RDX brake pad wear
#1
RDX brake pad wear
Our 2009 RDX has only about 24K miles on it and at the last oil change our mechanic recommended we replace the rear brake pads. This seemed early to me, plus usually the fronts go first. A trip to our local Acura dealer confirmed this. Has anyone noticed unusually early rear brake pad wear? Our car is bone stock RDX Tech. package, but we do live in a hilly area so perhaps the wife is "riding" the brakes.
#3
Our 2009 RDX has only about 24K miles on it and at the last oil change our mechanic recommended we replace the rear brake pads. This seemed early to me, plus usually the fronts go first. A trip to our local Acura dealer confirmed this. Has anyone noticed unusually early rear brake pad wear? Our car is bone stock RDX Tech. package, but we do live in a hilly area so perhaps the wife is "riding" the brakes.
#4
Suzuka Master
Our 2009 RDX has only about 24K miles on it and at the last oil change our mechanic recommended we replace the rear brake pads. This seemed early to me, plus usually the fronts go first. A trip to our local Acura dealer confirmed this. Has anyone noticed unusually early rear brake pad wear? Our car is bone stock RDX Tech. package, but we do live in a hilly area so perhaps the wife is "riding" the brakes.
#5
StayAtHomeDad
50K on the original (unless they were changed before I got the car with 8500 miles) and no signs of trouble. I have been to the dealership many times and no recommendation has been made yet.
#6
Our 2009 RDX has only about 24K miles on it and at the last oil change our mechanic recommended we replace the rear brake pads. This seemed early to me, plus usually the fronts go first. A trip to our local Acura dealer confirmed this. Has anyone noticed unusually early rear brake pad wear? Our car is bone stock RDX Tech. package, but we do live in a hilly area so perhaps the wife is "riding" the brakes.
Noticed this unusual wear pattern on the Left Rear disc. Looks more like the wife drove with E-Brake on rather than early wear.
However, at 47k miles you can clearly see there is plenty of pad left. 24k is pretty fast for the RDX, but the driver/driving conditions can have drastic effects on the lifespan.
I would be on the lookout for anyone that tells you your brakes are 'shot', even if they feel soft to you, this does not mean they need to be replaced. If they are truely worn out chances are you will need to replace just the brake pads, and have the rotors turned (on the car). If someone tries to tell you that your calipers should be replaced too, ask them to show you why. And again, if you are not convinced they need replacing, get a second opinion. This is the 'red' flag that and inexperienced technician is working on your vehicle. Unless your vehicle has well over 100,000 miles on it, it's not likely that your calipers need replacement.
Get a second opinion just in case.
Last edited by Mr Marco; 04-02-2011 at 07:56 PM.
#7
Three Wheelin'
approaching 50,000 miles with plenty of pad left. remember brakes have nothing to do with mileage. its how you use them. i managed to use up all my pads on my corolla once in about 10,000 miles because i drove in so much stop and go traffic.
Trending Topics
#8
haole kama'a-ina
Originally Posted by RDXHenry
Our 2009 RDX has only about 24K miles on it and at the last oil change our mechanic recommended we replace the rear brake pads. This seemed early to me, plus usually the fronts go first.
Originally Posted by Mr Marco
Noticed this unusual wear pattern on the Left Rear disc. Looks more like the wife drove with E-Brake on rather than early wear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mada51589
3G TL Problems & Fixes
79
05-03-2022 08:54 PM
nanos
Car Parts for Sale
26
11-12-2015 08:41 PM