question about euro accord performance...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:28 AM
  #1  
tc86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
question about euro accord performance...

if i undersatnd correctly, the euro accord has a 190 HP engine, compared to the US version TSX's 200 HP engine...does that mean that the euro accord is even slower than our TSX? and if so, then why do i see people wanting to swap an euro accord engine into their tsx's?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #2  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
I think it's the Euro-R that they're after: http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/accord_euro-r.asp
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:54 AM
  #3  
tc86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
oh ok, that would make more sense. i'd definitely take the 20 HP increase despite the 14 lb-ft. loss of torque.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 10:02 AM
  #4  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
I think it's the same engine that is in the RSX-R but I might be off on that one....
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 10:22 AM
  #5  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally posted by tc86
oh ok, that would make more sense. i'd definitely take the 20 HP increase despite the 14 lb-ft. loss of torque.
I would'nt, its everyday driveability would suffer. And yes Dan it is the same engine.

I know its been explained before but I still can't understand why our K24 is'nt making more power than it is. The Euro R/Type R is putting down 220 from a 2.0L while we're at 200 from a 2.4L The only true explanation I can come up with is cost and fuel consumption. The K24 in the TSX is considerably worse on gas than the K24 in the Accord. I'd imagine a 240HP K24 (which I think is possible) would be pathetic on fuel.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 10:27 AM
  #6  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
I think we'll start to see the 240hp k24 engines when the hondata comes out and some cams are available. The 8000rpm redline on the k20 helps the HP numbers considerably. I don't think I would want to change the TSX fuel cut point just because its just not designed to be revved that high but there have got to be a lot of gains to be made by changing the fuel maps.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #7  
Maxboost's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
I'm sure that the main reason that we're not breaking 200hp barrier comes from the fact that we're not able to go through that 7400 cut out. It's a matter of physic actually, more work = more power. And I think the reason that they don't want that is because the risk of blown engine.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 04:28 PM
  #8  
ldubuc's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
In order to have more torque you have to increase the stroke of the piston and reduce the bore. When yo do that you augment the piston speed. Piston speed in the TSX are 22m/s at redline which is very good. Few production engine can get to this speed, the current max piston speed is 20m/s. This is why the TSX max RPM is around 7000. The engine in the TSX is great, you get torque at low RPM and HP at hi-rev.

ld
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #9  
BLKEURO's Avatar
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ldubuc
In order to have more torque you have to increase the stroke of the piston and reduce the bore. When yo do that you augment the piston speed. Piston speed in the TSX are 22m/s at redline which is very good. Few production engine can get to this speed, the current max piston speed is 20m/s. This is why the TSX max RPM is around 7000. The engine in the TSX is great, you get torque at low RPM and HP at hi-rev.

ld
Good explaination ld
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #10  
Viscum48's Avatar
Form Follows Function
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: too far South
Originally Posted by domn
I ... The only true explanation I can come up with is cost and fuel consumption. The K24 in the TSX is considerably worse on gas than the K24 in the Accord. I'd imagine a 240HP K24 (which I think is possible) would be pathetic on fuel.

European Accord with 2 l engine is MUCH more fuel efficient than Euro Accord with 2.4 engine (or TSX);

http://www.honda.co.uk/cars/newcars/...ptionType=spec


Here are the numbers (range for four variants of Accord with 2.0 l engine).


Urban (mpg)
28.0- 23.9


Extra urban (mpg)
47.9 - 44.8


Combined (mpg)
38.2 - 34.0

Also note CO2 emissions are lower for the 2.0 l engine compared to 2.4 l engine (apparently in Europe data for CO2 emissions must be shown in all the specs - some people there must think that Kyoto should be kept alive...but we do not care and just need more power):

2.0 l
CO2 (g/km)
176 -200

2.4 l
CO2 (g/km)
214 -223
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #11  
ostrich's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 364
From: Calgary, AB
Viscum48, please bear in mind that the data from the Honda UK website refers to Imperial gallon, which is much larger than the US gallon. Therefore, every Imperial gallon would give you many more miles than a US gallon. I expect that the numbers will be much closer once you have done the conversion.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 10:59 PM
  #12  
jeffreytchui's Avatar
Delta Sigma Pi
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica
Emissions controls on the K24A2 restricts the engine from its full potential. The K24 ECU just needs a reflash or some BOOST (both still waiting). I think a 14:1 fuel mix ratio would do the trick. Damn you Hondata ,

i`m j/k

Check out Comptechs supercharger for the TSX it adds about 40whp for $3995 and its almost out.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 11:07 PM
  #13  
Viscum48's Avatar
Form Follows Function
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: too far South
Originally Posted by ostrich
Viscum48, please bear in mind that the data from the Honda UK website refers to Imperial gallon, which is much larger than the US gallon. Therefore, every Imperial gallon would give you many more miles than a US gallon. I expect that the numbers will be much closer once you have done the conversion.
Ostrich, you are right that these numbers are in imperial gallons. The coversion factor is 1.2. This makes 39.9-37.3 miles per US gallon for instead of 47.9-44.8.

I think it is still quite a big difference compared to what the 2.4 l engine achieves. (The site for Honda UK gives also fuel efficiency in l/100 km)
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 02:44 AM
  #14  
mel4fun's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tc86
if i undersatnd correctly, the euro accord has a 190 HP engine, compared to the US version TSX's 200 HP engine...does that mean that the euro accord is even slower than our TSX? and if so, then why do i see people wanting to swap an euro accord engine into their tsx's?
to the best of my understanding, the Euro-R (CL7R) K20 engine has vtec function on the intake and the exhuast loop of the engine, and a higher compression ratio.

Whereas the standard K20A (CL7A) or K24 (CL9) engine only has the vtec on the intake side and with a lower compression ratio.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 03:03 AM
  #15  
yfin's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by tc86
if i undersatnd correctly, the euro accord has a 190 HP engine, compared to the US version TSX's 200 HP engine...does that mean that the euro accord is even slower than our TSX?
Yes - it is 10HP down but is the same engine.

It is not slower as it weighs less than the TSX. My 6MT Euro K24 weighs between 1360kg and 1390kg (depends on which brochure you read).

The TSX weighs around 1465-1474kg (again depends on source).

So around 100kg heavier.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 03:13 AM
  #16  
yfin's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by mel4fun
to the best of my understanding, the Euro-R (CL7R) K20 engine has vtec function on the intake and the exhuast loop of the engine, and a higher compression ratio.

Whereas the standard K20A (CL7A) or K24 (CL9) engine only has the vtec on the intake side and with a lower compression ratio.

My Accord Euro K24 has a compression ratio of 10.5:1 - same as the TSX. VTEC is the same.

My Euro gear rations are different though.. Does anyone understand gear ratios -what does this mean?

1st 3.533
2nd 1.88
3rd 1.354
4th 1.027
5th 0.825
6th 0.659
Reverse 3.583
Final 4.388

TSX

1st 3.267
2nd 1.880
3rd 1.355
4th 1.028
5th 0.825
6th 0.659
Reverse 3.583
Final 4.7
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:27 AM
  #17  
MSZ's Avatar
MSZ
Lola
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 257
From: Toronto
If they decided to push the compression ratio to 11.5:1, 260hp on our engine is possible.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #18  
sauceman's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 6
From: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Originally Posted by MSZ
If they decided to push the compression ratio to 11.5:1, 260hp on our engine is possible.
NO.

At least not with upping the compression alone. For every full point of compression you add, you'll get +10hp, max.

Originally Posted by mel4fun
to the best of my understanding, the Euro-R (CL7R) K20 engine has vtec function on the intake and the exhuast loop of the engine, and a higher compression ratio.

Whereas the standard K20A (CL7A) or K24 (CL9) engine only has the vtec on the intake side and with a lower compression ratio.
You're right. BUT the K24A2, the TSX's version of the K24 has variable cam profiles on the exhaust cam, just like the K20A and K20A2.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Heyzuez20
1G TSX (2004-2008)
10
Oct 14, 2015 07:18 AM
CLsuperhero
Car Parts for Sale
16
Sep 23, 2015 12:53 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 14, 2015 10:10 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Sep 13, 2015 01:59 PM
datadr
5G TLX (2015-2020)
6
Sep 12, 2015 09:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.