There maybe hope for us TSX's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2007, 12:08 PM
  #161  
Boost Junky
 
simplyscion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Smithtown Scion LI, NY
Age: 42
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by godfather2
that torque curve is as flat as i've ever seen!
yup...thats as good as it gets right there...full tq from 3k rpm's and up
Old 12-20-2007, 06:25 PM
  #162  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well still having some trouble at the switch over from vacuum to boost. I got the impression for the company that was doing all the work that they really don't care if they fix it or not. Seems like they just wanted my money. I am going to another shop tomorrow to get their feed back. The tuner at the shop is aem certified so that might help out alittle as well.

I'll keep you posted.
Old 12-20-2007, 06:53 PM
  #163  
Boost Junky
 
simplyscion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Smithtown Scion LI, NY
Age: 42
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so the car just basically falls on its face during the transition? What does the wideband read? Is it running really rich? Pull the plugs and check them if you havent already
Old 12-21-2007, 03:02 PM
  #164  
3rd Gear
 
BLAZE28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 44
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whats Up Im New Here I Got A Tsx. Good Job With The Car. Why Dont You Put Camshaft,value Spring And Retainer. I Got The Website If You Want
Old 12-21-2007, 04:19 PM
  #165  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Excelerate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Age: 43
Posts: 9,877
Received 624 Likes on 478 Posts
I am really surprised none of you supercharged TSXers are running methanol injection. A number of the supercharged TL guys did it and they saw decent gains. Typically on the Stage 1 kits, which are recommended for low boost applications, you will see a 10% gain. The kits are inexpensive ($250 shipped) and with the Stage 1 you just let it inject and let the ECU throw more timing in based on what it sees. So you don't have to custom tune it or always have it in the car. Of course you can get more hp with a custom tune but the ECU will make adjustments by itself.
Old 12-21-2007, 04:29 PM
  #166  
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
 
Tsx536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Excelerate
I am really surprised none of you supercharged TSXers are running methanol injection. A number of the supercharged TL guys did it and they saw decent gains. Typically on the Stage 1 kits, which are recommended for low boost applications, you will see a 10% gain. The kits are inexpensive ($250 shipped) and with the Stage 1 you just let it inject and let the ECU throw more timing in based on what it sees. So you don't have to custom tune it or always have it in the car. Of course you can get more hp with a custom tune but the ECU will make adjustments by itself.
You be fine when the ECU is in closed loop and using the Primary O2 sensor to keep the A/F ratio at 14.7. But, what about when the ECU is in Open loop? Isn't it running strickly off the fuel maps in the Comptech ACM module and ignoring the readings from the O2 sensor?
Old 12-21-2007, 04:31 PM
  #167  
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
 
Tsx536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Ben
well still having some trouble at the switch over from vacuum to boost. I got the impression for the company that was doing all the work that they really don't care if they fix it or not. Seems like they just wanted my money. I am going to another shop tomorrow to get their feed back. The tuner at the shop is aem certified so that might help out alittle as well.

I'll keep you posted.
From what I've read, a good tuner can smoothin out this transition from vacuum to boost. I've also read that the M62 blower is known to have a little rougher of a transition from vacuum to boost.

As mention aboved, what is the A/F ratio when this happens?
Old 01-02-2008, 09:24 PM
  #168  
tehLEGOman
 
ACCURATEin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 41
Posts: 9,135
Received 1,982 Likes on 1,335 Posts
...just got done reading all 7 pages of info.

Gotta say nice work bro! It always takes some balls to be the guinea pig when it comes to work like this, especially when over riding an ecu.

Impressive numbers, let me know when you're in Charlotte and we'll meet up.
Old 01-04-2008, 04:35 PM
  #169  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well....

I am out in Utah now on Vacation and decided to take my car in to put it back to stock. I told them to try one last thing before going back to stock..

Well I got a message from them yesterday and they told me it is running great and the new stats on it is 276 whp and 215 tq!!!! I will fill in the details when I get back from my trip and after I test drive it. The best thing is that it will only cost around $300 with parts and labor.

Ben
Old 01-04-2008, 04:51 PM
  #170  
B A N N E D
 
Wisc Badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: in Madison, WI from Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Ben
new stats on it is 276 whp and 215 tq!!!! The best thing is that it will only cost around $300 with parts and labor.

Ben
WHAT?????
Old 01-04-2008, 04:59 PM
  #171  
Boost Junky
 
simplyscion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Smithtown Scion LI, NY
Age: 42
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TSX Wisc Badger
WHAT?????
I think he meant the cost on top of everything else that was already put in the car and paid for...he must have went with the water meth
Old 01-04-2008, 05:01 PM
  #172  
B A N N E D
 
Wisc Badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: in Madison, WI from Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was gonna say...

i almost shit myself right at my dining room table.


GL you guys, hope I get to see one of these monsters sometime soon.
Old 01-04-2008, 06:18 PM
  #173  
T.DoT P.I.M.P. lol
 
chuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice~! That extra torque gain might fix your jerkiness drive?
Old 01-04-2008, 10:39 PM
  #174  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nah didn't go with the meth kit. Also this is 300 plus the price of the sc kit lol...sorry.
Old 01-04-2008, 10:45 PM
  #175  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no reason to wait until I get home....

We went back and put the stock injectors in. Took off the AEM FIC and put the ACM back on by itself. We crushed the fuel regulator alittle more (when installing the sc you have to crush the fuel regulator). We kept the 255 fuel pump on (not sure if it is nessesary to have)

Put it on the dyno and hit those numbers..

With that being said I will have some RC 650 injectors and a AEM FIC that were used for two weeks.
Old 01-05-2008, 06:55 AM
  #176  
Ticket Slow Drivers
iTrader: (2)
 
Redfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 273
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, he just got one of these - $30 plus installation cost, made 276HP:

Supercharge your car, truck, van, boat, RV, or motorcycle in just a few minutes.
http://www.turbonator.com/index.html...ePowerBaseCars




Originally Posted by TSX Wisc Badger
WHAT?????
Old 01-05-2008, 06:57 AM
  #177  
Ticket Slow Drivers
iTrader: (2)
 
Redfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 273
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seriously though, Great Job Ben. Looking forward to seeing 1/4 mile times, when the warmer weather comes...

As far as 'crushing the fuel regulator', do you think there is more tuning available with an adjustable FPR?
Old 01-05-2008, 09:42 AM
  #178  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redfish
Seriously though, Great Job Ben. Looking forward to seeing 1/4 mile times, when the warmer weather comes...

As far as 'crushing the fuel regulator', do you think there is more tuning available with an adjustable FPR?
I am not sure that a FPR would allow that much more tuning. I think that it would help/make it easier in the tuning process but not something that will help that much, if that makes sense.
Old 01-05-2008, 04:30 PM
  #179  
Burning Brakes
 
DAYTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a NSX down by the river...
Age: 43
Posts: 1,128
Received 76 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Ben
There is no reason to wait until I get home....

We went back and put the stock injectors in. Took off the AEM FIC and put the ACM back on by itself. We crushed the fuel regulator alittle more (when installing the sc you have to crush the fuel regulator). We kept the 255 fuel pump on (not sure if it is nessesary to have)

Put it on the dyno and hit those numbers..

With that being said I will have some RC 650 injectors and a AEM FIC that were used for two weeks.
Wait, I'm confused...so what modifications did you keep on the S/C kit? Is it just the 3.2 pulley and a larger fuel pump? I can't believe you were able to gain 25wtq from that!!! How's your A/F curve looking? Please post the new dyno .
Old 01-05-2008, 07:58 PM
  #180  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will post the new dyno when I get back to atlanta. A/F are around 13. The pulley is a 3.0. The aftermarket fuel pump is still on and not sure if it is needed. I just didn't want them to charge me to take it off. They did more modification to the fuel pump regulator.
Old 01-06-2008, 01:40 AM
  #181  
Drives With Hands
 
rmpage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Age: 45
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What is your fuel pressure at now? I'd think that an adjustable FPR would be a good idea now that you're clearly well above stock levels, just to trim it back if desired.

Also, that AFR is a little high for that much boost through a blower...I'd want to keep it in the low 12s at WOT at most, just as a general rule, but if you're not running into knock retard then it might not be a worry for you.

Congrats on those numbers anyway; they're pretty impressive.
Old 01-06-2008, 09:56 AM
  #182  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rmpage
What is your fuel pressure at now? I'd think that an adjustable FPR would be a good idea now that you're clearly well above stock levels, just to trim it back if desired.

Also, that AFR is a little high for that much boost through a blower...I'd want to keep it in the low 12s at WOT at most, just as a general rule, but if you're not running into knock retard then it might not be a worry for you.

Congrats on those numbers anyway; they're pretty impressive.
I may look into the adjustable FPR. I am not 100% sure about the A/F ratio because I haven't driven it yet. I am getting back to atlanta tuesday night so I should have more info on wednesday.
Old 01-06-2008, 11:04 AM
  #183  
Burning Brakes
 
DAYTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a NSX down by the river...
Age: 43
Posts: 1,128
Received 76 Likes on 14 Posts
Again, this brings into question what a water/methanol injection kit could add. That would adjust your A/F ratio a bit to where you're running a little richer than 13.0, not to mention reducing the IAT noticeably since you're running higher boost (i.e. higher temps).
Old 01-06-2008, 11:23 AM
  #184  
Boost Junky
 
simplyscion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Smithtown Scion LI, NY
Age: 42
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DAYTA
Again, this brings into question what a water/methanol injection kit could add. That would adjust your A/F ratio a bit to where you're running a little richer than 13.0, not to mention reducing the IAT noticeably since you're running higher boost (i.e. higher temps).
+1
Old 01-06-2008, 12:49 PM
  #185  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DAYTA
Again, this brings into question what a water/methanol injection kit could add. That would adjust your A/F ratio a bit to where you're running a little richer than 13.0, not to mention reducing the IAT noticeably since you're running higher boost (i.e. higher temps).

Once I see how my a/f is going to run I will let ya'll know. How much richer could it run though with a water/methanol injection kit? From what I have read it would give me close to 300 whp. Front wheel drive ftl.
Old 01-06-2008, 04:56 PM
  #186  
E92
 
TommySalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: socal
Age: 36
Posts: 8,039
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
Which one was worse for FI cars, rich or lean?
Old 01-06-2008, 06:04 PM
  #187  
Boost Junky
 
simplyscion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Smithtown Scion LI, NY
Age: 42
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It can richen you up into the high 11's low 12's range if enough is being sprayed...Short answer as far as forced induction goes, you generally wanna be running more on the rich side than lean.
Old 01-14-2008, 10:14 PM
  #188  
Drifting
 
jmathew34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 44
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
any updates?
Old 01-15-2008, 08:06 AM
  #189  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We ended up putting stock injectors back in it and crushed the fuel regulator alittle more to allow more fuel to flow. I to have a 255 Walbro fuel pump which I am not sure if that is needed. Everything seems to be running fine. A/F are at 11.7 and I am running 10-11 psi. I am looking into an adjustable fuel regualtor but it would have to be a custom setup since our FR is in the trunk.
Old 01-15-2008, 08:19 AM
  #190  
Burning Brakes
 
DAYTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a NSX down by the river...
Age: 43
Posts: 1,128
Received 76 Likes on 14 Posts
Sounds great! Any driving impressions?

Also, just to confirm - the only mods you've done to your S/C are:

1) 3.0" HBP
2) larger fuel pump
3) crushed fuel regulators

If so, those are some amazing gains for not that much more $$$. 215wtq is EXACTLY where I'd like to be...
Old 01-15-2008, 08:27 AM
  #191  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DAYTA
Sounds great! Any driving impressions?

Also, just to confirm - the only mods you've done to your S/C are:

1) 3.0" HBP
2) larger fuel pump
3) crushed fuel regulators

If so, those are some amazing gains for not that much more $$$. 215wtq is EXACTLY where I'd like to be...
You will need to get a new belt and I also encourage an A/F gauge. The driving impressions are great so far. There has been a couple of times where it does the feels like its running out of gas/wigs out but I am thinking that it is because I go into full boost then back off. After I back off my RPM's are around 2k in 5th gear. It doesn't like that. And if it does that then I just let off the gas and it goes back to normal. That is why I would like to figure out an Adjustable FR. I am 99% there for it to be running perfect but that 1% is where it wiggs out. I have been driving my car now for over a week and it has only happend 2 times. Overall the drivablity is fine. I drive it everyday all day because I am in sales.
Old 01-15-2008, 09:49 AM
  #192  
ridiculously good looking
 
tsx 2 nv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stanton, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is GREAT news!!! way to take one for the team!
Old 01-15-2008, 12:30 PM
  #193  
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
 
Tsx536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DAYTA
Sounds great! Any driving impressions?

Also, just to confirm - the only mods you've done to your S/C are:

1) 3.0" HBP
2) larger fuel pump
3) crushed fuel regulators

If so, those are some amazing gains for not that much more $$$. 215wtq is EXACTLY where I'd like to be...
Wow...11 psi! You more than doubled what the kit was previously running. Hopefully you don't lose much power when you adjust the fuel ratio a bit.

How high are you reving? I think there is extra power up top in the power band, but our injectors run out of fuel up top with the stock setup. Maybe the fuel pump and and crushin the regulators help though.

Do you know what duty your injectors are running close to redline?
So you made no changes to the Comptech ACM?

Way to keep modding man
Old 01-15-2008, 12:34 PM
  #194  
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
 
Tsx536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Also, Comptech has modified higher flow injectors for sale. I wonder if you could just run those.
Old 01-15-2008, 01:53 PM
  #195  
Pfft!
Thread Starter
 
Big Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 43
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tsx536
Also, Comptech has modified higher flow injectors for sale. I wonder if you could just run those.
Their modified injectors are 550cc. The took the stock injectors and modified them to plug in with no modification needed. There would be no way to controll them so you would be running rich.
Old 01-15-2008, 05:59 PM
  #196  
Drives With Hands
 
rmpage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Age: 45
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Anybody know what boost levels these K engines start to float valves at? I figure if you're running better than 10# in the manifold, especially up near the rev limit, the intake valve springs have a much heftier job to do than they do at baro. It might be a good idea to look into stiffer valve springs if you don't want to kiss a piston in the long term.
Old 01-17-2008, 10:06 PM
  #197  
luvs redheads!
 
swift22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: back in WI
Age: 39
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Valve float is cause by high RPM revs..not boost. Therefore unless he has custom cams or feels like revving to 9k all day he shouldnt need upgraded springs.
Old 01-17-2008, 10:10 PM
  #198  
luvs redheads!
 
swift22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: back in WI
Age: 39
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AFter looking at your dyno sheet if they can keep the fuel coming at higher rpms then it is possible if you upgraded your valvesprings to keep going!!! my gosh nice curves!

Also what about upgraded cams to extend the curve farther out..? Good work!
Old 01-17-2008, 10:27 PM
  #199  
East Coast Crew
 
visuelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,433
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what's the new mpg with this setup?
Old 01-17-2008, 11:29 PM
  #200  
Drives With Hands
 
rmpage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Age: 45
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by swift22
Valve float is cause by high RPM revs..not boost. Therefore unless he has custom cams or feels like revving to 9k all day he shouldnt need upgraded springs.
Boost will do it, too. He's easily got another 15+ lbs pushing on the backside of his intake valves as they're trying to close. How much this actually increases the risks of floating one, I have no idea, but the risk is certainly elevated to some extent.


Quick Reply: There maybe hope for us TSX's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.