0-60mph in 3 seconds?
0-60mph in 3 seconds?
Japanese sports car builder Tommy Kaira, famous for its Norfolk-built two-seat Lotus Elise-rivalling roadster, is set to storm back into the market with this ZZ2, a 206mph Ferrari 360 Modena-rivalling coupé.
Based on a monocoque chassis and due to be launched at the Frankfurt Motor Show in October, the 550bhp machine uses a highly tuned 2.6-litre Nissan Skyline engine to sprint from 0-60mph in around 3.0 seconds. A four-wheel-drive system, also borrowed from the Skyline, ensures supreme traction, although news that the firm is also said to be working on a two-wheel-drive edition is sure to excite those who relish a challenge.
Despite the ZZ2's incredible speed, the brakes will be more than up to the job of slowing down the outrageous machine, as engineers are looking at six-pot callipers for the front and four-pot callipers for the rear.
The ZZ2 is expected to go on sale in 2002 with a price of around £60,000. The firm is also rumoured to be taking the car to the classic 24-hour Le Mans race in 2003.
------------------
Gabriel
CL Type S
god damn cool..and beautiful and streamline..cool
------------------
2001 Acura Red CL Type S.
1997 Honda Civic EX.
!!!! VTEC Power !!!!
Powered by HONDA
Powered by MUGEN
typescl@yahoo.com
------------------
2001 Acura Red CL Type S.
1997 Honda Civic EX.
!!!! VTEC Power !!!!
Powered by HONDA
Powered by MUGEN
typescl@yahoo.com
Not too bad... I can do without the thingies on the roof... but it looks a helluva lot better than that Saleen S7 piece of crap. I can't believe people are gonna pay $375K for that POS! 
[This message has been edited by GoldTypeS (edited 01-15-2001).]

[This message has been edited by GoldTypeS (edited 01-15-2001).]
Damn! 3 sec 0-60 time? Geez!!
I don't think that is coming over here to the states...ever!
------------------
Tw1112
CL 3.0 '98 - Cleared bumper, hiper/piaa bulbs all around, PIAA 1700x fogs, and AEM CAI.
I don't think that is coming over here to the states...ever! ------------------
Tw1112
CL 3.0 '98 - Cleared bumper, hiper/piaa bulbs all around, PIAA 1700x fogs, and AEM CAI.
Trending Topics
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by tw1112:
Damn! 3 sec 0-60 time? Geez!!
I don't think that is coming over here to the states...ever!
</font>
Damn! 3 sec 0-60 time? Geez!!
I don't think that is coming over here to the states...ever! </font>
Wake up.... Read some performance spec of killer bike.
------------------
Bare Bone Stock Type-S. Plenty of accessories. PIAA 19169 to be installed soon.
I've seen those tommy karra cars in Gran turismo. there small as heck. and pack alot of HP to launch them.
------------------
CL-S
White/Ebony/Navi/Spoiler/Visor/Full Bra/Mud Guards/Cargo Net/Acura Car Cover/Tint 20%,35%,5% on Sun Roof, Rockford 250a2 Amp w/JL10w6 / K&N Drop in Filter. Comptech Springs. Polarg m-6.
Comptech Headers soon now that I have a JOB again. hehe
gtech 0-60 6.03 w/ 438 pound load.
------------------
CL-S
White/Ebony/Navi/Spoiler/Visor/Full Bra/Mud Guards/Cargo Net/Acura Car Cover/Tint 20%,35%,5% on Sun Roof, Rockford 250a2 Amp w/JL10w6 / K&N Drop in Filter. Comptech Springs. Polarg m-6.
Comptech Headers soon now that I have a JOB again. hehe
gtech 0-60 6.03 w/ 438 pound load.
No other street legal killing machine can get you killed faster that these killers:
Yamaha : 10.346 @ 135.39 mph
Suzuki : 10.587 @ 133.75 mph
Kawasaki : 10.598 @ 131.92 mph
Honda : 10.731 @ 130.73 mph
Note: Correction factors are 1.0337 for mph, and 0.9679 for E.T.
Source: http://www.motorcycle.com/mo/mccompa...pen/strip.html
------------------
Bare Bone Stock Type-S. Plenty of accessories. PIAA 19169 to be installed soon.
Yamaha : 10.346 @ 135.39 mph
Suzuki : 10.587 @ 133.75 mph
Kawasaki : 10.598 @ 131.92 mph
Honda : 10.731 @ 130.73 mph
Note: Correction factors are 1.0337 for mph, and 0.9679 for E.T.
Source: http://www.motorcycle.com/mo/mccompa...pen/strip.html
------------------
Bare Bone Stock Type-S. Plenty of accessories. PIAA 19169 to be installed soon.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk:
WTF any nice Honda bike (e.g., XBR900) can do that 0-60 in 3 sec.
Wake up.... Read some performance spec of killer bike.
</font>
WTF any nice Honda bike (e.g., XBR900) can do that 0-60 in 3 sec.
Wake up.... Read some performance spec of killer bike.
</font>
The comparison here was for a street legal car in the United states at supercar speeds, ie 3 sec 0-60's. Name one, name a few? speechless? Thought so jackass.
Don't be so quick to blurt out a response just to make someone else feel stupid and make yourself look good.
For crying out loud, who the f*ck doesn't know a Superbike can't destroy anything short of a GT1.
For some reason I don't think you would feel justified if a random man came up to me and gave me a CLK-GTR then gave you a ZX-9R. Hell, we're both just as fast, right?
Wake up. Learn some common sense.
------------------
Kenny
Slow TL
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by F=ma:
Look smart guy, he was comparing apples to apples. Its like some guy raving about how the new F-22 can pull Mach 3 (hypothetically) when hell, the SR-71 was doing it way back in the 70's. The Apollo Moon Capsule did Mach 25 equivalent circling the moon. Big whoop huh?
The comparison here was for a street legal car in the United states at supercar speeds, ie 3 sec 0-60's. Name one, name a few? speechless? Thought so jackass.
Don't be so quick to blurt out a response just to make someone else feel stupid and make yourself look good.
For crying out loud, who the f*ck doesn't know a Superbike can't destroy anything short of a GT1.
For some reason I don't think you would feel justified if a random man came up to me and gave me a CLK-GTR then gave you a ZX-9R. Hell, we're both just as fast, right?
Wake up. Learn some common sense.
</font>
Look smart guy, he was comparing apples to apples. Its like some guy raving about how the new F-22 can pull Mach 3 (hypothetically) when hell, the SR-71 was doing it way back in the 70's. The Apollo Moon Capsule did Mach 25 equivalent circling the moon. Big whoop huh?
The comparison here was for a street legal car in the United states at supercar speeds, ie 3 sec 0-60's. Name one, name a few? speechless? Thought so jackass.
Don't be so quick to blurt out a response just to make someone else feel stupid and make yourself look good.
For crying out loud, who the f*ck doesn't know a Superbike can't destroy anything short of a GT1.
For some reason I don't think you would feel justified if a random man came up to me and gave me a CLK-GTR then gave you a ZX-9R. Hell, we're both just as fast, right?
Wake up. Learn some common sense.
</font>
That idea, you short-sighted, sqrt headed, smart azz, is that why you wonna go kill yourself faster! ( I do not give a shit, btw), how u want to justify a 3-sec car! pay 100K for that small coffin, if you want to do so go ahead a ride a super bike, save $90k for the one who will inhert ur azzz.
------------------
Bare Bone Stock Type-S. Plenty of accessories. PIAA 19169 to be installed soon.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by tw1112:
Damn! 3 sec 0-60 time? Geez!!
I don't think that is coming over here to the states...ever!
</font>
Damn! 3 sec 0-60 time? Geez!!
I don't think that is coming over here to the states...ever! </font>
Also that 3.0 sec 0-60 I am sure is there mainly due to the AWD. It does help put the power on the ground. The RWD version (if it ever happens) should be at least 0.5 sec slower.
------------------
Gabriel
CL Type S
Gabriel,
Thanks, anyways, for sharing this bit of info. All the time your postings are informative.
------------------
Bare Bone Stock Type-S. Plenty of accessories. PIAA 19169 to be installed soon.
Thanks, anyways, for sharing this bit of info. All the time your postings are informative.
------------------
Bare Bone Stock Type-S. Plenty of accessories. PIAA 19169 to be installed soon.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by gavriil:
Also that 3.0 sec 0-60 I am sure is there mainly due to the AWD. It does help put the power on the ground. The RWD version (if it ever happens) should be at least 0.5 sec slower.
</font>
Also that 3.0 sec 0-60 I am sure is there mainly due to the AWD. It does help put the power on the ground. The RWD version (if it ever happens) should be at least 0.5 sec slower.
</font>
------------------
Kenny
Slow TL
how about a top fule Funny car that does the 300 MPH in 3 seconds lol... i would race anyone with that car.. even ur damn superbike lol.
------------------
Gold CL-S with comptech headers, mufflers,Springs, V-AFC,AEM CAI. ACE hyper black Wheels 235-40-18ZR.
In the future..Supercharger or turbo if there is any.
Gtech run 0 to 60 in 5.41sec
My car pics are On http://albums.photopoint.com/j/Album...521&a=11013539
------------------
Gold CL-S with comptech headers, mufflers,Springs, V-AFC,AEM CAI. ACE hyper black Wheels 235-40-18ZR.
In the future..Supercharger or turbo if there is any.
Gtech run 0 to 60 in 5.41sec
My car pics are On http://albums.photopoint.com/j/Album...521&a=11013539
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
May 30, 2020 12:40 AM
spoiler900
5G TLX (2015-2020)
20
Oct 10, 2015 06:48 PM




