New models versus old
#1
New models versus old
I test drove a used 2012 RDX and may like it better than the revamped model. The handling, ride and visibility seemed more like my 2005 BMW X3 which I like but is getting expensive. The older models seem more dynamic than the plusher and quieter ride of the 2013-2014.
Any reasons why I should not go with the older model as opposed to the newer version? I remain hesitant about turbo charging and the pre-2013 are the only turbos Honda/Acura ever marketed in North America. Any other things I should look for?
My default choice is a 2014 Subaru Forester.
Any reasons why I should not go with the older model as opposed to the newer version? I remain hesitant about turbo charging and the pre-2013 are the only turbos Honda/Acura ever marketed in North America. Any other things I should look for?
My default choice is a 2014 Subaru Forester.
#3
Nail on head.
To OP, it's a very vague question to what's almost an apples to oranges debate/question. Like Marco said; go with older one for more a mature enthusiast experience and new one for the soccer mom/grocery getter experience.
As for your turbo concerns; car has been out for 6 years now and to my knowledge, haven't heard any recalls for blown blocks, destroyed motor mounts, fried trannies, etc. If you take care of it and don't hit the rev limiter every chance you get, you'll be fine. If you don't do mindless mods w/o proper research or testing, you'll be fine.
To OP, it's a very vague question to what's almost an apples to oranges debate/question. Like Marco said; go with older one for more a mature enthusiast experience and new one for the soccer mom/grocery getter experience.
As for your turbo concerns; car has been out for 6 years now and to my knowledge, haven't heard any recalls for blown blocks, destroyed motor mounts, fried trannies, etc. If you take care of it and don't hit the rev limiter every chance you get, you'll be fine. If you don't do mindless mods w/o proper research or testing, you'll be fine.
Last edited by x2lacrosse; 12-05-2013 at 03:00 PM.
#4
The old one with SH-AWD is a blast to drive though passengers will probably feel too bumpy. Sadly seems every luxury brand is softing nowadays for better sales.
The turbo in RDX is very reliable, unlike other turbo engines in the industry. The downside is it's kinda thirsty. The mileage is lower than what you normally expect for a turbo.
The new Forester I heard it's a nice car with a lot of great reviews. The only thing I don't like is its outdated look.
The turbo in RDX is very reliable, unlike other turbo engines in the industry. The downside is it's kinda thirsty. The mileage is lower than what you normally expect for a turbo.
The new Forester I heard it's a nice car with a lot of great reviews. The only thing I don't like is its outdated look.
#5
In addition to the 1G RDX being thirsty, it also requires a lot of expensive synthetic oil changes though coming from a bimmer, maintenance will likely still be cheaper. :-)
From my experience with a 2G loaner, the 3.5L is something I wished the 1G RDX had as I find it smoother and more linear but the ride while refined is no longer what I would classify as sporty. Handling is the 1G RDX's forte.
From my experience with a 2G loaner, the 3.5L is something I wished the 1G RDX had as I find it smoother and more linear but the ride while refined is no longer what I would classify as sporty. Handling is the 1G RDX's forte.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
CLOSED: 3G Acura TL Model Car(Blue)
bluetl04
Non-Automotive & Motorcycle Sales
12
08-16-2016 02:49 PM