Technology Get the latest on technology, electronics and software…

The Official Internet/Computer Security News Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #41  
RyanCHICL's Avatar
#GOBULLS
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 10
From: Chicago Suburbs, IL
Great info Stunna. Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 11:03 PM
  #42  
Never Summer's Avatar
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 22
From: Stockton, California
I've followed everything said in this thread. Great advice, please keep this up to date. I hate Google Chrome though but Firefox lost all of my info anyways so I'll try and make the switch.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 12:55 AM
  #43  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Adobe announced Adobe Reader X a few days ago it is the next version of the PDF reader that runs in a protected sandboxed mode much like google chrome and internet explorer on Vista/7. If implemented properly this should do a lot to limit attacks via PDFs. It will be available next month and can't come soon enough. Now java and firefox need to join the club.

http://blogs.adobe.com/adobereader/2...-reader-x.html
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 01:20 AM
  #44  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Here's a cool browser extension for Chrome, Firefox and Safari. Do you hate seeing facebook "like" infesting all the pages you visit, telling you what people liked, recommended and shared? Do you really not give a shit about who did what with Facebook? Do you NOT like the facebook "like" button on AZ? Then this extension is for you! It's called Facebook Blocker. It blocks communications with third party sites with facebook servers. Likes still work on the actual Facebook, it doesn't effect the facebook site at all just other sites that have embedded facebook shit on their pages.

To install click on the link below and choose your browser of choice. If you use chrome you can just install the extension and carry on and the browser starts working right away but if you use Firefox or Safari you actually have to restart the browser to take advantage of this extension, how primative!

http://webgraph.com/resources/facebookblocker/

Before Facebook blocker



After Facebook Blocker


Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Oct 23, 2010 at 01:23 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 01:39 AM
  #45  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
I am not generally a fan of your witch craft, but this one makes my Azine pages load faster, so I am cool with it.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 01:58 AM
  #46  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by stogie1020
I am not generally a fan of your witch craft, but this one makes my Azine pages load faster, so I am cool with it.


I use this and Adblock Plus, it makes my webz much better.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 02:33 AM
  #47  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Yes, I should've mentioned that. I thought of it but didn't bother to add that.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #48  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by #1 STUNNA
Yes, I should've mentioned that. I thought of it but didn't bother to add that.


Reply
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 03:20 PM
  #49  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
How primative [sic] indeed


F the like button! Installed and AZ is loading faster
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 02:50 PM
  #50  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
About to :surrender to a virus


I think it's some kind of Java exploit with what the PC's owner was telling me. Says it came from a link on Google Video.

Combofix cleared it, but says it detects rootkit activity every time it is ran. Malwarebytes cleared 8 files on the first run and doesn't detect anything again, but it's still there.

I've cleared everything bad out of:

HKEY LOCAL MACHINE --> Software --> Microsoft --> Windows --> Current Version --> Run and Run Once


HKEY LOCAL USER--> Software --> Microsoft --> Windows --> Current Version --> Run and Run Once


I've tried a couple of other tricks I've learned in the past but nothing has worked. I can't tell if it is clearing out and then coming back after a restart or not clearing at all. I believe it's infected and/or corrupted explorer.exe from what I can tell.

I have all the files backed up so wiping won't be a big deal, but I was trying to figure it out for a moral victory. Very few I've ever not been able to fix
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #51  
rza49311's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 8
From: Southern VA
Does combofix ask about installing the recovery console before you run it? Also, are you certain you have the latest version of combofix.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #52  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
Originally Posted by rza49311
Does combofix ask about installing the recovery console before you run it? Also, are you certain you have the latest version of combofix.
Yes and yes. I've used a combofix a lot and have always said no to the recovery console prompt.

It doesn't act normal when it runs. Runs way longer than normal, and when the message about rootkit activity comes up it says it needs to restart. After restart it finishes and displays the log like normal (again taking forever), saying it's clearing different things each time. Doesn't matter if it's safe mode or not.

And the virus doesn't try to block combofix or task manager or anything like that. I thought it was gonna be a walk in the park before I started...
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #53  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Run TDSS killer and also turn off system restore

Oh and clear your java cache in the control panel
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #54  
SRK85's Avatar
intelligentsia
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,376
Likes: 0
From: Land of cheap vodka, hot girls, and great nightlife
Damnit my stupid university requires me to run Cisco Nac Agent but the program doesn't work on my system at all anymore. They uninstalled my AVG pro too, since I have to download McAfee. Do you guys now any way around this and should I just install Microsoft Security Essentials instead of AVG again. I refuse to use McAfee and if I have to download it I will uninstall it.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 02:56 PM
  #55  
Gfaze's Avatar
S E L L
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,768
Likes: 51
From: Modesto, CA
Originally Posted by SRK85
Damnit my stupid university requires me to run Cisco Nac Agent but the program doesn't work on my system at all anymore. They uninstalled my AVG pro too, since I have to download McAfee. Do you guys now any way around this and should I just install Microsoft Security Essentials instead of AVG again. I refuse to use McAfee and if I have to download it I will uninstall it.
MSE works great for me. Give it a shot. McAfee can go die in a fire.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #56  
rza49311's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 8
From: Southern VA
Originally Posted by Scottman111
Yes and yes. I've used a combofix a lot and have always said no to the recovery console prompt.
Well it says in their instructions that the recovery console is the only way to remove some infections so thats why I asked. Might want to give it a shot if you haven't formatted yet.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:12 PM
  #57  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
Originally Posted by #1 STUNNA
Run TDSS killer and also turn off system restore

Oh and clear your java cache in the control panel
Since I was able to play around a bit I killed everything I could find related to Java and nothing changed. Time became an issue so I had to go ahead and start the reload. Now fighting with Dell's p.o.s. website for drivers What a terrible company.

Anyways I'll have to try the TDSS killer another time. Something you use often?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #58  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
Originally Posted by Gfaze
MSE works great for me. Give it a shot. McAfee can go die in a fire.
McAfee and Symantec. We use the corporate edition at work and it's absolute trash. It was a lot worse until they did an upgrade.

rtvscan.exe
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #59  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
Originally Posted by rza49311
Well it says in their instructions that the recovery console is the only way to remove some infections so thats why I asked. Might want to give it a shot if you haven't formatted yet.

Hmm, I've actually wondered that but my boss says don't worry about it so I never did. Do you do it every time? What happens if you click yes for recovery console?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #60  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
Scottman, corporate edition of McAfee or Symantec?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:32 PM
  #61  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
Originally Posted by Billiam
Scottman, corporate edition of McAfee or Symantec?
Symantec. Like I said, it's not too bad now that they've fixed the severe performance draining problems that were affecting every PC, but I still don't see it protecting much of anything. We have Websense and the Symantec and these things still come in with viruses. Yes I know it can't prevent/detect them all but it still seems a little high IMO.

Most of the time, when they come back infected and you do a full scan, the Symantec won't detect a thing. Yet you can throw a freeware anti-virus on there and that program will go nuts.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:57 PM
  #62  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Scottman111
Symantec. Like I said, it's not too bad now that they've fixed the severe performance draining problems that were affecting every PC, but I still don't see it protecting much of anything. We have Websense and the Symantec and these things still come in with viruses. Yes I know it can't prevent/detect them all but it still seems a little high IMO.

Most of the time, when they come back infected and you do a full scan, the Symantec won't detect a thing. Yet you can throw a freeware anti-virus on there and that program will go nuts.


I never felt I got good results from mcafee or norton and those avcomratives, virusvault AV effeciency tests are garbage, every AV catches at least 95% on of the malware in those test but IRL the results aren't anywhere near that high.

Yes I use TDSS killer cause it's effective and a very fast scan usually between 15-30 seconds and it can remove Alureon rootkits better than anything else.

http://support.kaspersky.com/viruses...?qid=208280684

I had been fighting Alureon on a few machines and I had some success with MSE and others I didn't (probably due to different strains of the TDSS rootkit) then I tried TDSS killer and it found it removed it in less than a minute saving me hours of time. Now I've seen a rootkit get past TDSS killer too (might not've been a TDSS rootkit to begin with) and I had to wipe and reinstall but still it's good to run it first cause it's so effective and fast.

Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Oct 27, 2010 at 04:03 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:58 PM
  #63  
rza49311's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 8
From: Southern VA
Originally Posted by Scottman111
Hmm, I've actually wondered that but my boss says don't worry about it so I never did. Do you do it every time? What happens if you click yes for recovery console?
No, I never have but haven't had to either. Every infection I've encountered has been removed with no problems.

After looking into though, all it does is install the recovery console and adds the option to the boot.ini file so when you startup, you have the option to boot to your OS or the console. I can't find anything about combofix using the console to remove something. It appears to me the console would have to be invoked manually and you'd have to delete file(s) manually. With that being said, I don't think the console will help in this case unless you knew exactly what you needed to remove.

If someone knows more about it then please correct me if I'm wrong.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #64  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
So you can't run the combofix exe from the recovery console? That would seem to make sense. You boot into recovery console and the main system isn't running but you can scan for malicious files and actually remove them since the system isn't running.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 05:15 PM
  #65  
rza49311's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 8
From: Southern VA
Originally Posted by #1 STUNNA
So you can't run the combofix exe from the recovery console? That would seem to make sense. You boot into recovery console and the main system isn't running but you can scan for malicious files and actually remove them since the system isn't running.
I don't know. I'll try it tomorrow when I get to work.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 08:39 PM
  #66  
SRK85's Avatar
intelligentsia
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,376
Likes: 0
From: Land of cheap vodka, hot girls, and great nightlife
Originally Posted by Gfaze
MSE works great for me. Give it a shot. McAfee can go die in a fire.
I've used MSE before but uninstalled it because it was conflicting with AVG. I hate McAfee so much it always crashes my system and IT is not willing to allow me to surf the internet without McAfee. Such bullshit and Cisco Nac Agent has to be the worst piece of software I have ever seen.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 08:52 PM
  #67  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
You're not supposed to run AVG and MSE at the same time. You're not supposed to run two realtime AVs at the same time.

If you want to run MSE then you must uninstall AVG, restart your PC and then install MSE
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #68  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Good article on Lifehacker about how to break into a Windows Machine and also how to prevent it from happening to you. It covers how to access files on a Windows NTFS hard drive using a linux LiveCD and how to prevent it (encrypt the drive), also how to use Linux to reset the password and how to prevent it (again encrypt the drive) and finally using bruteforce like ophcrack to guess the user password and how to prevent ophcrack from guessing the password (secure password).

I tried to use Ophcrack on my boss's PC (with his permission) because we couldn't get log in to it and Ophcrack couldn't figure out his password cause it was too complex, which gave me a hint as to what his password was and I was right.

But I've used Ophcrack a few times and it works on simple passwords pretty quickly.

http://lifehacker.com/5674972/how-to...ppening-to-you
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 11:01 PM
  #69  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
I am glad you are not freezing RAM to recover TrueCrypt passwords in volatile memory.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 11:20 PM
  #70  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Originally Posted by stogie1020
I am glad you are not freezing RAM to recover TrueCrypt passwords in volatile memory.
yeah I saw that hack. not going that far....
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 11:25 PM
  #71  
stogie1020's Avatar
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 01:47 AM
  #72  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Originally Posted by doopstr
You could just buy a mac and skip this thread.
Originally Posted by TS_eXpeed

Oh noes! An 'official' thread not started by a mod.



Originally Posted by Whiskers
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Fail..
Hey check it there's a new trojan for OS X floating around in the WILD!
It appears as a video link on social networking sites or via email and it uses as a Java exploit (surprise, surprise!) and then modifies system files so that it doesn't need to prompt for password to run then it hijacks your user account and sends out spam messages to spread the infection.

Hope you Mac users have updated your Java!

If you want to remove this trojan.osx.boonana.a infection you can run the software from this link

http://macscan.securemac.com/files/BTRT.dmg
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 02:04 AM
  #73  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
In related news, Apple has released a deprecated version of Java. To use their words
As of the release of Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3, the Java runtime ported by Apple and that ships with Mac OS X is deprecated. Developers should not rely on the Apple-supplied Java runtime being present in future versions of Mac OS X.

The Java runtime shipping in Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, and Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, will continue to be supported and maintained through the standard support cycles of those products.
Apple used to port the Java VM to work with OS X and would release updates for it and now after announcing the Mac App Store that won't allow Java Apps Apple won't be supporting it much longer and it may not be available at all in 10.7 Currently no one has stepped up to fill in the void. Apparently besides Windows, Java has been maintained by the OS developer, HP, IBM, etc maintain java for their OS's as did Apple until now.

It'll be interesting to see who picks up the Apple's slack and if this will have an impact on OS X for more exploits like the one listed above.

Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Oct 28, 2010 at 02:18 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 08:45 AM
  #74  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #75  
rza49311's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 8
From: Southern VA
Originally Posted by #1 STUNNA
So you can't run the combofix exe from the recovery console? That would seem to make sense. You boot into recovery console and the main system isn't running but you can scan for malicious files and actually remove them since the system isn't running.
Originally Posted by rza49311
I don't know. I'll try it tomorrow when I get to work.

No you cannot run combofix from the recovery console. Just tried it.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 08:03 PM
  #76  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
I bet you could if you booted to safe mode with command line. I've used that a few times to launch system restore on a system that refused to launch .exe files.

Speaking of which here's another tip I figured out for you guys that fight malware. Do you know how to get around when malware won't let you run any exe files?

One trick is to turn on hidden common file extensions in Folder options then go to c:\windows\ and change regedit.exe to regedit.com. Then try and open in it and if it opens then go to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\.exe. On an infected system you should see the folders "default icon" and "shell". Delete those! They aren't supposed to be there. Keep the "PersistentHandler" folder. Then click on the .exe folder and for the (Default) reg key it will probably say "secfile", edit that so that it says "exefile" (no quotes).

Secfile is added by the malware and shouldn't be in the registry, now if you scroll further down the HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT folder you should see a folder called "secfile", that folder is added by the malware and within that folder it will tell you the malware's file location. Make note of that location so you can delete the malware and then go ahead and delete the secfile folder cause it doesn't exist normally in the registry.

If you get worried you're going to fuck it up then find a known clean machine and compare the HKCR\.exe to the infected one and make the infected one match the clean one. There's a slight difference between HKCR\.exe in XP and 7 so be aware of that.

After modifying the registry with the steps above you should be able to run programs, just go and delete the malware whose file location was noted in the secfile folder and start with your normal cleanup routine.

You can also change mbam.exe to mbam.com to make malwarebytes run, I've had success doing that before too.

But remember I talk out of my ass 90% so I could be making this all up......

Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Oct 28, 2010 at 08:07 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 10:08 PM
  #77  
Jonesi's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 19,827
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I just ran across " backdoor:Win32/Cycbot.B " It's my dads computer that's infected but man is it a bitch so far. I assume because it's so new and the scans aren't picking it up completely yet.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 10:18 PM
  #78  
Whiskers's Avatar
Go Giants
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 70,003
Likes: 1,260
From: PA
Look here: http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic354181.html

Don't know about that Russian software though...
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 10:23 PM
  #79  
Jonesi's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 19,827
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Whiskers
Look here: http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic354181.html

Don't know about that Russian software though...

Yea, I and tried Dr. WebCure It but no luck. It's better but something is still fucked up.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 10:25 PM
  #80  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,998
Likes: 11,777
From: Florida
Another tip, if you can ping but can't load websites check internet options to see if a fake proxy has been setup. Go to internet options > connections > LAN > and if Proxy server it checked then uncheck it. If you click the advanced button it'll probably have 127.0.0.1 as your proxy server.

Also check your DNS server settings, I know Alureon rootkit sometimes puts in it's own DNS servers that won't work.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM.