C&D TSX comparison? ATTN zircon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2003, 02:23 PM
  #1  
fdl
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C&D TSX comparison? ATTN zircon

In that ridiculous "TSX ranks last" thread zircon mentions a Car and Driver comparison between the BMW 325, TSX, IS300, and Grand Prix GTP.

Does such a thing really exist? Was he confused? Or bsing?
Old 09-17-2003, 02:29 PM
  #2  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
I have the October issue and everyone before that and I don't see such a comparison?
Old 09-17-2003, 02:31 PM
  #3  
fdl
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by domn
I have the October issue and everyone before that and I don't see such a comparison?

Well I don't know what the hell he was talking about then. Here is exactly what he posted in page 3 of that other thread...

"The best comparo of these cars was in Car and Driver. Your beloved BMW was never worse than 2nd of 4 cars tested (TSX, IS300, Grand Prix GTP) in any of the 5-6 categories, and was 1st twice. Acura was 1st twice also, but was last in acceleration and braking (the car's only flaw). Let's leave it at this and all go out and drive our cars..."
Old 09-17-2003, 02:39 PM
  #4  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
I wondered about what the hell he was talking about too. But lets face it, if there was a comparo that tested the TSX vs BMW vs Grand Prix vs IS300 it would have been posted here.

I think he was still referring to the Automobile comparo though from what I can muster?
Old 09-17-2003, 02:48 PM
  #5  
fdl
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just say no to drugs.
Old 09-17-2003, 02:50 PM
  #6  
Burning Brakes
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We mustn't forget that not all trolls are locked up...yet.
Old 09-17-2003, 04:22 PM
  #7  
 
KC 2004 TSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think he is talking out of his
Old 09-17-2003, 04:33 PM
  #8  
fdl
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by wolfeacura
I think he is talking out of his
I thought something smelt funny
Old 09-17-2003, 04:50 PM
  #9  
anti-dentite bastard
 
wishiwere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe he was talking about a comparo that had the TL, not the tsx?
Old 09-17-2003, 05:16 PM
  #10  
fdl
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by wishiwere
Maybe he was talking about a comparo that had the TL, not the tsx?
Was there even a comparo like that with the TL? I thought the TL was in a different class!
Old 09-17-2003, 05:21 PM
  #11  
anti-dentite bastard
 
wishiwere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by fdl
Was there even a comparo like that with the TL? I thought the TL was in a different class!
I'm not sure about a comparison with the grand prix, but I know C&D has done at least 2 comparisons in the past that had the TL and the 3-series (and usually the A4, IS300, etc.). I believe the premise of hte comparisons were usually "entry-level luxury sedan shootout" or something to that effect. And, in these comparisons, they actually did a very admirable job of explicitly describing all the criteria and the methods and scales used to judge the cars, and the final rankings were just the sum total of the scores in all the individual categories. I believe in one of the comparisons, teh bmw came out on top of just about every performance category, but the tl won because the price differential was so great. Then, the next time they did it, the bmw came out on top, even with the price being taken into account.
Old 09-17-2003, 05:32 PM
  #12  
fdl
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by wishiwere
I'm not sure about a comparison with the grand prix, but I know C&D has done at least 2 comparisons in the past that had the TL and the 3-series (and usually the A4, IS300, etc.). I believe the premise of hte comparisons were usually "entry-level luxury sedan shootout" or something to that effect. And, in these comparisons, they actually did a very admirable job of explicitly describing all the criteria and the methods and scales used to judge the cars, and the final rankings were just the sum total of the scores in all the individual categories. I believe in one of the comparisons, teh bmw came out on top of just about every performance category, but the tl won because the price differential was so great. Then, the next time they did it, the bmw came out on top, even with the price being taken into account.
I remember seeing a CL-type S vs 330 comparo once. But anyways...the point is there is no TSX comparo by C&D yet But hopefully there will be one soon. I'm also looking forward to edmunds long term update. I want to see if they mention rattles.
Old 09-17-2003, 05:51 PM
  #13  
anti-dentite bastard
 
wishiwere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by fdl
I remember seeing a CL-type S vs 330 comparo once. But anyways...the point is there is no TSX comparo by C&D yet But hopefully there will be one soon. I'm also looking forward to edmunds long term update. I want to see if they mention rattles.
Ooops...after looking it up, I see that I was wrong. It was actually Edmunds that did the comparisons I was referring to, and they were 2002 and 2001 tests. They are here:
http://edmunds.com/reviews/compariso...9/article.html
and http://edmunds.com/reviews/compariso...8/article.html
Old 09-17-2003, 08:13 PM
  #14  
Racer
 
tsx-mdxman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It wasn't a comparison, Car and Driver showed the TSX's test numbers in comparison with the 3 series (325i), IS 300, etc, in their July issue full road test. It did well, bested in acceleration (by a hair's width) and on the skidpad (also within a hair's width) by the BMW (its fractionally better performance numbers in these two categories comes at a steep price, of course). Nothing fishy. Good article and another ringing endorsement of the TSX. Get lost, Wishewere trollman.
________________________________________________
04 TSX CG AT/NAV
03 MDX SSM TOURING/NAV/RES
Old 09-17-2003, 08:21 PM
  #15  
Obnoxious Philadelphian
 
jcg878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by fdl
I remember seeing a CL-type S vs 330 comparo once. But anyways...the point is there is no TSX comparo by C&D yet But hopefully there will be one soon. I'm also looking forward to edmunds long term update. I want to see if they mention rattles.
Edmunds didn't buy a long-term TSX, did they ??
Old 09-17-2003, 10:21 PM
  #16  
anti-dentite bastard
 
wishiwere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tsx-mdxman
It wasn't a comparison, Car and Driver showed the TSX's test numbers in comparison with the 3 series (325i), IS 300, etc, in their July issue full road test. It did well, bested in acceleration (by a hair's width) and on the skidpad (also within a hair's width) by the BMW (its fractionally better performance numbers in these two categories comes at a steep price, of course). Nothing fishy. Good article and another ringing endorsement of the TSX. Get lost, Wishewere trollman.
________________________________________________
04 TSX CG AT/NAV
03 MDX SSM TOURING/NAV/RES
What the hell are you talking about? My contributions to this thread consisted of conjecturing about the source of the comparison, as everyone else did, and then my pointing out of a comparison edmunds did that included the 3 series and the TL....that's trolling? You're luck a drug test isn't a mandatory requirement for posting...
Old 09-17-2003, 10:30 PM
  #17  
Three Wheelin'
 
AcuraFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tsx-mdxman
It wasn't a comparison, Car and Driver showed the TSX's test numbers in comparison with the 3 series (325i), IS 300, etc, in their July issue full road test. It did well, bested in acceleration (by a hair's width) and on the skidpad (also within a hair's width) by the BMW (its fractionally better performance numbers in these two categories comes at a steep price, of course). Nothing fishy. Good article and another ringing endorsement of the TSX. Get lost, Wishewere trollman.
________________________________________________
04 TSX CG AT/NAV
03 MDX SSM TOURING/NAV/RES
Sorry tsx-mdxman...but wishiwere has been civilized and objective in this thread. If you want to bash him, go to "the thread that never dies".
Old 09-17-2003, 11:28 PM
  #18  
Possessed with my Schemes
 
Ozzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Age: 48
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got what there talking about in front of me, page 81 July Car and Driver . . .

Just FYI, Rankings were as follows:

Current Base Brice:
1. Acura TSX
2. Grand Prix GTP Comp
3. BMW 325i
4. Lexus IS300

Acceleration:
1. Grand Prix
2. IS300
3. BMW
4. TSX

Braking:
1. 3251
2. IS300
3. Grand Prix
4. TSX

Roadhandling:
1. 325i
2. TSX
3. Grand Prix
4. IS300

Fuel Economy:
1. TSX
2. 325i
3. IS300
4. Grand Prix
Old 09-18-2003, 12:05 AM
  #19  
anti-dentite bastard
 
wishiwere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Ozzman
I've got what there talking about in front of me, page 81 July Car and Driver . . .

Just FYI, Rankings were as follows:

Current Base Brice:
1. Acura TSX
2. Grand Prix GTP Comp
3. BMW 325i
4. Lexus IS300

Acceleration:
1. Grand Prix
2. IS300
3. BMW
4. TSX

Braking:
1. 3251
2. IS300
3. Grand Prix
4. TSX

Roadhandling:
1. 325i
2. TSX
3. Grand Prix
4. IS300

Fuel Economy:
1. TSX
2. 325i
3. IS300
4. Grand Prix
Has anyone seen those pontiac commercials for the new Grand Prix where they talk about how it outhandles all cars in its class (I don't remember what names they threw out, but I know Audi was in there)? What a joke...I guess maybe its class is the boat class?
Old 09-18-2003, 12:40 AM
  #20  
Audi Driving Snob
 
TinkySD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is that roadholding figure just the skidpad G figure? I'm really starting to wonder why most car comparos don't use the slalom speed...seems a better judge of handling to me. What i'm getting at is I don't think the pontiac can "outhandle" an is300....
Old 09-18-2003, 01:06 AM
  #21  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That IS 300 has 16" tires, which damn near no IS has. Not sure why Lexus sent them one with 16s. The IS has gotten great reviews from C&D.

The TL-S has never come close to winning any comparison with these sport sedans. The TSX is a better handler and cheaper but slower, it should stack up well.
Old 09-18-2003, 02:16 AM
  #22  
Houston we have a problem
 
TSXautoXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by TinkySD
is that roadholding figure just the skidpad G figure? I'm really starting to wonder why most car comparos don't use the slalom speed...seems a better judge of handling to me. What i'm getting at is I don't think the pontiac can "outhandle" an is300....
Road and Track uses a 700ft slalom, and Car and Driver uses emergency lane change manuever. I have to agree that a slalom tells a better story.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tsx_boy
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
4
12-13-2019 08:33 PM
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
navtool.com
Sponsored Sales & Group Buys
87
01-23-2016 01:25 PM
GWEEDOspeedo
Car Parts for Sale
4
01-15-2016 10:39 PM
ceb
ILX
2
09-27-2015 10:56 AM



Quick Reply: C&D TSX comparison? ATTN zircon



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.