Is the 1999 2.3 CL Governed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2003, 01:55 PM
  #1  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
robertpel9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the 1999 2.3 CL Governed

I have a 99 2.3 and also a Corvette. I recently wanted to see what i could get the CL up to and founf that at 114 MPH whether it was uphill, downhill whatever. the car stopped accelerating. I am assuming this is electronically controlled but i have read to the contrary. Why does the car stopp accelerating at 114. It doesn't cut out or anything and is only turning about 4500-5000 rpm's. The car runs like it's brand new. I just find it odd as 114 is pretty slow. I don't expect it to do anywhere near what the vette does as i run out of balls before i run out of HP with that car but my old 2.0 eclipse would hit 130. What gives????
Old 06-04-2003, 02:00 PM
  #2  
23
Racer
 
23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago IL
Age: 43
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have pinned the speed'o on mine past the 140 mark multiple times so I would say something is wrong with yours.
Old 06-04-2003, 02:31 PM
  #3  
HOOK EM HORNS
 
HyDrOpOnIkToKa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas
Age: 43
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive gotten mine to 140 so i dont know why it would stop at 114, mines standard,, yours??
Old 06-04-2003, 02:44 PM
  #4  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
robertpel9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no i have an automatic and there is nothing wrong with the engine. it consumes no fluids, make no noises, accelerates like any other 2.3 i have driven. Any thoughts??? These things only have 150 HP so i dont expect it to go that fast in fact i think 140 is stretching it but i would think somewhere arounf 125-130 would be the norm. Why mine stops at 114 i dont know, anyone with info please advise
Old 06-04-2003, 03:01 PM
  #5  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
robertpel9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all the car test website state the top speed at 126. I tested mine out at the top of the berkshire mountains almost 1/2 mile above sea level. perhaps that was the difference. I guess i answered my own question that the top speed is 126 anyone disagree??
Old 06-04-2003, 05:49 PM
  #6  
Senior Moderator
 
DaInFaMMuS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Central FL...PSU Nittany Lion
Age: 40
Posts: 7,979
Received 79 Likes on 71 Posts
i disagree cuz ive gotten my 2.3 all the way to the 140 mark before and mine is stock
Old 06-04-2003, 09:32 PM
  #7  
Pro
 
Leon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 23
I have pinned the speed'o on mine past the 140 mark multiple times so I would say something is wrong with yours.
Me 2!
Old 06-04-2003, 09:59 PM
  #8  
i want a bimmer =(
 
Katies99CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Age: 43
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have a 99 2.3
it's auto...and competely stock engine wise....and i have taken it up to 120...but then i backed off
Old 06-05-2003, 10:14 AM
  #9  
cmng 2 a lawschool near u
 
KC CL 1785's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kansas City
Age: 39
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I actually dont know, I know that I can get it up to 125, but after that I get pretty scared so I let off.
Old 06-05-2003, 10:23 PM
  #10  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
robertpel9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what the hell is wrong with my car then. I tried again and it stopped accelerating right around 115. The car runs beeautifully, no fluid consumption, good gas mileage no discernable problems. What gives????
Old 06-05-2003, 11:33 PM
  #11  
10th Gear
 
4shizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: i wish i knew
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know that in mine if i punch it at 70 when it is still in 3rd that it sont top out ( or at least my speedo doesnt go that far ) but if i get it up to 95 100 and punch it then it drops into 4th and only does about 115 it is weird but who knows? I HOPE THAT IS UR PROBLEM IF IT ISNT I HAVE NO CLUE
Old 06-06-2003, 10:52 PM
  #12  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
robertpel9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 4shizzle
i know that in mine if i punch it at 70 when it is still in 3rd that it sont top out ( or at least my speedo doesnt go that far ) but if i get it up to 95 100 and punch it then it drops into 4th and only does about 115 it is weird but who knows? I HOPE THAT IS UR PROBLEM IF IT ISNT I HAVE NO CLUE
thats the way mine is. if i am going 80 and then floor it i only get to 115 then i am out of speed
Old 06-07-2003, 12:45 PM
  #13  
Seminole Fan
 
DirtyHarryFSU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Age: 41
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by robertpel9
no i have an automatic and there is nothing wrong with the engine. it consumes no fluids, make no noises, accelerates like any other 2.3 i have driven. Any thoughts??? These things only have 150 HP so i dont expect it to go that fast in fact i think 140 is stretching it but i would think somewhere arounf 125-130 would be the norm. Why mine stops at 114 i dont know, anyone with info please advise
I also have a 99 auto 2.3 with a short ram as the only performance mod. I've gotten up to 119 before I backed off - I know I had power to go faster. I'm not sure what's up with yours.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gator90065
2G TL Problems & Fixes
9
10-08-2015 10:14 AM
Matthew Purpura
1G CL (1997-1999)
3
09-25-2015 06:10 PM
michaellong77
1G CL Problems & Fixes
0
09-11-2015 12:54 AM



Quick Reply: Is the 1999 2.3 CL Governed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.