MDX vs. X5 vs. ?
04-09-2012, 04:47 PM
#41
04-11-2012, 07:17 PM
#42
Drifting
Automobile has a test of the BMWX5, MDX and Infiniti J35 on their site now. They picked the MDX.
04-11-2012, 08:03 PM
#43
04-11-2012, 08:30 PM
#44
2nd Gear
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I own a BMW 330ci and an MDX, so I have a good perspective on the two manufacturers. I love the MDX for my family vehicle. Value and third row seat were important for me. I bought mine in 2009 and most extended reviews of SUVs ranked the MDX first, regardless of price. One of the reviews I read was based on a three-month driving test in Minnesota. I like having a BMW sedan and the MDX family vehicle - good combination. I wish I could switch to the TL for the sedan, but front-wheel drive on a performance sedan is a deal-breaker for me (no offense to TL owners - I've driven them as loaners and they are great cars).
04-13-2012, 10:05 AM
#46
Drifting
I own a BMW 330ci and an MDX, so I have a good perspective on the two manufacturers. I love the MDX for my family vehicle. Value and third row seat were important for me. I bought mine in 2009 and most extended reviews of SUVs ranked the MDX first, regardless of price. One of the reviews I read was based on a three-month driving test in Minnesota. I like having a BMW sedan and the MDX family vehicle - good combination. I wish I could switch to the TL for the sedan, but front-wheel drive on a performance sedan is a deal-breaker for me (no offense to TL owners - I've driven them as loaners and they are great cars).
04-13-2012, 07:18 PM
#47
I just came from a 2010 BMW X5 diesel. There are two things I miss about it, but many others that I don't.
What I miss:
1. The multi-contour seats are simply the best seats available from any manufacturer. The Acura seats are not very good.
2. The diesel mpg, at 26-28 mpg's hwy, is awesome for a vehicle that size
What I don't miss:
1. The growing proliferation of incompetent BMW technicians
2. The crappy paint (scratches with the slightest rub from anything)
3. The fact that mine was in the shop almost 40 days since last October
4. $130 oil changes
5. Cost of repairs out of warranty
6. etc...
I went with the MDX because of it's value, reliability, sweet v6, standard 3rd row seat, and unmistakeable looks.
What I miss:
1. The multi-contour seats are simply the best seats available from any manufacturer. The Acura seats are not very good.
2. The diesel mpg, at 26-28 mpg's hwy, is awesome for a vehicle that size
What I don't miss:
1. The growing proliferation of incompetent BMW technicians
2. The crappy paint (scratches with the slightest rub from anything)
3. The fact that mine was in the shop almost 40 days since last October
4. $130 oil changes
5. Cost of repairs out of warranty
6. etc...
I went with the MDX because of it's value, reliability, sweet v6, standard 3rd row seat, and unmistakeable looks.
The following users liked this post:
ctsport (08-10-2012)
04-14-2012, 05:54 PM
#48
Racer
I just came from a 2010 BMW X5 diesel. There are two things I miss about it, but many others that I don't.
What I miss:
1. The multi-contour seats are simply the best seats available from any manufacturer. The Acura seats are not very good.
2. The diesel mpg, at 26-28 mpg's hwy, is awesome for a vehicle that size
What I don't miss:
1. The growing proliferation of incompetent BMW technicians
2. The crappy paint (scratches with the slightest rub from anything)
3. The fact that mine was in the shop almost 40 days since last October
4. $130 oil changes
5. Cost of repairs out of warranty
6. etc...
I went with the MDX because of it's value, reliability, sweet v6, standard 3rd row seat, and unmistakeable looks.
What I miss:
1. The multi-contour seats are simply the best seats available from any manufacturer. The Acura seats are not very good.
2. The diesel mpg, at 26-28 mpg's hwy, is awesome for a vehicle that size
What I don't miss:
1. The growing proliferation of incompetent BMW technicians
2. The crappy paint (scratches with the slightest rub from anything)
3. The fact that mine was in the shop almost 40 days since last October
4. $130 oil changes
5. Cost of repairs out of warranty
6. etc...
I went with the MDX because of it's value, reliability, sweet v6, standard 3rd row seat, and unmistakeable looks.
04-16-2012, 11:35 AM
#49
Pro
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 40
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I agree with BOYCE.
I just traded in my 2007 BMW X5 for a 2010 MDX Tech. The BMW is such a rough ride, it was an SUV for 2 people. Anyone sitting in the bench seat would be uncomfortable. The MDX is def the best choice for a family. Ive only had it for a week now and its soo much more comfortable than my X5. It drives awesome, and quite frankly, its the best bang for your buck. I'm really happy with my decision to get rid of the X5 for an MDX.
I just traded in my 2007 BMW X5 for a 2010 MDX Tech. The BMW is such a rough ride, it was an SUV for 2 people. Anyone sitting in the bench seat would be uncomfortable. The MDX is def the best choice for a family. Ive only had it for a week now and its soo much more comfortable than my X5. It drives awesome, and quite frankly, its the best bang for your buck. I'm really happy with my decision to get rid of the X5 for an MDX.
The following users liked this post:
ctsport (08-10-2012)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IIDXholic
3G RLX (2013+)
23
10-19-2015 09:40 PM
