Hypermiling the RDX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2008 | 10:14 PM
  #1  
XLR8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 377
From: Orion Spur, Milky Way
Hypermiling the RDX

Some reasonable techniques are sound:

A) Using side roads to avoid frequent stops and starts. Running at a more constant rpm is most efficient.

B) Reducing cruising speed by 10mph. Lower cruising rpm means fewer combustion strokes per mile.

Other hypermiling techniques are unsound and dangerous:

A) Pulse and glide or coast with forced stop. Switching the RDX ICE off (IG1) and back to Run without start (IG2) for neutral coasting leaves no steering or brake boost and runs the risk of locking the steering column.

B) Inflating the tires to 40psi, 50psi or more. While this sharpens turn-in response and increases fuel efficiency, it does so to the detriment of tire wear and overall grip due to the decreased contact patch area. The contact patch is narrower and the vehicle is riding on the center rib of the tread.

It is true that auto-crossers over-inflate but that is specifically for turn response at the expense of grip, and they don't drive home that way.

It's also true that German manufacturers advise over-inflation for the autobahn, but that is specifically for high speed temperature stability due to rapid sidewall deformation cycles, and it comes at the expense of grip and reduced load capability. Autobahn over-inflation is typically 5 to 7 psi above normal, and well within the max cold rated sidewall pressure.

Some hypermilers have stated that they see less tire wear, or make bizarre claims of no tire wear. This may be attributed to:

A) They don't know how to measure tire wear, or are looking just at the edge blocks and fail to see that the center rib is gone.

B) Some kind of eco-Green trance-like state in which -- like Lewis Carroll's White Queen -- they can believe impossible things.

Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 02:06 PM
  #2  
oasis3582's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
Do you ACTUALLY do any of this? Please tell me no.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #3  
XLR8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 377
From: Orion Spur, Milky Way
Originally Posted by oasis3582
Do you ACTUALLY do any of this? Please tell me no.
Originally Posted by XLR8R
Other hypermiling techniques are unsound and dangerous:
How's that Reading and Comprehension thing workin' for ya?

(With apologies to Dr. Phil)
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #4  
oasis3582's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
I was referring to the first two.
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #5  
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 4
From: Malvern, PA
Gotta call you on this one. Since engine speed is directly proportional to axle speed, the same number of combustion cycles per mile regardless of speed. Aerodynamic losses are proportionally lower at lower speeds, however.

Joe
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #6  
XLR8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 377
From: Orion Spur, Milky Way
Originally Posted by scudzuki
Gotta call you on this one. Since engine speed is directly proportional to axle speed, the same number of combustion cycles per mile regardless of speed. Aerodynamic losses are proportionally lower at lower speeds, however.

Joe
Good call. Thanks for correcting that.

I should have said engine loading for a given rpm is higher at higher speed, with an accompanying increase in inlet airflow and injected fuel.
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #7  
wrzt's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by scudzuki
Gotta call you on this one. Since engine speed is directly proportional to axle speed, the same number of combustion cycles per mile regardless of speed. Aerodynamic losses are proportionally lower at lower speeds, however.

Joe
Correct me if I am wrong Joe, but what you are saying only holds true while in gear. If you are in coasting in neutral, engine speed is no longer in direct proportion to axle speed. With minimal drag and/or friction, axle speed while in neutral can actually be higher than the engine speed.
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #8  
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 4
From: Malvern, PA
Of course that is true, engine speed idling in neutral is... idling. Coasting in neutral... how much of that do you get away with? My statement meant gear for gear i.e. in 3rd gear, the engine is spinning twice as fast at 50 MPH as it is at 25 MPH. I sure wouldn't mind coasting around all day. If only the roads I drive to and from work were like an Escher painting... where I could drive downhill to and from work... now that's a commute I could live with.

Joe
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 07:45 AM
  #9  
Fishbulb's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
I don't understand why someone would buy a fairly expensive performance oriented vehicle, and spend its life trying to drive it like a Prius.

If money is an issue because of gas prices, sell it and get something cheaper.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 08:45 AM
  #10  
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 4
From: Malvern, PA
Personally, I'm mindful of keeping my foot out of the gas when I'm NOT trying to go fast in order to keep the average economy up, but I have no reservations about jamming it in sport shift mode and manu-matic-ing it through the twisties to keep 'er on the pipe (gotta keep the motor in the sweet spot for the SH-AWD to deliver its potential), or to pass some knucklehead wobbling along at 10 MPH under the speed limit.

Joe
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #11  
oasis3582's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by Fishbulb
I don't understand why someone would buy a fairly expensive performance oriented vehicle, and spend its life trying to drive it like a Prius.

If money is an issue because of gas prices, sell it and get something cheaper.
My point exactly.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 02:46 PM
  #12  
mtxjohn's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by XLR8R
Some reasonable techniques are sound:

A) Using side roads to avoid frequent stops and starts. Running at a more constant rpm is most efficient.

B) Reducing cruising speed by 10mph. Lower cruising rpm means fewer combustion strokes per mile.

Other hypermiling techniques are unsound and dangerous:

A) Pulse and glide or coast with forced stop. Switching the RDX ICE off (IG1) and back to Run without start (IG2) for neutral coasting leaves no steering or brake boost and runs the risk of locking the steering column.

B) Inflating the tires to 40psi, 50psi or more. While this sharpens turn-in response and increases fuel efficiency, it does so to the detriment of tire wear and overall grip due to the decreased contact patch area. The contact patch is narrower and the vehicle is riding on the center rib of the tread.

It is true that auto-crossers over-inflate but that is specifically for turn response at the expense of grip, and they don't drive home that way.

It's also true that German manufacturers advise over-inflation for the autobahn, but that is specifically for high speed temperature stability due to rapid sidewall deformation cycles, and it comes at the expense of grip and reduced load capability. Autobahn over-inflation is typically 5 to 7 psi above normal, and well within the max cold rated sidewall pressure.

Some hypermilers have stated that they see less tire wear, or make bizarre claims of no tire wear. This may be attributed to:

A) They don't know how to measure tire wear, or are looking just at the edge blocks and fail to see that the center rib is gone.

B) Some kind of eco-Green trance-like state in which -- like Lewis Carroll's White Queen -- they can believe impossible things.

This is easily the most ignorant, incorrect, and ill-informed post about hypermiling I've ever seen. How unfortunate when I googled "hypermiling the RDX" this is what comes up. I don't have the time or energy to dispute how extremely wrong all this is but I'll choose a few points. Obv the OP is clueless about all things performance related. Currently I'm destroying the EPA ratings by getting 50% better than EPA in my RSX-S. Overinflation-google it dude. 32PSI is a scam so you'll waste gas and buy more tires. Most police departments inflate to 44psi or 50PSI in training vehicles because it dramatically improves tire life and slighly improves MPG. It does this because there is less heat created with higher inflation. Modern tires have steel belts and they dont wear out in the middle from high PSI. The contact patch does not get narrower with increased inflation. It gets shorter due to the vehicle "rising" when inflated. This is great for wet traction but not for dry. You probably think people put wider tires on cars to increase the contact patch dont you? Please don't post your ignorance as facts online. I'm not a huge frequenter of Acurazine but I know there is a lot of good info here by other posters.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 08:23 PM
  #13  
XLR8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 377
From: Orion Spur, Milky Way
...and with that we have have been provided a rare insight -- self disclosed, no less -- into the "physics-free" zone of the Hyper-miler.

Last edited by XLR8R; Sep 7, 2010 at 08:28 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
navtool.com
Sponsored Sales & Group Buys
87
Jan 23, 2016 01:25 PM
adrian_s2k
1G RDX (2007-2012)
23
Jan 12, 2016 04:25 PM
San Yasin
2G RDX (2013-2018)
21
Sep 29, 2015 10:52 AM
dirleton
2G RDX (2013-2018)
6
Sep 29, 2015 08:26 AM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
Sep 27, 2015 06:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.