Consumer Reports Latest Article TSX Reviewed!!!
#1
10th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Consumer Reports Latest Article TSX Reviewed!!!
Hey all,
Received Consumer Reports today. They review the TSX, the Subaru Legacy, the Audi A4 and the Volvo S40...exactly like Car & Driver just did...but from a much more objective consumer point of view...
Did anyone else see it/read the article?
It had great things to say about the TSX and it got the "red checkmark" as a recommended model!
Only negatives they had to comment on were:
*Ride Quality (said it was too stiff and unforgiving over bumps)
*Turning circle (40 ft)
*Requirement of premium fuel
*HID cutoff (but said the high beams were very effective)
Otherwise, the mad scientists at Consumer Reports loved the car and predict very good reliability...not just good, but very good.
They thought the Navi system was very intuitive and loved the fit and finish of the high quality materials on the inside.
Makes me happy I'm driving a great car and if an entity like CR says its good, it definitely is a good product in my opinion.
Only the Subaru got a red check recommendation mark in addition to the TSX... the Volvo and the Audi did not due to poor reliability and way cramped rear seats.
Take it or leave it, all the cars tested are great cars, but for the price I don't think the other three can even compare. A comparably equipped A4 or S40 is pushing $32,000. And they have POOR reliability.
You do the math.
Thanks CR!
Received Consumer Reports today. They review the TSX, the Subaru Legacy, the Audi A4 and the Volvo S40...exactly like Car & Driver just did...but from a much more objective consumer point of view...
Did anyone else see it/read the article?
It had great things to say about the TSX and it got the "red checkmark" as a recommended model!
Only negatives they had to comment on were:
*Ride Quality (said it was too stiff and unforgiving over bumps)
*Turning circle (40 ft)
*Requirement of premium fuel
*HID cutoff (but said the high beams were very effective)
Otherwise, the mad scientists at Consumer Reports loved the car and predict very good reliability...not just good, but very good.
They thought the Navi system was very intuitive and loved the fit and finish of the high quality materials on the inside.
Makes me happy I'm driving a great car and if an entity like CR says its good, it definitely is a good product in my opinion.
Only the Subaru got a red check recommendation mark in addition to the TSX... the Volvo and the Audi did not due to poor reliability and way cramped rear seats.
Take it or leave it, all the cars tested are great cars, but for the price I don't think the other three can even compare. A comparably equipped A4 or S40 is pushing $32,000. And they have POOR reliability.
You do the math.
Thanks CR!
#4
Go Giants
Originally Posted by jcg878
Thanks. I will look for it in the mail ![Nod](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/nod.gif)
![Nod](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/nod.gif)
jcg - dust off your scanner again.....
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#7
Obnoxious Philadelphian
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
Yay for the good review but I still hate CR.
Go by CR only: buy reliable, safe appliance that put you to sleep
Go by C&D only: buy a fun-to-drive sports car that's a blast in the twisties, but possibly unreliable and probably impractical
Go by both: buy a TSX
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
Obnoxious Philadelphian
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mg7726
don't tell him, but that resolution needs an upgrade ![Naughty](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![Naughty](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
#9
Go Giants
Originally Posted by mg7726
don't tell him, but that resolution needs an upgrade ![Naughty](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![Naughty](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![Soopa](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/soopa.gif)
#11
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by jcg
Why? They are a good reviewer of appliances IMO. My formula is:
Go by CR only: buy reliable, safe appliance that put you to sleep
Go by C&D only: buy a fun-to-drive sports car that's a blast in the twisties, but possibly unreliable and probably impractical
Go by both: buy a TSX
Go by CR only: buy reliable, safe appliance that put you to sleep
Go by C&D only: buy a fun-to-drive sports car that's a blast in the twisties, but possibly unreliable and probably impractical
Go by both: buy a TSX
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#14
Instructor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: sacramento
Age: 45
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright another good review for the TSX! Over at is300.net, I read a couple threads where they're basically looking down on us for owning this "$30,000 accord 4 banger pos" and saying how we're using magazines to prove our worth....blah blah blah. Can anybody say jealous? If there are a lot of reviews for the TSX and basically all good then there must be something about this car that's WORTH IT.
If you want to read the threads just do a search for TSX...lots of negativity over there.
If you want to read the threads just do a search for TSX...lots of negativity over there.
#15
Burning Brakes
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
Age: 55
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pdjjr78
Hey all,
Received Consumer Reports today. They review the TSX, the Subaru Legacy, the Audi A4 and the Volvo S40...exactly like Car & Driver just did...but from a much more objective consumer point of view...
Did anyone else see it/read the article?
It had great things to say about the TSX and it got the "red checkmark" as a recommended model!
Only negatives they had to comment on were:
*Ride Quality (said it was too stiff and unforgiving over bumps)
*Turning circle (40 ft)
*Requirement of premium fuel
*HID cutoff (but said the high beams were very effective)
Otherwise, the mad scientists at Consumer Reports loved the car and predict very good reliability...not just good, but very good.
They thought the Navi system was very intuitive and loved the fit and finish of the high quality materials on the inside.
Makes me happy I'm driving a great car and if an entity like CR says its good, it definitely is a good product in my opinion.
Only the Subaru got a red check recommendation mark in addition to the TSX... the Volvo and the Audi did not due to poor reliability and way cramped rear seats.
Take it or leave it, all the cars tested are great cars, but for the price I don't think the other three can even compare. A comparably equipped A4 or S40 is pushing $32,000. And they have POOR reliability.
You do the math.
Thanks CR!
Received Consumer Reports today. They review the TSX, the Subaru Legacy, the Audi A4 and the Volvo S40...exactly like Car & Driver just did...but from a much more objective consumer point of view...
Did anyone else see it/read the article?
It had great things to say about the TSX and it got the "red checkmark" as a recommended model!
Only negatives they had to comment on were:
*Ride Quality (said it was too stiff and unforgiving over bumps)
*Turning circle (40 ft)
*Requirement of premium fuel
*HID cutoff (but said the high beams were very effective)
Otherwise, the mad scientists at Consumer Reports loved the car and predict very good reliability...not just good, but very good.
They thought the Navi system was very intuitive and loved the fit and finish of the high quality materials on the inside.
Makes me happy I'm driving a great car and if an entity like CR says its good, it definitely is a good product in my opinion.
Only the Subaru got a red check recommendation mark in addition to the TSX... the Volvo and the Audi did not due to poor reliability and way cramped rear seats.
Take it or leave it, all the cars tested are great cars, but for the price I don't think the other three can even compare. A comparably equipped A4 or S40 is pushing $32,000. And they have POOR reliability.
You do the math.
Thanks CR!
![Woot](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/woot.gif)
![Racing](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/racing.gif)
BTW, no matter how many options put on A4 or S40, their refinement, engine smoothest, shifting feel still no way come close to a Honda. Also both Audi & Volvo will drive like a 10yr old Honda after 2yr.
![Hurl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/hurl.gif)
#16
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Carolina
Age: 80
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ianS
The ride quality can be improved dramatically by installing a-spec suspension...
#17
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by Jim Holloman
What does the a-spec suspension consist of and how much does it cost? Does it change the ground clearance any? I presume that there is no adverse effect on handling.
#18
Senior Moderator
I would think a-spec would make things worse, not better. They complained the ride was too stiff, and a-spec will make it even more stiff.
Jim there are tons of threads on the a-spec package. It lowers the ride height very sligtly (1 cm i think).
Jim there are tons of threads on the a-spec package. It lowers the ride height very sligtly (1 cm i think).
#19
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Carolina
Age: 80
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl
I would think a-spec would make things worse, not better. They complained the ride was too stiff, and a-spec will make it even more stiff.
"For some people, the stock TSX ride is a bit too stiff, and if you're one of these people who feels that way, then the A-Spec suspension is not for you."
Guess I will be looking for better tires. The OEM tires get a lot of negative comments. But I have not yet complied a list of suitable alternatives. If I recall correctly, I went to the TireRack site and found only one tire that was recommended. Perhaps I overlooked something. My pass tire experiences have been only with the popular names.
#20
Burning Brakes
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
Age: 55
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim Holloman
What does the a-spec suspension consist of and how much does it cost? Does it change the ground clearance any? I presume that there is no adverse effect on handling.
![Woot](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/woot.gif)
#21
Burning Brakes
I didn't see the review on here so here it is if anyone cares.
Highs: Engine and transmission, handling, driving position, controls, fit and finish, crash-test results.
Lows: Ride, turning circle, requires premium fuel.
The Acura TSX is a well-rounded package that provides a good mix of performance, sportiness, and luxurious amenities. It's not as exciting to drive as the best sports sedans, but it is agile and adequately roomy. The powertrain is very smooth, and the four-cylinder engine provides good fuel economy. The interior has intuitive controls and impressive fit and finish, but the ride is a bit too firm.
THE DRIVING EXPERIENCE
The TSX has a taut ride, with fairly pronounced impacts. Ride motions are short and quick, making the car a bit jittery, but the highway ride is more composed. Engine and wind noise are muted, but tire rumble is pronounced on some coarse surfaces. The TSX is more nimble than some competing models, such as the Audi A4 and Volvo S40, but not quite as agile as, say, the Subaru Legacy GT. The TSX's steering is responsive, communicative, and well-weighted. The car has little body lean in corners, but its 40-foot turning circle is a bit wide. On our handling course, the TSX was secure and predictable at its limits, helped by its standard electronic stability control (ESC). It posted a fast speed in our avoidance maneuver. The 200-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine revs smoothly and provides adequate performance, while delivering 23 mpg overall on premium fuel. The five-speed automatic transmission shifts very smoothly and has a manual shift feature. Braking performance was very good overall. The HID low beams reach a limited distance and have a sharp visual cutoff that can further reduce their range on undulations. The halogen high beams reach a long distance and have very good intensity.
INSIDE THE CABIN
The TSX has a nicely detailed, well-assembled cabin consisting of quality materials. The tilt and telescoping steering wheel helps all drivers find a comfortable driving position with good visibility. The interior is a bit snug. The power seats are firm and supportive, but some drivers needed more lower-back support. The rear seats offer sufficient leg room but lack thigh support. Access to the front seats is very easy, but the low roof impedes rear access. The controls are logically placed and lighted at night, and the navigation system is very intuitive. Reaching the dimmer control is a bit difficult. Cabin storage is modest. There are two sturdy cup holders in front and a sturdy flip-down pair in the rear. The 60/40-split rear seats fold to expand the trunk.
SAFETY NOTES
Side-impact air bags housed in the front seatbacks and curtain-type head-protection air bags that extend from the headliner to protect front and rear outboard passengers are both standard in the TSX. They supplement dual-stage front air bags and 3-point front seatbelts equipped with adjustable anchors for improved fit and pretensioners to reduce belt slack in the event of a crash. Sensors in the front passenger seat detect the position and size of the front passenger and will disable the side air bags for that seat if they detect a child or someone leaning sideways into the path of the air bag's deployment. Rear passengers all have a 3-point belts. There are adjustable and locking head restraints in the outboard seats that are tall enough even when fully down to reduce rearward head travel and limit whiplash injuries. The center rear seat lacks a head restraint and the seatback is too low. Driving with kids: It may prove difficult to install rear-facing child seats securely in the rear center as they can tilt easily or have side-to-side movement. Belts anchored forward of the bolster in the outboard rear positions may also make it hard to secure some rear-facing seats and LATCH may prove to be more secure. Front-facing seats should be secure in the appropriate passenger positions. There are three tether strap attachment anchors under covers on the rear parcel shelf and LATCH anchors in the rear outboard seats. The LATCH anchors are recessed, making them awkward to get to; they are slightly offset toward the center seat, which causes the seats to sit at a slight angle on the center seat hump.
RELIABILITY
We expect reliability to be better than average, according to our latest subscriber survey.
Copyright © 2000-2004 Consumers Union of U.S., Inc.
Highs: Engine and transmission, handling, driving position, controls, fit and finish, crash-test results.
Lows: Ride, turning circle, requires premium fuel.
The Acura TSX is a well-rounded package that provides a good mix of performance, sportiness, and luxurious amenities. It's not as exciting to drive as the best sports sedans, but it is agile and adequately roomy. The powertrain is very smooth, and the four-cylinder engine provides good fuel economy. The interior has intuitive controls and impressive fit and finish, but the ride is a bit too firm.
THE DRIVING EXPERIENCE
The TSX has a taut ride, with fairly pronounced impacts. Ride motions are short and quick, making the car a bit jittery, but the highway ride is more composed. Engine and wind noise are muted, but tire rumble is pronounced on some coarse surfaces. The TSX is more nimble than some competing models, such as the Audi A4 and Volvo S40, but not quite as agile as, say, the Subaru Legacy GT. The TSX's steering is responsive, communicative, and well-weighted. The car has little body lean in corners, but its 40-foot turning circle is a bit wide. On our handling course, the TSX was secure and predictable at its limits, helped by its standard electronic stability control (ESC). It posted a fast speed in our avoidance maneuver. The 200-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine revs smoothly and provides adequate performance, while delivering 23 mpg overall on premium fuel. The five-speed automatic transmission shifts very smoothly and has a manual shift feature. Braking performance was very good overall. The HID low beams reach a limited distance and have a sharp visual cutoff that can further reduce their range on undulations. The halogen high beams reach a long distance and have very good intensity.
INSIDE THE CABIN
The TSX has a nicely detailed, well-assembled cabin consisting of quality materials. The tilt and telescoping steering wheel helps all drivers find a comfortable driving position with good visibility. The interior is a bit snug. The power seats are firm and supportive, but some drivers needed more lower-back support. The rear seats offer sufficient leg room but lack thigh support. Access to the front seats is very easy, but the low roof impedes rear access. The controls are logically placed and lighted at night, and the navigation system is very intuitive. Reaching the dimmer control is a bit difficult. Cabin storage is modest. There are two sturdy cup holders in front and a sturdy flip-down pair in the rear. The 60/40-split rear seats fold to expand the trunk.
SAFETY NOTES
Side-impact air bags housed in the front seatbacks and curtain-type head-protection air bags that extend from the headliner to protect front and rear outboard passengers are both standard in the TSX. They supplement dual-stage front air bags and 3-point front seatbelts equipped with adjustable anchors for improved fit and pretensioners to reduce belt slack in the event of a crash. Sensors in the front passenger seat detect the position and size of the front passenger and will disable the side air bags for that seat if they detect a child or someone leaning sideways into the path of the air bag's deployment. Rear passengers all have a 3-point belts. There are adjustable and locking head restraints in the outboard seats that are tall enough even when fully down to reduce rearward head travel and limit whiplash injuries. The center rear seat lacks a head restraint and the seatback is too low. Driving with kids: It may prove difficult to install rear-facing child seats securely in the rear center as they can tilt easily or have side-to-side movement. Belts anchored forward of the bolster in the outboard rear positions may also make it hard to secure some rear-facing seats and LATCH may prove to be more secure. Front-facing seats should be secure in the appropriate passenger positions. There are three tether strap attachment anchors under covers on the rear parcel shelf and LATCH anchors in the rear outboard seats. The LATCH anchors are recessed, making them awkward to get to; they are slightly offset toward the center seat, which causes the seats to sit at a slight angle on the center seat hump.
RELIABILITY
We expect reliability to be better than average, according to our latest subscriber survey.
Copyright © 2000-2004 Consumers Union of U.S., Inc.
#22
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Jim Holloman
Guess I will be looking for better tires. The OEM tires get a lot of negative comments. But I have not yet complied a list of suitable alternatives. If I recall correctly, I went to the TireRack site and found only one tire that was recommended. Perhaps I overlooked something. My pass tire experiences have been only with the popular names.
#23
Not an Ashtray
BTW, CR reported a dismal 0-60 of 9.2 seconds for the 5AT TSX. That is slightly slower than the USDM Accord they tested a few months ago.
#24
Originally Posted by rivvin
Alright another good review for the TSX! Over at is300.net, I read a couple threads where they're basically looking down on us for owning this "$30,000 accord 4 banger pos" and saying how we're using magazines to prove our worth....blah blah blah. Can anybody say jealous? If there are a lot of reviews for the TSX and basically all good then there must be something about this car that's WORTH IT.
If you want to read the threads just do a search for TSX...lots of negativity over there.
If you want to read the threads just do a search for TSX...lots of negativity over there.
#25
Teh seX
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: unknown
Age: 40
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gilboman
why would a IS owner be jealous of a TSX owner???? it's like a ferrari owner jealous of a kia owner. and you really do drive a 4 banger FWD 4 door 3300lb accord that cost 30k
![Ecstatic](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ecstatic.gif)
![Ecstatic](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ecstatic.gif)
![Uzi](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/uzi.gif)
#27
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by gilboman
why would a IS owner be jealous of a TSX owner???? it's like a ferrari owner jealous of a kia owner. and you really do drive a 4 banger FWD 4 door 3300lb accord that cost 30k
![Doh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/doh.gif)
Gilbo, you can be fun to have around and at times make good arguments but then you come out and throw
![Lame](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/lame.gif)
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
I vote for a 2 month ban, that statement was just too much for me to take.
#28
Obnoxious Philadelphian
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
I vote for a 2 month ban, that statement was just too much for me to take.
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
At least he doesn't send 'mixed messages'!
#29
Obnoxious Philadelphian
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by briny319
The TSX is more nimble than some competing models, such as the Audi A4 and Volvo S40, but not quite as agile as, say, the Subaru Legacy GT.
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#30
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by jcg878
I wonder if the Legacy owners will now say that CR is the enthusiast's mag of choice, since C&D is for SUV-driving soccer moms and all
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
Starnge that CR would come up with that since both the other tests felt the TSX was far nimbler?
#31
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by jcg878
I wonder if the Legacy owners will now say that CR is the enthusiast's mag of choice, since C&D is for SUV-driving soccer moms and all
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#32
Obnoxious Philadelphian
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I'd love to see CR do a review of the Elise. ![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#33
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by fdl
IJim there are tons of threads on the a-spec package. It lowers the ride height very sligtly (1 cm i think).
#34
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by Jim Holloman
Guess I will be looking for better tires. The OEM tires get a lot of negative comments. But I have not yet complied a list of suitable alternatives. If I recall correctly, I went to the TireRack site and found only one tire that was recommended. Perhaps I overlooked something. My pass tire experiences have been only with the popular names.
#37
Good review and IMO right to the heart of the avg consumer. Personally I don't think the right is stiff but I'm more sport oriented than most. Their 0-60 ir right where my pant-o-meter was when I drove the auto, it is definitely slow compared to the TL. The manual is much quicker and fun to drive though still slower than an auto TL. They test the automatics only since thats what 90% of drivers want anyway. I'm certain that it would have beat the 325 too if it had been in the mix. Overall it beat all luxo 4 bangers which is no surprise since like most Honda products its overall excellence seems to be more than the sum of its parts. Acura did a wonderful job in filling the niche below the TL with the TSX. Can't wait to give some seat time to the RL and see how the top end of the brand finally gets a worthy vehicle. This is going to be a great model cycle for the entire Acura line up. Lexus MB and BMW are going to have to fight very hard for market share in the next couple of years!
#39
Not an Ashtray
BTW, as far as the Legacy GT is concerned, CR actually said it did better than the TSX in most regards. Far quicker, better ride, and better routine handling. The Legacy got downgraded for bad emergency handling (too much oversteer) and dismal MPG (18 mpg overall - SUV like numbers).
Is anybody else suprrised that 1) The 0-60 was not a tad quicker, 2) CR liked TSX's brakes?
Is anybody else suprrised that 1) The 0-60 was not a tad quicker, 2) CR liked TSX's brakes?
#40
aka davo-tsx
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 55
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by darth62
BTW, CR reported a dismal 0-60 of 9.2 seconds for the 5AT TSX. That is slightly slower than the USDM Accord they tested a few months ago.
![Squint](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/squint.gif)
Here are some 0-60 numbers from the 6-speed I've found.
Auto Week : 7.38 seconds
Car and Driver : 7.2 seconds
Car and Driver (test 2) : 6.6 seconds
Motor Trend : 7.9 seconds
Motor Trend (test 2) : 7.5 seconds