Technology Get the latest on technology, electronics and software…

Amazon Glacier

Old Jan 17, 2017 | 11:33 AM
  #1  
stogie1020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Amazon Glacier

Anyone else using Glacier for backups?

I found a nice program that makes uploads/downloads pretty easy, along with folder/sub-folder creation, etc.

It's called FastGlacier and the paid version is $40. The free version gives you two upload "channels" so it may be kind of slow, but the paid version lets you set as many upload channels as you want (there is a functional limit of what's practical based on your ISP upload speed). I currently have a 150GB backup running with 20 channels and it's running at ~95MB/s.

FastGlacier also allows for client side encrypted upload and compression.

https://fastglacier.com/
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 12:11 PM
  #2  
stogie1020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Speeds (upload) settled down to about 4-6MB/s... on a 20MB/s up line.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2017 | 12:53 PM
  #3  
Whiskers's Avatar
Go Giants
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 70,003
Likes: 1,260
From: PA
Interesting
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2017 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
Doom878's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 28,435
Likes: 1,573
From: Miami, FL
I assume Glacier is more a commercial product?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2017 | 03:30 PM
  #5  
stogie1020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Doom878
I assume Glacier is more a commercial product?
It's super low cost Amazon S3 storage. It's low cost because the expectation of retrieval is low, so there are built in delays (retrieval can be delayed by 4 hours, etc.) and the cost to retrieve is significantly higher than the cost to store (around $0.004/GB)

it's certainly not as simple to work/manage as something like Carbonite or Crashplan, but it's cheap, effective and when you need to store terabytes of data, pretty cost effective.

Reply
Old Jan 19, 2017 | 02:32 AM
  #6  
AZuser's Avatar
_
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,344
Likes: 3,440
?How to Use Amazon Glacier as a Dirt Cheap Backup Solution
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2018 | 11:27 AM
  #7  
stogie1020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
I am now approaching 24TB stored in Amazon Glacier, and am still using FastGlacier to perform the uploads.

While I have not had to perform any restores yet (and hopefully never will), I am pleased with both the cost and service, as well as the FastGlacier program.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.