) to 6 x $80 ($480) for install costs.

That means WITH installation you could come in under $4,500.

Problem is you still need a transmission cooler ($50 plus $60 to install) and a smaller battery ($40-$50).

So you total grand damage would be about $4,700.

You guys will get MUCH better low end gains than the Accord.

Our cars are restricted to a SINGLE intake valve below 3,500 rpms where as you guys get full use of BOTH valves below your VTEC switchover. We currently have a member that is in the process of swapping out the CL-S camshafts in his Accord. In additionto the two camshafts we also have to purchase a CL-S cam gear.
Old 05-08-2002, 09:31 AM
  #23  
I LOVE MY CAR
 
Dom418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
Age: 45
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BNut


You guys will get MUCH better low end gains than the Accord.

Our cars are restricted to a SINGLE intake valve below 3,500 rpms where as you guys get full use of BOTH valves below your VTEC switchover. We currently have a member that is in the process of swapping out the CL-S camshafts in his Accord. In additionto the two camshafts we also have to purchase a CL-S cam gear.
Wouldn't it be cheaper/easier just to buy a CL-S ??

I can't imagine 01's are going for that much $$$ now? More power to him if he can pull it off though.. it will certainly be one of the fastest Accords out there!!!

DOM
Old 05-08-2002, 09:33 AM
  #24  
Rod
Drifting
 
Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 46
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want to see how the auto tranny will handle the extra power, especially when changing the pulley. I definitely don't want to be the guinea pig.
Old 05-08-2002, 09:37 AM
  #25  
S/C'd Accord Coming Soon!
 
BNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Lafayette, LA | Houston, TX (Weekends)
Age: 47
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Dom418
Wouldn't it be cheaper/easier just to buy a CL-S ??

I can't imagine 01's are going for that much $$$ now? More power to him if he can pull it off though.. it will certainly be one of the fastest Accords out there!!!
LOL, in my case it wouldn't be cheaper. I paid 20,500 for my Accord (excluding TT&L) so spending $300 plus on the parts for CL-S camshafts is a steal! Its the labor that's a killer.

Easier? Well I don't mod cars because its easy, some of us like a challenge and we enjoy it as a hobby.

Just ask Scalbert about his prototype RES and how "easy" that was.
Old 05-08-2002, 11:16 AM
  #26  
Not AtlCl98 or Atl-CL
 
AtlCl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no sc for the 1gen
Old 05-08-2002, 11:56 AM
  #27  
Old timer
 
JRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: .
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Rod
I want to see how the auto tranny will handle the extra power, especially when changing the pulley. I definitely don't want to be the guinea pig.
You would need to lower the compression before you could up the boost very much, not to mention upgrade the fuel system, most of all the injectors which are fine for the weak boost the SC will put out stock I think they said, but would need upgrading for higher boost.
Old 05-08-2002, 12:38 PM
  #28  
Suzuka Master
 
scalbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW, there is about an overall, area power gain of about 15.7%. That is significant and would be very noticeable. In other words, the car would accelerate harder at 4k revs with the SC than it could have ever without it.

A pulley swap on our CR might not be a viable option for most purchasing the blower. You would need to monitor knock and adjust a 4:1 rising rate regulator to compensate. We might get away with 6 PSI provided you can get the A/F in the 12:1 range.
Old 05-08-2002, 04:25 PM
  #29  
Seminole Fan
 
DirtyHarryFSU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Age: 41
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BNut


Our cars are restricted to a SINGLE intake valve below 3,500 rpms where as you guys get full use of BOTH valves below your VTEC switchover. We currently have a member that is in the process of swapping out the CL-S camshafts in his Accord. In additionto the two camshafts we also have to purchase a CL-S cam gear.


I'm not sure about your CL but my CL only has one camshaft.
Old 05-08-2002, 07:01 PM
  #30  
Instructor
 
Ming 2.7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to be a jerk:

Stock A6 2.7T

HP LBS
250 258

Chip only
GIAC X-Chip
HP LBS
330 370


Cost: $595

Just had to do that.

Seriously, That would a nice touch to the Acura CL-S. I wonder if you have to beef up the tranny any? For that $4995 does it come with a type of Warranty ala Dinan??? If not could you purchase one thru Comptech? Wonder how many people would pay $7000 to include a warranty by Comptech??
Old 05-08-2002, 07:14 PM
  #31  
What can I get ya?
 
moforose3.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mechanicsburg, Pa
Age: 43
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1genCL
for all you people that are complainig about the price of the supercharger..... dont!

just think what a simple pulley mod will do for your powerband.

take it down to zero, by blowing the engine. To much boost for a stock engine isnt good
Old 05-08-2002, 07:45 PM
  #32  
Banned
 
moomaster_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Ming 2.7T
Just to be a jerk:

Stock A6 2.7T

HP LBS
250 258

Chip only
GIAC X-Chip
HP LBS
330 370


Cost: $595

Just had to do that.

Seriously, That would a nice touch to the Acura CL-S. I wonder if you have to beef up the tranny any? For that $4995 does it come with a type of Warranty ala Dinan??? If not could you purchase one thru Comptech? Wonder how many people would pay $7000 to include a warranty by Comptech??
Probably the people that would buy one anyway.....look around Ming...a lot of people here are all talk....
Old 05-08-2002, 08:23 PM
  #33  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Ming 2.7T
Just to be a jerk:

Stock A6 2.7T

HP LBS
250 258

Chip only
GIAC X-Chip
HP LBS
330 370


Cost: $595

Just had to do that.

Just sick!
Old 05-09-2002, 10:09 AM
  #34  
S/C'd Accord Coming Soon!
 
BNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Lafayette, LA | Houston, TX (Weekends)
Age: 47
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DirtyHarryFSU
I'm not sure about your CL but my CL only has one camshaft.
Bah... you and your 4 banger... be gone. :P
Old 05-09-2002, 01:56 PM
  #35  
Pro
 
cnatra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Ming 2.7T
Just to be a jerk:

Stock A6 2.7T

HP LBS
250 258

Chip only
GIAC X-Chip
HP LBS
330 370

Cost: $595

So what's the difference in boost between OEM & the aftermarket chip ?
Old 05-09-2002, 01:59 PM
  #36  
I LOVE MY CAR
 
Dom418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
Age: 45
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apparently 80 hp !!!

j/k


I really don't know exactly how that chip works.... I sure it adjust the fuel/air mixture, engine timing, BOOST LEVELS??, etc...

I would like to know the details though

DOM
Old 05-09-2002, 02:53 PM
  #37  
Instructor
 
Ming 2.7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Stock chip is .7bar 10.152psi

Giac chip is 1.0 bar 14.503psi

GIAC X-chip is 1.2 bar(actually 1.15bar) 16.678psi

The X-chip spikes sometimes when its hot to 1.35 for a brief millisecond then returns to normal.

It remaps and changes values . You can look on the GIAC. site

WWW.giacusa.com or .org I forgot.
Old 05-09-2002, 03:01 PM
  #38  
Find beauty in dissonance
 
Bluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Takoma Park, MD
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Dom418
apparently 80 hp !!!

Forget HP, look at the torque.

Ming is this for all 2.7Ts?
Old 05-09-2002, 03:44 PM
  #39  
Instructor
 
Ming 2.7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, for both the S4 and the A6 2.7T model. 6 speed and Tiptronics

There is a chip from AMS that limits the lb to 300lb(still 310hp) for the Tip cars to help with the tranny limits.

The A6 4.2 also has a GIAC ECU and Tip computer upgrade. THe improvements are less but still OK. ECU chip maybe 10-15hp.
The GIAC Tip Tranny Chip actually speeds up the shifts on the automatic, making it a little more responsive and improves times.
Old 05-09-2002, 03:53 PM
  #40  
I LOVE MY CAR
 
Dom418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
Age: 45
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's amazing... My next car is going to be Turbo!!

How much are S4's going for now??


DOM


Quick Reply: CT SC dyno for AV6 has been posted!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.