Load index??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 07:56 PM
  #1  
laee3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Load index??

Alright so I ordered Kumo ecsta ASX off of tirerack last weekend and salesmanager calls me that TSX comes with load index of 93 pounds. Kumho ecsta ASX is 92 rated. He says probably nothing will happen given that i live in central california. Also Kumho ecsta ASX is Z-rated. I know many of the forum member is running this tires. Size I got was 225/40/18. What do you guys think? What are the chance that I might get a flat tire? I usually drive with one person on the passenger seat and pretty much nothing in the trunk. So let me know what you guys think.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #2  
laee3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
as i searched the forum you could get side bubbles or something if you run lower load index tires than what they recoomened. what exactly is this?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #3  
Joeys'TSX's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
don't have any idea
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #4  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
Tirerack has all the info you need about tires.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=35

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/tiretech.jsp
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #5  
laee3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
yeah I read that, it just basically tells me to run as high as i can but since i'm running 92 rather than 93, what am i really compromising?? I heard that you can get bubbles in the side walls. I'm not sure the "sidewall" here is referrering to fenders or the sidewalls on the tirewall, does anybody know what it is really?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #6  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
The load capacity of the 92 rating is 44 lbs less than the 93 rating per tire. so, that's really nothing to worry about.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #7  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
^^ is that a static load rating or a dynamic load rating?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #8  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
^^
Good question. I'm not sure and couldn't find any further info other than just numbers. However, the max load capacity is rated at the max air pressure of the tire. Most tires are inflated to approx. 32 psi and the max can be as high as 50 psi. So, it depends on the tire and the current inflated pressure, I guess it's possible to excess the load capacity if the car is fully loaded with people and luggage. Car weight + people + luggage.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #9  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
I've always assumed it was a static rating and that you would just take the weight of the car, add 850 (max weight capacity I believe), multiply by the F/R weight ratio and then divide by two to get the required load rating per tire. If its dynamic then the forces on a tire could be quite high, particularly braking into a sharp turn (as an example).
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #10  
925tsx's Avatar
B A N N E D
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Jerzey
did you get the tires on the car yet? how are they?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
knight rider
Car Talk
9
Mar 4, 2016 08:59 AM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
Oct 8, 2015 11:16 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
Sep 25, 2015 12:50 PM
snorf
2G RDX (2013-2018)
7
Sep 17, 2015 10:04 PM
Mike Bertram
2G TL (1999-2003)
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:27 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.