"Just" Got it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2010, 09:38 AM
  #1  
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
PearlyWhite07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: York PA
Age: 47
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Just" Got it

Wanted to intro myself and ask a few questions. Just got this from the wife as she got a new Highlander.

I know that she has been using 89 octane for awhile (no matter how much bitchin' I did about it.) I was reading about lower octane fuel retarding the timing. Of course I'll be using nothing but 93 octane, but do I need to do anything to make up for her using 89?

Also, will be replacing the air filter. Anyone using the K&N and is it worth it.

Lastly, any tricks I need to know? I got rid of my 02 Audi A6 2.7t and it had a few tricks.

Thanks!

p.s. In York PA, any Acura heads out my way?
Old 03-25-2010, 09:59 AM
  #2  
mrgold35
 
mrgold35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 6,740
Received 1,517 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Hondata!!

http://www.hondata.com/reflash_rdx.html

Priced reduced to $295 (down from $695). You can't find a better mod than this. I'm reflashing the wife's RDX on Monday, 3/29/10.
Old 03-25-2010, 10:20 AM
  #3  
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
PearlyWhite07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: York PA
Age: 47
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ I was looking at doing that, didn't know the price had come down. Thanks.
Old 03-25-2010, 10:32 AM
  #4  
StayAtHomeDad
 
wrestrepo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Limbo
Posts: 2,165
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
If the Highlander is made to run on 89 there is no need to spend extra money and there is nothing to do to "make up for it", that's my opinion.

EDIT: I believe that the RDX is fine running on 91, so if you find it there is no harm in using that one either.
Old 03-25-2010, 12:24 PM
  #5  
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
PearlyWhite07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: York PA
Age: 47
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wrestrepo
If the Highlander is made to run on 89 there is no need to spend extra money and there is nothing to do to "make up for it", that's my opinion.

EDIT: I believe that the RDX is fine running on 91, so if you find it there is no harm in using that one either.
What I meant was that my wife (the previous "owner") has been using 89 octane in the RDX.
Old 03-25-2010, 12:29 PM
  #6  
StayAtHomeDad
 
wrestrepo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Limbo
Posts: 2,165
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by PearlyWhite07
What I meant was that my wife (the previous "owner") has been using 89 octane in the RDX.
got it....
Old 03-25-2010, 04:56 PM
  #7  
big shot.
 
MMike1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,706
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I have used the K&N air filter w/consistent results in MPG increases and subjective feelings of increased throttle response.

My review is cut short there because im not going to incite another riot about +/-'s of the K&N filter.

IMO - it works, and i feel differences with it and vs out. (i take it out seasonally - stock goes in for winters)
Old 03-25-2010, 04:58 PM
  #8  
big shot.
 
MMike1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,706
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
with the drop in price for hondata -there would really be no reason not to do it. Its basically the only cost effective aftermarket increase around. You could do an exhaust etc but they are hard to come by and will be at least dble the cost and not nearly as effective as the ECU tune.
Old 03-25-2010, 04:59 PM
  #9  
StayAtHomeDad
 
wrestrepo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Limbo
Posts: 2,165
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by MMike1981
I have used the K&N air filter w/consistent results in MPG increases and subjective feelings of increased throttle response.

My review is cut short there because im not going to incite another riot about +/-'s of the K&N filter.

IMO - it works, and i feel differences with it and vs out. (i take it out seasonally - stock goes in for winters)
I started that fire before.....
In Mike's defense, some people have praise for the KN, some other don't...to me is like religion.
In the end I decided to spend the 20 bucks on the paper filter and it works fine for me....but I have not tried the KN, so I cannot tell what's "best"
Old 03-25-2010, 06:56 PM
  #10  
2008 Honda Civic Mugen Si
 
PANG-S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lawton/Ft. Sill, Oklahoma
Age: 47
Posts: 57
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wow, I didn't know about the price drop also, until I read this thread. Thanks guys. So let me get this straight, if I send in my current ECU, will I need to reprogram the immobilizer or anything else when I get it back? Or it is it Plug and play?

This is very very tempting....
Old 03-25-2010, 08:28 PM
  #11  
Racer
 
bgillette79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Age: 44
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Love my KN drop it....Support it spending every penny on it. It pays for itself in fuel savings in a year. Then it is profit because you don't have to buy another filter ever!
Old 03-25-2010, 10:07 PM
  #12  
StayAtHomeDad
 
wrestrepo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Limbo
Posts: 2,165
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by bgillette79
Love my KN drop it....Support it spending every penny on it. It pays for itself in fuel savings in a year. Then it is profit because you don't have to buy another filter ever!
What you are failing to mention is that you do need to buy a filter maintenance kit.....so, you don't buy a filter, but you buy stuff to clean it.....
Old 03-25-2010, 11:00 PM
  #13  
big shot.
 
MMike1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,706
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
1 kit will last you about 10 cleans & oils..not like its a reason NOT to buy one...
-so if you are doing it lets say every 20k call it - well lol ya it does pay for itself, its 10 extra bucks for cleaner & oil
Old 03-26-2010, 07:07 AM
  #14  
StayAtHomeDad
 
wrestrepo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Limbo
Posts: 2,165
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Here is the thing Mike, I got my first change around 30K based on the MID. The KN is something like $50 and the cleaning kit is $15, so let's call it $65. I would need to do three changes (paper filter around $20) to make it even, that's 90K miles.
I think that the return on investment (without taking in consideration the increased response and savings in gas mileage) may not do it for me. With the paper I open the hood, drop the new one in and walk away. I don't know what cleaning the KN means, but at the very least takes more of my time.

I am not advocating for using paper Vs KN, I am just saying that for ME it was not worth it.
Old 03-26-2010, 09:14 AM
  #15  
big shot.
 
MMike1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,706
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
running my 3rd tank after just recently switching my K&N - 190 miles @ 1/2 tank -- stock is ROUTINE 140-150, always.
Old 03-26-2010, 09:54 AM
  #16  
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
PearlyWhite07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: York PA
Age: 47
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm going with paper this time, will probably pony up for k&n next time.
Old 03-27-2010, 04:10 PM
  #17  
Instructor
 
zerogravity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bronx , N.Y
Age: 46
Posts: 218
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by PANG-S2
Wow, I didn't know about the price drop also, until I read this thread. Thanks guys. So let me get this straight, if I send in my current ECU, will I need to reprogram the immobilizer or anything else when I get it back? Or it is it Plug and play?

This is very very tempting....
No one answered this question. I would also like to know
Old 03-27-2010, 04:44 PM
  #18  
Instructor
 
crazycated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Reno' NV
Posts: 238
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
No programing just plug and play .




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.