2.2 vs. SC300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2002 | 12:55 PM
  #1  
CLUofI's Avatar
Thread Starter
337
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 0
From: Iowa City/Des Moines
2.2 vs. SC300

I raced a sc 300, i thought i was going to get tooled. He sat at about my door all the way through second gear. I didnt have a chance to talk with him, was he just playing with me or did i actualy have a win that wasnt a civic or old prelude.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2002 | 02:27 PM
  #2  
ThoroDredCLS's Avatar
Shift_3.5 Auto
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: MD <> VA
Nice Job!

It all depends on the mods you have done to your car. If the sc300 was an auto you could hold your own with the mods you have listed. SC300 came in stick and auto so if he was driving stick, they are rated around 7.4 -7.9 0-60. They have weak engines for their heavy body. Nice job!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2002 | 08:18 PM
  #3  
JLai's Avatar
Cause stock sux.
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 0
From: FL
SC300s are slow. So are the older SC400s. V8 with only 250 HP. And heavy as crap.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Aug 15, 2019 12:58 PM
DiamondJoeQuimby
Car Parts for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 11:40 AM
atm_ent
Car Parts for Sale
10
May 8, 2002 04:42 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.