New models versus old

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2013 | 02:36 PM
  #1  
Badenoch's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
New models versus old

I test drove a used 2012 RDX and may like it better than the revamped model. The handling, ride and visibility seemed more like my 2005 BMW X3 which I like but is getting expensive. The older models seem more dynamic than the plusher and quieter ride of the 2013-2014.

Any reasons why I should not go with the older model as opposed to the newer version? I remain hesitant about turbo charging and the pre-2013 are the only turbos Honda/Acura ever marketed in North America. Any other things I should look for?

My default choice is a 2014 Subaru Forester.
Old 11-25-2013 | 10:40 AM
  #2  
Mr Marco's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Likes: 609
You want a fun car to drive, or simply want to own a nicer Toyota?
Old 12-05-2013 | 02:55 PM
  #3  
x2lacrosse's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by Mr Marco
You want a fun car to drive, or simply want to own a nicer Toyota?
Nail on head.

To OP, it's a very vague question to what's almost an apples to oranges debate/question. Like Marco said; go with older one for more a mature enthusiast experience and new one for the soccer mom/grocery getter experience.

As for your turbo concerns; car has been out for 6 years now and to my knowledge, haven't heard any recalls for blown blocks, destroyed motor mounts, fried trannies, etc. If you take care of it and don't hit the rev limiter every chance you get, you'll be fine. If you don't do mindless mods w/o proper research or testing, you'll be fine.

Last edited by x2lacrosse; 12-05-2013 at 03:00 PM.
Old 01-16-2014 | 03:43 PM
  #4  
piggybox's Avatar
6th Gear
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
The old one with SH-AWD is a blast to drive though passengers will probably feel too bumpy. Sadly seems every luxury brand is softing nowadays for better sales.

The turbo in RDX is very reliable, unlike other turbo engines in the industry. The downside is it's kinda thirsty. The mileage is lower than what you normally expect for a turbo.

The new Forester I heard it's a nice car with a lot of great reviews. The only thing I don't like is its outdated look.
Old 01-16-2014 | 04:27 PM
  #5  
RDX Dad's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 4
In addition to the 1G RDX being thirsty, it also requires a lot of expensive synthetic oil changes though coming from a bimmer, maintenance will likely still be cheaper. :-)


From my experience with a 2G loaner, the 3.5L is something I wished the 1G RDX had as I find it smoother and more linear but the ride while refined is no longer what I would classify as sporty. Handling is the 1G RDX's forte.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
bluetl04
Non-Automotive & Motorcycle Sales
12
08-16-2016 02:49 PM
Recipe7
3G RLX (2013+)
45
12-07-2015 06:43 PM
Jinkazetsukai
2G RL (2005-2012)
6
11-21-2015 05:28 PM
c1souk
5G TLX (2015-2020)
17
09-28-2015 11:20 AM



Quick Reply: New models versus old



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.