Tsx536's - Auto 5AT - w/ Comptech Supercharger - Dyno / Pics (No 56K)
#41
crc
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: bellevue washington
Age: 36
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also i would like to know what Hondata did with the ECU?and how much did it cost? i alrady had my ECU reflashed and was wondering if that is just going ot end up being a waste of money...that would really suck
#43
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by cArKc
also i would like to know what Hondata did with the ECU?and how much did it cost? i alrady had my ECU reflashed and was wondering if that is just going ot end up being a waste of money...that would really suck
The Hondata reflash for the SC is included with Comptech's SC Kit. You do not have to pay extra for it.
#46
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Cali
Age: 45
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I only lost 2 mpg my last refuel, and thats with me hitting 140mph and going WOT a couple of times, so the mpg is negligible if not nil. Here are some vids of the 6mt
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...t=27968&page=6
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...t=27968&page=6
#50
Pro
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is 223whp at the crank? And Would a supercharged TSX 5AT be able to keep up with a TL / CL?
What would you guys estimate the installation costs of this thing?
What would you guys estimate the installation costs of this thing?
#51
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Age: 48
Posts: 7,594
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by NJTSXMan
What is 223whp at the crank? And Would a supercharged TSX 5AT be able to keep up with a TL / CL?
What would you guys estimate the installation costs of this thing?
What would you guys estimate the installation costs of this thing?
#54
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by dingobiatch
uhh tsxx536, can you test your 0-60 if possible? im really interested to see if it improves by much (on the AT)
Originally Posted by NJTSXMan
What is 223whp at the crank? And Would a supercharged TSX 5AT be able to keep up with a TL / CL?
What would you guys estimate the installation costs of this thing?
What would you guys estimate the installation costs of this thing?
I should definitely be able to keep up with a 5AT Auto TL though. I'm not sure about a stock TL 6MT I have less torque, but it weighs more. I think it would be close and maybe even depend on the driver. Check out Dan's post from Sho-one's thread below:
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I was just surfing over in the 3G TL section and noticed that a stock 6MT TL-S dynos at ~225whp/184lb ft. The TL-S does 0-60 in 5.9 and the 1/4 in 14.5@95mph.
#55
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by Zasker1
How is wheel spin with this much power?
I've been having a lot of fun driving. I have so much more power now, yet my car is kind of a sleeper since it's so quiet. A RSX Type-S tried to rev on me on the freeway yesterday on the way home. He was dropped with wheels and exhaust. I downshifted to 3rd, pulled on him hard, and left him in the dust
#56
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 43,555
Received 3,753 Likes
on
2,536 Posts
Originally Posted by Tsx536
I get wheel spin if I floor it completely from a stop. Other then that I have not gotten very much wheel spin. I'm usually kind of light on the gas until I hit 3k though. Once I hit 3k, that's when I floor it
I've been having a lot of fun driving. I have so much more power now, yet my car is kind of a sleeper since it's so quiet. A RSX Type-S tried to rev on me on the freeway yesterday on the way home. He was dropped with wheels and exhaust. I downshifted to 3rd, pulled on him hard, and left him in the dust
I've been having a lot of fun driving. I have so much more power now, yet my car is kind of a sleeper since it's so quiet. A RSX Type-S tried to rev on me on the freeway yesterday on the way home. He was dropped with wheels and exhaust. I downshifted to 3rd, pulled on him hard, and left him in the dust
#58
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 43,555
Received 3,753 Likes
on
2,536 Posts
Originally Posted by gsclifton
Comptech = USDM
#59
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by CCColtsicehockey
yeah funny. but you know what there is no other jdm supercharger or turbo and whether its usdm or jdm i will get a lot of additional points at shows for the supercharger.
#61
i was just wondering....is anyone else not disturbed by the fact that the AT loses 64hp through drive train loss compared to 43hp for the MT...and stock its about a 10-15hp difference(about 8% increase over the MT already high 20-25% )...no wonder all the magazines repeatedly say that the AT and MT are esentially 2 different cars (with the MT being the "type-s") version
#62
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Yeah I think it is a little disappointing, but I knew going into this that I would have less power to the wheels then a 6MT. I'm a very realistic person, and I was expecting a power difference, and would not have been suprised if the difference was even bigger.
I try to look at it from this point of view. By getting the SC, I was not trying to achieve higher peak numbers than other cars. It was more about my gains and trying to improve on the numbers that I already had. No matter what, there will always be cars that make more HP. If I was all about straight performance, I wouldn't have gotten an auto and probably would have gotten something else besides a TSX. I don't track the car and for me this mod is about just making my car that much more fun to drive. I already love my car and the missing piece has always been a little extra power. Although numbers are great, for me, in the end it's all about the permagrin on my face whenever I hit boost
I try to look at it from this point of view. By getting the SC, I was not trying to achieve higher peak numbers than other cars. It was more about my gains and trying to improve on the numbers that I already had. No matter what, there will always be cars that make more HP. If I was all about straight performance, I wouldn't have gotten an auto and probably would have gotten something else besides a TSX. I don't track the car and for me this mod is about just making my car that much more fun to drive. I already love my car and the missing piece has always been a little extra power. Although numbers are great, for me, in the end it's all about the permagrin on my face whenever I hit boost
#64
Drives With Hands
Originally Posted by r33p04s
that shit is amazing...i can already see it now...turnin the boost up to 7-8psi and a new tune...shooting for 350z maybe even a evo or STi
But for the same of argument, let us assume we get a K-pro and can obviate the mess that proprietary programming entails. Regardless of this advantage you will still be limited by the mechanical shortcomings of the supercharger. Roots blowers generate the most heat-per-pressure of any pump type, and the Eaton M62 is no exception to this rule. Look at this:
http://www.automotive.eaton.com/prod...argers/M62.asp
Keep in mind that currently there is no option for an aftercooler for this supercharger, so those are going to be a conservative estimation of your charge temps (with the addition of convection heating from the radiator a few inches upwind, and conduction heating from the engine block itself). In 80F weather, my IAT is already somewhere around 110F (with CAI) and that's when the car is in continuous motion, with good airflow over the engine cowling. So, with only 5 pounds of boost it is going to be closer to 180F. Not good for a high compression engine. Realize that the K24A2 is an engine with native compression that is already quite high, so high that running less than premium gasoline causes detonation and the adaptive knock control to pull timing even with natual aspiration. So here we have an engine whose native design is inherently intolerant of all but modest amounts of boost, blown by a pump with the thermal efficicency ranking somewhere between "blast furnace" and "Satan's asscrack", with no means of cooling the charge air. I tip my hat to Comptech and Hondata for their successful R&D efforts. It was surely a six headed bitch, lack of ECU programmability notwithstanding.
My impression is that this SC is the ideal solution for people who simply want to improve upon the TSX's decidedly weakest spot - its power/weight ratio - with the minimum amount of fuss and while still retaining OE reliability and street driveability. This gets us up in the neighborhood of the 2004+ TL in terms of power/weight, which is ideal for most people's desires (remember, the TSX is a sport luxury car). If you want to live your life a quarter mile at a time...you are better off looking elsewhere. As the saying goes, you can't polish a turd, and if you want Evo/STi/350Z performance, you're better off looking at another car.
Edit: Better yet, just read the post above this one.
#65
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orlando, Fl
Age: 37
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
now let me ask a dumb question. why did they choose that type of blower? or is that just the nature of a sc in general?
assuming that this step has been taken, what is stopping tuners from dropping in larger scs or better yet a turbo?
sorry if they have been brought up, im just a tad bit curious why one would stop with only a sc when it seems the majority of the legwork has been done. i can defiantely see that this sc is going to be testing the waters for forced induction but is there even chances of something more powerful on the horizion or better yet a turbo? aside from hondas addition of a turbo. or is that what is being waited upon to see how honda does it
assuming that this step has been taken, what is stopping tuners from dropping in larger scs or better yet a turbo?
sorry if they have been brought up, im just a tad bit curious why one would stop with only a sc when it seems the majority of the legwork has been done. i can defiantely see that this sc is going to be testing the waters for forced induction but is there even chances of something more powerful on the horizion or better yet a turbo? aside from hondas addition of a turbo. or is that what is being waited upon to see how honda does it
#67
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
When I picked up my car I asked Comptech about a Stage 2 kit that would include a smaller pulley for higher boost, larger injectors, and a new reflash. Basically, something similar to the RSX Stage 2 Upgrade.
http://www.comptechusa.com/store/product314.html
Comptech said they wanted to get the base SC package finalized and released first. After that they plan to do some development and research for a Stage 2 kit for the TSX. They told me they would give me a call in a few months and give me a chance to be the test vehicle again. At this point I don't think I need the extra power, but we'll see. They are also looking into developing some other prototype parts for the TSX which I may also be involved with later. Unfortunately, I definitely cannot talk about the prototype parts. If I hear any concrete information about these parts being release, you guys will be the first to know though.
I also asked about an aftercooler. They already have a prototype aftercooler on a RSX, and said the cost for the aftercooler would be high, and they didn't think there would be enough of a market for it because of that. With the high temps that we are dealing with high boost though, I wouldn't be surprised if they did end up selling an aftercooler kit.
http://www.comptechusa.com/store/product314.html
Comptech said they wanted to get the base SC package finalized and released first. After that they plan to do some development and research for a Stage 2 kit for the TSX. They told me they would give me a call in a few months and give me a chance to be the test vehicle again. At this point I don't think I need the extra power, but we'll see. They are also looking into developing some other prototype parts for the TSX which I may also be involved with later. Unfortunately, I definitely cannot talk about the prototype parts. If I hear any concrete information about these parts being release, you guys will be the first to know though.
I also asked about an aftercooler. They already have a prototype aftercooler on a RSX, and said the cost for the aftercooler would be high, and they didn't think there would be enough of a market for it because of that. With the high temps that we are dealing with high boost though, I wouldn't be surprised if they did end up selling an aftercooler kit.
#68
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeC1982
TSX536, did you have the intake gasket mod and if not did comptech not recommend it?
#71
its not all about racing...i agree completely with tsx536 about the perma-grin...but taking that performance upgrade and going one step further is something that i can never say is a bad idea...no matter what it might entail...aftercoolers retuning custom or mass produced...as long as the price isnt through the roof its still worth it to have the mix of the tsx with the speed of a evo or STi would be great...thats all I'm saying...just take an already great mix and improve on it...no street race mentality just more perma-grin
#72
Drives With Hands
Originally Posted by Xtremespeed2102
now let me ask a dumb question. why did they choose that type of blower? or is that just the nature of a sc in general?
I would advise anyone with curiousity on this subject to read this. In fact, that is part 2 of a 3 part series on superchargers that is quite a good read front to back.
Originally Posted by Xtremespeed2102
assuming that this step has been taken, what is stopping tuners from dropping in larger scs or better yet a turbo?
#73
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orlando, Fl
Age: 37
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thnx, ill definately read up some!
i think nows a good time for another company to come out and pressure hondata to get the move on.... competition always makes a better product, well let me rephrase that... cheaper
i think nows a good time for another company to come out and pressure hondata to get the move on.... competition always makes a better product, well let me rephrase that... cheaper
#75
Audi Driving Snob
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
seeing as how it's a roots type blower i'm surprised, and a little dissapointed, at the torque curve below 3k rpms. Don't get me wrong the torque curve and power above 3000 rpms is fantastic and will pay huge acceleration dividends but it's a little dissapointing that when cruising on the freeway in 5th gear you might have less power on tap then a NA tsx. Tsx536 maybe you can speak to your driving impression for cruising and the like.
I wonder if it was tuned that way on purpose to deal with the shortcomings of trying to launch a fwd car.
I wonder if it was tuned that way on purpose to deal with the shortcomings of trying to launch a fwd car.
#76
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by TinkySD
seeing as how it's a roots type blower i'm surprised, and a little dissapointed, at the torque curve below 3k rpms. Don't get me wrong the torque curve and power above 3000 rpms is fantastic and will pay huge acceleration dividends but it's a little dissapointing that when cruising on the freeway in 5th gear you might have less power on tap then a NA tsx. Tsx536 maybe you can speak to your driving impression for cruising and the like.
I wonder if it was tuned that way on purpose to deal with the shortcomings of trying to launch a fwd car.
I wonder if it was tuned that way on purpose to deal with the shortcomings of trying to launch a fwd car.
Also keep in mind that we are talking about a relatively small drop in hp/tq drop at those RPMs. It's not a night and day difference. My baseline dyno was done with a stock airbox. When you run an Icebox or Injen intake you're going to get the same amount of power drop in those RPMs. The low end power loss of the SC is not really any different from what you would get by installing an intake. If you take a look at some of the intake dynos it will illustrate this. A NA TSX with intake is probably going to have about the same amount of HP/TQ at those RPMs as a TSX with SC. Once the TSX with SC hits 3k though, the boost will kick in, and it will have a decisive advantage.
#77
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by aznt1217
does it work on 05's...?
Rmpage: Great posts and link man. Thanks for the info
#78
Got Milk???
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tsx536
Not yet unfortunately. The SC is only available for the 2004 TSX. Hondata is still working on trying to crack the 05 ECU.
Rmpage: Great posts and link man. Thanks for the info
Rmpage: Great posts and link man. Thanks for the info
How much did this whole kit cost you, including labor?
#79
Drifting
Originally Posted by kaikai114
How much did this whole kit cost you, including labor?
the cheapest price so far is $3700 for the kit
#80
Drives With Hands
Originally Posted by Tsx536
I think that it was tuned this way for fuel economy.