First time driving a TSX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-2008 | 12:56 PM
  #1  
david-s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
First time driving a TSX

I am currently a 2nd gen tl type s owner. Recently some things went wrong with it and its in the dealer getting repaired. They gave me a 2008 TSX until mine is repaired. First off im gonna say i miss the power of tl-s. When i floor the gas on the tsx it doesnt even feel like it drops gears. Kind of slow. But then again it could be me because i havent driven a 4 cylinder in ages. Now the good part. The car handles and steers like a proper sports car. I love how precise the steering is, and how tight the turning radius is. The seats are pretty comfy and i really appreciated the XM radio. 30MPG didnt hurt either. Looks compact and tidy yet rather roomy inside. I really like these cars. My tl-s is almost paid off. Im thinking about adding a tsx to my collection now.
Old 12-24-2008 | 01:22 PM
  #2  
valeratj's Avatar
Unregistered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: California
so whats your point? We all know that 4 cyl car is slower than 6 cylinder (excluding BMW 325i and Lexus IS250). I dont mean to be aggressive but I am growing tired of being told that TL's have more power because they are boring cars compared to TSX's
Old 12-24-2008 | 02:33 PM
  #3  
zguy95135's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 19
From: Pleasant Hill, CA
The 5AT's come with the gentle acceleration feature
Old 12-24-2008 | 03:19 PM
  #4  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
Originally Posted by valeratj
so whats your point? We all know that 4 cyl car is slower than 6 cylinder (excluding BMW 325i and Lexus IS250). I dont mean to be aggressive but I am growing tired of being told that TL's have more power because they are boring cars compared to TSX's
What is your problem? The OP simply states his observation when driving a loaner TSX. I don't see anything wrong with his assessment. OTOH, you continue to make generalized comments with nothing to back them up. Additionally, you seem to believe your opinions as facts. I'm really growing tired of your posting.
Old 12-24-2008 | 03:33 PM
  #5  
TommySalami's Avatar
E92
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,039
Likes: 93
From: socal
Originally Posted by david-s
I am currently a 2nd gen tl type s owner. Recently some things went wrong with it and its in the dealer getting repaired. They gave me a 2008 TSX until mine is repaired. First off im gonna say i miss the power of tl-s. When i floor the gas on the tsx it doesnt even feel like it drops gears. Kind of slow. But then again it could be me because i havent driven a 4 cylinder in ages. Now the good part. The car handles and steers like a proper sports car. I love how precise the steering is, and how tight the turning radius is. The seats are pretty comfy and i really appreciated the XM radio. 30MPG didnt hurt either. Looks compact and tidy yet rather roomy inside. I really like these cars. My tl-s is almost paid off. Im thinking about adding a tsx to my collection now.
If you thought the stock one handled well, you'd be blown away by one that is lowered, has a thicker rear sway bar, and has better tires.
Old 12-24-2008 | 03:55 PM
  #6  
davidspalding's Avatar
Make a hole, coming thru!
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,945
Likes: 15
From: Somewhere between 70 and 125 mph
Funny. Last year I dropped my TSX off at the dealer for a day's warranty repair work, and got a 2008 TL for a loaner. I felt similar things there: it was a bit slow (until i really put the spurs to 'er), a bit heavy and ploddy. But once I decided to kick it into using all 6 of those V's, it was fun to drive. But when I got into my TSX at the end of the day, my TSX felt nimble, light, eager to accelerate ... all things that I didn't initially get from the TL in a few hours' driving.
Old 12-24-2008 | 04:23 PM
  #7  
valeratj's Avatar
Unregistered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by JTso
What is your problem? The OP simply states his observation when driving a loaner TSX. I don't see anything wrong with his assessment. OTOH, you continue to make generalized comments with nothing to back them up. Additionally, you seem to believe your opinions as facts. I'm really growing tired of your posting.

The problem is stated. Its that people ALWAYS diss on TSX's performance. I made the comment according to my experience and experience of others.
Old 12-24-2008 | 04:27 PM
  #8  
valeratj's Avatar
Unregistered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by zguy95135
The 5AT's come with the gentle acceleration feature


04 models come with imperfection feature :wink:
Old 12-24-2008 | 04:40 PM
  #9  
zguy95135's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 19
From: Pleasant Hill, CA
Touché

But who can get Hondata again? Ohhh thats right

Last edited by zguy95135; 12-24-2008 at 04:45 PM.
Old 12-24-2008 | 05:03 PM
  #10  
valeratj's Avatar
Unregistered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by zguy95135
Touché

But who can get Hondata again? Ohhh thats right

Hondata is a broad term. K pro u mean? or the reflash which is coming for 05 AT shortly? and who has power passenger seat? ohhhh
Old 12-24-2008 | 05:49 PM
  #11  
TommySalami's Avatar
E92
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,039
Likes: 93
From: socal
Originally Posted by valeratj
Hondata is a broad term. K pro u mean? or the reflash which is coming for 05 AT shortly? and who has power passenger seat? ohhhh
you know what he means
Old 12-24-2008 | 06:11 PM
  #12  
david-s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by valeratj
The problem is stated. Its that people ALWAYS diss on TSX's performance. I made the comment according to my experience and experience of others.
I am in no way dissing the TSX's performance. Maybe if you read my original post you would see that I liked the car a lot. I said how nice it steers and handles. I even went on to say that i really want one. All I am doing is simply giving my opinion on a particular car. And yes, no offense, but is slower than a TL-S, quiet a bit actually. But thats expected its a 4 vs. 6. If it was as fast then the TL would be a complete failure. And what do you care if someone says your car is slower than his, Im sure at the end of the day you're very pleased with your car and love every second of it. My brother drives a 2002 BMW 330i with a few mods, and frankly it smashes my car in performance, and he reminds me all the time, but I dont take it to heart and still enjoy driving my tl.
Old 12-24-2008 | 07:02 PM
  #13  
valeratj's Avatar
Unregistered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by david-s
I am in no way dissing the TSX's performance. Maybe if you read my original post you would see that I liked the car a lot. I said how nice it steers and handles. I even went on to say that i really want one. All I am doing is simply giving my opinion on a particular car. And yes, no offense, but is slower than a TL-S, quiet a bit actually. But thats expected its a 4 vs. 6. If it was as fast then the TL would be a complete failure. And what do you care if someone says your car is slower than his, Im sure at the end of the day you're very pleased with your car and love every second of it. My brother drives a 2002 BMW 330i with a few mods, and frankly it smashes my car in performance, and he reminds me all the time, but I dont take it to heart and still enjoy driving my tl.

Dude, I am not mad at you in any way and I guess I was a bit too harsh expressing my thoughts, but there are many others who keep dissing on these cars simply because they have 4 cylinders. ok, lets just forget it
Old 12-24-2008 | 07:25 PM
  #14  
TommySalami's Avatar
E92
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,039
Likes: 93
From: socal
Originally Posted by valeratj
Dude, I am not mad at you in any way and I guess I was a bit too harsh expressing my thoughts, but there are many others who keep dissing on these cars simply because they have 4 cylinders. ok, lets just forget it
The engine is honestly the only problem I have with the car though, that and FWD. Everything else is spectacular in my opinion.
Old 12-24-2008 | 07:50 PM
  #15  
valeratj's Avatar
Unregistered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by TommySalami
The engine is honestly the only problem I have with the car though, that and FWD. Everything else is spectacular in my opinion.

couldnt agree more.
Old 12-24-2008 | 08:49 PM
  #16  
davidspalding's Avatar
Make a hole, coming thru!
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,945
Likes: 15
From: Somewhere between 70 and 125 mph
/me de-subscribes from the conversation....
Old 12-24-2008 | 11:22 PM
  #17  
miked8887's Avatar
Mike D from Ohio
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
yes, now that you mention it, the fine steering is one of the first things i noticed when i started driving mine.

I also agree that the tsx isn't that powerful. I think its mostly quick and fun, but there are other cars that will smoke us. I'm fine with that. There are other things besides 'fast' that impress me. I especially like the looks, the interior luxury, the drive quality, and the steering.

Also, I came from a little toyota corolla. Of course I'm going to love the Acura.

Speaking in type-s, they are fast as hell. My dad has an RSX type-S and i think it screams pretty good
Old 12-25-2008 | 11:28 AM
  #18  
davidspalding's Avatar
Make a hole, coming thru!
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,945
Likes: 15
From: Somewhere between 70 and 125 mph
I thought the RSX-S was the same engine as the RSX ... they tuned it up on 2005, if I recall, but the Type-S added leather seats, something else, both standard, and maybe a different suspension.

And IIRC it's the same engine that's in the TSX.

I could be wrong on both counts, but I was shopping for an RSX last year when I settled upon a TSX for a couple thou$and more.
Old 12-25-2008 | 12:29 PM
  #19  
acura_ak's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: California
My brother also has a BMW 3-series, and although his car is probably quicker than mine, he still likes the fact that I have more "features" on my car than his.
Old 12-25-2008 | 03:01 PM
  #20  
Sclass88's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 4
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by valeratj
Hondata is a broad term. K pro u mean? or the reflash which is coming for 05 AT shortly? and who has power passenger seat? ohhhh


You have a lot to learn about life, chief. Good luck, and I agree with Jtso, your posts are getting pretty annoying with your "know-it-all" attitude. It's not going to get your anywhere in life... give it a rest

OP, thanks for the compliment on the car. Sure is a fun little car, I love my '04.
Old 12-30-2008 | 09:28 AM
  #21  
Type RC's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
The RSX has the Same Horsepower as the TSX (200hp) but it's a different engine. The RSX uses the Same 2.0l engine as the Civic Si, except tuned to produce 200hp as opposed to 160hp.

My 2 cents.

I just bought (yesterday) a 2004 TSX and traded in my 1999 TL-P. Yes the car has less punch (200hp vs 225hp and 166lbf of torque vs 212lbf of torque), but it's much smoother(engine and tranny) and the interior is nicer. And while my TL wasn't a type-S, it was impressively quick for such a large car. But my speeding days are over (actually they were marked when I sold my 300hp Turbo B16 powered Civic EX and picked up the TL), so a reliable comfortable ride that's good on gas and still very good looking is more important to me then performance.

edit: the civic was actually Dyno'd at 293hp, but who cares if I round up?
Old 12-30-2008 | 10:16 AM
  #22  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by davidspalding
I thought the RSX-S was the same engine as the RSX ... they tuned it up on 2005, if I recall, but the Type-S added leather seats, something else, both standard, and maybe a different suspension.

And IIRC it's the same engine that's in the TSX.

I could be wrong on both counts, but I was shopping for an RSX last year when I settled upon a TSX for a couple thou$and more.
RSX and RSX-S both have 2.0L engines. The 'base' rated at 155-160 depending on year and the S is rated at 200 to 210 depending on year.
Old 12-30-2008 | 10:29 AM
  #23  
JimHolloman's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Hi, David. Someone that is used to a V-6 engine is not likely to push the TSX into the power band of around 3500 RPM's, and up, before allowing the transmission to shift. The TSX is not quick off the line, but it is fast -- and it is fairly quick at accelerating once at crusing speed -- providing you downshift and put the RPM's in the 3500 to 7000 range. And, you can certainly hear, and feel, the difference when VTEC kicks in. I drive 99.9 percent of the time in Sport Shift, and that is the only way to get decent performance from the automatic.

I love the handling of the TSX in the mountains and there are probably no other sedans in it's price range that are quicker around the curves -- once the OEM tires are replaced with something that has better grip.
Old 12-30-2008 | 11:05 AM
  #24  
Type RC's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dom
RSX and RSX-S both have 2.0L engines. The 'base' rated at 155-160 depending on year and the S is rated at 200 to 210 depending on year.
Woops, I thought that they were saying the TSX and RSX had the same engine, my bad.

You are 100% correct, infact, I forgot the RSX was upped to 210hp at the end of it's life. Those must've been a hoot to drive.
Old 12-30-2008 | 05:46 PM
  #25  
PrecyseStylez's Avatar
Special-K
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 1
From: Trenton, NJ
I was never really impressed with the TL-S in the power department. I've driven faster cars so nothing to brag about. The Altima 3.5 SE felt faster than all the previous TL's.. The last model Type-S is pretty quick though. But an 03 Type-s isnt really that fast. I beat one in my Matrix XRS!..with mods though. It was back in 04. The XRS was no beast but fast enough to stay ahead of a stock TL Type-S. The 6speed TSX's have alil more pep than an auto..I hated getting an auto loaner from the dealer.. car felt stupid slow! Then i got my baby back and had to open her up on my drive back home!..haha
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jriv7
2G TSX (2009-2014)
23
05-08-2020 05:50 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
02-25-2020 09:57 AM
divac
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
16
08-29-2018 10:13 AM
kuzdu
5G TLX (2015-2020)
3
09-10-2015 08:42 PM
jordanboi
2G TSX (2009-2014)
16
09-05-2015 01:33 AM



Quick Reply: First time driving a TSX



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.