Microsoft Offers $44.6B for Yahoo
Originally Posted by sonnyg80
They're gonna be asking for $40 per share...let's see if MS is wanting to be THAT aggressive.
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Originally Posted by doopstr
Steve has a huge ego to fuel and Yahoo knows it. Steve will not let this slip through his fingers.
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
tango!
mother fucking fox trot!!
Originally Posted by doopstr
Steve has a huge ego to fuel and Yahoo knows it. Steve will not let this slip through his fingers.
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
wtf!?!
Originally Posted by doopstr
Steve has a huge ego to fuel and Yahoo knows it. Steve will not let this slip through his fingers.
<EMBED src=""http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1 width=425 height=355 type=application/x-shockwave-flash wmode="transparent"></EMBED>
<EMBED src=""http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1 width=425 height=355 type=application/x-shockwave-flash wmode="transparent"></EMBED>
Microsoft Responds to Yahoo's Rejection:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080211/aqm241.html?.v=2
lol That last paragraph sounds like they're gonna do a hostile takeover.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080211/aqm241.html?.v=2
It is unfortunate that Yahoo! has not embraced our full and fair proposal
to combine our companies. Based on conversations with stakeholders of both
companies, we are confident that moving forward promptly to consummate a
transaction is in the best interests of all parties.
We are offering shareholders superior value and the opportunity to
participate in the upside of the combined company. The combination also
offers an increasingly exciting set of solutions for consumers, publishers
and advertisers while becoming better positioned to compete in the online
services market.
A Microsoft-Yahoo! combination will create a more effective company that
would provide greater value and service to our customers. Furthermore, the
combination will create a more competitive marketplace by establishing a
compelling number two competitor for Internet search and online
advertising.
The Yahoo! response does not change our belief in the strategic and
financial merits of our proposal. As we have said previously, Microsoft
reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!'s
shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value
inherent in our proposal.
to combine our companies. Based on conversations with stakeholders of both
companies, we are confident that moving forward promptly to consummate a
transaction is in the best interests of all parties.
We are offering shareholders superior value and the opportunity to
participate in the upside of the combined company. The combination also
offers an increasingly exciting set of solutions for consumers, publishers
and advertisers while becoming better positioned to compete in the online
services market.
A Microsoft-Yahoo! combination will create a more effective company that
would provide greater value and service to our customers. Furthermore, the
combination will create a more competitive marketplace by establishing a
compelling number two competitor for Internet search and online
advertising.
The Yahoo! response does not change our belief in the strategic and
financial merits of our proposal. As we have said previously, Microsoft
reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!'s
shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value
inherent in our proposal.
Prediction: MS waits yet another year and watches Yahoo! go further down the tubes and lose more and more money and then makes another offer for less money, while everyone laughs @ Yahoo! for not taking this bid.
Does this remind anyone else of Deal or no Deal and MS is the banker. they offered Yahoo! $44.6 billion. Yahoo! said no deal cause the $100 billion case was still out there and then they pick the next case and it's the $100 billion case and then when MS makes their next offer it's for like $20 billion and then the world laughs.
Does this remind anyone else of Deal or no Deal and MS is the banker. they offered Yahoo! $44.6 billion. Yahoo! said no deal cause the $100 billion case was still out there and then they pick the next case and it's the $100 billion case and then when MS makes their next offer it's for like $20 billion and then the world laughs.

Originally Posted by mc222
That HAS to be some sales kick off meeting. Usually that kind of crap happens to get the sales guys excited and they put on a show...I cant blame the guy, he is just trying to rally the troops
Bringing some hot dancers out on stage or something like that would get people excited.
Watching his fatness flop around on stage like a beached whale would do nothing but make me quit my job

:fail:
Originally Posted by Scottman111
Bringing some hot dancers out on stage or something like that would get people excited.
Watching his fatness flop around on stage like a beached whale would do nothing but make me quit my job
:fail:
Watching his fatness flop around on stage like a beached whale would do nothing but make me quit my job

:fail:
Does someone care to explain this to me
So can MS go to Yahoo! shareholders and offer to buy their shares for more than they're worth and then therefore MS would then run the show? Is that what they'd do? Cause damn that is hostile!
Yahoo may not like Microsoft’s acquisition bid, but Microsoft isn’t backing down.
The Redmond software company isn’t signaling whether it will raise its $44 billion offer or push ahead without Yahoo’s blessing. In a statement Microsoft issued at the end of the day on February 11, company officials said:
“The Yahoo! response does not change our belief in the strategic and financial merits of our proposal. As we have said previously, Microsoft reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!’s shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value inherent in our proposal.”
The Redmond software company isn’t signaling whether it will raise its $44 billion offer or push ahead without Yahoo’s blessing. In a statement Microsoft issued at the end of the day on February 11, company officials said:
“The Yahoo! response does not change our belief in the strategic and financial merits of our proposal. As we have said previously, Microsoft reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!’s shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value inherent in our proposal.”
That's how all buyouts take place. You have to pay more than the company is worth in most cases. Price/earnings ratios play a factor in the transaction. Takes money to make money if you know what I mean?
WOW, MSFT walks away from deal.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24445554/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24445554/
Good for Yahoo. Even though I have 0 stake in it at this point, I didn't particularly like the idea of Microsoft buying Yahoo through a hostile takeover bid, which is what it would have turned out to be. It looks like Yahoo stood their ground and basically said, if you force us to sell, you ain't gonna like what you get. 
GOOD for Yahoo - hostile takeovers need to stop - they are bad for business and society.
<-- victim of a hostile takeover at work... merger with another law firm.. everyone is leaving my work.. I am actively pursuing new employment... the ship is sinking.. what was once a nice law firm is now a dwindling memory.. sad.

"Our discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you would take steps that would make Yahoo undesirable as an acquisition," Ballmer wrote to Yang.
<-- victim of a hostile takeover at work... merger with another law firm.. everyone is leaving my work.. I am actively pursuing new employment... the ship is sinking.. what was once a nice law firm is now a dwindling memory.. sad.
Originally Posted by Renegade
Options trading. If this hits $20 on Monday, holders of May $20 Puts will most likely see 600% gain on their investment.
Originally Posted by #1 DOUCHER
Yeah I still don't get it. What?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7712298.stm
Yahoo said the "For Sale" sign is still on its front lawn and that Microsoft should buy the company.
The internet portal's co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang made the comment despite the fact Yahoo rejected a $33 (£21) a share offer from Microsoft back in May.
Mr Yang's suggestion also came hours after Google pulled out of an internet advertising partnership with Yahoo.
"To this day the best thing for Microsoft to do is buy Yahoo," said Mr Yang.
Yahoo said the "For Sale" sign is still on its front lawn and that Microsoft should buy the company.
The internet portal's co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang made the comment despite the fact Yahoo rejected a $33 (£21) a share offer from Microsoft back in May.
Mr Yang's suggestion also came hours after Google pulled out of an internet advertising partnership with Yahoo.
"To this day the best thing for Microsoft to do is buy Yahoo," said Mr Yang.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7712298.stm
Yahoo said the "For Sale" sign is still on its front lawn and that Microsoft should buy the company.
The internet portal's co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang made the comment despite the fact Yahoo rejected a $33 (£21) a share offer from Microsoft back in May.
Mr Yang's suggestion also came hours after Google pulled out of an internet advertising partnership with Yahoo.
"To this day the best thing for Microsoft to do is buy Yahoo," said Mr Yang.
Yahoo said the "For Sale" sign is still on its front lawn and that Microsoft should buy the company.
The internet portal's co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang made the comment despite the fact Yahoo rejected a $33 (£21) a share offer from Microsoft back in May.
Mr Yang's suggestion also came hours after Google pulled out of an internet advertising partnership with Yahoo.
"To this day the best thing for Microsoft to do is buy Yahoo," said Mr Yang.
Prediction: MS waits yet another year and watches Yahoo! go further down the tubes and lose more and more money and then MS makes another offer for less money, while everyone laughs @ Yahoo! for not taking this bid.
Does this remind anyone else of Deal or no Deal and MS is the banker. they offered Yahoo! $44.6 billion. Yahoo! said no deal cause the $100 billion case was still out there and then they pick the next case and it's the $100 billion case and then when MS makes their next offer it's for like $20 billion and then the world laughs.

Does this remind anyone else of Deal or no Deal and MS is the banker. they offered Yahoo! $44.6 billion. Yahoo! said no deal cause the $100 billion case was still out there and then they pick the next case and it's the $100 billion case and then when MS makes their next offer it's for like $20 billion and then the world laughs.


Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Nov 6, 2008 at 09:35 AM.
Steve has a huge ego to fuel and Yahoo knows it. Steve will not let this slip through his fingers.
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wvsboPUjrGc&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

W.....T......F
Jerry Yang has stepped down as CEO his replacement has not been named
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/...0_FORTUNE5.htm
SAN FRANCISCO -(Dow Jones)- Embattled Yahoo Inc. (YHOO) Chief Executive Jerry Yang has agreed to give up his position, leaving the struggling Internet giant without a clear leader and increasing the possibility an acquirer might seek to buy it.
Yahoo, which earlier this year was the target of a $47.5 billion unsolicited takeover attempt by Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), said Monday it had hired a search firm to look for a successor to Yang, who co-founded the 13-year-old company while he was a graduate student at Stanford University.
Yahoo said it would consider internal and external candidates for the job. Yahoo President Sue Decker is one of the candidates under consideration, a person familiar with the situation said. It wasn't clear why the company hadn't immediately appointed her as chief executive or why Yang's resignation was announced without a successor already chosen.
The new CEO will face a series of difficult challenges, including trying to turn around Yahoo's slumping online advertising business. The new CEO might also be thrust into the difficult position of trying to strike a deal with potential acquirers from a very obvious position of weakness.
"This is a company that could use additional executive experience, but you still have the same strategic issues," said Colin Gillis, managing partner at Click Capital Research.
Reaction to the news, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, was quick. Yahoo shares, which had fallen 1.8% to $10.63 during the regular session, jumped to $11.10 in after-hours trading. Three months ago, Yahoo shares were trading at twice that level.
Yang has been under intense shareholder pressure ever since he rejected Microsoft's offer earlier this year. Calls for his resignation have only increased as Yahoo's business has deteriorated with the slumping economy.
The company, once the leader in Internet advertising, has been losing share in the market for Internet search to Google Inc. (GOOG) and it has been unable to make as much money per search as its larger rival. Yahoo has also been hard hit by the weakening economy because it is more heavily exposed to the slumping online display advertising market.
Yang's dwindling options were recently reduced even further when Google pulled out of a search advertising pact that would have generated hundreds of millions of dollars in additional revenue for Yahoo.
The collapse of that deal prompted Yang to publicly declare he was open to clinching a deal with Microsoft. At one point, Microsoft offered $33 a share to buy the company.
"To this day, I'd say the best thing for Microsoft to do is buy Yahoo," Yang said at a conference earlier this month. "We're willing to sell the company."
Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer, however, said at one point Yang was an impediment to striking a deal with Yahoo. The company has maintained it was no longer interested in buying Yahoo. Analysts, however, say if Microsoft is serious about mounting a credible challenge to Google, it had no clear choice other than to revisit an acquisition of the company. Microsoft declined to comment.
In addition to battling outsiders, Yang has also had to contend with restive shareholders. Activist investor Carl Icahn, who is Yahoo's biggest shareholder and earlier this year forced himself onto Yahoo's board, has continually pressured Yang to consider selling the company. Icahn, who earlier pushed for Yang to sell the company to Microsoft, recently said the company ought to strike a search deal with the software giant.
Icahn didn't return a call seeking comment.
Yang, who took over as CEO in June 2007, has been plagued with challenges. Initially tasked with trying to revive Yahoo's slumping online advertising business, he introduced a series of strategic and technical initiatives late last year. But Wall Street remained unconvinced, setting the stage for Microsoft's takeover bid earlier this year.
In a press release, Yahoo Chairman Roy Bostock suggested Yang's decision was amicable and came after long discussion inside the company.
"Jerry and the Board have had an ongoing dialogue about succession timing, and we all agree that now is the right time to make the transition to a new CEO who can take the company to the next level," Bostock said in a statement.
Yang, who will remain CEO until a successor is named, will return to a less formal but still-visible role within the company and remain on its board, Bostock's statement said.
Yang, who immigrated to the U.S. from Taiwan as child, created Yahoo in 1994 with fellow Stanford University graduate student David Filo. The two envisioned the site as a directory of material available in the growing online world, a concept that still underscores the feel and operation of the Web site.
The concept quickly grew popular and by 1995, well before the birth of the commercial Internet, Yahoo was regularly getting 200,000 visitors a day. In 1995, Yang and Filo, who had dubbed themselves Chief Yahoos rather than take on more corporate titles, got early support from venture capitalist Michael Moritz at Sequioa.
A year later, Yahoo was employing 39 full-time staffers, including 19 people, known as "surfers," who categorized Web sites vying for a coveted place on the company's list. In 1996, Yahoo sold its shares to the public in an initial offering underwritten by Goldman Sachs & Co. The deal made Yang and Filo instant millionaires, as well as symbols of the Internet bubble that was beginning to inflate in Silicon Valley.
For a while, Yahoo was the undisputed king of the Internet, charging ever- higher prices for advertising. But the company began running into problems, finding it harder to develop new revenue streams. It also faced new challengers, most notably Google, a search engine that used a mathematical approach to finding information on the Web.
Yahoo, which earlier this year was the target of a $47.5 billion unsolicited takeover attempt by Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), said Monday it had hired a search firm to look for a successor to Yang, who co-founded the 13-year-old company while he was a graduate student at Stanford University.
Yahoo said it would consider internal and external candidates for the job. Yahoo President Sue Decker is one of the candidates under consideration, a person familiar with the situation said. It wasn't clear why the company hadn't immediately appointed her as chief executive or why Yang's resignation was announced without a successor already chosen.
The new CEO will face a series of difficult challenges, including trying to turn around Yahoo's slumping online advertising business. The new CEO might also be thrust into the difficult position of trying to strike a deal with potential acquirers from a very obvious position of weakness.
"This is a company that could use additional executive experience, but you still have the same strategic issues," said Colin Gillis, managing partner at Click Capital Research.
Reaction to the news, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, was quick. Yahoo shares, which had fallen 1.8% to $10.63 during the regular session, jumped to $11.10 in after-hours trading. Three months ago, Yahoo shares were trading at twice that level.
Yang has been under intense shareholder pressure ever since he rejected Microsoft's offer earlier this year. Calls for his resignation have only increased as Yahoo's business has deteriorated with the slumping economy.
The company, once the leader in Internet advertising, has been losing share in the market for Internet search to Google Inc. (GOOG) and it has been unable to make as much money per search as its larger rival. Yahoo has also been hard hit by the weakening economy because it is more heavily exposed to the slumping online display advertising market.
Yang's dwindling options were recently reduced even further when Google pulled out of a search advertising pact that would have generated hundreds of millions of dollars in additional revenue for Yahoo.
The collapse of that deal prompted Yang to publicly declare he was open to clinching a deal with Microsoft. At one point, Microsoft offered $33 a share to buy the company.
"To this day, I'd say the best thing for Microsoft to do is buy Yahoo," Yang said at a conference earlier this month. "We're willing to sell the company."
Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer, however, said at one point Yang was an impediment to striking a deal with Yahoo. The company has maintained it was no longer interested in buying Yahoo. Analysts, however, say if Microsoft is serious about mounting a credible challenge to Google, it had no clear choice other than to revisit an acquisition of the company. Microsoft declined to comment.
In addition to battling outsiders, Yang has also had to contend with restive shareholders. Activist investor Carl Icahn, who is Yahoo's biggest shareholder and earlier this year forced himself onto Yahoo's board, has continually pressured Yang to consider selling the company. Icahn, who earlier pushed for Yang to sell the company to Microsoft, recently said the company ought to strike a search deal with the software giant.
Icahn didn't return a call seeking comment.
Yang, who took over as CEO in June 2007, has been plagued with challenges. Initially tasked with trying to revive Yahoo's slumping online advertising business, he introduced a series of strategic and technical initiatives late last year. But Wall Street remained unconvinced, setting the stage for Microsoft's takeover bid earlier this year.
In a press release, Yahoo Chairman Roy Bostock suggested Yang's decision was amicable and came after long discussion inside the company.
"Jerry and the Board have had an ongoing dialogue about succession timing, and we all agree that now is the right time to make the transition to a new CEO who can take the company to the next level," Bostock said in a statement.
Yang, who will remain CEO until a successor is named, will return to a less formal but still-visible role within the company and remain on its board, Bostock's statement said.
Yang, who immigrated to the U.S. from Taiwan as child, created Yahoo in 1994 with fellow Stanford University graduate student David Filo. The two envisioned the site as a directory of material available in the growing online world, a concept that still underscores the feel and operation of the Web site.
The concept quickly grew popular and by 1995, well before the birth of the commercial Internet, Yahoo was regularly getting 200,000 visitors a day. In 1995, Yang and Filo, who had dubbed themselves Chief Yahoos rather than take on more corporate titles, got early support from venture capitalist Michael Moritz at Sequioa.
A year later, Yahoo was employing 39 full-time staffers, including 19 people, known as "surfers," who categorized Web sites vying for a coveted place on the company's list. In 1996, Yahoo sold its shares to the public in an initial offering underwritten by Goldman Sachs & Co. The deal made Yang and Filo instant millionaires, as well as symbols of the Internet bubble that was beginning to inflate in Silicon Valley.
For a while, Yahoo was the undisputed king of the Internet, charging ever- higher prices for advertising. But the company began running into problems, finding it harder to develop new revenue streams. It also faced new challengers, most notably Google, a search engine that used a mathematical approach to finding information on the Web.
Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Nov 17, 2008 at 11:43 PM.
MS has now hired Yahoo Search Exec Suchter. Maybe they'll just wait until they go under and then pick up all their former employees. It's alot cheaper than $44.6 billion.
Yesterday, BoomTown reported, based on sources, that Yahoo search exec Sean Suchter was headed to Microsoft.
Now it’s official. Here’s a Microsoft (MSFT) statement on the hiring of Suchter (pictured here), an important tech leader at Yahoo (YHOO), from Satya Nadella, SVP for Search, Portal and Advertising:
“We are very pleased to confirm that Sean Suchter will be joining Microsoft as the GM of our Silicon Valley Search Technology Center, working on Live Search. Sean will report into Harry Shum when he starts work on December 22. We look forward to welcoming him to Microsoft at that time.”
The talent grab from Yahoo is an interesting one, given that Microsoft has also tried to to buy Yahoo’s search and search ad business many times, to little success.
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer reiterated that desire yesterday at the software giant’s annual meeting, although he discounted the possibility that Microsoft would rebid for all of Yahoo after it abandoned a takeover attempt earlier this year.
His statement sent Yahoo’s stock further into the basement.
Losing important execs like Suchter, who was the VP of Search Technology at Yahoo, will also not help the company’s prospects. Suchter was deeply involved in Yahoo’s efforts to open up its search platform, initiatives the company has touted aggressively as a bright spot in its not-so-lustrous landscape.
Suchter–who came to Yahoo almost six years ago after it acquired Inktomi (the company that got Yahoo into the search business) in early 2003–has been talking with Microsoft for a while and his leaving was not linked to this week’s announcement that Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang will be stepping down.
But it could be linked to the possibility that another former major Yahoo search exec could also be going to Microsoft. I wrote a post earlier today that I thought the Ballmer was looking at Qi Lu–the well-regarded Search and Advertising Technology group EVP at Yahoo, who left earlier this year–to be its digital head.
All this muscling up in search by Microsoft is troubling for Yahoo. There are big questions, now that Yang is stepping down, whether Yahoo will stay in the search business or sell it off. Yang has been a big proponent of doubling down in search, considering it integral to the entire Yahoo ecosystem.
But others make the very persuasive argument that Yahoo will be increasingly outspent by both Google (GOOG) and Microsoft, in what is turning into a very vicious and expensive arms race.
If it sold off its No. 2 search business to Microsoft–ironically, Yahoo used to deliver Microsoft’s search results–many think it could have huge costs savings and garner guaranteed revenues.
News of Suchter’s departure from Yahoo, including the internal memo announcing it, appeared in Valleywag yesterday.
Now it’s official. Here’s a Microsoft (MSFT) statement on the hiring of Suchter (pictured here), an important tech leader at Yahoo (YHOO), from Satya Nadella, SVP for Search, Portal and Advertising:
“We are very pleased to confirm that Sean Suchter will be joining Microsoft as the GM of our Silicon Valley Search Technology Center, working on Live Search. Sean will report into Harry Shum when he starts work on December 22. We look forward to welcoming him to Microsoft at that time.”
The talent grab from Yahoo is an interesting one, given that Microsoft has also tried to to buy Yahoo’s search and search ad business many times, to little success.
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer reiterated that desire yesterday at the software giant’s annual meeting, although he discounted the possibility that Microsoft would rebid for all of Yahoo after it abandoned a takeover attempt earlier this year.
His statement sent Yahoo’s stock further into the basement.

Losing important execs like Suchter, who was the VP of Search Technology at Yahoo, will also not help the company’s prospects. Suchter was deeply involved in Yahoo’s efforts to open up its search platform, initiatives the company has touted aggressively as a bright spot in its not-so-lustrous landscape.
Suchter–who came to Yahoo almost six years ago after it acquired Inktomi (the company that got Yahoo into the search business) in early 2003–has been talking with Microsoft for a while and his leaving was not linked to this week’s announcement that Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang will be stepping down.
But it could be linked to the possibility that another former major Yahoo search exec could also be going to Microsoft. I wrote a post earlier today that I thought the Ballmer was looking at Qi Lu–the well-regarded Search and Advertising Technology group EVP at Yahoo, who left earlier this year–to be its digital head.
All this muscling up in search by Microsoft is troubling for Yahoo. There are big questions, now that Yang is stepping down, whether Yahoo will stay in the search business or sell it off. Yang has been a big proponent of doubling down in search, considering it integral to the entire Yahoo ecosystem.
But others make the very persuasive argument that Yahoo will be increasingly outspent by both Google (GOOG) and Microsoft, in what is turning into a very vicious and expensive arms race.
If it sold off its No. 2 search business to Microsoft–ironically, Yahoo used to deliver Microsoft’s search results–many think it could have huge costs savings and garner guaranteed revenues.
News of Suchter’s departure from Yahoo, including the internal memo announcing it, appeared in Valleywag yesterday.
MS is said to be offering to buy Yahoo! for $20 billion
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle5258258.ece
SOFTWARE giant Microsoft is in talks to acquire Yahoo’s online search business for $20 billion (£13 billion).
The proposal forms the centrepiece of a complex transaction that would see Microsoft support a new management team to take control of Yahoo. But there is no intention of Microsoft tabling another takeover bid for the web giant, after its aborted $47.5 billion offer this summer.
It is thought that Jonathan Miller, ex-chairman and chief executive of AOL, and Ross Levinsohn, a former president of Fox Interactive Media, have been lined up to lead the new management team. Senior directors at Microsoft and Yahoo are understood to have agreed the broad terms of a deal, but there is no guarantee that it will succeed.
However Yahoo is under intense pressure from its investors after rejecting the offer from Microsoft. This valued each share at $33. Since then Yahoo’s price has tumbled to a low of $9 per share.
In recent weeks it has risen to $11.5 per share partly due to the arrival of billionaire investor Carl Icahn who won a proxy fight to get a seat on the board.
According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Icahn has built up a 5.5% stake in the company which is now capitalised at $16 billion.
Analysts say it is an opportune time for Microsoft and Yahoo to work on a new deal. There is a management vacuum at Yahoo after Jerry Yang, the group’s co-founder, said this month that he will step down as chief executive as soon as the board finds a successor. He opposed the earlier Microsoft deal and an advertising alliance with Google that he championed broke down because of competition fears.
Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Microsoft would provide a $5 billion facility to the Miller and Levinsohn management team. The duo would raise an additional $5 billion from external investors.
This cash would be used to buy convertible preference shares and warrants which would give it a holding in excess of 30% of Yahoo.
The external investors would also have the right to appoint three of Yahoo’s 11 board directors. The talks with Yahoo involve Microsoft obtaining a 10-year operating agreement to manage the search business. It would also receive a two-year call option to buy the search business for $20 billion. That would leave Yahoo to run its own e-mail, messaging, and content services.
It is expected that the operating agreement would boost Yahoo’s income by as much as $2 billion per annum.
While Microsoft and Yahoo remain profitable, they are slipping behind Google on the web. Over half the $40 billion-plus online-advertising market comes from internet-search ads, and analysts estimate Google has about 77% of spending compared with Yahoo’s 18% and Microsoft’s 5%.
The company’s Windows software is the world’s dominant operating system. But in the internet age Microsoft has been losing its edge and arch-rival Google has come to dominate the web.
Microsoft wants to address that. Last May, Microsoft’s former head of online, Kevin Johnson, told his employees: “The fact is we are not where we want to be in this business yet, and we’ve been in this position longer than we’d like.”
Steve Ballmer, Microsoft’s chief executive, has now made two unsuccessful attempts to buy Yahoo.
He has said he is no longer interested in buying the whole company, but has expressed a strong interest in buying the search business.
The proposal forms the centrepiece of a complex transaction that would see Microsoft support a new management team to take control of Yahoo. But there is no intention of Microsoft tabling another takeover bid for the web giant, after its aborted $47.5 billion offer this summer.
It is thought that Jonathan Miller, ex-chairman and chief executive of AOL, and Ross Levinsohn, a former president of Fox Interactive Media, have been lined up to lead the new management team. Senior directors at Microsoft and Yahoo are understood to have agreed the broad terms of a deal, but there is no guarantee that it will succeed.
However Yahoo is under intense pressure from its investors after rejecting the offer from Microsoft. This valued each share at $33. Since then Yahoo’s price has tumbled to a low of $9 per share.
In recent weeks it has risen to $11.5 per share partly due to the arrival of billionaire investor Carl Icahn who won a proxy fight to get a seat on the board.
According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Icahn has built up a 5.5% stake in the company which is now capitalised at $16 billion.
Analysts say it is an opportune time for Microsoft and Yahoo to work on a new deal. There is a management vacuum at Yahoo after Jerry Yang, the group’s co-founder, said this month that he will step down as chief executive as soon as the board finds a successor. He opposed the earlier Microsoft deal and an advertising alliance with Google that he championed broke down because of competition fears.
Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Microsoft would provide a $5 billion facility to the Miller and Levinsohn management team. The duo would raise an additional $5 billion from external investors.
This cash would be used to buy convertible preference shares and warrants which would give it a holding in excess of 30% of Yahoo.
The external investors would also have the right to appoint three of Yahoo’s 11 board directors. The talks with Yahoo involve Microsoft obtaining a 10-year operating agreement to manage the search business. It would also receive a two-year call option to buy the search business for $20 billion. That would leave Yahoo to run its own e-mail, messaging, and content services.
It is expected that the operating agreement would boost Yahoo’s income by as much as $2 billion per annum.
While Microsoft and Yahoo remain profitable, they are slipping behind Google on the web. Over half the $40 billion-plus online-advertising market comes from internet-search ads, and analysts estimate Google has about 77% of spending compared with Yahoo’s 18% and Microsoft’s 5%.
The company’s Windows software is the world’s dominant operating system. But in the internet age Microsoft has been losing its edge and arch-rival Google has come to dominate the web.
Microsoft wants to address that. Last May, Microsoft’s former head of online, Kevin Johnson, told his employees: “The fact is we are not where we want to be in this business yet, and we’ve been in this position longer than we’d like.”
Steve Ballmer, Microsoft’s chief executive, has now made two unsuccessful attempts to buy Yahoo.
He has said he is no longer interested in buying the whole company, but has expressed a strong interest in buying the search business.
In fairness, 1995 Jerry Yang = EPIC SUCCESS. 2008 Yang = Fail.
It was Yahoo's Board's fault for putting him in charge again.
Yahoo's previous CEO (Terry Semel), was also a failure -- Yahoo stagnated with him as CEO, he failed to close the deal on buying Google early on (google was providing search for Yahoo until Goog went public), and he was trying to shift the company in the wrong direction.
They were smart enough to get rid of Semel, but dumb enough to put the old back in play again instead of trying to find someone better.
Yahoo has basically gone from a leader in internet innovation to a company that might become insignificant in 5 years. Basically, yahoo had the user base to become the leader in social networking (messenger, chat, message boards, games, profiles, email, millions of users, etc); Instead of licensing google search, they should've bought it, and they would've been the leader in search/advertising instead of playing catchup.
And MSFT I think dodged a huge bullet...
It was Yahoo's Board's fault for putting him in charge again.
Yahoo's previous CEO (Terry Semel), was also a failure -- Yahoo stagnated with him as CEO, he failed to close the deal on buying Google early on (google was providing search for Yahoo until Goog went public), and he was trying to shift the company in the wrong direction.
They were smart enough to get rid of Semel, but dumb enough to put the old back in play again instead of trying to find someone better.
Yahoo has basically gone from a leader in internet innovation to a company that might become insignificant in 5 years. Basically, yahoo had the user base to become the leader in social networking (messenger, chat, message boards, games, profiles, email, millions of users, etc); Instead of licensing google search, they should've bought it, and they would've been the leader in search/advertising instead of playing catchup.
And MSFT I think dodged a huge bullet...
Microsoft and Yahoo: Search partners
After a year and a half of dealing, the tech giants reach a deal to take on Google, which holds a 65% market share in online search.
By David Goldman, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Last Updated: July 29, 2009: 8:47 AM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Microsoft and Yahoo reached a long-awaited partnership Wednesday in a bid to challenge Google's dominance in online search.
Under the 10-year deal, searches on Yahoo.com will be powered by Microsoft's new Bing search engine. Yahoo, in turn, will be responsible for attracting premium advertisers.
Microsoft will pay Yahoo 88% of the revenue it gains from searches on Yahoo's sites. Microsoft will also have the rights to integrate Yahoo search technology into its own existing Web search platforms.
Yahoo said the revenue sharing agreement will increase its operating income by about $500 million annually.
According to Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer, the deal will allow Microsoft to "create more innovation in search, better value for advertisers and real consumer choice in a market currently dominated by a single company."
And in a dig against search market leader Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), the companies said in a joint statement that "advertisers no longer have to rely on one company that dominates more than 70% of all search."
An 18-month odyssey. It was a partnership that was a long time in the making. Microsoft's (MSFT, Fortune 500) search market share has been slipping for more than two years, and the company has struggled to make its online advertising unit profitable. Meanwhile, Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500), once the search market leader, dropped to a distant second place behind leader Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) by 2007.
The dealings between the two companies began Feb. 1, 2008, when Microsoft made an unsolicited $44.6 billion cash and stock bid for Yahoo. A week later, Yahoo rejected the bid, saying the $31 per share offer "massively undervalues" the company, despite the fact that the bid represented a 62% premium over Yahoo's $19.18 closing stock price a day before the announcement.
In an attempt to fend off Microsoft, Yahoo launched a two-week trial partnership with rival Google on April 10, 2008. That involved outsourcing advertising space to Google as part of a short-term agreement that could eventually lead to a bigger partnership.
Microsoft threatened to take its bid to Yahoo's shareholders by the end of April if a deal could not be reached, and even sweetened the pot to $33 per share. In a turnaround move, Microsoft opted to avoid a hostile takeover and simply dropped the bid for Yahoo altogether on May 5 of last year. Microsoft CEO Ballmer cited the economics of the deal as well as Yahoo's interest in a long-term Google partnership as reasons.
Almost as soon as the deal seemingly died, signs of life re-emerged. First, activist investor Carl Icahn threatened Yahoo's board with a proxy battle if the company's executives didn't return to the bargaining table with Microsoft. Then, shares of Yahoo rocketed higher on May 19, 2008, when rumors circulated that Microsoft was interested in Yahoo's search advertisement business.
0:00 /4:54Yahoo searches for itself
On June 12 of last year, however, Yahoo announced that discussions with Microsoft had ended without a pact. The same day, Yahoo turned around and announced a deal with Google to put Google ads on Yahoo's search pages. That tie-up was later nixed after a Justice Department antitrust investigation prompted Google to end the partnership. Icahn and Yahoo reached a truce in late July of last year.
The situation at Yahoo took a turn for the worse after the credit crisis erupted in October. Yahoo announced it would lay off 10% of its workforce in late October, shares slipped below $9 in November and Chief Executive Jerry Yang announced his resignation.
When Carol Bartz came on as Yahoo's new CEO in January 2009, she said she would not sell the company outright, but appeared to be more open to a sale of the company's search business.
Rumors of a possible deal were reignited when Bartz acknowledged at the All Things Digital conference on May 27 that Yahoo and Microsoft had been talking "a little bit," and said outright that Yahoo's search business was for sale, albeit for "boatloads" of money.
The next day, Ballmer unveiled Microsoft's new Bing search engine. Reports began to circulate in mid-June that Bing was a success, growing Microsoft's beaten-down search market share and eating into Yahoo's, and Ballmer reiterated to Fortune's Patricia Sellers that Microsoft "remains open to a partnership with Yahoo."
First Published: July 29, 2009: 8:11 AM ET
http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/29/tech...ion=2009072908
After a year and a half of dealing, the tech giants reach a deal to take on Google, which holds a 65% market share in online search.
By David Goldman, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Last Updated: July 29, 2009: 8:47 AM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Microsoft and Yahoo reached a long-awaited partnership Wednesday in a bid to challenge Google's dominance in online search.
Under the 10-year deal, searches on Yahoo.com will be powered by Microsoft's new Bing search engine. Yahoo, in turn, will be responsible for attracting premium advertisers.
Microsoft will pay Yahoo 88% of the revenue it gains from searches on Yahoo's sites. Microsoft will also have the rights to integrate Yahoo search technology into its own existing Web search platforms.
Yahoo said the revenue sharing agreement will increase its operating income by about $500 million annually.
According to Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer, the deal will allow Microsoft to "create more innovation in search, better value for advertisers and real consumer choice in a market currently dominated by a single company."
And in a dig against search market leader Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), the companies said in a joint statement that "advertisers no longer have to rely on one company that dominates more than 70% of all search."
An 18-month odyssey. It was a partnership that was a long time in the making. Microsoft's (MSFT, Fortune 500) search market share has been slipping for more than two years, and the company has struggled to make its online advertising unit profitable. Meanwhile, Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500), once the search market leader, dropped to a distant second place behind leader Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) by 2007.
The dealings between the two companies began Feb. 1, 2008, when Microsoft made an unsolicited $44.6 billion cash and stock bid for Yahoo. A week later, Yahoo rejected the bid, saying the $31 per share offer "massively undervalues" the company, despite the fact that the bid represented a 62% premium over Yahoo's $19.18 closing stock price a day before the announcement.
In an attempt to fend off Microsoft, Yahoo launched a two-week trial partnership with rival Google on April 10, 2008. That involved outsourcing advertising space to Google as part of a short-term agreement that could eventually lead to a bigger partnership.
Microsoft threatened to take its bid to Yahoo's shareholders by the end of April if a deal could not be reached, and even sweetened the pot to $33 per share. In a turnaround move, Microsoft opted to avoid a hostile takeover and simply dropped the bid for Yahoo altogether on May 5 of last year. Microsoft CEO Ballmer cited the economics of the deal as well as Yahoo's interest in a long-term Google partnership as reasons.
Almost as soon as the deal seemingly died, signs of life re-emerged. First, activist investor Carl Icahn threatened Yahoo's board with a proxy battle if the company's executives didn't return to the bargaining table with Microsoft. Then, shares of Yahoo rocketed higher on May 19, 2008, when rumors circulated that Microsoft was interested in Yahoo's search advertisement business.
0:00 /4:54Yahoo searches for itself
On June 12 of last year, however, Yahoo announced that discussions with Microsoft had ended without a pact. The same day, Yahoo turned around and announced a deal with Google to put Google ads on Yahoo's search pages. That tie-up was later nixed after a Justice Department antitrust investigation prompted Google to end the partnership. Icahn and Yahoo reached a truce in late July of last year.
The situation at Yahoo took a turn for the worse after the credit crisis erupted in October. Yahoo announced it would lay off 10% of its workforce in late October, shares slipped below $9 in November and Chief Executive Jerry Yang announced his resignation.
When Carol Bartz came on as Yahoo's new CEO in January 2009, she said she would not sell the company outright, but appeared to be more open to a sale of the company's search business.
Rumors of a possible deal were reignited when Bartz acknowledged at the All Things Digital conference on May 27 that Yahoo and Microsoft had been talking "a little bit," and said outright that Yahoo's search business was for sale, albeit for "boatloads" of money.
The next day, Ballmer unveiled Microsoft's new Bing search engine. Reports began to circulate in mid-June that Bing was a success, growing Microsoft's beaten-down search market share and eating into Yahoo's, and Ballmer reiterated to Fortune's Patricia Sellers that Microsoft "remains open to a partnership with Yahoo."
First Published: July 29, 2009: 8:11 AM ET
http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/29/tech...ion=2009072908












Carol Bartz and stuck her with the bill.
88% of the revenue seems like a better deal.