Dynoed results for 11-29-03 (before race tomorrow)
11-29-2003, 12:16 PM
#1
fastest time 13.4@107 !!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: charlotte north carolina
Age: 44
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynoed results for 11-29-03 (before race tomorrow)
well once again i have big fuel problems.. between 4000rpms and 4700rpms the air/fuel GOES WAY LEAN 18.5 SPRAYING
other than the rpm rang above, the air/fuel wasn't too bad about 13.1
it dynoed 250hp and 277lbs of torque......(to the wheels with the 125 shot... bottle pressure was 1000
overall i happy with the number but not the air/fuel...
hopefully she won't blow tomorrow
other than the rpm rang above, the air/fuel wasn't too bad about 13.1
it dynoed 250hp and 277lbs of torque......(to the wheels with the 125 shot... bottle pressure was 1000
overall i happy with the number but not the air/fuel...
hopefully she won't blow tomorrow
11-29-2003, 05:35 PM
#6
-S namyaC-
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Something doesn't seem right about the HP. You should have around 195-200hp NA - then at least 100whp if the N2O shot is crank HP. So that should be around 300whp, no? I'm confused. 
11-29-2003, 07:28 PM
#7
In Da LBC with Snoop Dogg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Long Beach, Cali Baby!
Age: 55
Posts: 2,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by proaudio22
Something doesn't seem right about the HP. You should have around 195-200hp NA - then at least 100whp if the N2O shot is crank HP. So that should be around 300whp, no? I'm confused.
Something doesn't seem right about the HP. You should have around 195-200hp NA - then at least 100whp if the N2O shot is crank HP. So that should be around 300whp, no? I'm confused.
Does this make any sense?
Trending Topics
11-29-2003, 07:31 PM
#8
Commander in Chief
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Howell, NJ
Age: 44
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dajuice27
it's just an average amount of N20 scientifically estimated to be sprayed into your engine for a guestimated total amunt of horsepower per application.
Does this make any sense?
it's just an average amount of N20 scientifically estimated to be sprayed into your engine for a guestimated total amunt of horsepower per application.
Does this make any sense?
11-29-2003, 07:47 PM
#9
-S namyaC-
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dajuice27
Theoretically, yes he should have around 200 to the wheels before spraying, but you have to factor in the roughly 20% of power loss contributed to the automatic tranny, so the claimed 20-30 hp you were to get from the Headers are actually closer to 16-24 hp. Then you have other factors as altitude, outside air temperature, condition of vehicles motor (he did say he was running way too lean) and other things that could reduce the estimated horsepower even more. Then, the 125 shot of gas is not truly an exact 125 hp gain. There is no true way to accurately measure the output of the N2) for every engine, some will get more gas, others less, it's just an average amount of N20 scientifically estimated to be sprayed into your engine for a guestimated total amunt of horsepower per application.
Does this make any sense?
Theoretically, yes he should have around 200 to the wheels before spraying, but you have to factor in the roughly 20% of power loss contributed to the automatic tranny, so the claimed 20-30 hp you were to get from the Headers are actually closer to 16-24 hp. Then you have other factors as altitude, outside air temperature, condition of vehicles motor (he did say he was running way too lean) and other things that could reduce the estimated horsepower even more. Then, the 125 shot of gas is not truly an exact 125 hp gain. There is no true way to accurately measure the output of the N2) for every engine, some will get more gas, others less, it's just an average amount of N20 scientifically estimated to be sprayed into your engine for a guestimated total amunt of horsepower per application.
Does this make any sense?
I do understand what your saying, but I still think he should have 50 or so more whp. Tq looks nice tho. I wish I that kinda # all the time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM