Comptech headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2003, 09:40 AM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Roleez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comptech headers

To those that have ONLY the Comptech headers installed (no S/C, no CAI or IceBox, no axle back exhaust)...

Did you notice a significant change once you had them installed? Comptech states a +32hp over stock. So did it really feel like 292hp? The reason I ask is because I drove a CL-S 6sp (1200 miles on odo) with only the headers and I really didn't notice much of a change. Perhaps it's because the engine was still being broken in. Anyway, please give me your honest thoughts. I have a 6sp with only a K/N drop-in filter. If you only have the Comptech headers (not the OBX ones), what are your honest opinions on it? Worth the plunge? I don't plan on any axle-back exhaust because I hate the droning sound.
Old 07-28-2003, 09:43 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
jimcol711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 44
Posts: 6,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dude, i had a 2002 CL-S that ran 14.8@96 stock....with no other mods besides OBX (supposedly weaker than comptech) headers, and in VERY similar weather, my car was down to a 14.3@99.

yes, headers alone make a big differance. no matter how you slice it, 5 tenths of a 1/4 mile time from one mod is pretty damn good
Old 07-28-2003, 09:45 AM
  #3  
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Your trap speed is more indicative to your engine HP.
Jimcol, do you know your 60' time in both runs?
Old 07-28-2003, 09:49 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
jimcol711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 44
Posts: 6,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nashua, 60 foot time was 2.269 on the 14.3 sec run, not sure about the 14.8 run anymore, didnt save that slip
Old 07-28-2003, 09:58 AM
  #5  
Revving at 9K...
 
CLS2001_97124's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have CAI and CT header for a while on my Auto, and I definatly noticed a big difference in TOP end power. (smoother, and pulls harder). I got the CT exhaust later on, and did not notice any performance difference, but it's all good, because I got it for the looks. I hate looks of the 01 exhaust.
Old 07-28-2003, 09:59 AM
  #6  
///M POWER
 
darrinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
jim i remember reading it was a 2.36 60' in d5

as for me

stock-15.0@93
i/h-14.2@98
Old 07-28-2003, 12:05 PM
  #7  
Drifting
 
peiqinglong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definitely worth it.
Old 07-28-2003, 12:57 PM
  #8  
Where is my super sauce?
 
Slimey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tick-Tock Tech
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
When I had my headers installed I only had the K&N filter (now I have IceBox) on my six speeder.

Yes. You can feel it with the famed 'butt dyno.

No. You won't feel it in sub-VTEC RPMs. As advertised, it adds the majority of HP in the upper part of the RPM band. It doesn't seem to do squat (nor would I expect it to) for everyday stop & go traffic driving, but it will help you get onto the freeway faster .

Is it worth it? You know the cost, so the real question would be, 'can you afford it?' I could, so the relative worth was not an issue that I considered. In other words, since there is only one product on the market, there is nothing to compare it too. It costs what it costs. If there were competing products that had similar quality and specs then the concept of 'worth' may come into issue.

...and to those who are going to retort with 'what about OBX, stone, or brand x...?', please re-read Roleez' post: he has a six speeder. There is only one aftermarket header available and marketed.
Old 07-28-2003, 12:58 PM
  #9  
Burning Brakes
 
TL_Type_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah.. i ran a best of 14.8 @ 95mph w/ icebox and headers

my tires are pretty bald .. and it was pretty humid, but these are just excuses for the fact that my TL-S is slllllooooooow.
Old 07-28-2003, 01:20 PM
  #10  
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
running 98-99 MPH is excllent for the CLS-5AT, my best is 97.x I would love to hot 99+ MPH!
Old 07-28-2003, 02:21 PM
  #11  
Posts: 1,100,980
 
Chemmech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lake Arrowhead
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take it up to the red line and you should notice the subtle difference 32 whpmakes .
Old 07-28-2003, 02:29 PM
  #12  
Suzuka Master
 
KCPreki11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 5,773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roleez, I suggest you research the Comptech Exhaust a little more, it's hardly noticeable during normal driving, but sounds great when pushed. It doesn't drone like other exhausts plus it looks better than the stock exhaust. I think a lot of members here would agree with me.
Old 07-28-2003, 05:26 PM
  #13  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
of course!!!!! I can't wait to get them on the 6speed!!!!
Old 07-28-2003, 05:33 PM
  #14  
Has been sold for a while
 
J.T.'s 3.2CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I felt a big difference on my TL-P, I know I'll be even better on the CL-S 6 speed.
Old 07-28-2003, 05:41 PM
  #15  
Suzuka Master
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best bang for the buck... I had mine on at 1200 miles... and Slimey and the rest of the guys are right.. Upper RPMS is where it gets it!!!....

I also noticed that the car felt easier to pull out and launch, but I think that was just a figment of my imagination....


Smitty
Old 07-28-2003, 07:10 PM
  #16  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Roleez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many more ft-lbs of torque does the header generate? (I know comptechusa.com has an Acrobat reader .pdf file for their dyno results, but for some reason, my computer's not cooperating). Or if someone can open the .pdf file, can someone please post the dyno for just the header? Thanks!
Old 07-28-2003, 07:31 PM
  #17  
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
check the dyno in my sig for Stone Headers.
OBX did some 20 lbft more than stock starting at 5500 rpms. (Bulldog's CLS)
Stone headers did 4lbft more than OBX on the same day.
Old 07-28-2003, 07:33 PM
  #18  
Pro
iTrader: (2)
 
flint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 625
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
You will notice the difference. Average quarter mile gains are .5 or so depending on weather.
Old 07-28-2003, 07:35 PM
  #19  
Has been sold for a while
 
J.T.'s 3.2CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
check the dyno in my sig for Stone Headers.
OBX did some 20 lbft more than stock starting at 5500 rpms. (Bulldog's CLS)
Stone headers did 4lbft more than OBX on the same day.
Just wondering if any plans to fabricate these for the 6 speed folks have been made?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM
BoricuaTL
Car Parts for Sale
138
04-08-2016 01:08 PM
CL-S progression 01
Car Parts for Sale
65
01-26-2016 04:15 PM
k6biv
Car Parts for Sale
45
09-22-2015 02:06 PM



Quick Reply: Comptech headers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.