1998 3.0CL, is it OBD2a or OBD2b ECU?
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Age: 42
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1998 3.0CL, is it OBD2a or OBD2b ECU?
I've done some googling and I can't seem to find a definite answer so I want to ask it here. Is the 1998 3.0 an a or b OBD2 ECU? I know it's OBD2 but I'm not sure. My googling seems to say that it's OBD2b but I need more evidence. Why do I want to know you ask, well I was trying to install my VAFC and discovered that I have no play at all on the wires to work with, so I can either my a long tedious task much longer and much more tedious by adding slack to each end of the wires or make it literally plug and play with the harness. Being that I got the VAFC for cheap and the harnesses are on clearance I'm gonna save myself alot of work, time, sanity and take away the risk that I fuck the whole thing up and just buy the harness. I'm still doing it myself but it's gonna be way easier!! Now I just need to figure out how to mount my vafc.
#5
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Age: 42
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OH yeah in my search i read about that. They called it OBDIII and they want to basically force you to get your car fixed if something goes wrong and it starts polluting to much. basically they try to limit your top speed and maybe other things, hold on I'll find it.
Here it is:
That's some crazy shit, huh!
Here it is:
OBD-III
As covered in the last section, OBD-II does a good job of monitoring for malfunctions. So good that emissions experts are looking into the possibility of eliminating the annual tailpipe test if they could figure out a way to get a customer to bring a car in for repair when the MIL illuminates. This next generation of OBD-II cars that report malfunctions are usually referred to as OBD-III cars. The implementation of this type of system is a long ways off, not because of the technology, but because of civil liberty, freedom, and liability issues. The goal of OBD-III is to minimize the time delay between detection of a malfunction by the OBD-III system and the actual repair of the vehicle. Some of the reporting technologies that are being studied are:
External Signal
The car would have some type of external indicator (like a light) that would indicate the car was being driven around with an illuminated MIL. Apparently the Visit Our Website: www.tech2tech.net Page idea was to "shame" the owner into getting the car fixed. The civil liberties organizations and the manufacturers are fighting this one. This idea will not be one that will make it!
Driveability Modification
The idea to start having the car change its driveability the longer the owner went without getting the car fixed. Something like slowly reduce the top speed until the car is repaired. The civil liberties organizations and the manufacturers are fighting this one too and it is highly unlikely that this idea will be used either.
On-Board Transmitter
If there is ever going to be an OBD-III, it will probably use an on-board transmitter to report a MIL light on. The technology is available to handle this. The most likely version will be the use of a roadside receiver to "query" cars as they pass. GM Hughes Electronics has already tested a roadside unit that can check every car on an eight lane interstate going 100 MPH. A violating car will transmit its VIN and stored DTCs to the roadside receiver.
As covered in the last section, OBD-II does a good job of monitoring for malfunctions. So good that emissions experts are looking into the possibility of eliminating the annual tailpipe test if they could figure out a way to get a customer to bring a car in for repair when the MIL illuminates. This next generation of OBD-II cars that report malfunctions are usually referred to as OBD-III cars. The implementation of this type of system is a long ways off, not because of the technology, but because of civil liberty, freedom, and liability issues. The goal of OBD-III is to minimize the time delay between detection of a malfunction by the OBD-III system and the actual repair of the vehicle. Some of the reporting technologies that are being studied are:
External Signal
The car would have some type of external indicator (like a light) that would indicate the car was being driven around with an illuminated MIL. Apparently the Visit Our Website: www.tech2tech.net Page idea was to "shame" the owner into getting the car fixed. The civil liberties organizations and the manufacturers are fighting this one. This idea will not be one that will make it!
Driveability Modification
The idea to start having the car change its driveability the longer the owner went without getting the car fixed. Something like slowly reduce the top speed until the car is repaired. The civil liberties organizations and the manufacturers are fighting this one too and it is highly unlikely that this idea will be used either.
On-Board Transmitter
If there is ever going to be an OBD-III, it will probably use an on-board transmitter to report a MIL light on. The technology is available to handle this. The most likely version will be the use of a roadside receiver to "query" cars as they pass. GM Hughes Electronics has already tested a roadside unit that can check every car on an eight lane interstate going 100 MPH. A violating car will transmit its VIN and stored DTCs to the roadside receiver.
#6
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Age: 42
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh yeah and I ordered the obd2b harness for my vafc. Thanks guys. Feel free to do hijack or do what you wish with this thread!! Post Whore it up!!
#7
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Can you post a link of where you got the harness from?
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Your 97 3.0 is an obd2
I think it's an A though, anyone know for sure?
I think it's an A though, anyone know for sure?
#11
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Alright, in my searching so far, I've found that the 97 and 98 ecu are the same part number from ack automotive parts, but I need to know for sure. Ghost, you work at a honda dealer, anyway you can find out for sure if the 97's are obd2 A or B for me?
Or anyone, help a brother out
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#14
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by SilverCL97
96-97 accord = obd2a - 97 CLs
98-02 accord = obd2b - 98+ CLs
98-02 accord = obd2b - 98+ CLs
![Genius](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/genius.gif)
#16
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by SilverCL97
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
thats all i got
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cycdaniel
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
8
12-17-2019 10:58 AM