TSX in infrared..
#1
TSX in infrared..
First pic after the "incident"
went to a local sail ship event in the city... the parking lot was in a field... after driving in the dirt/graval the car is SUPER dirty (long live B/W).. i m gona wash it after i post this pic... hehe...
hehe and now some pics of the Tall ship hehe
went to a local sail ship event in the city... the parking lot was in a field... after driving in the dirt/graval the car is SUPER dirty (long live B/W).. i m gona wash it after i post this pic... hehe...
hehe and now some pics of the Tall ship hehe
Trending Topics
#10
Originally Posted by iamhomin
Try submitting some of your work to any Acura dealerships or to Acura, they'll probably be interested in using your photos.
Great shot by the way.
Great shot by the way.
thanks...
#11
Neo, you truly are one hell of a photographer, not too sure if you are a pro or an amatuer but damn brother, you got some skills. I take crime scene photos all day (definately not as artistic) so i can definately appreciate the value of a good photo. Kudos bro!
#12
Originally Posted by TSX CSI
Neo, you truly are one hell of a photographer, not too sure if you are a pro or an amatuer but damn brother, you got some skills. I take crime scene photos all day (definately not as artistic) so i can definately appreciate the value of a good photo. Kudos bro!
man, that's one of the nicest comment's i've received ever...
:o I m definitely an amateur, no where near pro's edge... usually i don't post non-tsx
related pics on here.. cause i don't feel confident (not to mention off topic, but i like to share
and i've created a photo thread b4 but no one was too into it) and i've been on a photo
slump for months..
so for ur CSI style work, i m sure u are not allowed to take any pics artsy right? cause
it would be deceiving... also a dead body is a dead body... hehehe jk..
#22
Originally Posted by biker
That would be BW pic not infrared, but nice pic nonetheless.
just out of curiosity, how did u conclude with that idea? if it's bw, how can grass and trees
become washed out? and sky becomes darker? (cause it's got more radiant energy)
I used a Hoya R72... w/ Sony's Night shot.
BW shot...
#23
It's probably not a "true" IR shot.
IR shots shouldn't have reflections off the car - it should only have reflected heat signatures.
You said you used night shot?
Maybe it would be more accurate to call it a NV shot - similar to what you get with a night-vision goggles.
But in any case, wicked shot, NeoChaser - you definitely have the touch with a camera.
IR shots shouldn't have reflections off the car - it should only have reflected heat signatures.
You said you used night shot?
Maybe it would be more accurate to call it a NV shot - similar to what you get with a night-vision goggles.
But in any case, wicked shot, NeoChaser - you definitely have the touch with a camera.
#24
Originally Posted by Revenent
It's probably not a "true" IR shot.
IR shots shouldn't have reflections off the car - it should only have reflected heat signatures.
You said you used night shot?
Maybe it would be more accurate to call it a NV shot - similar to what you get with a night-vision goggles.
But in any case, wicked shot, NeoChaser - you definitely have the touch with a camera.
IR shots shouldn't have reflections off the car - it should only have reflected heat signatures.
You said you used night shot?
Maybe it would be more accurate to call it a NV shot - similar to what you get with a night-vision goggles.
But in any case, wicked shot, NeoChaser - you definitely have the touch with a camera.
thanks... Rev...
but again, it's not NV shot...
tho NV would help assist with the R72...
but then again, again, Night shot is produced by two Infrared emitter on my camera
which projects onto the subject..
#25
I guess its a matter of semantics. I associate infrared with a thermal imager - whereas you are talking about a camera that has capability to "see" infrared. A thermal imager would need no infrared illumination to "see" the subject. Thermal imagers are a totally different type of device - and a very costly one. And they would be extremely expensive (more than the cost of a TSX) to get a sharp picture as the one you have. I might be able to provide an example.
#26
Originally Posted by biker
I guess its a matter of semantics. I associate infrared with a thermal imager - whereas you are talking about a camera that has capability to "see" infrared. A thermal imager would need no infrared illumination to "see" the subject. Thermal imagers are a totally different type of device - and a very costly one. And they would be extremely expensive (more than the cost of a TSX) to get a sharp picture as the one you have. I might be able to provide an example.
Yep i know exactly wut u mean..
it's like that 7-UP commerical right... (dono if u've seen it)
i guess it's just a matter of terminology i guess... cause... for digitals, there are Infrared
filters..
and for SLR's there are IR film....
#36
Originally Posted by TSXfan23
is it just me or does the Acura TSX look like its on a right to left slanting car, vs. the Euro/Jdm Accord which looks leveled?
hehe i read ur post 3 times but i didn't it
could u rephase it...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
GWEEDOspeedo
Car Parts for Sale
4
01-15-2016 10:39 PM