Why spend 50k on a fully loaded, four-seater EX? Because it's fast? Actually, it's slow compared to THE enthusiasts' machine. Want AWD? Check. Want neck-snapping acceleration? Check. Want four seats? Check. Want double-clutch technology? Check. Want first-class cockpit with different modes for transmission and suspension? Check. Navigation? HIDs? Check check CHECK! Want to run with or surpass the Porsche 911 Turbo, Vette Z06, Ferrari F40, and anything Lamborghini makes without spending low to mid six figures? Check. Oh yeah, an unlike cars in its class, it has a trunk.

Your car, gentlemen. My new DREAM CAR:

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=124017

 

0-60 in 3.3

 

GTR's are sweet for sure. I wonder how much dealers are going to be asking over sticker.

 

Halfway through your post, I thought you were going to end with "IT'S THE RDX", but you totally got me with the GT-R haha.

 

Its an amazing car, but a sports car without a clutch pedal just doesn't seem right to me.

Yeah, yeah, I know that the sequential paddles are superior in many ways, but even if I had the means, I'd never buy this car because of it.

 

I was thinking the same thing... So where IS the connection to the RDX? Or is this just a random thread that doesn't belong here?

Mike

 

How about that launch control? I have to start saving now! My kid doesn't need to go to college. He can join the army.

 

Sorry, but this car is ugly. It looks so, Japanese. The NSX was a much better looking Japanese sports car. And the current Z is much better looking. If I'm spending 75-ish, I'm buying German. The new BMW M3 is 10X the car. Sorry.

 

What a useless thread.

 

This car is in a different park than the EX35..

both are cool though...

 

Well, the car is Japanese to start out with...thats probably why it looks Japanese?

 

Great car, but nothing to do with the RDX. Please take it to CarTalk in Off-Topic.