01CLS-Auto vs. 03CLS-Manual

Old Aug 9, 2005 | 05:14 PM
  #1  
ceenite's Avatar
Thread Starter
2004 Acura TL
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH
Question 01CLS-Auto vs. 03CLS-Manual

I've been racing around in my 01 CLS Auto for about 3 months now. Have to say I'm very impressed with the performance. I'm running pretty much stock with AEM CAI. Can't say I have ever lost a race to a car that is not totally out of my league so figured I would look for some comp and race the family. What's gonna happen when I go up against an 03' CLS Manual? How bad am I going to get beat.. will I get beat? Just curious.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 07:16 PM
  #2  
robeaneee's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: 909 foo
like a car length..maybe a car length and a half
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 12:00 AM
  #3  
hairybonch's Avatar
A work in progress
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Washington
depends on the driver probably.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 07:33 AM
  #4  
03 CL TypeS's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Depends on his tires too. The manuals are tricky to launch. That's why both the M6 and the A5 will run the same ET's at the track (stock for stock)... the auto's generally have a better take off whereas the manuals will make up for it in the top end (and therefore end up trapping higher mph's.)

Bottom line though is that the odds are against you, and a fairly decent driver should start pulling away as of 2nd gear.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #5  
NSX-Tuner's Avatar
boosted is best
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 4
From: .
I've had both an '01 CLS 5AT and an '03 CLS 6MT. Out-of-the-box the 6MT is quicker. Once you get a 6MT launched and into 2nd gear, it will keep pulling on a 5AT all the way up in the gears. Unlike the 5AT which hits a brick wall in 4th, the 6MT gearing is much more evenly spaced.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #6  
Lord Helmet's Avatar
I'm here in spirit...
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,607
Likes: 0
From: CO
I have the '01 whereas my ex-gf had the '03 6spd. Everytime she tried to race me, I'd smoke her.... Bigtime. From a stop, from a roll, highway speed, whatever. I think a lot of it is driver. Her launches always sucked.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #7  
NSX-Tuner's Avatar
boosted is best
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 4
From: .
Originally Posted by chriskh
I have the '01 whereas my ex-gf had the '03 6spd. Everytime she tried to race me, I'd smoke her.... Bigtime. From a stop, from a roll, highway speed, whatever. I think a lot of it is driver. Her launches always sucked.
LOL... She doesn't want to crush your ego...
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #8  
Lord Helmet's Avatar
I'm here in spirit...
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,607
Likes: 0
From: CO
Maybe but for some reason she was always irritated at me afterwards.... haha
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #9  
NSX-Tuner's Avatar
boosted is best
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 4
From: .
Originally Posted by chriskh
Maybe but for some reason she was always irritated at me afterwards.... haha
more LOL... she's probably irritated because of your gloating afterward... she probably thinking to herself "what's he all puffed up about, I let him win so I wouldn't bruise his fragile ego"... j/k (note: I'm speaking from experience )
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #10  
ceenite's Avatar
Thread Starter
2004 Acura TL
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH
Question

Figured as much. Oh well. What U think I should do next to gain some speed/power. Done all the basics.. Of course most have nothing to do with perfomance. Tint, H&R Sport springs (Tein Coilovers coming), AEM CAI, Minor system upgrade. Headers or cat back exhaust system? Suttn else?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #11  
03 CL TypeS's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Headers will give you 30whp.

A catback system will give you 1 or 2whp.

Headers should be next on your acceleration-related mod list, without a doubt. Every knowledgeable dude on this site would agree with me.

If you really wanna go nuts, get the Comptech blower too...
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 02:07 PM
  #12  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
I've raced two at the track when I was 5AT.

First time I had tires/intake he was bone stock. I ran 14.5 to his 14.6. However his trap speed was 3MPH faster (95 vs 98)

Second time I had I/H/E/tires/springs he had tires and AEM intake. I ran 14.2 @ 97 vs 14.3 @ 98.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #13  
Joe5.0's Avatar
TQ > MPG
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 8
From: Metro Detroit
From a stop you will probably get 1/2 car length, after that it will be a gradual but pronounced walking. This is assuming the other guy is a good driver and you are too. If either of you mess up the launch it will change the outcome. The 6 speed dyno's ~ 20whp more than where you're at, so your only hope is a race from like 0-60mph, because after that it will def pull on you.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #14  
goredcar's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Wink Your kidding... right?

Originally Posted by NSX-Tuner
LOL... She doesn't want to crush your ego...
I agree totally...

I used to have an 01 CLS, with significant modding... CT Headers, AEM intake and UR pulleys. I thought it was fast till I drove a 03 CLS 6MT. I recently purchased a 6MT. I think that the 6MT was faster than my modded 5AT.

Just think about the difference in drive train efficiencies... you are talking 15 - 20%. Do the math on that converting crank HP to WHP. Comptech rates their S/C at +40WHP for the auto and +60 for the 6MT. Same S/C unit... the only difference is drivetrain efficiency.

The only problem I have with launching the 6MT is too much HP for tires I have on. You have to do a more gradual accelleration to WOT or you will just smoke your tires.

Trade cars with your g/f... and try again.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #15  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
There's more than just the dirvetrain efficiency between the two S/C'er kits. The voltage clamp on the 6MT is different and thus allows more timing.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #16  
goredcar's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by mrsteve
There's more than just the dirvetrain efficiency between the two S/C'er kits. The voltage clamp on the 6MT is different and thus allows more timing.
This is interesting...Can you give me some more details? I am no S/C expert, but from an electrical perspective I don't see how the voltage clamp could make a difference unless it is connecting to more than just voltage source.

I had called Comptech a while back as I was considering the S/C when I had my 5AT and they told me that it was just a function of drivertain efficiency.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #17  
kevin79925's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 1
From: Houston
the 6 speed cls can nevar be beat.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #18  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by goredcar
This is interesting...Can you give me some more details? I am no S/C expert, but from an electrical perspective I don't see how the voltage clamp could make a difference unless it is connecting to more than just voltage source.

I had called Comptech a while back as I was considering the S/C when I had my 5AT and they told me that it was just a function of drivertain efficiency.

The voltage clamp controls the MAP sensor's signal to the ECU. If the voltage clamp wasn't in place, as soon as the MAP sensor detected boost it would retard timing. The higher the voltage allowed, the more timing the ECU will run (err, the less it will retard).
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 06:09 PM
  #19  
goredcar's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by mrsteve
The voltage clamp controls the MAP sensor's signal to the ECU. If the voltage clamp wasn't in place, as soon as the MAP sensor detected boost it would retard timing. The higher the voltage allowed, the more timing the ECU will run (err, the less it will retard).
Thanks... that explanation helps. So are you saying that the voltage clamp on the auto allows lower voltage? and therefore more retarded timing (capped) in the presense of boost?

Does this also have an impact on required octane? as in the 6MT S/C requiring a higher octane fuel?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 06:32 PM
  #20  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
No no... the difference isn't that great. We are talking less than 0.1 volts. But every little bit helps
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #21  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by mrsteve
The voltage clamp controls the MAP sensor's signal to the ECU. If the voltage clamp wasn't in place, as soon as the MAP sensor detected boost it would retard timing. The higher the voltage allowed, the more timing the ECU will run (err, the less it will retard).
Actually the lower the clamp level the lower the percieved load which will result in more timing. I beleive it has more to do with the drivetrain and how it responds to the SC.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #22  
goredcar's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by scalbert
Actually the lower the clamp level the lower the percieved load which will result in more timing. I beleive it has more to do with the drivetrain and how it responds to the SC.
How do you guys know all this stuff? I am totally amazed (and impressed)
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #23  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by scalbert
Actually the lower the clamp level the lower the percieved load which will result in more timing. I beleive it has more to do with the drivetrain and how it responds to the SC.

You know... I guess that does make a lot more sense. Ram tried to explain it one time and mentioned something about the clap level on the 6MT adding to the power difference.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 05:56 PM
  #24  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by goredcar
How do you guys know all this stuff? I am totally amazed (and impressed)
We tend to stay at Holiday-Inn Express's.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #25  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by scalbert
We tend to stay at Holiday-Inn Express's.

Glad to see you around again Steve. Check your PM
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 09:29 PM
  #26  
power3dfx's Avatar
Parting out 02 Type S :(
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: LA,CA
Originally Posted by scalbert
We tend to stay at Holiday-Inn Express's.
Hey Steve, good to see you still checking the forums. Any input you give us is always helpful! Come around more often and keep us posted on your current ride!
As for the threads question: Given equal drivers, an auto requires headers to be even. Think of it this way, a 6speed comes with a headers worth of HP. So it can do some damage when it actually gets headers. I think that its more about the TQ of the 6sp that helps them in runs. Even with headers,intake,pulley, etc.. we only gain 10-20 tq. the 6 speed starts off with that extra lead which is very helpful since most boltons hardly help in the tq dept.
In a race, if all you have is an intake, and the other driver is stock but good at shifting, i would estimate 1.5-2 cars in the 1/4 mile. If you are within one car length, then you did extremely well.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 06:53 AM
  #27  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by mrsteve
Glad to see you around again Steve. Check your PM

It is hard to get too far away from a home I was at for many years. Plus, with the EU and the work I am doing with it, I have got to be around more now.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #28  
02AV6's Avatar
563hp daily
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 565
Likes: 5
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by scalbert
It is hard to get too far away from a home I was at for many years. Plus, with the EU and the work I am doing with it, I have got to be around more now.
Yep you should, and I'll keep you busy
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 04:29 PM
  #29  
02AV6's Avatar
563hp daily
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 565
Likes: 5
From: Chicago
Less drivetrain loss, better gearing, less weight and reliability makes 6MT better option. The only dissadvantage is traction vs auto but this is FWD. Regardless, my next car is manual V8 but RWD, well unless I opt for stock IC 13psi E55 AMG
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Aug 15, 2019 12:58 PM
DiamondJoeQuimby
Car Parts for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 11:40 AM
mattg
Car Talk
245
Oct 20, 2003 03:15 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.