US ISPs Agree to "Six Strikes" Copyright Enforcement Plan
#1
Sanest Florida Man
Thread Starter
![Exclamation](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon4.gif)
American Internet users, get ready for three strikes "six strikes." Major US Internet providers—including AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, Cablevision, and Time Warner Cable—have just signed on to a voluntary agreement with the movie and music businesses to crack down on online copyright infringers. But they will protect subscriber privacy and they won't filter or monitor their own networks for infringement. And after the sixth "strike," you won't necessarily be "out."
Much of the scheme mirrors what ISPs do now. Copyright holders will scan the 'Net for infringement, grabbing suspect IP addresses from peer-to-peer file-sharing networks. If they see your IP address participating in a swarm for, say, Transformers, they will look up that IP address to see which ISP controls it, then fire off a message.
ISPs have committed to forward such notices to subscribers—though, crucially, they won't turn over actual subscriber names or addresses without a court order. This is a one-way notification process.
The agreement puts heavy emphasis on "education," going so far as to recast this behavior as some "right to know" on the part of parents unaware of a child's P2P activity. According to today's announcement materials, the goal is to "educate and stop the alleged content theft in question, not to punish. No ISP wants to lose a customer or see a customer face legal trouble based on a misunderstanding, so the alert system provides every opportunity to set the record straight."
It would be much easier to see "education" focus as a principled stand by content owners if they hadn't spent years suing such end users, securing absurd multi-million dollar judgments in cases that they are still pursuing in court. As it is, the shift looks more like a pragmatic attempt to solve a real problem through less aggressive measures after the failure of scorched earth tactics.
In addition, the ISPs were never going to go along with draconian penalties imposed on their own paying customers. The end result, then, is actually a fairly sensible system arrived at years too late, after infringement has already begun its shift away from easily-monitored P2P networks to HTTP streaming and one-click download services which can't be so easily monitored by third parties.
The result is "copyright alerts," a series of messages warning users that their (alleged) activity has been detected and that penalties could result if it continues. These notes continue repeatedly—two, three, even four warnings likely won't result in any penalties—but the scheme certainly does have a punitive component.
ISPs have agreed to institute "mitigation measures" (or, as you and I know them, punishments) based on the collected say-so of copyright holders. These measures begin with the fifth or six alert, and they may include "temporary reductions of Internet speeds, redirection to a landing page until the subscriber contacts the ISP to discuss the matter or reviews and responds to some educational information about copyright, or other measures that the ISP may deem necessary to help resolve the matter."
There is no requirement that ISPs disconnect a user's Internet connection at any point, and indeed ISPs say they will refuse any measure that might cut off a user's phone service, e-mail access, "or any security or health service (such as home security or medical monitoring)." But ISPs are free to disconnect users if they wish (as indeed they have always been).
As such approaches go, this one sounds fairly sane, and ISPs certainly claim the rights to take such actions in their terms of service. The stated goal is to provide enough "education" that the punishment stick can stay in the shed, but there's no avoiding the fact that the "mitigation measures" are the result of private, unverified accusations not vetted by a judiciary. Depending on your view of Internet access—is it a human right as some in the UN think?—such private countermeasures on infringement may look problematic. (The French courts also demanded that any tough measures by ISPs come only after judicial scrutiny, though their system is actually administered by the government; this one, run voluntarily, is not.)
An appeals process does at least exist. Before a "mitigation measure" is taken, users can request an independent review of the accusation, but not from a judge; it remains unclear who exactly will handle the appeal. To keep everyone from using the system every time, there's a $35 filing fee (which can be waived by the independent reviewer). In addition, subscribers can always still sue their ISP in court.
Baby steps to mitigation
The complete list of "alert" steps is included below for your reading pleasure:
First Alert: In response to a notice from a copyright owner, an ISP will send an online alert to a subscriber, such as an email, notifying the subscriber that his/her account may have been misused for content theft, that content theft is illegal and a violation of published policies, and that consequences could result from any such conduct. This first alert will also direct the subscriber to educational resources which will (i) help him/her to check the security of his/her computer and any Wifi network, (ii) provide explanatory steps which will help to avoid content theft in the future and (iii) provide information about the abundant sources of lawful music, film and TV content.
Second Alert: If the alleged activity persists despite the receipt of the first alert, the subscriber may get a second similar alert that will underscore the educational messages, or the ISP may in its discretion proceed to the next alert.
Third Alert: If the subscribers account again appears to have been used for content theft, he/she will receive another alert, much like the initial alerts. However, this alert will provide a conspicuous mechanism (a click-through pop-up notice, landing page, or similar mechanism) asking the subscriber to acknowledge receipt of this alert. This is designed to ensure that the subscriber is aware of the third copyright alert and reminds the subscriber that content theft conducted through their account could lead to consequences under the law and published policies.
Fourth Alert: If the subscribers account again appears to have been used for content theft, the subscriber will receive yet another alert that again requires the subscriber to acknowledge receipt.
Fifth Alert: If the subscribers account again appears to have been used for content theft, the ISP will send yet another alert. At this time, the ISP may take one of several steps, specified in its published policies, reasonably calculated to stop future content theft. These steps, referred to as Mitigation Measures, may include, for example: temporary reductions of Internet speeds, redirection to a landing page until the subscriber contacts the ISP to discuss the matter or reviews and responds to some educational information about copyright, or other measures that the ISP may deem necessary to help resolve the matter. ISPs are not obligated to impose any Mitigation Measure which would disable or be reasonably likely to disable the subscribers voice telephone service (including the ability to call 911), e-mail account, or any security or health service (such as home security or medical monitoring). The use of the mitigation measure is waivable by the ISP at this point.
Sixth Alert: Whether or not the ISP has previously waived the Mitigation Measure, if the subscribers account again appears to have been used for content theft, the ISP will send another alert and will implement a Mitigation Measure as described above. As described above, it's likely that very few subscribers who after having received multiple alerts, will persist (or allow others to persist) in the content theft.
Much of the scheme mirrors what ISPs do now. Copyright holders will scan the 'Net for infringement, grabbing suspect IP addresses from peer-to-peer file-sharing networks. If they see your IP address participating in a swarm for, say, Transformers, they will look up that IP address to see which ISP controls it, then fire off a message.
ISPs have committed to forward such notices to subscribers—though, crucially, they won't turn over actual subscriber names or addresses without a court order. This is a one-way notification process.
The agreement puts heavy emphasis on "education," going so far as to recast this behavior as some "right to know" on the part of parents unaware of a child's P2P activity. According to today's announcement materials, the goal is to "educate and stop the alleged content theft in question, not to punish. No ISP wants to lose a customer or see a customer face legal trouble based on a misunderstanding, so the alert system provides every opportunity to set the record straight."
It would be much easier to see "education" focus as a principled stand by content owners if they hadn't spent years suing such end users, securing absurd multi-million dollar judgments in cases that they are still pursuing in court. As it is, the shift looks more like a pragmatic attempt to solve a real problem through less aggressive measures after the failure of scorched earth tactics.
In addition, the ISPs were never going to go along with draconian penalties imposed on their own paying customers. The end result, then, is actually a fairly sensible system arrived at years too late, after infringement has already begun its shift away from easily-monitored P2P networks to HTTP streaming and one-click download services which can't be so easily monitored by third parties.
The result is "copyright alerts," a series of messages warning users that their (alleged) activity has been detected and that penalties could result if it continues. These notes continue repeatedly—two, three, even four warnings likely won't result in any penalties—but the scheme certainly does have a punitive component.
ISPs have agreed to institute "mitigation measures" (or, as you and I know them, punishments) based on the collected say-so of copyright holders. These measures begin with the fifth or six alert, and they may include "temporary reductions of Internet speeds, redirection to a landing page until the subscriber contacts the ISP to discuss the matter or reviews and responds to some educational information about copyright, or other measures that the ISP may deem necessary to help resolve the matter."
There is no requirement that ISPs disconnect a user's Internet connection at any point, and indeed ISPs say they will refuse any measure that might cut off a user's phone service, e-mail access, "or any security or health service (such as home security or medical monitoring)." But ISPs are free to disconnect users if they wish (as indeed they have always been).
As such approaches go, this one sounds fairly sane, and ISPs certainly claim the rights to take such actions in their terms of service. The stated goal is to provide enough "education" that the punishment stick can stay in the shed, but there's no avoiding the fact that the "mitigation measures" are the result of private, unverified accusations not vetted by a judiciary. Depending on your view of Internet access—is it a human right as some in the UN think?—such private countermeasures on infringement may look problematic. (The French courts also demanded that any tough measures by ISPs come only after judicial scrutiny, though their system is actually administered by the government; this one, run voluntarily, is not.)
An appeals process does at least exist. Before a "mitigation measure" is taken, users can request an independent review of the accusation, but not from a judge; it remains unclear who exactly will handle the appeal. To keep everyone from using the system every time, there's a $35 filing fee (which can be waived by the independent reviewer). In addition, subscribers can always still sue their ISP in court.
Baby steps to mitigation
The complete list of "alert" steps is included below for your reading pleasure:
First Alert: In response to a notice from a copyright owner, an ISP will send an online alert to a subscriber, such as an email, notifying the subscriber that his/her account may have been misused for content theft, that content theft is illegal and a violation of published policies, and that consequences could result from any such conduct. This first alert will also direct the subscriber to educational resources which will (i) help him/her to check the security of his/her computer and any Wifi network, (ii) provide explanatory steps which will help to avoid content theft in the future and (iii) provide information about the abundant sources of lawful music, film and TV content.
Second Alert: If the alleged activity persists despite the receipt of the first alert, the subscriber may get a second similar alert that will underscore the educational messages, or the ISP may in its discretion proceed to the next alert.
Third Alert: If the subscribers account again appears to have been used for content theft, he/she will receive another alert, much like the initial alerts. However, this alert will provide a conspicuous mechanism (a click-through pop-up notice, landing page, or similar mechanism) asking the subscriber to acknowledge receipt of this alert. This is designed to ensure that the subscriber is aware of the third copyright alert and reminds the subscriber that content theft conducted through their account could lead to consequences under the law and published policies.
Fourth Alert: If the subscribers account again appears to have been used for content theft, the subscriber will receive yet another alert that again requires the subscriber to acknowledge receipt.
Fifth Alert: If the subscribers account again appears to have been used for content theft, the ISP will send yet another alert. At this time, the ISP may take one of several steps, specified in its published policies, reasonably calculated to stop future content theft. These steps, referred to as Mitigation Measures, may include, for example: temporary reductions of Internet speeds, redirection to a landing page until the subscriber contacts the ISP to discuss the matter or reviews and responds to some educational information about copyright, or other measures that the ISP may deem necessary to help resolve the matter. ISPs are not obligated to impose any Mitigation Measure which would disable or be reasonably likely to disable the subscribers voice telephone service (including the ability to call 911), e-mail account, or any security or health service (such as home security or medical monitoring). The use of the mitigation measure is waivable by the ISP at this point.
Sixth Alert: Whether or not the ISP has previously waived the Mitigation Measure, if the subscribers account again appears to have been used for content theft, the ISP will send another alert and will implement a Mitigation Measure as described above. As described above, it's likely that very few subscribers who after having received multiple alerts, will persist (or allow others to persist) in the content theft.
#3
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes
on
4,341 Posts
#5
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
I got a copyright notice for some shit show from HBO I've never heard of. Threw it in the trash. Apparently thousands of others on my ISP got the same letter in the mail.
Trending Topics
#8
Team Owner
The biggest news to me is that Verizon is on the list. Previously, Verizon wouldn't send the subscriber a letter and would tell the RIAA to go F themselves. Apparently not the case anymore.
#10
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes
on
4,341 Posts
.... grabbing suspect IP addresses from peer-to-peer file-sharing networks. If they see your IP address participating in a swarm for, say, Transformers, they will look up that IP address to see which ISP controls it, then fire off a message.
....
....
Just because it's a torrent doesn't mean your IP address is anonymous.
#11
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
![Nod](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/nod.gif)
bunch of idiots thinking that torrents are excluded or some how are magically blocked
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
ive gotten the notice a few times when i was on AT&T. but it was sent to an email i hardly check.
comcast so far
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#12
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
i remember a while back at school my apartment we got a notice that someone downloaded "mean girls" i know for a fact that i never downloaded that movie. and my roommate denies it, and our wireless is secure.. so
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#14
Just use someone's unsecure wifi
#15
Needs more Lemon Pledge
any viable proxies to use with Vuze for torrents?
#16
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
yes i would like to know to.
there was a website i saw a while back that when you sign up to them you proxy or whatever into them and download anonymously. sounded like a great idea until i foudn out you have to pay for it.
ive mightve seen it on demonoid or empornium (
)
there was a website i saw a while back that when you sign up to them you proxy or whatever into them and download anonymously. sounded like a great idea until i foudn out you have to pay for it.
ive mightve seen it on demonoid or empornium (
![RIP](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smitty.gif)
#17
heh, I would think no ISP out there would submit subscribers' names unless the RIAA was ponying up big ones to support such an act. Ratting out your paying customers isn't corporate suicide but more like corporate wrist slitting.
#18
May I recommend newsgroups? Encrypted (SSL 256)... Fast... Private... But yes you pay.
#19
And by swarm they are talking mostly about SEEDING; they will monitor more those who help distribute. I hate torrents anyways, pure malware crap.
Best choices still remain newsgroups or the ancient (but glorious) irc dcc.
#21
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
Yes and Yes
#26
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
![Blaze](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/blaze.gif)
#27
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
#28
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
To elaborate.. Torrents are PUBLIC - there is no such thing as anonymous user in torrents from an ISP perspective. Unless the host responsible for trackers is a privately encrypted server/service; but those are not free; they do end-to-end encryption similar like demonoid ((by the way does anyone have an invite to them?))
And by swarm they are talking mostly about SEEDING; they will monitor more those who help distribute. I hate torrents anyways, pure malware crap.
Best choices still remain newsgroups or the ancient (but glorious) irc dcc.
And by swarm they are talking mostly about SEEDING; they will monitor more those who help distribute. I hate torrents anyways, pure malware crap.
Best choices still remain newsgroups or the ancient (but glorious) irc dcc.
im using it but im still wary of dling stuff...
#29
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
btw what are some good pr0n sites, haven't gotten any new material since empornium went under
![RIP](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smitty.gif)
ive checked out TBLOP, but
![Cry](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/cry.gif)
![RIP](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smitty.gif)
ive checked out TBLOP, but
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
#31
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
im just saying if everyone said "dont seed" then there wouldnt be any point to torrents since no one is sharing.
#32
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
agreed.. but we can be realistic here.
I don't download much at all anymore..
a few rage songs and a classic movie here and there isn't worth playing with fire.
Netflix has all but eliminated my movie DL's
I don't download much at all anymore..
a few rage songs and a classic movie here and there isn't worth playing with fire.
Netflix has all but eliminated my movie DL's
#33
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
same here.
although there are times where i am too impatient to wait for it to come out on netflix...
although there are times where i am too impatient to wait for it to come out on netflix...
#34
Sanest Florida Man
Thread Starter
I wonder what the response time will be can they send a bunch of notices at the same time or close enough to gether that they'll send notice #5 before I even get notice #1?
#35
Sanest Florida Man
Thread Starter
also do the notices transfer if I switch ISP or does it start over again with a new ISP?
maybe you could signup for a small ISP that isn't participating.....
maybe you could signup for a small ISP that isn't participating.....
#36
Bent = #1
#38
Sanest Florida Man
Thread Starter
I usually just have a never ending stream of DVD/Blurays coming in from Netflix that I can rip exactly how I like it and put them on my server....
No worries about malware or getting a low quality rip or worrying if the format will work with all my devices plus hollywood is making some money from me
No worries about malware or getting a low quality rip or worrying if the format will work with all my devices plus hollywood is making some money from me
#39
I've noticed most people that get letters of piracy when they are downloading a very popular torrent with lots of seeds/peers. ISPs cant patrol all of the traffic, it is tooooo expensive to do so, so they aggregate resources to popular items.
I use giganews, transfer of solid 5.5MB/s. Do I enjoy paying for it? Hell no.
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#40
Three Wheelin'