Acura CL 2002 vs. Nissan 350Z 2003
#1
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Acura CL 2002 vs. Nissan 350Z 2003
Just to inform you guys that I raced a Nissan 350Z. Off the start, my boost was faster (by the way, my car is completely stock). However, his third gear was much more powerful. He beat me 0-100km/h probably by 0.4 seconds.
It was a good race
It was a good race
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#4
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah exactly what i meant. the 350z is lighter. I knew it would beat me. But it's 287hp is well taken into consideration when you want to race. Believe it, it's a speedy car.
Trending Topics
#10
Liquid Ice
Originally Posted by berny
the 350z is 5.5seconds 0-60mph. the cls is 5.9
#12
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Dude... if you are saying you only went 0-100km/h how does 3rd gear even factor in? 100km/h is roughly 62 mph and last time I checked I'm still in 2nd gear. ![Scratch](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)
Also if your "boost" off the line was better, how did he beat you by .4 seconds to 100km/h (and how did you measure all the way down to 4/10ths of a second while driving?)![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Also was the Z an auto or 6-speed?
:noob:
![Scratch](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/scratch.gif)
Also if your "boost" off the line was better, how did he beat you by .4 seconds to 100km/h (and how did you measure all the way down to 4/10ths of a second while driving?)
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Also was the Z an auto or 6-speed?
:noob:
#14
GEEZER
UBER
![Bullshit](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/bs.gif)
#15
Senior Moderator
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
#17
Happy CL-S Pilot
WTF... a 5-speed Altima V6 can do 0-60 in 5.9s and Z will do it in 5.59s! Just to let you know CL-S does it in 6.7s stock!.... a 6-speed Version will save you a 0.4 to 60!...
#18
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
The stock auto CL-S is definitely faster than 6.7 to 60mph. Most likely 6.4 range. Although 0-60 is such a worthless figure that is given WAY too much importance by car magazines. So much can change from run to run (0-60). That is such a short distance. It's all about 1/4 mile times.
#19
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by mrsteve
Although 0-60 is such a worthless figure that is given WAY too much importance by car magazines. So much can change from run to run (0-60). That is such a short distance. It's all about 1/4 mile times.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
saberlove
2G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
12
03-11-2021 09:29 AM