Thinking about doing the oil catch can mod
#1
Thinking about doing the oil catch can mod
I was debating whether or not I should do the oil catch can mod this week. For those of you who could enlighten me, especially JTso I had a quick question.
This is the original setup that is used for catching the most oil before it reaches your intake manifold correct? I was looking at a secondary oil catch can I saw from RacinghartACURA.
From what I figured (correct me if I'm wrong) the blow by gasses will go through this route and into the intake (thus making the TB dirty) under three situations:
1. The first vent is blocked causing the gasses to go by the next best route
2. You are running boost
3. You are running WOT
I also noticed that the Carbing oil catch can racinghartACURA used doesn't say anything about a filter application. So would the best setup be to use duplicate oil catch cans for both applications (Maybe route both pipes to a single catch can)?
Would there be any negative/positive results from running both setups? Aside from having two catch cans, if I am running a NA setup, but do hit WOT every so often during the day would it be worthwhile to install that setup that catches oil prior to entry via the intake?
Last but not east can I get the diameter for the hose needed to fit to the Injen intake and the tube from the top of the engine?
Thanks guys.
This is the original setup that is used for catching the most oil before it reaches your intake manifold correct? I was looking at a secondary oil catch can I saw from RacinghartACURA.
From what I figured (correct me if I'm wrong) the blow by gasses will go through this route and into the intake (thus making the TB dirty) under three situations:
1. The first vent is blocked causing the gasses to go by the next best route
2. You are running boost
3. You are running WOT
I also noticed that the Carbing oil catch can racinghartACURA used doesn't say anything about a filter application. So would the best setup be to use duplicate oil catch cans for both applications (Maybe route both pipes to a single catch can)?
Would there be any negative/positive results from running both setups? Aside from having two catch cans, if I am running a NA setup, but do hit WOT every so often during the day would it be worthwhile to install that setup that catches oil prior to entry via the intake?
Last but not east can I get the diameter for the hose needed to fit to the Injen intake and the tube from the top of the engine?
Thanks guys.
#2
The setup in the first pic will catch most of the oil going into the intake manifold under normal condition. Your assessment is also correct for the 3 listed conditions. However, there isn't really a need for a secondary setup unless the oil becomes a problem. I also do a lot of WOT runs but have not experienced oil in the TB yet. I would just monitor the line, intake pipe and TB throttle plate and reevaluate the need for a secondary setup. Sorry, not sure what hose dia is for the Injen. I have the K&N.
Btw, another option is to run the setup in open mode by replacing the PCV valve with a fitting and route the hose to the open catch can. Then route the hose from the valve cover to the same can like below. There won't be much oil going into the can. It's mainly for relieving crankcase pressure as it's venting all the time. The engine will also smell like a race car - stinky.
Btw, another option is to run the setup in open mode by replacing the PCV valve with a fitting and route the hose to the open catch can. Then route the hose from the valve cover to the same can like below. There won't be much oil going into the can. It's mainly for relieving crankcase pressure as it's venting all the time. The engine will also smell like a race car - stinky.
#3
Originally Posted by JTso
The setup in the first pic will catch most of the oil going into the intake manifold under normal condition. Your assessment is also correct for the 3 listed conditions. However, there isn't really a need for a secondary setup unless the oil becomes a problem. I also do a lot of WOT runs but have not experienced oil in the TB yet. I would just monitor the line, intake pipe and TB throttle plate and reevaluate the need for a secondary setup. Sorry, not sure what hose dia is for the Injen. I have the K&N.
Btw, another option is to run the setup in open mode by replacing the PCV valve with a fitting and route the hose to the open catch can. Then route the hose from the valve cover to the same can like below. There won't be much oil going into the can. It's mainly for relieving crankcase pressure as it's venting all the time. The engine will also smell like a race car - stinky.
Btw, another option is to run the setup in open mode by replacing the PCV valve with a fitting and route the hose to the open catch can. Then route the hose from the valve cover to the same can like below. There won't be much oil going into the can. It's mainly for relieving crankcase pressure as it's venting all the time. The engine will also smell like a race car - stinky.
So this would be the setup you are referring to?
Would there be any negative results from blocking off the PCV valve on the intake manifold?
This would seem to be a fun little project to work on... so hopefully I'm thinking in the right direction with this one.
I was planning on getting a aluminum oilcatch can from eBay like this one
And fitting a filter system you used inside of it
Also with this I will make another opening to release the pressure and mount a small air filter
on that as well. Hopefully this can prove to be a fun weekend project.
#4
Not blocking the PCV port. You would replace it with a fitting. You can see better from a different angle. Btw, don't go crazy with all that stuffs. Try to keep it simple.
You can try use something like this for an open system...
You can try use something like this for an open system...
#5
I'm sorry for being a noob about this...
But what kind of fitting would I be replacing it with? ie. where would I buy it and what application would it have?
Is the PCV valve the part on the center of the intake manifold witht he tube connecting off it?
But what kind of fitting would I be replacing it with? ie. where would I buy it and what application would it have?
Is the PCV valve the part on the center of the intake manifold witht he tube connecting off it?
#6
Yes, the tube connects to the PCV valve on top of the alternator. Most older PCV valves are push-in type. This one threads on like a fitting. Just take out the PCV valve and go to your local auto parts store to match a fitting.
Trending Topics
#11
Originally Posted by JTso
Haha... when I see the term "block", I associate it as not functioning, or nothing is going through. What I mean is to take out the PCV valve and install a fitting as replacement.
#13
Ah I see, so cap the nipple (I still need to cap my TB) and just use the adaptor along with another tube to bring to the catch can.
Thanks for clarifying and helping out with this. Much appreciated
Thanks for clarifying and helping out with this. Much appreciated
#16
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
I might pick this one up, though I need to double check on the fitment of the tubing. Also I need to find a location to mount this sucker.
#19
^ I'd assume that since it's not legal to have it on this kind of setup that it'll throw the CEL
Damn, I forgot about that. Is there any way to advert the CEL in a open system?
Damn, I forgot about that. Is there any way to advert the CEL in a open system?
#20
Originally Posted by rmpage
Won't running the PCV system in open loop throw a CEL? I've wanted to do this for a while but thought it'd cause problems with the emissions controls.
I've actually driven for a while with the connection broken from my intake and nothing really came up.
#22
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,665
Likes: 3,908
From: Mooresville, NC
I have to get pictures up but many said the cusco catch can would not be functional and before installing it in my car I poured out a bunch of oil from when it was in TSX.Fury's car. I am not sure yet how long it was in his car and not sure an exact measurement on the amount of oil but I will post a picture of it poured into a bottle.
#23
Originally Posted by CCColtsicehockey
I have to get pictures up but many said the cusco catch can would not be functional and before installing it in my car I poured out a bunch of oil from when it was in TSX.Fury's car. I am not sure yet how long it was in his car and not sure an exact measurement on the amount of oil but I will post a picture of it poured into a bottle.
#24
Originally Posted by JTso
Just remember the oil can get dirtier by running an open setup. You should see the oil collected in the catch can. Personally, I would stick with a closed setup.
#25
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
I think for simplicity and cost I'll stick with a closed system for now. However I would like to know what you mean by the oil getting dirtier? The oil that collects in the open system would merely collect and air does not reenter into the PCV system (does it?)
The PCV system also removes certain amount of condensation from the crankcase from a cold engine. Otherwise, the engine oil in the crankcase could be contaminated. It depends on the condition of the engine. The extra rich fuel mixture during warm up can sip through worn piston rings or valve guides which further contaminates the oil, the reasons for dirtier oil. It's not an issue with race cars running an open setup as they have different maintenance schedule. They most likely have a vacuum pump as well.
#26
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,665
Likes: 3,908
From: Mooresville, NC
#27
Originally Posted by JTso
The open system won't collect much oil as it's merely used for relieving crankcase pressure. There is no vacuum to suck the blowby gases unless you install a vacuum pump. Here's an analogy of the PCV closed system... picture you're cooking up a storm in the kitchen (simulating blowby gases during the normal engine operating process). Turning on the exhaust fan would suck the smoke out of the kitchen keeping the place clean (simulating the PCV valve with aid of vacuum from the intake manifold sucking blowby gases out). However, if the exhaust fan doesn't work and you simply opening a window to vent (simulating an open system without the PCV valve and vacuum), it still works to relieve some smoke but not very effective. But it does vent all the time. Btw, the catch can would be the little oil container in the back of the exhaust fan.
The PCV system also removes certain amount of condensation from the crankcase from a cold engine. Otherwise, the engine oil in the crankcase could be contaminated. It depends on the condition of the engine. The extra rich fuel mixture during warm up can sip through worn piston rings or valve guides which further contaminates the oil, the reasons for dirtier oil. It's not an issue with race cars running an open setup as they have different maintenance schedule. They most likely have a vacuum pump as well.
The PCV system also removes certain amount of condensation from the crankcase from a cold engine. Otherwise, the engine oil in the crankcase could be contaminated. It depends on the condition of the engine. The extra rich fuel mixture during warm up can sip through worn piston rings or valve guides which further contaminates the oil, the reasons for dirtier oil. It's not an issue with race cars running an open setup as they have different maintenance schedule. They most likely have a vacuum pump as well.
I just thought why not kill two birds with one stone by building an open system. Maybe I'll installed two closed systems instead? Either way I think it'll be a nice way to cheaply mod my car while dressing my engine bay a bit more.
Thanks again, you've been a huge help in my learning process
#28
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,665
Likes: 3,908
From: Mooresville, NC
#30
Originally Posted by lcrazyaznl
Can one of you explain the reason of addng a oil catch can? is there pros or cons to it?
#31
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,665
Likes: 3,908
From: Mooresville, NC
JTso so do you think that is a decent amount of oil for 1000miles considering the cusco can doesnt have a filter in it. I mean I would think its obviously better than nothing but what are your thoughts on it.
#32
It's hard to tell how much oil is in that pic but it's definitely better than nothing. One way to test the effectiveness is to remove the EGR plate on top of the intake manifold and see how much oil has passed through the catch can.
#35
FYI Colts, that looks 'normal'-ish to me. I'm constantly surprised how much oil winds up in my catch jar. I've emptied it twice in 3k driving miles I've had it on there, both times it was more than half full. I have the one that you probably see the most on this board, aka jtso v1. It was $6 at Home Depot, made by Husky, and can be found in the pneumatic tools section. If possible, consider strapping one inside that Cusco can. I find myself checking oil level a bit more often as a result too.
#36
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,665
Likes: 3,908
From: Mooresville, NC
Originally Posted by Reach
FYI Colts, that looks 'normal'-ish to me. I'm constantly surprised how much oil winds up in my catch jar. I've emptied it twice in 3k driving miles I've had it on there, both times it was more than half full. I have the one that you probably see the most on this board, aka jtso v1. It was $6 at Home Depot, made by Husky, and can be found in the pneumatic tools section. If possible, consider strapping one inside that Cusco can. I find myself checking oil level a bit more often as a result too.
#37
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
^ Same I've been driving 25k miles without one.
I'm sure you can drive the life of your car without one, why else would Honda not put a catch can there?
I'm sure you can drive the life of your car without one, why else would Honda not put a catch can there?
#38
Originally Posted by JTso
Honda did install it for certain engines but not on the TSX. Item # 1 breather chamber sits between the block and the PCV valve #3. It helps a little and the oil drains back to the crankcase.
It seems like the cusco can works even though no filter is present. JTso, how often do you have to change the filter?
#39
Question
Answer
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
So for the Honda installed catch cans were they just emptied out every time the car was maintained by honda? It'll suck if someone just forgot about it and the car was sucking in dirty oils.
It seems like the cusco can works even though no filter is present. JTso, how often do you have to change the filter?
It seems like the cusco can works even though no filter is present. JTso, how often do you have to change the filter?
Answer
It helps a little and the oil drains back to the crankcase.