2002 altima times are here from mt !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2001, 05:38 PM
  #1  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
gun shotta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 altima times are here from mt !!!

From MT article

"This unassuming sedan turns from econocar to hot-rod in an instant, torque-steering you 0-60 mph in 6.28 seconds (good !) and besting the new 345-hp Infiniti Q45 by over 2 tenths. Blazing through the quarter mile in 14.72 sec/96.82 mph lets you pick on Porsche Boxsters !"

"Power delivery is smooth and linear. It's not super strong below 3000, but from that point to redline, it delivers a healthy, velvety rush. Use the gearbox to keep the revs up a bit and it makes a credible play at sport-sedanship."

"The shift linkage on our preproduction tester felt strange, however. It was light in between the gates, yet notchy at the same time. We'll reserve judgement until we drive a series-production vehicle."

"A 2.5SL with an automatic feels about as quick as a 170-hp VW Passat 1.8T, without the turbo lag, of course."

About the 4-cyl: "The four is much noisier than the V-6 in getting up to speed on full-throttle launches (DUH !). It feels strongest in the upper ranges, but it's not devoid of low- and mid- range torque like so many Japanese four-cylinder engines". BTW it's still rated at 180 horses in the article ...

"Steering is light, too, much lighter than an Accord's, but feels very precise. The Altima, whether equipped with the 2.5L engine and 16-in. wheels or the 3.5L engine and 17-in alloys, is one of the better-handling sedans in this segment."

"The brakes are big and strong, although not quite Germanic..."

"Weight ranges from 2998 lb for the base 4-cylinder model with 5 speed manual gearbox to 3244 for an SE 3.5 V-6 with the automatic. It seems light, perhaps a bit too light in the weight and feel of some of its interior panels that appear to have been cost-cut a bit too far"

BTW: This is still just the preproduction car !!
Old 07-31-2001, 05:43 PM
  #2  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
maybe this might force Acura to bring the RSX-type R over here a bit sooner
Old 07-31-2001, 05:43 PM
  #3  
Safety Car
 
BigPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good 0-60 and 1/4 times, but the description of the cheap interior is not very uplifting.
Old 07-31-2001, 05:48 PM
  #4  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
gun shotta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's what i'm saying
Old 07-31-2001, 06:03 PM
  #5  
Racer
 
CLS16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: NJ
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now I wonder what the Maxima numbers will be...
Old 07-31-2001, 06:08 PM
  #6  
Racer
 
CLS16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: NJ
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually what scares me even more is that the new Z is going to have between 280-300hp, and it's going to way about 3200lbs, with a 6spd and RWD. Now that's definitely going to be a rocket...an affordable rocket!
Old 07-31-2001, 06:09 PM
  #7  
Moderator Alumnus
 
eclipse23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: CRY, CRY SOME MORE!
Age: 48
Posts: 11,829
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
All of a sudden headers sound like a good idea......
Old 07-31-2001, 06:13 PM
  #8  
aka davo-tsx
 
davo-cls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 55
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by CLS16:
<STRONG>Now I wonder what the Maxima numbers will be...</STRONG>
I'll put money down that with the added weight and the extra 15hp will result in no more than an extra 2/10 over those numbers. If/when a 6-speed Type S comes out, hopefully the car will be lighter and will result in sub-6 second numbers.
Old 07-31-2001, 06:13 PM
  #9  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
gun shotta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i like that one!!. How much time would a helical lsd bring off on the 1/4 mile and 0-60. That supercharger better come fast??
Old 07-31-2001, 08:24 PM
  #10  
Instructor
 
SLVRTSUNAMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: OC n SoCal
Age: 55
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my exdperience has been that production does not come close to production so we will just have to wait and see!!!
Old 07-31-2001, 08:35 PM
  #11  
Pro
 
e1828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by gun shotta:
<STRONG>From MT article

"This unassuming sedan turns from econocar to hot-rod in an instant, torque-steering you 0-60 mph in 6.28 seconds (good !) and besting the new 345-hp Infiniti Q45 by over 2 tenths... !!</STRONG>
When did the Q45 ever get 345 hp?!?!?!
Old 07-31-2001, 10:04 PM
  #12  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Holy shit! I was not expectin this to be that low. Hmmm...
Old 07-31-2001, 10:06 PM
  #13  
Suzuka Master
 
EricL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ninth Gate & So Cal
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by gavriil:
<STRONG>Holy shit! I was not expectin this to be that low. Hmmm...</STRONG>
Lighter car than ours....
Old 07-31-2001, 10:27 PM
  #14  
almost as fast as a CL-S
 
doug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the Maxima is smaller and lighter than the Altima.. it has 15 hp and more tq and it has LSD.. its definately going to be faster than the Altima..

thing to note.. 96 mph traps usually result in low 14's

Originally posted by davo-cls:
<STRONG>

I'll put money down that with the added weight and the extra 15hp will result in no more than an extra 2/10 over those numbers. If/when a 6-speed Type S comes out, hopefully the car will be lighter and will result in sub-6 second numbers.</STRONG>
Old 08-01-2001, 01:36 AM
  #15  
Soon to be, fairly famous
 
SmoothJyzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You must mean the new stuff (and not even then) the Altima is way smaller than the Maxima. Had both.

dee
Old 08-01-2001, 02:01 AM
  #16  
Racer
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: nyc
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i read somewhere that the new q does 0-60 in under 6 sec
Old 08-01-2001, 02:03 AM
  #17  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally posted by Southpaw:
<STRONG>i read somewhere that the new q does 0-60 in under 6 sec</STRONG>
we all did...but htere's a debate about it whether it really does or not 'cuz no one (no mags) have been able to get anywhere near 6, much less under.
Old 08-01-2001, 02:10 AM
  #18  
Racer
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: nyc
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont care if the new altima or maxima can fly, those are some ugly looking cars just my opinion.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
forrie
2G RDX (2013-2018)
12
09-15-2015 09:57 AM
theinsvnity
2G TL Problems & Fixes
2
09-10-2015 10:22 PM
kuzdu
5G TLX (2015-2020)
3
09-10-2015 08:42 PM
ellisd03tls
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
09-08-2015 04:17 PM
NSolace
2G TL Problems & Fixes
15
09-03-2015 08:02 PM



Quick Reply: 2002 altima times are here from mt !!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.