2002 altima times are here from mt !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
gun shotta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
2002 altima times are here from mt !!!

From MT article

"This unassuming sedan turns from econocar to hot-rod in an instant, torque-steering you 0-60 mph in 6.28 seconds (good !) and besting the new 345-hp Infiniti Q45 by over 2 tenths. Blazing through the quarter mile in 14.72 sec/96.82 mph lets you pick on Porsche Boxsters !"

"Power delivery is smooth and linear. It's not super strong below 3000, but from that point to redline, it delivers a healthy, velvety rush. Use the gearbox to keep the revs up a bit and it makes a credible play at sport-sedanship."

"The shift linkage on our preproduction tester felt strange, however. It was light in between the gates, yet notchy at the same time. We'll reserve judgement until we drive a series-production vehicle."

"A 2.5SL with an automatic feels about as quick as a 170-hp VW Passat 1.8T, without the turbo lag, of course."

About the 4-cyl: "The four is much noisier than the V-6 in getting up to speed on full-throttle launches (DUH !). It feels strongest in the upper ranges, but it's not devoid of low- and mid- range torque like so many Japanese four-cylinder engines". BTW it's still rated at 180 horses in the article ...

"Steering is light, too, much lighter than an Accord's, but feels very precise. The Altima, whether equipped with the 2.5L engine and 16-in. wheels or the 3.5L engine and 17-in alloys, is one of the better-handling sedans in this segment."

"The brakes are big and strong, although not quite Germanic..."

"Weight ranges from 2998 lb for the base 4-cylinder model with 5 speed manual gearbox to 3244 for an SE 3.5 V-6 with the automatic. It seems light, perhaps a bit too light in the weight and feel of some of its interior panels that appear to have been cost-cut a bit too far"

BTW: This is still just the preproduction car !!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 05:43 PM
  #2  
Zapata's Avatar
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
maybe this might force Acura to bring the RSX-type R over here a bit sooner
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 05:43 PM
  #3  
BigPimp's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,052
Likes: 0
Good 0-60 and 1/4 times, but the description of the cheap interior is not very uplifting.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
gun shotta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
That's what i'm saying
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 06:03 PM
  #5  
CLS16's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Now I wonder what the Maxima numbers will be...
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 06:08 PM
  #6  
CLS16's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Actually what scares me even more is that the new Z is going to have between 280-300hp, and it's going to way about 3200lbs, with a 6spd and RWD. Now that's definitely going to be a rocket...an affordable rocket!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 06:09 PM
  #7  
eclipse23's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,829
Likes: 3
From: CRY, CRY SOME MORE!
All of a sudden headers sound like a good idea......
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 06:13 PM
  #8  
davo-cls's Avatar
aka davo-tsx
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally posted by CLS16:
<STRONG>Now I wonder what the Maxima numbers will be...</STRONG>
I'll put money down that with the added weight and the extra 15hp will result in no more than an extra 2/10 over those numbers. If/when a 6-speed Type S comes out, hopefully the car will be lighter and will result in sub-6 second numbers.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 06:13 PM
  #9  
gun shotta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
i like that one!!. How much time would a helical lsd bring off on the 1/4 mile and 0-60. That supercharger better come fast??
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 08:24 PM
  #10  
SLVRTSUNAMI's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: OC n SoCal
my exdperience has been that production does not come close to production so we will just have to wait and see!!!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 08:35 PM
  #11  
e1828's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Originally posted by gun shotta:
<STRONG>From MT article

"This unassuming sedan turns from econocar to hot-rod in an instant, torque-steering you 0-60 mph in 6.28 seconds (good !) and besting the new 345-hp Infiniti Q45 by over 2 tenths... !!</STRONG>
When did the Q45 ever get 345 hp?!?!?!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 10:04 PM
  #12  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Holy shit! I was not expectin this to be that low. Hmmm...
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 10:06 PM
  #13  
EricL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 1
From: Ninth Gate & So Cal
Originally posted by gavriil:
<STRONG>Holy shit! I was not expectin this to be that low. Hmmm...</STRONG>
Lighter car than ours....
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2001 | 10:27 PM
  #14  
doug's Avatar
almost as fast as a CL-S
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: CT
the Maxima is smaller and lighter than the Altima.. it has 15 hp and more tq and it has LSD.. its definately going to be faster than the Altima..

thing to note.. 96 mph traps usually result in low 14's

Originally posted by davo-cls:
<STRONG>

I'll put money down that with the added weight and the extra 15hp will result in no more than an extra 2/10 over those numbers. If/when a 6-speed Type S comes out, hopefully the car will be lighter and will result in sub-6 second numbers.</STRONG>
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2001 | 01:36 AM
  #15  
SmoothJyzz's Avatar
Soon to be, fairly famous
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
You must mean the new stuff (and not even then) the Altima is way smaller than the Maxima. Had both.

dee
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2001 | 02:01 AM
  #16  
Southpaw's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: nyc
i read somewhere that the new q does 0-60 in under 6 sec
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2001 | 02:03 AM
  #17  
mrdeeno's Avatar
Suzuka Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 3
From: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Originally posted by Southpaw:
<STRONG>i read somewhere that the new q does 0-60 in under 6 sec</STRONG>
we all did...but htere's a debate about it whether it really does or not 'cuz no one (no mags) have been able to get anywhere near 6, much less under.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2001 | 02:10 AM
  #18  
Southpaw's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: nyc
i dont care if the new altima or maxima can fly, those are some ugly looking cars just my opinion.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
forrie
2G RDX (2013-2018)
12
Sep 15, 2015 09:57 AM
theinsvnity
2G TL Problems & Fixes
2
Sep 10, 2015 10:22 PM
kuzdu
5G TLX (2015-2020)
3
Sep 10, 2015 08:42 PM
ellisd03tls
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
Sep 8, 2015 04:17 PM
NSolace
2G TL Problems & Fixes
15
Sep 3, 2015 08:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM.