View Poll Results: Cheap or Expensive??
Cheap
75
59.52%
Expensive
51
40.48%
Voters: 126. You may not vote on this poll

TSX, expensive or cheap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #1  
iTimmy's Avatar
Thread Starter
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 1
From: Lexington, KY
TSX, expensive or cheap

What do you think is the TSX an expensive car or a cheap car. I purchased it because it was a cheapest car that filled my criteria of a car - and it did so quite well. So I always think of the TSX as a cheap car, but I see a lot of folks saying its expensive... What are your thoughts? Feel free to post your reasoning if you want, I am curious.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:06 PM
  #2  
DMBand0026's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Cheap.

For my money, the TSX is wonderful. It's an incredible value for what you get. Comparably equipped cars run $5,000 higher (sometimes even more.) Granted, the car isn't perfect...but no car is. As far as I'm concerned, for the features, engine, handling, looks, and luxury nameplate, there's no better value than the TSX.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #3  
TypeRS's Avatar
Got Ramen?
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
best value for the money
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:10 PM
  #4  
waTSX's Avatar
Have camera, will travel
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
Purely a matter of perspective. One mans cheap is anothers expensive and vice versa.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #5  
fuckleberry's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
^

not too expensive and not cheap
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #6  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
+ 1

I came from a 91 Integra that cost me $15,300 brand new. My wife's Civic was $14K. We were shopping for a car in the $20K-$22K range. So, with that in mind, I consider it expensive since we "streached" a little to buy it.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:23 PM
  #7  
karoberts's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: OC
Cheap? Expensive? Relative to what?

I think most of us would agree $30K is a lot of money.
But for a car, $30K isn't that much at all.

Although my friend can't possibly imagine why I would spend "double" what it costs for a Civic LX.

But for me, I don't think a better deal can be had than a TSX when comparing features/fun vs money.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #8  
CJams's Avatar
Guinea Pig
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: At home
Entry level luxury sedan! ENTRY LEVEL!!!!

The cheapest of the expensive cars........

@ $30k to me it's expensive.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #9  
tsxflexer's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
I wouldn't call it cheap or expensive, its just right for the type of car.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #10  
leftride's Avatar
i want to ride my bicycle
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 21
From: denver, co
Originally Posted by TypeRS
best value for the money
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #11  
ninjamyst's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 742
Likes: 4
civic/mazda3 - cheap
tsx - expensive
bmw/lexus - overpriced
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #12  
vwong's Avatar
n00b
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 45
From: SoCal
Compared to the cars I want, the TSX is cheap. Compared to the cars I've owned, it's expensive.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:40 PM
  #13  
mg7726's Avatar
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 2
From: NYC
this car should of been $27k usd MAX!

honda, :rippedoff !!!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #14  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
Comparing to other cars with similar options/featurs, it's cheap.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #15  
MyopicPaideia's Avatar
Motivator
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by mg7726
this car should of been $27k usd MAX!

honda, :rippedoff !!!

Hmmm....last I heard it was selling for that price....but even if you did pay $30k, what car that is equivalent to the TSX does cost $27k?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #16  
joerockt's Avatar
Just dial 1911
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
I dont get why people would vote the car is "cheap". Cheap to me means little value, poor craftsmanship and low grade materials used in making the product. None of which the TSX shares...

And if people think that $30K for a car is cheap, why the hell did you buy it if you could afford more? I just dont get that logic. If I could easly afford a $50K+ car, I would never have even considered the TSX.

The Kia Rio, Chevy Aveo and Hyundai Accent are cheap cars that meet the critera above...
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 06:56 PM
  #17  
swirlie's Avatar
Swinger, just ask Lindy
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by vwong
Compared to the cars I want, the TSX is cheap. Compared to the cars I've owned, it's expensive.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #18  
psteng19's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by DMBand0026
Cheap.

For my money, the TSX is wonderful. It's an incredible value for what you get. Comparably equipped cars run $5,000 higher (sometimes even more.) Granted, the car isn't perfect...but no car is. As far as I'm concerned, for the features, engine, handling, looks, and luxury nameplate, there's no better value than the TSX.
But that's the thing.
There really isn't any other car in it's class (entry level luxury 4 cyclinder naturally aspirated FWD sedan).
It's kind of in a class of its own.

I would say the TSX's closest competitors are Audi A4 (FWD/AWD 2.0T) and Subaru Legacy (AWD 2.5).
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #19  
DJDZ's Avatar
VV "Precision Crafted" VV
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA.
In terms of actual money spent - Expensive.
Relative to other entry level luxury cars in its class - cheap (defined as value for the money).
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #20  
ChasC's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Cheap/expensive compared to what? If you are living in poverty and have nothing to eat, a TSX is prohibitively expensive! On the other hand, if you are Warren Buffet you could buy a new one every hour and still find the TSX cheap! It's all relative, like so many other things.

My wife and I make good money and have everything we want or need. I suppose I could afford a car costing 50-60K, but to what end? I want a safe and comfortable car with refinement and some extras. For me, the TSX is neither cheap, nor expensive. The TSX is just right, and thank God I have the wherewithal to make that statement.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 07:59 PM
  #21  
helraiser's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
All cars are overpriced... from a canadian, bloody expensive cuz we coulda got it cheaper if we bought straight from the US
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #22  
pizzaman555's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
I think its kind of in between cheap and exspensive.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #23  
foolioness's Avatar
Professional SLACKER
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga
Its what I want in the car.... its cheaper than a Benz C-class.
More expensive than an Accord V6.
I wanted something different from a Honda... so TSX fits perfectly.....
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 08:42 PM
  #24  
russduck's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
I think cheap is rather the wrong term. High value per dollar spent is perhaps a better description.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #25  
FromEX2TSX's Avatar
User-N-Abuser
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NY
Originally Posted by helraiser
All cars are overpriced... from a canadian, bloody expensive cuz we coulda got it cheaper if we bought straight from the US
All cars are overpriced... from a canadian, bloody expensive cuz we coulda got it cheaper if we bought straight from the US


Instead of making statements like this all the time, why don't you just come down here and buy it cheaper? you complain about everyone else complainging about the same thing you are complaining about... in my humble opinion.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #26  
virtualbong's Avatar
Luke 1:37
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 1
From: Boston, MA
Best value for the money, but its still expensive.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 09:23 PM
  #27  
TSXdawg's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada
Where's the just right option? I don't think it's either. I think it is competitively priced and good bang for the buck.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 11:27 PM
  #28  
yukit's Avatar
06 TSX ASM/Ebony 5AT
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
As most people said already, it is 'cheap' value-wise.
But TL may even be 'cheaper' now that one dealer is offering me a new TL auto & nav for about $2k more than TSX.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 12:07 AM
  #29  
kyotousa's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by yukit
As most people said already, it is 'cheap' value-wise.
But TL may even be 'cheaper' now that one dealer is offering me a new TL auto & nav for about $2k more than TSX.

you got incredible deal then

my friend got 34K TL non nav....i got 27850 non nav
both are drive out price with everything paid + few free gifts

so......you are pretty much getting a deal of the century
get it and run.....

I don't think TSX is the best value btw.....i think it's just about right
Accord V6 might be cheap imo
compare to the price.....i'd never get TL.......i'll get G35 coupe instead...
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 12:14 AM
  #30  
ninjamyst's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 742
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by kyotousa
you got incredible deal then

my friend got 34K TL non nav....i got 27850 non nav
both are drive out price with everything paid + few free gifts

so......you are pretty much getting a deal of the century
get it and run.....

I don't think TSX is the best value btw.....i think it's just about right
Accord V6 might be cheap imo
compare to the price.....i'd never get TL.......i'll get G35 coupe instead...
The G35 is a little more expensive than a TL, similarly equipped. Any new car over $25k OTD is expensive, over $35k OTD and you are talking about overpriced even if value wise it's a good deal. I think value is completely different than how expensive or cheap a car is.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 12:39 AM
  #31  
kyotousa's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
yes.....but i think G35 looks better than TL......and have more power + it's a coupe

The reason i choose TSX over Accord is it looks better....i can live with 200 hp.....it's an Acura....HID

sport package G35 coupe 36K drive out with everything paid.....
would never get TL with that price compare to 34K TL....
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 12:46 AM
  #32  
MyopicPaideia's Avatar
Motivator
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by ninjamyst
The G35 is a little more expensive than a TL, similarly equipped. Any new car over $25k OTD is expensive, over $35k OTD and you are talking about overpriced even if value wise it's a good deal. I think value is completely different than how expensive or cheap a car is.

I don't want to be an antagonist, but how can an overpriced car also be a good deal value wise? In relation to other similar cars that are "overpriced"? I don't think a car is overpriced if it is incrementally more expensive than another car, but also has incrememntally more, such as bigger engine, more space, more features, etc...I don't understand the view that the TSX is a great value, and therefore relatively "cheap" compared to it competitors, but the TL is overpriced? I think the TL is very competitively priced in its segment, especially when you start equipping cars to its level, just like you point out above.

I think maybe what your saying is that you wouldn't pay 35k for ANY new car, right? At that point for you it is simply opulance...
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 03:00 AM
  #33  
cp3117's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 719
Likes: 45
Originally Posted by psteng19
But that's the thing.
There really isn't any other car in it's class (entry level luxury 4 cyclinder naturally aspirated FWD sedan).
It's kind of in a class of its own.

I would say the TSX's closest competitors are Audi A4 (FWD/AWD 2.0T) and Subaru Legacy (AWD 2.5).
The TSX is a great car value wise....

The closest competitor when comparing equal cars though would be a GLI/2.0T. It has the same FWD 2.0T as the Audi and can be purchased with the same options as a TSX (except bluetooth) for about the same price or even $2000-2500 less if you go for the 2.0T.
Audi doesnt allow you to purchase their FWD model with comparable options to a TSX unless you opt for the Quattro..and then its alot more money.

Edmunds gave the edge to the GLI over the TSX in their review and it looks like C&D gave the edge to the TSX over the GLI for "best sport sedan". So it looks like these two cars are extremely competitive and both great value for what you get.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 03:03 AM
  #34  
kyotousa's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by psteng19
But that's the thing.
There really isn't any other car in it's class (entry level luxury 4 cyclinder naturally aspirated FWD sedan).
It's kind of in a class of its own.

I would say the TSX's closest competitors are Audi A4 (FWD/AWD 2.0T) and Subaru Legacy (AWD 2.5).
i don't understand...why you specifically want a 4 cyl. car?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 06:06 AM
  #35  
lamster's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by kyotousa
i don't understand...why you specifically want a 4 cyl. car?
Because it is more gas-efficient. To me, as long as the car has a decent performance (i.e. TSX has 200 HP), it's enough.

Honestly speaking, I can't never justify for a real need of having a 6-cylinder car.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 07:06 AM
  #36  
mg7726's Avatar
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Originally Posted by lamster
Because it is more gas-efficient. To me, as long as the car has a decent performance (i.e. TSX has 200 HP), it's enough.

Honestly speaking, I can't never justify for a real need of having a 6-cylinder car.
spending my life in city driving, this is the perfect 4-cyl imo. also the almost perfect chassis.

acura just needs to incrementally offer better upgraded/gadgets, suspension and tire/options, small hp increases, and improve QC until the 2nd gen.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 07:08 AM
  #37  
kyotousa's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
6cyl...= more torque...and Accord V6 is about same milage as TSX...

i just don't think putting i4 + fwd sedan is an advantage over anything haha
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 07:11 AM
  #38  
kyotousa's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ninjamyst
The G35 is a little more expensive than a TL, similarly equipped. Any new car over $25k OTD is expensive, over $35k OTD and you are talking about overpriced even if value wise it's a good deal. I think value is completely different than how expensive or cheap a car is.

so a car can't be over 35k? wtf
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #39  
ninjamyst's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 742
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by kyotousa
so a car can't be over 35k? wtf
A car can be over 35k. It will just be an overpriced car . If your friend told you they bought a $3,000 computer with all the bells and whistles, you would think "damn, that's an expensive, overpriced computer compared to my $700 Dell" . Even if the $3,000 computer comes with the newest graphics card, processor, 3 gigs of ram, or whatever to justify the price tag, it's still an expensive, overpriced computer.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:33 AM
  #40  
Newplay1's Avatar
08 MDX with Sports
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Its on the expensive side because cheapest Acura you can buy is the RSX and that thing still goes for around 23k-24k.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.